Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Modelling Nitrogen Removal in the Kibendera Wastewater Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya

Received: 19 February 2024    Accepted: 8 March 2024    Published: 19 March 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Application of waste stabilization ponds (WSP) in wastewater treatment in the tropical regions is primarily due to their affordability and relatively high treatment performance. Monitoring of 2-year nitrogen removal behavior in Kibendera WSP in Ruiru, Kenya, was undertaken between January 2021 and December 2022. The experimental work determined the concentrations and removal efficiencies of Ammonia, Nitrate, Nitrite, Organic Nitrogen and Total Nitrogen. Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater determined Nitrogen and Dissolved Oxygen (DO) concentrations. Based on the experimental data obtained, mass balance reaction rate models characterized the nitrogen transformation and removal behavior in the WSP. Whereas model calibration was achieved using observed data from January to December 2021, model validation was achieved using observed data from January to December 2022. Ammonia volatilization, sedimentation, mineralization, nitrification, denitrification and microbial ammonia uptake were the possible transformation and removal pathways. Whereas ammonia volatilization contributed the least to the overall nitrogen removal (0.01-0.02 mg/L.d), denitrification contributed the most (2.12-14.67 mg/L.d). Low DO levels and high ammonia concentrations were responsible for low nitrification rates and high microbial ammonia uptake respectively. Comparison between experimental and modelled effluent concentrations yielded correlation coefficients (r) of 0.77 and 0.69 for ammonia and organic nitrogen respectively during the calibration period. The corresponding model validation r values were 0.74 and 0.93 respectively. The good agreement between the model output and observed effluent concentrations implies that nitrogen removal prediction and optimization is possible. External aeration to spike DO concentration levels is necessary to enhance the long-term nitrification rates.

Published in Applied Engineering (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11
Page(s) 1-13
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Modeling, Nitrification-Denitrification, Nitrogen Removal, Shock Load, Waste Stabilization Pond

References
[1] Ho, L. T., Van Echelpoel, W., & Goethals, P. L. (2017). Design of waste stabilization pond systems: A review. Water research, 123, 236-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.071
[2] Mburu, N., Tebitendwa, S. M., Van Bruggen, J. J., Rousseau, D. P., & Lens, P. N. (2013). Performance comparison and economics analysis of waste stabilization ponds and horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater: A case study of the Juja sewage treatment works. Journal of environmental management, 128, 220-225 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.031
[3] Bundi, L. K., & Njeru, C. W. (2018). Use of vegetative wastewater treatment systems for counties’ effluent management in Kenya. Rwanda Journal of Engineering, Science, Technology and Environment, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/rjeste.v1i1.1S
[4] Kirumba, G., Thumbi, G., Mwangi, J., & Mbugua, J. (2022) Evaluation of Sewage Treatment Efficiency of the Kibendera Waste Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya. Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary, 10 (8), 6-23 https://www.jiarm.com/Oct2022.html
[5] Sewe, H. A. (2013). A study on the Efficiency of Dandora Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant in Nairobi (Doctoral dissertation). http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/handle/123456789/995
[6] Canfield, D. E., Glazer, A. N., & Falkowski, P. G. (2010). The evolution and future of Earth’s nitrogen cycle. Science, 330(6001), 192-196. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186120
[7] Kuypers, M. M., Marchant, H. K., & Kartal, B. (2018). The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16(5), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9
[8] Wang, B., & Lan, C. Q. (2011). Biomass production and nitrogen and phosphorus removal by the green algae Neochloris oleoabundans in simulated wastewater and secondary municipal wastewater effluent. Bioresource technology, 102(10), 5639-5644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.054
[9] Fujitani, H., Kumagai, A., Ushiki, N., Momiuchi, K., & Tsuneda, S. (2015). Selective isolation of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria from autotrophic nitrifying granules by applying cell-sorting and sub-culturing of microcolonies. Frontiers in microbiology, 6, 1159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01159
[10] Shalini, S. S., & Joseph, K. (2012). Nitrogen management in landfill leachate: Application of SHARON, ANAMMOX and combined SHARON–ANAMMOX process. Waste Management, 32(12), 2385-2400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.06.006
[11] Wang, H., Song, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, H., He, Q., Zhang, W.,... & Li, H. (2018). Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal in an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor with high dissolved oxygen: effects of carbon to nitrogen ratios. Science of the Total Environment, 642, 1145-1152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.081
[12] Zhou, X., Song, J., Wang, G., Yin, Z., Cao, X., & Gao, J. (2020). Unravelling nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide emission from mainstream integrated nitrification-partial denitrification-anammox for low carbon/nitrogen domestic wastewater. Journal of environmental management, 270, 110872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110872
[13] Valero, C., Read, L. F., Mara, D. D., Newton, R. J., Curtis, T. P., & Davenport, R. J. (2010). Nitrification-denitrification in waste stabilisation ponds: a mechanism for permanent nitrogen removal in maturation ponds. Water Science and Technology, 61(5), 1137-1146. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.963
[14] Bastos, R. K. X., Rios, E. N., & Sánchez, I. A. (2018). Further contributions to the understanding of nitrogen removal in waste stabilization ponds. Water Science and Technology, 77(11), 2635-2641. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.218
[15] Mayo, A. W., & Abbas, M. (2014). Removal mechanisms of nitrogen in waste stabilization ponds. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 72, 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2014.09.011
[16] Ghneim, N. (2003). Quantification of Nitrification and Denitrification Rates in Algae Based and Duckweed Based Waste Stabilization Ponds (Doctoral dissertation). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11889/5337
[17] Mayo, A. W. (2013). Nitrogen mass balance in waste stabilization ponds at the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7(8), 836-845. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2013.1495
[18] Mukhtar, H., Lin, Y. P., Shipin, O. V., & Petway, J. R. (2017). Modeling nitrogen dynamics in a waste stabilization pond system using flexible modeling environment with MCMC. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070765
[19] Wanjohi, L., Mwasi, S., Mwamburi, L., & Isaboke, J. (2020). The efficiency of University of Eldoret Wastewater Treatment Plant, Kenya. Africa, Environmental Review Journal, 3(2), 99109. https://doi.org/10.2200/aerj.v3i2.174
[20] K'oreje, K. O., Kandie, F. J., Vergeynst, L., Abira, M. A., Van Langenhove, H., Okoth, M., & Demeestere, K. (2018). Occurrence, fate and removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products and pesticides in wastewater stabilization ponds and receiving rivers in the Nzoia Basin, Kenya. Science of the Total Environment, 637, 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.331
[21] Kirumba, G., Thumbi, G., Mwangi, J., & Mbugua, J.(2023) Analysis of the Sludge Settling Behavior of the Kibendera Waste Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya. Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, 8(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20230801.13
[22] American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005), American Water Works Association (AWWA) & Water Environment Federation (WEF): Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st Edition.
[23] Mayo, A. W., & Hanai, E. E. (2014). Dynamics of nitrogen transformation and removal in a pilot high rate pond. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6(05), 433. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.65043
[24] Rashid, S. S., & Liu, Y. Q. (2020). Assessing environmental impacts of large centralized wastewater treatment plants with combined or separate sewer systems in dry/wet seasons by using LCA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), 15674-15690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08038-2
[25] Li Y, Hou X, Zhang W, Xiong W, Wang L, Zhang S, Wang P, Wang C (2017) Integration of life cycle assessment and statistical analysis to understand the influence of rainfall on WWTPs with combined sewer systems. J Clean Prod 172: 2521–2530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.158
[26] Kayombo, S., Mbwette, T. S. A., Mayo, A. W., Katima, J. H. Y., & Jorgensen, S. E. (2000). Modelling diurnal variation of dissolved oxygen in waste stabilization ponds. Ecological modelling, 127(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00196-9
[27] Pescod, M. B. (1996). The role and limitations of anaerobic pond systems. Water science and Technology, 33(7), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(96)00335-6
[28] Tchobanoglous, G., Stensel, H. D., Tsuchihashi, R., and Burton, F. L. (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th Edn. Metcalf and Eddy I AECOM. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
[29] Rodda, J. C. and Ubartini, L. (2004). The Basis of Civilization. Water Science and Technology, 161. International Association of Hydrological Sciences (International Association of Hydrological Sciences Press 2004).
[30] Abagale, F. K., Osei, R. A., &Kranjac-Berisavljevic, G. (2020). Occurrence dynamics of nitrogen compounds in faecal sludge stabilisation ponds in the Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 14(10), 329-335. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2020.2885
[31] Xu, Z., Xiong, L., Li, H., Liao, Z., Yin, H., Wu, J.,... & Chen, H. (2017). Influences of rainfall variables and antecedent discharge on urban effluent concentrations and loads in wet weather. Water Science and Technology, 75(7), 1584-1598 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.020
[32] Stephenson, T., Brindle, K., Judd, S., & Jefferson, B. (2000). Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. IWA publishing.
[33] Kim, D. J., & Kim, S. H. (2006). Effect of nitrite concentration on the distribution and competition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in nitratation reactor systems and their kinetic characteristics. Water research, 40(5), 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.023
[34] Zhao, Y., Li, Q., Cui, Q., & Ni, S. Q. (2022). Nitrogen recovery through fermentative dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA): Carbon source comparison and metabolic pathway. Chemical Engineering Journal, 441, 135938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.135938
[35] Picot, B., Andrianarison, T., Olijnyk, D. P., Wang, X., Qiu, J. P., & Brissaud, F. (2009). Nitrogen removal in wastewater stabilisation ponds. Desalination and Water Treatment, 4(1-3), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2009.363
[36] Senzia, M. A.; Mayo, A. W.; Mbwette, T. S. A.; Katima, J. H. Y.; Jørgensen, S. E (2002). Modelling nitrogen transformation and removal in primary facultative ponds. Ecol. Model., 154, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00018-2
[37] Ferrara R. A., Avci C. B. (1982). Nitrogen dynamics in waste stabilization ponds. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 54: 361–369. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25041314
[38] Trang, N. T. D.; Konnerup, D.; Schierup, H.-H.; Chiem, N. H.; Brix, H. (2010). Kinetics of pollutant removal from domestic wastewater in a tropical horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland system: Effects of hydraulic loading rate. Ecol. Eng., 36, 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.022
[39] Merino-Solís, M. L.; Villegas, E.; de Anda, J.; López-López, A. (2015). The effect of the hydraulic retention time on the performance of an ecological wastewater treatment system: An anaerobic filter with a constructed wetland. Water, 7, 1149–1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7031149
[40] Faleschini, M., Esteves, J. L., & Camargo Valero, M. A. (2012). The effects of hydraulic and organic loadings on the performance of a full-scale facultative pond in a temperate climate region (Argentine Patagonia). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223, 2483-2493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-1041-0
[41] Baca, R. G., & Arnett, R. C. (1976). A limnological model for eutrophic lakes and impoundments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Environmental Modeling and Simulation, EPA 600/9-76 (Vol. 16, pp. 768-772).
[42] Jørgensen, S. E. (1994) Fundamentals of Ecological Modelling: Development in Environmental Modelling. Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam.
[43] Mayo, A. W., & Mutamba, J. (2005). Modelling nitrogen removal in a coupled HRP and unplanted horizontal flow subsurface gravel bed constructed wetland. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 30(11-16), 673-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2005.08.007
[44] Ferrara, R. A., & Harleman, D. R. (1980). Dynamic nutrient cycle for waste stabilization ponds. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, 106(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1061/JEEGAV.0001010
[45] Charley, R. C., Hoper, D. G. and McLee, A. G. (1980) Nitrification Kinetics in Activated Sludge at Various Temperatures and Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations. Water Research, 14, 1387-1396 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90002-0
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kirumba, G., Thumbi, G., Mwangi, J., Mbugua, J. (2024). Modelling Nitrogen Removal in the Kibendera Wastewater Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya. Applied Engineering, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kirumba, G.; Thumbi, G.; Mwangi, J.; Mbugua, J. Modelling Nitrogen Removal in the Kibendera Wastewater Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya. Appl. Eng. 2024, 8(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kirumba G, Thumbi G, Mwangi J, Mbugua J. Modelling Nitrogen Removal in the Kibendera Wastewater Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya. Appl Eng. 2024;8(1):1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11,
      author = {George Kirumba and George Thumbi and John Mwangi and John Mbugua},
      title = {Modelling Nitrogen Removal in the Kibendera Wastewater Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya},
      journal = {Applied Engineering},
      volume = {8},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-13},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ae.20240801.11},
      abstract = {Application of waste stabilization ponds (WSP) in wastewater treatment in the tropical regions is primarily due to their affordability and relatively high treatment performance. Monitoring of 2-year nitrogen removal behavior in Kibendera WSP in Ruiru, Kenya, was undertaken between January 2021 and December 2022. The experimental work determined the concentrations and removal efficiencies of Ammonia, Nitrate, Nitrite, Organic Nitrogen and Total Nitrogen. Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater determined Nitrogen and Dissolved Oxygen (DO) concentrations. Based on the experimental data obtained, mass balance reaction rate models characterized the nitrogen transformation and removal behavior in the WSP. Whereas model calibration was achieved using observed data from January to December 2021, model validation was achieved using observed data from January to December 2022. Ammonia volatilization, sedimentation, mineralization, nitrification, denitrification and microbial ammonia uptake were the possible transformation and removal pathways. Whereas ammonia volatilization contributed the least to the overall nitrogen removal (0.01-0.02 mg/L.d), denitrification contributed the most (2.12-14.67 mg/L.d). Low DO levels and high ammonia concentrations were responsible for low nitrification rates and high microbial ammonia uptake respectively. Comparison between experimental and modelled effluent concentrations yielded correlation coefficients (r) of 0.77 and 0.69 for ammonia and organic nitrogen respectively during the calibration period. The corresponding model validation r values were 0.74 and 0.93 respectively. The good agreement between the model output and observed effluent concentrations implies that nitrogen removal prediction and optimization is possible. External aeration to spike DO concentration levels is necessary to enhance the long-term nitrification rates.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Modelling Nitrogen Removal in the Kibendera Wastewater Stabilization Ponds in Ruiru, Kenya
    AU  - George Kirumba
    AU  - George Thumbi
    AU  - John Mwangi
    AU  - John Mbugua
    Y1  - 2024/03/19
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11
    T2  - Applied Engineering
    JF  - Applied Engineering
    JO  - Applied Engineering
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 13
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7456
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20240801.11
    AB  - Application of waste stabilization ponds (WSP) in wastewater treatment in the tropical regions is primarily due to their affordability and relatively high treatment performance. Monitoring of 2-year nitrogen removal behavior in Kibendera WSP in Ruiru, Kenya, was undertaken between January 2021 and December 2022. The experimental work determined the concentrations and removal efficiencies of Ammonia, Nitrate, Nitrite, Organic Nitrogen and Total Nitrogen. Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater determined Nitrogen and Dissolved Oxygen (DO) concentrations. Based on the experimental data obtained, mass balance reaction rate models characterized the nitrogen transformation and removal behavior in the WSP. Whereas model calibration was achieved using observed data from January to December 2021, model validation was achieved using observed data from January to December 2022. Ammonia volatilization, sedimentation, mineralization, nitrification, denitrification and microbial ammonia uptake were the possible transformation and removal pathways. Whereas ammonia volatilization contributed the least to the overall nitrogen removal (0.01-0.02 mg/L.d), denitrification contributed the most (2.12-14.67 mg/L.d). Low DO levels and high ammonia concentrations were responsible for low nitrification rates and high microbial ammonia uptake respectively. Comparison between experimental and modelled effluent concentrations yielded correlation coefficients (r) of 0.77 and 0.69 for ammonia and organic nitrogen respectively during the calibration period. The corresponding model validation r values were 0.74 and 0.93 respectively. The good agreement between the model output and observed effluent concentrations implies that nitrogen removal prediction and optimization is possible. External aeration to spike DO concentration levels is necessary to enhance the long-term nitrification rates.
    
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Chemical and Biological Systems Engineering, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya

  • School of Civil and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya

  • School of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

  • School of Chemistry and Material Science, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Sections