| Peer-Reviewed

Physicochemical and Heavy Metal Analysis of Effluent from Pharmaceutical Industry for Sustainable Development and Its Risk Assessment

Received: 11 June 2021    Accepted: 5 July 2021    Published: 18 August 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Pollution is an act of contaminating the environment by harmful or toxic substances that could be of solid, liquid or gaseous materials. Effluents containing heavy metals that are indiscriminately discharged into the environment pollute the ecosystem and pose great risks to the organisms in it. Here, we review effluent discharged from a pharmaceutical industry in Awka, Anambra state, Nigeria and analyzed for heavy metal pollution. The twenty heavy metals analyzed were: magnesium, calcium, zinc, copper, Nickel, Cobalt, Iron, chromium, sodium, aluminum, vanadium, potassium, silver, manganese, mercury, cadmium, lead, molybdenum, selenium and arsenic. The heavy metals were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (model 240FS AA). The study presented the several risks and environmental effects associated with heavy metal toxicity. The environmental risk assessment was performed in which the chronic daily intake through ingestion for adults was calculated. The hazard quotient (HQ) for non-carcinogenic risk assessment and cancer risk assessment were also calculated. The obtained HQ values for Pb (7.857), Hg (4.333×101), As (1.867×102), Ni (4.521×102), Cr (3.333), Al (5.753), Mo (11), Ag (1.13) and Se (19) were greater than 1 and they were in the order: Se > Mo > Pb > Al > Ni > Hg > Cr > As > Ag. This means that the population is exposed to health risks with non-carcinogenic effects from this study. Metals with HQ values less than 1 were Cd (0.425), Fe (0.346), Zn (0.199), Cu (0.123), Mn (0.023) and Co (0.011). Cancer risk assessment was also carried out based on Pb, As, Ni, Cr and Cd with values 3.887 × 10-5, 3.6 × 10-2, 3.526, 2.184 × 10-3 and 2.73 ×10-3 respectively and nickel (Ni) proved to be the highest contributor to cancer risk in this study. Long term exposure to heavy metals possesses both potential non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks to the local residents.

Published in American Journal of Applied and Industrial Chemistry (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11
Page(s) 27-32
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pollution, Heavy Metals, Pharmaceutical Effluents

References
[1] Akaninwor, J. O., Anosike, E. O., Egwim, O. (2007). Effect of indomie industrial effluent discharge on microbial properties of new Calabar river. Scientific Research and Essay. 2 (1): 1-5.
[2] Akpomie, K. G., Eze, S. I., Ezeofor, C. C., Mmadubuike, N. V., Ojo, F. K. (2019). Remmediation of oil spill polluted water from Niger Delta Nigeria by sorption onto ammonium sulfate modified Dialiumguineenseseed husk. Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology. 37 (15) 1830-1838.
[3] Bahar, M. M., Mahbub, K. R., Naidu, R., Megharai, M. (2018). As (V) removal from aqueous solution using a low-cost adsorbent coir pith ash: equilibrium and kinetic study. Environmental Technology Innovation. 9: 198-209.
[4] Fairman, R., Mead, C., Williams, W. P. (1999). Environmental Risk Assessment-Approaches, Experiences and Information Souirces. European Environmental Agency.
[5] Glassmeyer, S. T., Furlong, E. T., Kolpin, D. W., Cahill, J. D., Zaugg, S. D., Werner, S. L. (2005). Transport of chemical and microbial contaminants from known wastewater discharge: potential for use as indicators for human fecal contamination. Environmental Science Technology. 36: 5157-5169.
[6] Gupta, U. C., 1997. Symptoms of molybdenum deficiency and toxicity in crops. Molybdenum in Agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 160-181.
[7] Jain, R., Dominic, D., Jordan, N., Rene, E. R., Weiss, S., Van, H. E. D., Hubner, R., Lens, P. N. (2016). Higher Cd adsorption on biogenic elemental selenium nanoparticles. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 14 (3): 381-386.
[8] Jaishankar, M., Tseten, T., Anbalagan, N., Matthew, B. B., Beeregowda, K. N. (2014). Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdisciplinary Toxicology. 7 (2): 60-72.
[9] Lateef, A. (2004). The microbiology of a pharmaceutical effluent and its public health Implications. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 20 (2): 167-171.
[10] Li, D., Wang, M. Q., Lee, C. (2020). The waste treatment and recycling efficiency of industrial waste processing based on two-stage data envelopment analysis with undesirable inputs. Journal of Cleaner Production. 242: 118279.
[11] Liu, X., Song, Q., Tang, Y., Li, W., Xu, J., Wu, J., Wang, F., Brookes, P. C. (2013). Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil–vegetable system: A multi-medium analysis. Science of the Total Environment. 463–464 (2013) 530–540.
[12] Lu, Y., Yin, W., Huang, L. B., Zhang, G. L., Zhao, Y. G. (2011). Assessment of bioaccessibility and exposure risk of arsenic and lead in urban soils of Guangzhou City, China. Environ Geochem Health 33: 93–102.
[13] Mahurpawar, M. (2015). Effects of heavy metals on human health. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah. ISSN-2350-0530 (0) ISSN-2394-3629.
[14] Martin, S., Griswold, W. (2009). Human health effects of heavy metals. Environmental Science and Technology Briefs for Citizens. 15: 1-6.
[15] Najafia, M., Rostamian, R., Rafati, A. A. (2011). Chemically modified silica gel with throl group as an absorbent for retention of some toxic soft metal ions from water and industrial effluent. Chemical Engineering Journal 168: 426-432.
[16] Nwosu, U. L., Ajiwe, V. I. E., Okoye, P. A. C. (2014). Assessment of heavy metal pollution of effluents from three (3) food industries in Nnewi/Ogidi areas of Anambra state, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology. 8 (11): 13-21.
[17] Patneedi, C. B., Prasadu, K. D. (2015). Impact of pharmaceutical wastes on human life and environment. Rasayan Journal Chemistry (RJC). 8: 67-70.
[18] Smedley, P. L., Kinniburgh, D. G. (2017). Molybdenum in natural waters: A review of occurrence, distributions and controls. Applied Geochemistry. 84 (2017) 387-432.
[19] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (HHEM) – part A, baseline risk assessment. Washington DC: Office of emergency and remedial response; [EPA/540/1-89/002].
[20] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1991). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), volume 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual (HHEM) supplemental guidance. Washington DC: Office of emergency and remedial response; [EPA/540/R-92/003].
[21] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2001). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: volume III – part A, process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment. Washington D.C: [EPA/540/R-02/002].
[22] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002). Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. Washington, DC: Office of soild waste and emergency response; [OSWER 9355.4-24].
[23] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011). Exposure factors handbook 2011 edition (Final).
[24] Wang, X., Sato, T. Xing, B. (2005). Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci. Total Environ. 350: 28-37.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Nnaeme Esther Uchechukwu, Okoye Nkechi Helen. (2021). Physicochemical and Heavy Metal Analysis of Effluent from Pharmaceutical Industry for Sustainable Development and Its Risk Assessment. American Journal of Applied and Industrial Chemistry, 5(2), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Nnaeme Esther Uchechukwu; Okoye Nkechi Helen. Physicochemical and Heavy Metal Analysis of Effluent from Pharmaceutical Industry for Sustainable Development and Its Risk Assessment. Am. J. Appl. Ind. Chem. 2021, 5(2), 27-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Nnaeme Esther Uchechukwu, Okoye Nkechi Helen. Physicochemical and Heavy Metal Analysis of Effluent from Pharmaceutical Industry for Sustainable Development and Its Risk Assessment. Am J Appl Ind Chem. 2021;5(2):27-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11,
      author = {Nnaeme Esther Uchechukwu and Okoye Nkechi Helen},
      title = {Physicochemical and Heavy Metal Analysis of Effluent from Pharmaceutical Industry for Sustainable Development and Its Risk Assessment},
      journal = {American Journal of Applied and Industrial Chemistry},
      volume = {5},
      number = {2},
      pages = {27-32},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaic.20210502.11},
      abstract = {Pollution is an act of contaminating the environment by harmful or toxic substances that could be of solid, liquid or gaseous materials. Effluents containing heavy metals that are indiscriminately discharged into the environment pollute the ecosystem and pose great risks to the organisms in it. Here, we review effluent discharged from a pharmaceutical industry in Awka, Anambra state, Nigeria and analyzed for heavy metal pollution. The twenty heavy metals analyzed were: magnesium, calcium, zinc, copper, Nickel, Cobalt, Iron, chromium, sodium, aluminum, vanadium, potassium, silver, manganese, mercury, cadmium, lead, molybdenum, selenium and arsenic. The heavy metals were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (model 240FS AA). The study presented the several risks and environmental effects associated with heavy metal toxicity. The environmental risk assessment was performed in which the chronic daily intake through ingestion for adults was calculated. The hazard quotient (HQ) for non-carcinogenic risk assessment and cancer risk assessment were also calculated. The obtained HQ values for Pb (7.857), Hg (4.333×101), As (1.867×102), Ni (4.521×102), Cr (3.333), Al (5.753), Mo (11), Ag (1.13) and Se (19) were greater than 1 and they were in the order: Se > Mo > Pb > Al > Ni > Hg > Cr > As > Ag. This means that the population is exposed to health risks with non-carcinogenic effects from this study. Metals with HQ values less than 1 were Cd (0.425), Fe (0.346), Zn (0.199), Cu (0.123), Mn (0.023) and Co (0.011). Cancer risk assessment was also carried out based on Pb, As, Ni, Cr and Cd with values 3.887 × 10-5, 3.6 × 10-2, 3.526, 2.184 × 10-3 and 2.73 ×10-3 respectively and nickel (Ni) proved to be the highest contributor to cancer risk in this study. Long term exposure to heavy metals possesses both potential non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks to the local residents.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Physicochemical and Heavy Metal Analysis of Effluent from Pharmaceutical Industry for Sustainable Development and Its Risk Assessment
    AU  - Nnaeme Esther Uchechukwu
    AU  - Okoye Nkechi Helen
    Y1  - 2021/08/18
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11
    T2  - American Journal of Applied and Industrial Chemistry
    JF  - American Journal of Applied and Industrial Chemistry
    JO  - American Journal of Applied and Industrial Chemistry
    SP  - 27
    EP  - 32
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7294
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaic.20210502.11
    AB  - Pollution is an act of contaminating the environment by harmful or toxic substances that could be of solid, liquid or gaseous materials. Effluents containing heavy metals that are indiscriminately discharged into the environment pollute the ecosystem and pose great risks to the organisms in it. Here, we review effluent discharged from a pharmaceutical industry in Awka, Anambra state, Nigeria and analyzed for heavy metal pollution. The twenty heavy metals analyzed were: magnesium, calcium, zinc, copper, Nickel, Cobalt, Iron, chromium, sodium, aluminum, vanadium, potassium, silver, manganese, mercury, cadmium, lead, molybdenum, selenium and arsenic. The heavy metals were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (model 240FS AA). The study presented the several risks and environmental effects associated with heavy metal toxicity. The environmental risk assessment was performed in which the chronic daily intake through ingestion for adults was calculated. The hazard quotient (HQ) for non-carcinogenic risk assessment and cancer risk assessment were also calculated. The obtained HQ values for Pb (7.857), Hg (4.333×101), As (1.867×102), Ni (4.521×102), Cr (3.333), Al (5.753), Mo (11), Ag (1.13) and Se (19) were greater than 1 and they were in the order: Se > Mo > Pb > Al > Ni > Hg > Cr > As > Ag. This means that the population is exposed to health risks with non-carcinogenic effects from this study. Metals with HQ values less than 1 were Cd (0.425), Fe (0.346), Zn (0.199), Cu (0.123), Mn (0.023) and Co (0.011). Cancer risk assessment was also carried out based on Pb, As, Ni, Cr and Cd with values 3.887 × 10-5, 3.6 × 10-2, 3.526, 2.184 × 10-3 and 2.73 ×10-3 respectively and nickel (Ni) proved to be the highest contributor to cancer risk in this study. Long term exposure to heavy metals possesses both potential non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks to the local residents.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

  • Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

  • Sections