| Peer-Reviewed

Zooplankton of the Torrential River Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu, India, and Its Comparison with Earlier Findings

Received: 28 April 2021    Accepted: 24 June 2021    Published: 22 July 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The river Chenab, river of the Indian sub-continent in north-western India and north-eastern and eastern Pakistan, has mostly torrential flow in India. It drains Jammu region of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, India, and after passing through Pragwal wetland, Akhnoor, enters into the broad alluvial lowlands of Punjab province, Pakistan. The present communication highlights the origin and seasonal qualitative and quantitative fluctuations of zooplankton of the Himalayan river Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu. Zooplankton of the river Chenab has its origin mainly in rockpools, in tributaries joining upstream Akhnoor and a part is periphytonic (epilithic/ epibenthic). A total of 28 zooplanktonic species belonging to 25 species of protozoa, gemmules of 2 species of Porifera (Spongilla lacustris and Eunapius carteri) and 1 species of Turbellaria (Planaria sp.) were noticed. There is almost no change in composition of zooplankton from the earlier observations at Akhnoor. Whereas, its slow moving and polluted segment in Pakistan is dominated by metazoans. Qualitatively and quantitatively zooplankton remained irregular and low during monsoon and post monsoon months. Analysis of coefficient of correlation of zooplankton with water quality parameters is almost insignificant.

Published in American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13
Page(s) 46-55
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Zooplankton, The River Chenab at Akhnoor, Comparison with Earlier Findings

References
[1] J. F. III Saunders and W. M. Jr. Lewis, “Zooplankton abundance and transport in a tropical white-water river”, Hydrobiologia, Vol. 162, pp 147-155, 1988a.
[2] M. L. Pace, S. E. G. Findlay and D. Lints, “Zooplankton in advective environments. The Hudson River community and a comparative analysis”, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 49, pp 1060-1069, 1992.
[3] J. H. Thorp, A. R. Black, K. H. Haag and J. D. Wehr, “Zooplankton assemblages in the Ohio River: seasonal tributary and navigation dam effects”, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 51, pp 1634-1643, 1994.
[4] M. Weitere, A. Scherwass, Karl-Theo Sieben and H. Arndt, “Planktonic food web structure and potential carbon flow in the lower river Rhine with a focus on the role of protozoans.” River Research and Applications, Vol. 21, pp 535-549, 2005.
[5] C. S. Reynolds and J. P. Descy, “The production, biomass and structure of phytoplankton in large rivers”, Archive Für Hydrobiologie supplement band, Vol. 113, pp 161-187, 1996.
[6] N. Lair, V. Jacquet and P. Reyes-Marchant, “Factors related to autotrophic potamoplankton, heterotrophic protists and micrometazoan abundance, at two sites in a lowland temperate river during low water flow”, Hydrobiologia, Vol. 394, pp 13-28, 1999.
[7] M. Weitere and H. Arndt, “Top down effects on pelagic heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) in large River (Rhine): Do losses to the benthos play a role”, Freshwater Biology, Vol. 47, pp 1437-1450, 2002a.
[8] M. Weitere and H. Arndt, “Water discharge regulated- bacteria/heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) interactions in the water column of the River Rhine”, Microbial Ecology, Vol. 44, pp 19-29, 2002b.
[9] R. Sanders, “Trophic strategies among heterotrophic flagellates. In: The biology of free living heterotrophic flagellates”, Peterson, D. J. and Larsen, J. (eds.). Clarendon Press: Oxford; pp 21-38, 1991.
[10] E. B. Sherr and B. F. Sherr, “Bacterivory and herbivory: Keyroles of phagotrophic protists in pelagic food webs”, Microbial Ecology, Vol. 28, pp 233-235, 1994.
[11] H. Arndt, D. Dietrich, B. Auer, E. J. Cleven, T. Grafenhän, M. Weitere, and A. P. Mylnikov, “Functional diversity of heterotrophic flagellates in the aquatic ecosystems”. In the flagellates, Leadbeater, B. S. C. and Green, J. C. (eds), Taylor and Francis, London, pp 240-268, 2000.
[12] R. W. Howarth, R. Shneider, and D. Swaney, “Metabolism and organic carbon fluxes in the tidal freshwater Hudson River”, Estuaries, Vol. 19, pp 848-865, 1996.
[13] N. Zutshi, “Effect of Jammu city sewage on abiotic and biotic factors of the river Tawi, Jammu”, Ph.D Thesis, University of Jammu, Jammu, 1992.
[14] J. Sawhney, “Physico-chemical characteristics of water and plankton of river Tawi at Nagrota bypass, Jammu”, M.Sc Dissertation, University of Jammu, Jammu, 1998.
[15] F. A. Faiaz, T. A. Qureshi, K. Borana, I. Joginder and M. Singh, “Qualitative abundance of zooplankton of Bishleri stream of Banihal, Doda (J & K State)”, Current World Environment, Vol. 1 (1), pp 151-152, 2006.
[16] A. Sharma, “Hydrobiology of river Basanter at Samba, Jammu”, Ph.D Thesis, University of Jammu, Jammu, 2009.
[17] V. Rathore, “Hydrobiology of Uch River, Kathua (J&K)”, Ph.D Thesis, University of Jammu, Jammu, 2009.
[18] S. P. S. Dutta and K. K. Verma, “Zooplanktonic analysis of the river Chenab, at Akhnoor, Jammu”, The Ecoscan, Vol. 4 (1), pp 123-128, 2010.
[19] S. P. S. Dutta, “Ecology of the river Tawi with reference to its pollution in Jammu city”, Project report submitted to the Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir, Deptt. of Ecology, Environment and Remote Sensing, 55 pp, 2012.
[20] D. I. Baba, K. K. Sharma, and K. Gupta “Zooplanktonic community structure of river Chenab of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K)”, J. Sci., Vol. 5 (9), pp 776-780, 2015.
[21] K. N. Nair, B. K. Das and B. N. Mukherjee, “On some freshwater Rhizopoda and Helizoa (Protozoa) from Calcutta and Environments”, Part 1. Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Vol. 65 (1-4), pp 1-16, 1971.
[22] R. W. Pennak, “Freshwater invertebrates of the United States”, 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 803 pp, 1978.
[23] S. P. S Dutta, “On some freshwater Rhizopoda from Jammu Part – 1”, J. University Review (Science), Vol. 1, pp 91-94, 1983.
[24] R. R. Kudo, “Protozoology”, Published by Books & Periodicals Corp. (India), 1174 pp, 1986.
[25] W. T. Edmondson, “Fresh water Biology”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1248 pp, 1992.
[26] C. A. Kofoid, “The plankton of Illinois River, 1804-1809, with introductory notes upon the hydrography of Illinois River and its basin. Part II Constituent organisms and their seasonal distribution”, Bull. II. State Lab Nat. Hist., Vol. 8, pp 1-354, 1908.
[27] P. S. Galstoff “Limnological observations in the upper Mississippi, 1921”, Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., Vol. 39, pp 347-438, 1924.
[28] W. Krieger, “Zur. Biologie des Flussplanktons”, Pflanzenforschung, Vol. 10, 66 pp, 1927.
[29] R. W. Butcher, “Studies in the ecology of rivers II. The microflora of rivers with special reference to the algae on the riverbed”, Ann. Botany, Vol. 46, pp 813-861, 1932.
[30] A. V. Brown, R. I. Limbeck and M. D. Schram, “Trophic importance of zooplankton in streams with alluvial riffle and pool geomorphometry”, Archive. Für. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 114, pp 349-367, 1989.
[31] B. K. Basu and F. R. Pick, “Factors regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers”, Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 41, pp 1572-1577, 1996.
[32] W. Reckendorfer, H. Keckeih, G. Winkler and F. Schiemer, “Zooplankton abundance in the river Danube, Austria: the significance of inshore retention”, Freshwater Biology, Vol. 41, pp 583-591, 1999.
[33] C. Baranyi, T. Hein, C. Holarek, S. Keckeis and F. Schiemer, “Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube river flood plain system: effects of Hydrology”, Freshwater Biology, Vol. 47, pp 473-482, 2002.
[34] B. K. Basu, J. Kalff and B. Pinel-Alloul, “The influence of macrophyte beds on plankton communities and their export from Fluvial lakes in the St. Lawrence river”, Freshwater Biology, Vol. 45, pp 373-382, 2002.
[35] S. P. S. Dutta, “Limnology of rock pools in the river Chenab at Dhoomi, Akhnoor, in Jammu region of Union Territory of the Jammu and Kashmir”, Journal of Applied and Natural Science, Vol. 12 (4), pp 599-606, 2020.
[36] M. Weitere and H. Arndt, “Structure of the heterotrophic flagellate community in the water column of the river Rhine (Germany)”, European Journal of Protistology, Vol. 39, pp 287-300, 2003.
[37] E. C. Philips, “Composition of the zooplankton of a lake and stream in Northwest Arkansas”, Journal of Freshwater Ecology, Vol. 10, pp 337-341, 1995.
[38] N. Sawhney, “Limnology of Ban Ganga stream with special reference to some consumers inhabiting the stream”, M. Phil Dissertation, University of Jammu, Jammu, 2004.
[39] M. S. Chughtai, K. Mahmood and A. R. Awan, “Assessment of planktonic diversity in the river Chenab as affected by sewage of Multan city”, Pak. J. Bot., Vol. 43 (5), pp 2551-2555, 2011.
[40] M. F. Khan, M. Afzal, A. Rab, M. R. Ali, R. Kausa and S. M. H. Mehdi, “Baseline studies on microinvertebrates of Head Marala, river Chenab, Punjab, Pakistan”, Inter. J. Vet. Sc., Vol. 3 (4), pp 166-171, 2014.
[41] Z. Bhatti, M. A. Gondal, A. Ghufran and A. Batool, “Checklist of zooplankton in different rivers of Bajwat area”, J. Biores. Manag., Vol. 5 (4), pp 9-13, 2018.
[42] S. Eddy, “The plankton of Sangamon River in the summer of 1929”, State of Illionis. Div. Nat. Hist. Surv., Vol. 19, pp 469-486, 1932.
[43] J. H. Thorp and A. F. Casper, “Importance of biotic interactions in large rivers: an experiment with planktivorous fish, dreissenid mussels and zooplankton in the St. Lawrence River”, River Research and Application, Vol. 19, pp 265-279, 2003.
[44] R. C. Hart, “Zooplankton feeding rates in relation to suspended matter content: Potential influences on community structure in a turbid reservoir”, Freshwater Biologie, Vol. 19, pp 123-139, 1988.
[45] R. C. Hart “Food and suspended sediment influences on the nauplair and copepodid durations of freshwater copepods: Comparative studies on Tropodiaptomus and Metadiaptomus”, Journal of Plankton Research, Vol. 12, pp 345-363, 1991.
[46] R. Pourriot, C. Rougler and A. Miquelis, “Origin and development of river zooplankton: example of the Marne”, Hydrobilogia, Vol. 345, pp 143-148, 1997.
[47] J. R. Karr, “Biological integrity: A long – neglected aspect of water resource management”. Ecological Applications, Vol. 1, pp 66-84, 1991.
[48] N. L. Poff, J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks and J. C. Stromberg, “The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration”, Bio-Sciences, Vol. 47, pp 769-784, 1997.
[49] A. F. Casper and J. H. Thorp, “Diel and lateral patterns of zooplankton distribution in the ST. Lawrence River”, Riv. Res. Applic., Vol. 23, pp 73-85, 2007.
[50] J. F. III Saunders and W. M. Jr. Lewis, “Zooplankton abundance in the Caura River, Venezuela”, Biotropica, Vol. 20, pp 206-214, 1988b.
[51] J. D. Jack, S. A. Toalson and J. J. Gilbert, “The effect of clays on a freshwater plankton community: an enclosure experiment”, Archive. Für. Hydrobiologie, Vol. 127, pp 257-270, 1993.
[52] D. L. Guelda, R. W. Koch, J. D. Jack and P. A. Bukaveckas, “Experimental evidence for density dependent effects and the importance of algal production in determining population growth rates of riverine zooplankton”, River Research and Applications, Vol. 21, pp 595-608, 2005.
[53] S. K. Hamilton, S. J. Slipper, W. M. Lewis, and J. F. Saunders, “Zooplankton abundance and evidence for its reduction by macrophyte mats into Orinoca flood plain lakes”, J. Plankton Research, Vol. 12, pp 345-367, 1990.
[54] C. Nilson, G. Grelsson, M. P. Johanson and U. Sprens, “Patterns of plant species richness along river banks”, Ecology, Vol. 70, pp 71-84, 1989.
[55] H. Joshi, S. K. Shishodia, S. N. Kumar, D. K Sailia, B. P. Naijriyal, R. P. Mathur, P. K. Pande, B. S. Mathur, and N. Puri, “Ecosystems studies of upper region of Ganga River, India”, Environ. Monit. and Assess., Vol. 35, pp 181-206, 1995.
[56] J. Sharma, “Effect of Industrial wastes and sewage on abiotic and biotic (planktons and macrophytes) components of Behlol nullah, Jammu”, P.hD Thesis, University of Jammu, Jammu, 1999.
[57] N. K. Aggarwal and B. L. Thapilyal “Preimpoudment hydrological study of Bhilanganga River from Tehri dam reservoir area in Uttranchal”, Environ. Geochem., Vol. 8, pp 143-148, 2005.
[58] D. R. Khanna, R. Bhutiani, G. Matta, V. Singh and G. Bhadauriya, “Study of planktonic diversity of river Ganga from Devprayag to Rourkee, Uttrakhand, India”, Environment Conservation Journal, Vol. 13 (1-2), pp 211-217, 2012.
[59] A. Kumar, D. R. Khanna and R. Bhutiani, “Seasonal variations in physico-chemical parameters of river Beas, Himachal Pradesh, with special reference to planktonic population”, Environment Conservation Journal, Vol. 16 (3), pp 127-131, 2015.
[60] L. De Cabo, A. Puig, S. Arreghini, H. F. Olguin, R. Seoane and I. Obertello, “Physico-chemical variables and plankton from the lower delta of the Parana River (Argentina) in relation to flow”, Hydrobiological Processes, Vol. 17, pp 1279-1290, 2003.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sunt P. Singh Dutta. (2021). Zooplankton of the Torrential River Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu, India, and Its Comparison with Earlier Findings. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 7(3), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sunt P. Singh Dutta. Zooplankton of the Torrential River Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu, India, and Its Comparison with Earlier Findings. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2021, 7(3), 46-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sunt P. Singh Dutta. Zooplankton of the Torrential River Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu, India, and Its Comparison with Earlier Findings. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2021;7(3):46-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13,
      author = {Sunt P. Singh Dutta},
      title = {Zooplankton of the Torrential River Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu, India, and Its Comparison with Earlier Findings},
      journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
      volume = {7},
      number = {3},
      pages = {46-55},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20210703.13},
      abstract = {The river Chenab, river of the Indian sub-continent in north-western India and north-eastern and eastern Pakistan, has mostly torrential flow in India. It drains Jammu region of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, India, and after passing through Pragwal wetland, Akhnoor, enters into the broad alluvial lowlands of Punjab province, Pakistan. The present communication highlights the origin and seasonal qualitative and quantitative fluctuations of zooplankton of the Himalayan river Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu. Zooplankton of the river Chenab has its origin mainly in rockpools, in tributaries joining upstream Akhnoor and a part is periphytonic (epilithic/ epibenthic). A total of 28 zooplanktonic species belonging to 25 species of protozoa, gemmules of 2 species of Porifera (Spongilla lacustris and Eunapius carteri) and 1 species of Turbellaria (Planaria sp.) were noticed. There is almost no change in composition of zooplankton from the earlier observations at Akhnoor. Whereas, its slow moving and polluted segment in Pakistan is dominated by metazoans. Qualitatively and quantitatively zooplankton remained irregular and low during monsoon and post monsoon months. Analysis of coefficient of correlation of zooplankton with water quality parameters is almost insignificant.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Zooplankton of the Torrential River Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu, India, and Its Comparison with Earlier Findings
    AU  - Sunt P. Singh Dutta
    Y1  - 2021/07/22
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13
    T2  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    JF  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    JO  - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research
    SP  - 46
    EP  - 55
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2471-9730
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210703.13
    AB  - The river Chenab, river of the Indian sub-continent in north-western India and north-eastern and eastern Pakistan, has mostly torrential flow in India. It drains Jammu region of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, India, and after passing through Pragwal wetland, Akhnoor, enters into the broad alluvial lowlands of Punjab province, Pakistan. The present communication highlights the origin and seasonal qualitative and quantitative fluctuations of zooplankton of the Himalayan river Chenab at Akhnoor, Jammu. Zooplankton of the river Chenab has its origin mainly in rockpools, in tributaries joining upstream Akhnoor and a part is periphytonic (epilithic/ epibenthic). A total of 28 zooplanktonic species belonging to 25 species of protozoa, gemmules of 2 species of Porifera (Spongilla lacustris and Eunapius carteri) and 1 species of Turbellaria (Planaria sp.) were noticed. There is almost no change in composition of zooplankton from the earlier observations at Akhnoor. Whereas, its slow moving and polluted segment in Pakistan is dominated by metazoans. Qualitatively and quantitatively zooplankton remained irregular and low during monsoon and post monsoon months. Analysis of coefficient of correlation of zooplankton with water quality parameters is almost insignificant.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Jammu, Jammu, India

  • Sections