| Peer-Reviewed

Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) Conferring Dry Matter Content and Starch Content in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

Received: 25 November 2020    Accepted: 9 December 2020    Published: 18 January 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Cassava tubers are an excellent source of carbohydrate and a competitive source of starch most traded internationally. It is a highly desirable raw material for food and industrial purpose due to its high dietary carbohydrate content. The economic value of cassava products lies in the DMC (dry matter content). Cassava roots contain up to 80-90 per cent of carbohydrate by dry weight and 80 per cent of carbohydrate is starch. Increasing world population, limited land area, changing climatic condition and food scarcity demanded the need for improved cassava starch. Yield of cassava tubers is related to both tuber volume and DMC and thus DMC can be improved by cassava breeding. Thus QTL mapping of DMC is very much relevant to understand the genetic effects controlling the traits. The current study focused on QTL mapping for DMC and SC (starch content) to identify and study the favourite alleles using Windows cartographer version 2.5. Single marker analysis (SMA) identified seven marker alleles associated with DMC and eight marker alleles associated with SC. Using interval mapping, a single QTL for DMC was identified in chrom21 flanked by SSRY110b and SSRY182b. On the other hand, five QTLs for SC were identified by simple interval mapping (SIM) and a single QTL in chrom17 with R2 value of 12% and at a LOD value 5 using composite interval mapping (CIM). The exact position of the QTLs and its interactions were studied using MIM and the genetic effect of QTLs controlling DMC was found to be over-dominance. But in the case of SC, the QTL interaction was identified and found to be additive x additive epistatic interaction.

Published in American Journal of BioScience (Volume 9, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11
Page(s) 1-9
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cassava, Dry Matter Content, Linkage Map, Quantitative Trait Loci, Starch Content

References
[1] Aigbe SO and Remison SU (2010). The influence of root rot on starch content of cassava planted in different ecological environment of Nigeria. Nigerian Annals of Natural Sciences 10 (1): 60-70.
[2] Amma CSE and Sheela MN (1998). Genetic analysis in a diallel cross of inbred lines of cassava. Madras Agricultural Journal 85: 64-268.
[3] Amma CSE, Sheela MN and Pillai PKT (1995). Combining ability heterosis and gene action for three major quality traits in cassava. Journal of Root Crops 21: 24-29.
[4] Asare PA. 2004. Determination of dry matter content in cassava tubers. B. Sc. dissertation. University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. pp. 34.
[5] Benesi IRM, Labuschagne MT, Dixon AGO and Mahungu NM (2004). Stability of native starch quality parameters, starch extraction and root dry matter of cassava genotypes in different environments. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84: 1381-1388.
[6] Boonchanawiwat A, Sraphet S, Boonseng O, Lightfoot D and Triwitayakorn K (2011). QTL underlying plant and first branch height in cassava (Mahihot esculenta Crantz). Field Crops Research 121: 343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.022.
[7] Bright BP, Elizabeth P, Joseph M-A, Peter K, Angeline van B and Maryke L (2020). Genetic variability, stability and heritability for quality and yield characteristics in provitamin A cassava varieties. Euphytica 216: 31
[8] Burns A, Gleadow R, Cliff J, Zacarias A and Cavagnaro T (2010). Cassava: The Drought, War and Famine Crop in a Changing World. Sustainability 2: 3572-3607. doi: 10.3390/su2113572.
[9] Byrne D (1984). Breeding cassava. Plant Breeding Reviews 2: 73-133.
[10] Cach NT, Lenis JI, Perez JC, Morante N, Calle F and Ceballos H (2006). Inheritance of useful traits in cassava grown in subhumid conditions. Plant Breeding 125: 177-182.
[11] Cach NT, Perez JC, Lenis JI, Calle F, Morante N and Ceballos H (2005). Epistasis in the expression of relevant traits in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) for subhumid conditions. Journal of Heredity 96 (5): 586-592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esi084.
[12] Calle F, Perez JC, Gaitán W, Morante N, Ceballos H, Llano G and Alvarez E. 2005. Diallel inheritance of relevant traits in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) adapted to acid-soil savannas. Euphytica 144 (1): 177-186. doi: 10.1007/s10681-005-5810-y.
[13] Ceballos H, Hershey C and Becerra-López-Lavalle LA (2012). New approaches to cassava breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 36: 427-504.
[14] Ceballos H, Kawuki RS, Gracen VE, Yencho GC and Hershey CH (2015). Conventional breeding, marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and inbreeding in clonally propagated crops: a case study for cassava. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128: 1647-1667.
[15] Ceballos H, Jaramillo JJ, Salazar S, Pineda LM, Calle F and Setter T (2017). Induction of flowering in cassava through grafting. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 9 (2): 19-29. DOI: 10.5897/JPBCS2016.0617.
[16] Cervantes JC, Sosinski B, Pecota KV, Mwanga ROM, Catignani GL, Truong VD, Watkins RH, Ulmer MR, Yencho GC (2011). Identification of quantitative trait loci for dry matter, starch and β-carotene content in sweet potato. Molecular Breeding 28: 201-216. DOI 10.1007/s11032-010-9474-5.
[17] Chalwe A, Melis R, Shanahan P and Chiona M (2015). Inheritance of resistance to cassava green mite and other useful agronomic traits in cassava grown in Zimbia. Euphytica 205 (1): 103-119. doi: 10.1007/s10681-015-1404-5
[18] Charles AL, Sriroth K and Tozou-chi H (2005). Proximate composition, mineral contents, hydrogen cyanide and phytic acid of 5 cassava genotypes. Food Chemistry 92 (4): 615-620.
[19] Cockerham CC (1954). An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39 (6): 859-882
[20] de Oliveira EJ, Resende MD V, Silva SV, Ferreira CF, Oliveira GAF, da Silva MS, de Oliveira LA and Aguilar-Vildoso CI (2012). Genome wide selection in cassava. Euphytica 187: 263-276.
[21] FAOSTAT (2018). Food and Agricultural Commodities Production.
[22] Fisher RA (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh archives 52: 399-433.
[23] Fuglie KO, Oates CG and Xie J (2006). Root Crops, starch and agro-industrialization in Asia, Social Sciences Working Paper Series No. 2006-3. International Potato Center. (Peru: CIP) 19.
[24] Hahn SK, John C, Isoba G and Ikohun T (1989). Resistance breeding in root crops at International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria. Crop Protection 8: 147-168.
[25] IITA (1985). Cassava in Tropical Africa. A reference Manual. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 12-13, 24-25.
[26] Jansen PC (1993). Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 135: 205-211.
[27] Jansen RC and Stam P (1994). High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics 136: 1447-1455.
[28] Jaramillo G, Morante N, Pérez JC, Calle F, Ceballos H, Arias B and Bellotti AC (2005). Diallel analysis in cassava adapted to the midaltitude valleys environment. Crop Science 45: 1058-1063.
[29] Kawano K, Fukuda WMG and Cenpukdec U (1987). Genetic and environmental effects on dry matter content of cassava root. Crop science 27: 69-74.
[30] Kawuki RS, Ferguson M, Labuschagne M, Herselman L, Orone J, Ralimanana I, Bidiaka M, Lukombo S, Kanyange MC, Gashaka G, Mkamilo G, Gethi J and Obiero H (2011). Variation in qualitative and quantitative traits of cassava germplasm from selected national breeding programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Research 122 (2): 151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.006.
[31] Kempthorne O (1954). The correlation between relatives in a random mating population. Proceedings of Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 143: 103-113. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0056.
[32] Killick RJ (1977). Genetic analysis of several traits in potatoes by means of a diallel cross. Annals of Applied Biology 86 (2): 279-289. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1977.tb01841.x.
[33] Kizito EB, Chiwona-Karltun L, Egwang T, Fregene M and Westerbergh A (2007). Genetic diversity and variety composition of cassava on small scale farms in Uganda: an interdisciplinary study using genetic markers and farmer interviews. Genetics 130 (3): 301-318. doi: 10.1007/s10709-006-9107-4.
[34] Kulembeka HP, Ferguson M, Herselman L, Kanju E, Mkamilo G, Masumba E, Fregene M and Labuschagne MT (2012). Diallel analysis of field resistance to brown streak disease in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) landraces from Tanzania. Euphytica 187: 277-288. doi: 10.1007/s10681-012-0730-0.
[35] Lander ES and Botstein D (1989). Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121 (1): 185-199.
[36] Lian SL (1985). Selection for yield potential. In: Cassava: Research, Production and Utilization (Eds. Cork JH, Reyes JA). Cali, Columbia: UNDP/CIAT.
[37] Lincoln S, Dalyand M and Lander E (1993). Constructing genetic Linkage maps with MAPMAKER/EXP Version 3.0: A Tutorial and Reference Manual. Whitehead Institute Technical Report. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research/MIT Center for Genome Research, Cambridge, MA.
[38] Ly D, Hamblin M, Rabbi I, Melaku G, Bakare M, Hugh G. Gauch Jr. HG, Okechukwu R, Dixon AGO, Kulakow P and Jannink JL (2013). Relatedness and genotype × environment interaction affect prediction accuracies in genomic selection: a study in cassava. Crop Science 53: 1312.
[39] Mitra J (2001). Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science 80 (6): 758-763.
[40] Muñoz PR, Resende MFR, Gezan SA, Resende MDV, de los Campos G, Kirst M and Peter GF (2014). Unraveling additive from non-additive effects using genomic relationship matrices. Genetics 198: 1759-1768.
[41] Ntawuruhunga P and Dixon AGO (2010). Quantitative variation and interrelationship between factors influencing cassava yield. Journal of Applied Biosciences 26: 1594-1602.
[42] Okogbenin E and Fregene M (2002). Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of early root bulking in an F1 population of non-inbred parents in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106 (1): 58-66. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1068-0.
[43] Okogbenin E and Fregene M (2003). Genetic mapping of QTLs affecting productivity and plant architecture in a full-sib cross from non-inbred parents in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107 (8): 1452-1462. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1383-0.
[44] Okogbenin E, Marin J and Fregene M (2008). QTL analysis for early yield in a pseudo F2 population of cassava. African Journal of Biotechnology 7 (2): 131-138.
[45] Pérez JC, Ceballos H, Calle F, Morante N, Gaitán W, Llano G and Álvarez E (2005a). Within-family genetic variation and epistasis in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) adapted to the acid soils environment. Euphytica 145: 77-85.
[46] Pérez JC, Ceballos H, Jaramillo G, Morante N, Calle F, Arias B and Bellotti AC (2005b). Epistasis in cassava adapted to midaltitude valley environments. Crop Science 45: 1491-1496.
[47] Redoña ED and Mackill DJ (1998). Quantitative trait locus analysis for rice panicle and grain characteristics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96 (6): 957-963. doi: 10.1007/s001220050826.
[48] Shi J, Li R, Qiu D, Jiang C, Long Y, Morgan C, Bancroft I, Zhao J and Meng J (2009). Unraveling the complex trait of crop yield with quantitative trait loci mapping in Brassica napus. Genetics 182 (3): 851-861. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.101642.
[49] Silva CEJ, Borralho NM and Potts BM (2004). Additive and non-additive genetic parameters from clonally replicated and seedling progenies of Eucalyptus globulus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108 (6): 1113-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1524-5.
[50] Song X, Han Y, Teng W, Sun G and Li W (2010). Identification of QTL underlying somatic embryogenesis capacity of immature embryos in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Plant Cell Reports 29 (2): 125-131. doi: 10.1007/s00299-009-0804-1.
[51] Sraphet S, Boonchanawiwat A, Thanyasiriwat TR, Thaikert R, Whankaew S, Smith DR, Boonseng O and Lightfoot D A, Triwitayakorn K (2016). Quantitative trait loci underlying root yield and starch content in an F1 derived cassava population (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Journal of Agricultural Science 1-13. doi: 10.1017/S0021859616000678.
[52] Sun XY, Wu K, Zhao Y, Kong FM, Han GZ, Jiang HM, Huang XJ, Li RJ, Wang HG and Li SS (2009). QTL analysis of kernel shape and weight using recombinant inbred lines in wheat. Euphytica 165: 615-624. doi: 10.1007/s10681-008-9794-2.
[53] Teye E, Asare AP., Amoah RS. and Tetteh JP (2011). Determination of the dry matter content of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) tubers using specific gravity method. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 6 (11): 23-28
[54] Timmerman-vaughan GM, Mills A, Whitfield C, Frew T, Butler R, Murray S, Lakeman M, Mccallum J, Russell A and Wilson D (2005). Linkage mapping of QTL for seed yield, yield components, and developmental traits in pea. Crop Science 45: 1336-1344.
[55] Tumuhimbise R, Melis R and Shanahan P (2014). Diallel analysis of early storage root yield and disease resistance traits in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Field Crops Research 167: 86-93.
[56] Vidya P, 2020, Aswathy GH Nair, Mohan C, Sreekumar J and Ambu V (2020). Construction of SSR Based Genetic Linkage Map and Identification of QTLs Conferring CMD Resistance in Cassava. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2020, 11 (4), 387-397. DOI. ORG/10.23910/1.2020.2135
[57] Wanatsanan S, Saowalak K, Malinee S, Supatcharee N, Asawin M, Treenut S (2012). Transcriptomic data integration inferring the dominance of starch biosynthesis in carbon utilization of developing cassava roots. Procedia Computer Science 11: 96-106.
[58] Wolfe MD, Kulakow P, Rabbi IY and Jannink JL (2016). Marker-Based Estimates Reveal Significant nonadditive effects in clonally propagated cassava (Manihot esculenta): Implications for the prediction of total genetic value and the selection of varieties. Genes/Genomes/Genetics 6 (11): 3497-3506. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.033332.
[59] Xiao J, Grandillo S, Ahn SN, Mccouch SR, Tanksley SD, LI J and Yuan L (1996). Genes from wild rice improve yield. Nature 384: 223-224. doi: 10.1038/384223a0.
[60] Zacarias M and Labuschagne MT (2010). Diallel analysis of cassava brown streak disease, yield and yield related characteristics in Mozambique. Euphytica 176 (3): 309-320. doi: 10.1007/s10681-010-0203-2.
[61] Zeng ZB (1993). Theoretical basis of separation of multiple linked gene effects on mapping quantitative trait loci. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90 (23): 10972-10976.
[62] Zeng ZB (1994). Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136 (4): 1457-1468.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Vidya Prasannakumari, Aswathy Gopalakrishnan Heinining Nair, Chokkappan Mohan. (2021). Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) Conferring Dry Matter Content and Starch Content in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). American Journal of BioScience, 9(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Vidya Prasannakumari; Aswathy Gopalakrishnan Heinining Nair; Chokkappan Mohan. Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) Conferring Dry Matter Content and Starch Content in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Am. J. BioScience 2021, 9(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Vidya Prasannakumari, Aswathy Gopalakrishnan Heinining Nair, Chokkappan Mohan. Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) Conferring Dry Matter Content and Starch Content in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Am J BioScience. 2021;9(1):1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11,
      author = {Vidya Prasannakumari and Aswathy Gopalakrishnan Heinining Nair and Chokkappan Mohan},
      title = {Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) Conferring Dry Matter Content and Starch Content in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)},
      journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
      volume = {9},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-9},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20210901.11},
      abstract = {Cassava tubers are an excellent source of carbohydrate and a competitive source of starch most traded internationally. It is a highly desirable raw material for food and industrial purpose due to its high dietary carbohydrate content. The economic value of cassava products lies in the DMC (dry matter content). Cassava roots contain up to 80-90 per cent of carbohydrate by dry weight and 80 per cent of carbohydrate is starch. Increasing world population, limited land area, changing climatic condition and food scarcity demanded the need for improved cassava starch. Yield of cassava tubers is related to both tuber volume and DMC and thus DMC can be improved by cassava breeding. Thus QTL mapping of DMC is very much relevant to understand the genetic effects controlling the traits. The current study focused on QTL mapping for DMC and SC (starch content) to identify and study the favourite alleles using Windows cartographer version 2.5. Single marker analysis (SMA) identified seven marker alleles associated with DMC and eight marker alleles associated with SC. Using interval mapping, a single QTL for DMC was identified in chrom21 flanked by SSRY110b  and SSRY182b. On the other hand, five QTLs for SC were identified by simple interval mapping (SIM) and a single QTL in chrom17 with R2  value of 12% and at a LOD value 5 using composite interval mapping (CIM). The exact position of the QTLs and its interactions were studied using MIM and the genetic effect of QTLs controlling DMC was found to be over-dominance. But in the case of SC, the QTL interaction was identified and found to be additive x additive epistatic interaction.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) Conferring Dry Matter Content and Starch Content in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)
    AU  - Vidya Prasannakumari
    AU  - Aswathy Gopalakrishnan Heinining Nair
    AU  - Chokkappan Mohan
    Y1  - 2021/01/18
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11
    T2  - American Journal of BioScience
    JF  - American Journal of BioScience
    JO  - American Journal of BioScience
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 9
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0167
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20210901.11
    AB  - Cassava tubers are an excellent source of carbohydrate and a competitive source of starch most traded internationally. It is a highly desirable raw material for food and industrial purpose due to its high dietary carbohydrate content. The economic value of cassava products lies in the DMC (dry matter content). Cassava roots contain up to 80-90 per cent of carbohydrate by dry weight and 80 per cent of carbohydrate is starch. Increasing world population, limited land area, changing climatic condition and food scarcity demanded the need for improved cassava starch. Yield of cassava tubers is related to both tuber volume and DMC and thus DMC can be improved by cassava breeding. Thus QTL mapping of DMC is very much relevant to understand the genetic effects controlling the traits. The current study focused on QTL mapping for DMC and SC (starch content) to identify and study the favourite alleles using Windows cartographer version 2.5. Single marker analysis (SMA) identified seven marker alleles associated with DMC and eight marker alleles associated with SC. Using interval mapping, a single QTL for DMC was identified in chrom21 flanked by SSRY110b  and SSRY182b. On the other hand, five QTLs for SC were identified by simple interval mapping (SIM) and a single QTL in chrom17 with R2  value of 12% and at a LOD value 5 using composite interval mapping (CIM). The exact position of the QTLs and its interactions were studied using MIM and the genetic effect of QTLs controlling DMC was found to be over-dominance. But in the case of SC, the QTL interaction was identified and found to be additive x additive epistatic interaction.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Division of Crop Improvement ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (ICAR-CTCRI), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, India

  • Division of Crop Improvement ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (ICAR-CTCRI), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, India

  • Division of Crop Improvement ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute (ICAR-CTCRI), Sreekariyam, Thiruvananthapuram, India

  • Sections