Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Measures to Improve the Maintenance of University Buildings in Nigeria

Received: 1 December 2023    Accepted: 5 January 2024    Published: 18 January 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Sustainable measures for effectively maintaining buildings have become essential to sustainable building development with the growing influx of building portfolios worldwide. This is so, considering building maintenance problems have become a global menace. It has been ascertained that improving building maintenance operations for sustainable considerations will benefit university facilities in terms of profitability, user well-being, and increased lifespan. Although studies abound on the maintenance of university buildings in Nigeria, its barriers, and the factors affecting it, very few studies have touched on the solutions to maintenance problems and the measures to improve the maintenance management of these buildings. Therefore, this paper presents the findings from assessing the measures to improve the maintenance of buildings in six selected higher education institutions in the country. The study embraced a quantitative approach, and data were gathered from maintenance managers, supervisors, and technicians working in the Works Departments of the selected public institutions. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as percentile and factor analysis. Findings revealed that human, materials resources, and policy improvement measures, computerized approach to management, assessment, and feedback mechanism measures, less sabotage and quick response measures, and improved funding, design, and construction measures are the most viable measures to improve building maintenance in these universities.

Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 12, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12
Page(s) 10-16
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Maintenance, Building Maintenance, Measures, Higher Education Institutions

References
[1] Abdul Lateef, O. A. (2012). Quantitative analysis of defects in university buildings: user perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 167-181.
[2] Adamu, A. (2015). Maintenance management systems of on-campus student hostels at Nigerian Universities. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth.
[3] Adenuga, A. O., Olufowobi, B. M. and Raheem, A. A. (2010). Effective maintenance policy as a tool for sustaining housing stock in downturn economy. Journal of Building Performance, 1(1), pp. 93–109.
[4] Ajayi, M., Nwosu, A. and Ajani, Y. (2015). Students’ satisfaction with hostel facilities in federal university of technology, Akure, Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 11(34), pp. 1857–7881.
[5] Akinsola, E. O., Hussaini, O. P., Oyenuga, O. S. and Fatokun, A. O., (2012). Critical factors influencing facility maintenance management of tertiary institutional buildings in Southwest Nigeria. Mediterranean journal of social sciences, 3(11), pp. 489-489, doi: 10.5901/mjss. 2012.v3n11p489.
[6] Alves T. M. G. and Casado L. J. A. (2019). Building maintenance management activities in a public institution. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(1), pp. 85–103, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-01-2018-0024.
[7] Andile, S., Kahilu, K. S. and Opawole, A. (2018). Critical factors in municipal building maintenance in developing countries: a case of Buffalo City metropolitan municipality, South Africa. in 12th Built Environment Conference, pp. 430–439.
[8] Ardil, E., Ucar, E. and Sandhu, P. S., 2009. Software maintenance severity prediction with soft computing approach. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 3(2), pp. 253-258.
[9] Arditi, D. and Nawakorawit, M. (1999). Designing buildings for maintenance: designers' perspective. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 5(4), pp. 107-116.
[10] Arnaiz Irigaray, A., Gilabert, E., Jantunen, E. and Adgar, A. (2009). Ubiquitous computing for dynamic condition‐based maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 15(2), pp. 151-166.
[11] Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H. and Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. MIT Sloan Management Review.
[12] Buys, F., Cumberlege, R. and Crafford, G. (2009). Comparative analysis of the performance of tertiary institutions in managing its assets. in COBRA 2009 - Construction and Building Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, pp. 658–671.
[13] Chanter, B and Swallow, P (2007). Building Maintenance Management Title: Building Maintenance Management,” J. Build. Apprais., doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jba.2950079.
[14] Chohan, A. H., Che-Ani, A. R., Memon, Z., Tahir, M. M., Abdullah, G. K. N. and Ishak, H. N. (2011). Evaluation of user satisfaction towards construction faults in medium-cost housing of under-developing metropolis. American Journal of Scientific Research, 13(1), pp. 6-17.
[15] Dabara, D. I., Adegoke, O. J., Ankeli, I. A. and Akinjogbin, I. O. (2014). Government Policies and Household Mobility Behaviour in Nigeria: The Case of Osun State Property Development Corporation (Ospdc) (No. afres2014_121). African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
[16] Ferreira, F., M., C. (2017). Model for building maintenance management in public universities: the case of Minas Gerais IFES. Thesis (Doctorate in Civil Engineering) - School of Mines, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto.
[17] Gulua, E. (2019). European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Management of Process and Infrastructure in Higher Education Institution,” journals.euser.org.
[18] Gressler, F., Seleme, R., De Assis Silva, W. and Marques, A. M. M. (2020). Diagnóstico do grau de maturidade do sistema de gestão orientado para a manutenção 4.0. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(3), pp. 14951-14978.
[19] Hassanain, A. M. (2008). On the performance evaluation of sustainable student housing facilities’, Journal of Facilities Management, 6(3), pp. 212–225.
[20] Iruonagbe, C. T., Imhonopi, D. and Egharevba, E. M. (2015). Higher education in Nigeria and the emergence of private universities. International journal of Education and Research, 3(2), pp. 49-64.
[21] Lee, H. H. Y. and Scott, D. (2009). Overview of maintenance strategy, acceptable maintenance standard and resources from a building maintenance operation perspective. Journal of Building Appraisal, 4(4), pp. 269–278, doi: 10.1057/jba.2008.46.
[22] Madumane, M. (2011). Investigating the challenges in school infrastructure delivery in the Eastern Cape Provincial Department of Education (Doctoral dissertation, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University).
[23] Musa, F. M. and Ahmad, Z. (2012). Higher education physical assets and facilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 50, pp. 472-478.
[24] Nik-Mat, N. E. M., Kamaruzzaman, S. N. and Pitt, M. (2011). Assessing the maintenance aspect of facilities management through a performance measurement system: A Malaysian case study. Procedia Engineering, 20, pp. 329-338.
[25] Odebiyi, A. I. and Aina, J. O. (1999). Alternative higher education in Nigeria and implication for university governance. Final Report. Accra: Association of African Universities (AAU).
[26] Odediran, J. S., Opatunji, A. O. and Eghenure, F. O. (2012). Maintenance of residential buildings: users' practices in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), pp. 261-265.
[27] Ofide, B., Jimoh, R. and Achuenu, E. (2015). Assessment of building maintenance management practices of higher education institutions in Niger state – Nigeria. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 15(2), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.22452/jdbe.vol15no2.4.
[28] Oladapo, A. A. (2004). A comparative evaluation of the building maintenance management of three tertiary educational institutions in Osun State. Journal of Property Research and Construction, 1, pp. 1-13.
[29] Omar, M. F., Ibrahim, F. A. and Omar, W. M. S. W. (2016). An assessment of the maintenance management effectiveness of public hospital building through key performance indicators. Sains Humanika, 8(4-2). doi: 10.11113/sh. v8n4-2.1059.
[30] Omar, M. F., Ibrahim, F. A. and Omar, W. M. S. W., (2017). Key performance indicators for maintenance management effectiveness of public hospital building. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 97, p. 01056). EDP Sciences, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20179701056.
[31] Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival manual. A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4.
[32] Quayson, H. J. and Akomah, B. B. (2016). Maintenance of residential buildings of selected public institutions in Ghana. African Journal of Applied Research, 2(1).
[33] Raposo, S., de Brito, J. and Fonseca, M. (2013). Planned preventive maintenance activities: Analysis of guidance documents. Durability of building materials and components, pp. 35-60.
[34] Saqib, M., Farooqui, R. U. and Lodi, H. S. (2008). Assessment of critical success factors for construction projects in Pakistan. First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC–I) “Advancing and Integrating Construction Education, Research & Practice”, pp. 392–404.
[35] Smyth, R. and Johnson, A. (2016). Factor Analysis, (July), pp. 189–205.
[36] Spector, P. (2015). Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. Aging, 7 (11), pp. 956–963. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
[37] Stern, L. (2010). A visual approach to SPSS for Windows: a guide to SPSS 17.0. wps.ablongman.com, pp. xii, 420 p.
[38] Straub, A. (2011). Maintenance contractors acting as service innovators. Constr. Innov., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 179–189, doi: 10.1108/14714171111124158.
[39] Talib, R., Ahmad, A. G., Zakaria, N. and Sulieman, M. Z. (2014). Assessment of factors affecting building maintenance and defects of public buildings in Penang, Malaysia. Architecture Research, 4(2), pp. 48-53.
[40] Ugwu, O. O., Okafor, C. C. and Nwoji, C. U. (2018). Assessment of building maintenance in Nigerian university system: a case study of University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 37(1), pp. 44-52.doi: 10.4314/njt. v37i1.6.
[41] Wahid, A. R. and Corner, J. (2009). Critical success factors and problems in ISO 9000 maintenance. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 26(9), pp. 881–893, doi: 10.1108/02656710910995073.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ayokunle, L., Aigbavboa, C., Ntebo, N., Aghimien, D., Adesominu, O. (2024). Measures to Improve the Maintenance of University Buildings in Nigeria. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ayokunle, L.; Aigbavboa, C.; Ntebo, N.; Aghimien, D.; Adesominu, O. Measures to Improve the Maintenance of University Buildings in Nigeria. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2024, 12(1), 10-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ayokunle L, Aigbavboa C, Ntebo N, Aghimien D, Adesominu O. Measures to Improve the Maintenance of University Buildings in Nigeria. Am J Civ Eng. 2024;12(1):10-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12,
      author = {Lesanmi Ayokunle and Clinton Aigbavboa and Ngcobo Ntebo and Douglas Aghimien and Olubusola Adesominu},
      title = {Measures to Improve the Maintenance of University Buildings in Nigeria},
      journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
      volume = {12},
      number = {1},
      pages = {10-16},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20241201.12},
      abstract = {Sustainable measures for effectively maintaining buildings have become essential to sustainable building development with the growing influx of building portfolios worldwide. This is so, considering building maintenance problems have become a global menace. It has been ascertained that improving building maintenance operations for sustainable considerations will benefit university facilities in terms of profitability, user well-being, and increased lifespan. Although studies abound on the maintenance of university buildings in Nigeria, its barriers, and the factors affecting it, very few studies have touched on the solutions to maintenance problems and the measures to improve the maintenance management of these buildings. Therefore, this paper presents the findings from assessing the measures to improve the maintenance of buildings in six selected higher education institutions in the country. The study embraced a quantitative approach, and data were gathered from maintenance managers, supervisors, and technicians working in the Works Departments of the selected public institutions. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as percentile and factor analysis. Findings revealed that human, materials resources, and policy improvement measures, computerized approach to management, assessment, and feedback mechanism measures, less sabotage and quick response measures, and improved funding, design, and construction measures are the most viable measures to improve building maintenance in these universities.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Measures to Improve the Maintenance of University Buildings in Nigeria
    AU  - Lesanmi Ayokunle
    AU  - Clinton Aigbavboa
    AU  - Ngcobo Ntebo
    AU  - Douglas Aghimien
    AU  - Olubusola Adesominu
    Y1  - 2024/01/18
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12
    T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    SP  - 10
    EP  - 16
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20241201.12
    AB  - Sustainable measures for effectively maintaining buildings have become essential to sustainable building development with the growing influx of building portfolios worldwide. This is so, considering building maintenance problems have become a global menace. It has been ascertained that improving building maintenance operations for sustainable considerations will benefit university facilities in terms of profitability, user well-being, and increased lifespan. Although studies abound on the maintenance of university buildings in Nigeria, its barriers, and the factors affecting it, very few studies have touched on the solutions to maintenance problems and the measures to improve the maintenance management of these buildings. Therefore, this paper presents the findings from assessing the measures to improve the maintenance of buildings in six selected higher education institutions in the country. The study embraced a quantitative approach, and data were gathered from maintenance managers, supervisors, and technicians working in the Works Departments of the selected public institutions. Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics such as percentile and factor analysis. Findings revealed that human, materials resources, and policy improvement measures, computerized approach to management, assessment, and feedback mechanism measures, less sabotage and quick response measures, and improved funding, design, and construction measures are the most viable measures to improve building maintenance in these universities.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

  • Sustainable Human Settlement and Construction Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

  • Department of Civil Engineering Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

  • School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Faculty of Arts, Design and Humanities, De Mont University, Leicester, United Kingdom

  • Department of Engineering, School of Science, Engineering and Technology, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, United States

  • Sections