| Peer-Reviewed

Host Preference of Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae) to Different Mango Cultivars in East Wollega and East Shewa Zones, Ethiopia

Received: 23 December 2022    Accepted: 13 June 2023    Published: 27 June 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Scale insects are serious pests of mango (Mangifera indica) in many mango-producing countries of the world, including Ethiopia. Among the many scale insects, the white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae), is a key insect pest of mango causing devastating losses. The current experiment was conducted to study the host preference of A. tubercularis to different mango cultivars grown at Raj Agro Industry Loko Mango Commercial Farm (RAILMCF) in the East Wollega and Melkasa Agricultural Research Center (MARC) mango orchards in the East Shewa zones. Nine mango cultivars were included in the study, viz. Kent, Tommy Atkins, Apple, Kiett, Dodo, Alphonso, Van Dyke, Sabre, and Local cultivars. Among the mango cultivars included in this study, Dodo and Alphonso were grown only at RAILMCF, whereas Van Dyke and Sabre cultivars were grown at MARC. The host preference of A. tubercularis was determined by counting A. tubercularis clusters (ATCs) formed on infested mango leaves over twelve consecutive months from January to December 2018. Four mango trees from each cultivar were randomly selected, and 12 mango leaves were collected at four cardinals from the upper, middle, and lower parts of the tree at monthly bases. The results of the study revealed that the peak maximum mean ATCs were recorded during the month of June on local cultivars at RAILMCF and MARC, with values of 50.97±4.62 and 49.22±5.13, respectively. The minimum mean average clusters of A. tubercularis aggregation were recorded on the Dodo cultivar (0.47±0.56) at RAILMCF and on the Apple cultivar (0.33±0.48) at MARC during the month of November. At both study sites, the mean annual minimum ATCs formation was recorded on Sabre (2.14±0.41) and Vandyke (2.29±0.33), followed by Dodo (4.26±0.63) and Apple (5.20±1.02), respectively. The variation in cluster formation of A. tubercularis on different mango cultivars and the sampling protocol presented here could be used as initial preliminary information for future research on developing resistant cultivars for integrated pest management methods of A. tubercularis.

Published in American Journal of Entomology (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14
Page(s) 70-82
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Aulacaspis tubercularis, Cultivars, Clusters, Host Preference Mangifera indica, Infestation

References
[1] Litz, R. E.,. 2009. The Mango: Botany, Production and Uses 2nd edition. CAB International.
[2] Pradeep Kumar, Ashok Kumar Misra and Dinesh Raj Modi. 2011. Current Status of Mango Production in India. Asian Network for Scientific Information; Asian Journal of Plantn Scienes, 10 (1): 1–23.
[3] Hernandez P. M. Delgado, Aranguren M., Reig C., Fernandez D. Galvan, Mesejo C., Martinez A. Fuentes, Galan V. Sauco, Agusti M. 2011. Phenological growth stages of mango (Mangifera indica L.) according to the BBCH scale; Science Direct; Elsevier. P. M. Hernandez Delgado et al./ ScientiaHorticulturae, 130: 536-540. www.elsevier.com/locate/ scihorti
[4] FAOSTAT. 2020. Mango area and production in 2018, FAO Statistics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. http://faostat.fao.org/Assessed, 06 April 2020.
[5] CSA. 2019. Agricultural Sample; The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency (CSA) Report on Area and Production of major crops; Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season 1: 1–58.
[6] UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2016. Mango: An INFOCOMM Commodity Profile; UNCTAD Trust Fund on Market Information on Agricultural Commodities; New York and Geneva. pp. 1−21.
[7] Takele Honja. 2014. Review of Mango Value Chain in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 4 (25): 230-239. http://www.iiste.org
[8] Yigzaw Dessalegna, Habtemariam Assefab, Teshome Dersoc, Mesfin Teferad. 2014. Mango Production Knowledge and Technological Gaps of Smallholder Farmers in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 10 (1): 28-39.
[9] Gizachew Girma, Gezahegn Garo and Seifu Fetena. 2016. Chemical Composition of Mango (Mangifera indica L) Fruit as Influence by Postharvest Treatments in Arba Minch, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT), 10 (11): 70-77. www.iosrjournals.org
[10] FAO. 2010. Technical guidelines on tropical fruit tree management in Ethiopia; Giuseppe De Bac Project GCP/ETH/073/ITA.
[11] Temesgen Fita. 2014. White Mango Scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis, Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae) Distribution and Severity Status in East and West Wollega Zones, Western Ethiopia; Department of Plant Sciences, Wollega University. Science, Technology and Arts Research (STAR) Journal, 3 (3): 1-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314%2Fstar.
[12] Bhagat KC. 2004. Mango mealy bug, Drosicha mangiferae (Green) (Margarodidae: Hemiptera) on Ashwagandha - a medicinal plant. Insect Environment, 10 (1): 14.
[13] Totan Das and Kaushik Chakraborty. 2018. Seasonal occurrence and record of alternative host plant of mango mealy bug, Drosicha mangiferae in relative to climatic parameters at Malda, West Bengal Totan Das and Dr. Kaushik Chakraborty. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 7 (9): 55-61.
[14] Edao AL, Kibert K, Mamo G. 2018. Analysis of Start, End and Length of the Growing Season and Number of Rainy Days in Semi-Arid Central Refit Valley of Oromia State, Ethiopia. Advances Crop Science and Technology, 6: 386. doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000386.
[15] Devi Thangam S., Abraham Verghese, Dinesh M. R., Vasugi C. and Kamala Jayanthi P. D. 2013. Germplasm evaluation of mango for preference of the mango hopper, Idioscopus nitidulus (Walker) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): The first step in understanding the host plant resistance. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems, 19 (1): 10–16.
[16] Ademir D. Neves, Ricardo F. Oliveira and Jose R. P. Parra. 2006. A new concept for insect damage evaluation based on plant physiological variables, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 78 (4): 821-835 www.scielo.br/aabc
[17] IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
[18] Little, T. M., and Hills, F. J. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation: Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 350 pp.
[19] Shivu Prasad, S. R., Reddy, Y. T. N., Upreti, K. K., and Rajeshwara, A. N. (2014). Studies on Changes in Carbohydrate Metabolism in Regular Bearing and “Off” Season Bearing Cultivars of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) During Flowering, International Journal of Fruit Science, 14, 4, 437–459. DOI: 10.1080/15538362.2014.897891.
[20] Luis A, Bello Perez, Francisco J. L., Garcia Suarez, Edith Agama- Acevedo. 2007. Mango Carbohydrates. Global Science Books. Center of Biotic Development of Biotic Products, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico, 1 (1): 36–40.
[21] Cavalcante I. H. L., dos Santos G. N. F, da Silva M. A, Martins R. d. S, Lima A. M. N, Modesto P. I R, Alcobia A. M, Silva T. R. de. S, Amariz R. A, Beckmann-Cavalcante M. Z. 2018. A new approach to induce mango shoot maturation in Brazilian semi-arid environment. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 91: 281–286. DOI: 10.5073/JABFQ.2018.091.036.
[22] Roeder Karl A. and Behmer Spencer T. 2014. Lifetime consequences of food protein-carbohydrate content for an insect herbivore. Functional Ecology, 28: 1135–1143. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12262.
[23] Urias-Lopez M. A., Osuna-Garcia J. A., Vazquez-Valdivia V., Perez-Barraza M. H. 2010. Population dynamics and distribution of the white mango scale (Aulacaspis tubercularis) Newstead in Nayarit, Mexico Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 16 (2): 77−82. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2010.16.009
[24] Otieno, M. M. O., 2021. A review of white mango scale (Aulacaspis tubercularis) Newstead (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Sub-Saharan Africa: distribution, impact and management strategies. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 34 (1): 227–238. DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2021/34.1.227.238
[25] Karar Haider, Arif Muhammad Jalal, Arshad Muhammad, Ali Amjad and Abbas Qaisar. 2015. Resistance/ susceptibility of different mango cultivars against mango mealybug (Drosicha mangiferae G.) Pakistan Journal Agricultural Science, 52 (2): 367–377 http://www.pakjas.com.pk
[26] Verghese, A., C. B. Soumya, S. Shivashankar, S. Manivannan and S. V. Krishnamurthy. 2012. Phenolics as chemical barriers to female fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) in mango. Current Science 103 (5): 563-566.
[27] Augustyn, W. A., W. du Plooy, B. M. Botha and E. van Wilp. 2013. Infestation of Mangifera indica by the mango gallfly, Procontarinia matteiana, (Kieffer and Cecconi) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae. African Entomology; 21 (1): 79-88.
[28] Karar, H., J. Arif, A. Hameed, A. Ali, M. Hussain, F. H. Shah and S. Ahmad. 2013. Effect of cardinal directions and weather factors on population dynamics of mango mealybug, Drosicha mangiferae (Green) (Margarodidae: Homoptera) on Chaunsa cultivar of mango. Pak. J. Zool. 45: 1541-1547.
[29] Skendzic, S., Zovko, M., Zivkovic, I. P., Lesic, V., Lemic, D. 2021. The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Insect Pests. Insects, 12 (440): 1-31. doi.org/10.3390/insects12050440
[30] Yadav JL, Singh SP, Kumar R. 2004. The population density of the mango mealy bug (Drosicha mangiferae G.) in mango. Progressive Agriculture, 4 (1): 35-37.
[31] Heong KL, Manza A, Catindig J, Villareal S, Jacobsen T. 2007. Changes in pesticide use and arthropod biodiversity in the IRRI research farm. Outlooks on Pest Management, 18: 229-233.
[32] Tanwar RK, Jeyakumar P, Monga D. 2007. Mealy bugs and their management. Technical Bulletin 19, National Centre for Integrated Pest Management. New Delhi, India, 12.
[33] Joubert, P. H.; Daneel, M. S.; Grove, T. and Pichakum, A. 2000a. Progress towards integrated pest management (IPM) on mangoes in South Africa. Acta Horticulturae No. 509: 811-817.
[34] Abo-Shanab, A. S. H. 2012. Suppression white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on mango trees in El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Science, 5 (3): 43-50.
[35] Shrestha, S. 2019. Effects of climate change in agricultural insect pest. Acta Scientific Agriculture, 3: 74-80.
[36] Sanad, M. E. 2017. Improving an integrated program for management scale insects and mealybugs on mango trees in Egypt. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University. 227 pp.
[37] Bakry Moustafa M. S. and Islam R. M. El-Zoghby. 2019. Effect of Climatic Weather Factors, Physical and Chemical Components of Mango Leaves on the Population Abundance of Aulacaspis tubercularis (New stead). International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 8 (1): 2319-1473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/27080013.2020.v1.i2a.12
[38] Hamdy, N. M. 2016. Some ecological aspects on mango white scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis and associated natural enemies infesting mango trees in Qalyubiya Governorate (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Diaspididae). Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, Mansoura University, 7 (6): 377-383.
[39] Nabil, H. A., Shahein, A. A., Hammad, K. A. A., and Hassan, A. S. 2012. Ecological studies of Aulacaspis tubercularis (Diaspididae: Hemiptera) and its natural enemies infesting mango trees in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Science, 5 (3): 9-17.
[40] Kawiz, F. A. 2009. Ecological studies on the mango scale insect, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homptera: Diaspididae) infesting mango trees under field conditions at Qualubia governorate. Egypt. Journal of Agricultural Research, 87 (1): 71-83.
[41] Marwa, E. S. Amer, Salem, M. A., Hanafy. M. E. H and Ahmed, N. 2017. Ecological Studies on Aulacaspis tubercularis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) and Its Associated Natural Enemies on Mango Trees at Qaliobiya Governorate, Egypt. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences A. Entomology, 10 (7): 81-89. DOI: 10.21608/EAJB.2017.1209.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Temesgen Fita, Emana Getu, Mulatu Wakgari, Kebede Woldetsadike. (2023). Host Preference of Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae) to Different Mango Cultivars in East Wollega and East Shewa Zones, Ethiopia. American Journal of Entomology, 7(2), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Temesgen Fita; Emana Getu; Mulatu Wakgari; Kebede Woldetsadike. Host Preference of Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae) to Different Mango Cultivars in East Wollega and East Shewa Zones, Ethiopia. Am. J. Entomol. 2023, 7(2), 70-82. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Temesgen Fita, Emana Getu, Mulatu Wakgari, Kebede Woldetsadike. Host Preference of Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae) to Different Mango Cultivars in East Wollega and East Shewa Zones, Ethiopia. Am J Entomol. 2023;7(2):70-82. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14,
      author = {Temesgen Fita and Emana Getu and Mulatu Wakgari and Kebede Woldetsadike},
      title = {Host Preference of Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae) to Different Mango Cultivars in East Wollega and East Shewa Zones, Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Entomology},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {70-82},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aje.20230702.14},
      abstract = {Scale insects are serious pests of mango (Mangifera indica) in many mango-producing countries of the world, including Ethiopia. Among the many scale insects, the white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae), is a key insect pest of mango causing devastating losses. The current experiment was conducted to study the host preference of A. tubercularis to different mango cultivars grown at Raj Agro Industry Loko Mango Commercial Farm (RAILMCF) in the East Wollega and Melkasa Agricultural Research Center (MARC) mango orchards in the East Shewa zones. Nine mango cultivars were included in the study, viz. Kent, Tommy Atkins, Apple, Kiett, Dodo, Alphonso, Van Dyke, Sabre, and Local cultivars. Among the mango cultivars included in this study, Dodo and Alphonso were grown only at RAILMCF, whereas Van Dyke and Sabre cultivars were grown at MARC. The host preference of A. tubercularis was determined by counting A. tubercularis clusters (ATCs) formed on infested mango leaves over twelve consecutive months from January to December 2018. Four mango trees from each cultivar were randomly selected, and 12 mango leaves were collected at four cardinals from the upper, middle, and lower parts of the tree at monthly bases. The results of the study revealed that the peak maximum mean ATCs were recorded during the month of June on local cultivars at RAILMCF and MARC, with values of 50.97±4.62 and 49.22±5.13, respectively. The minimum mean average clusters of A. tubercularis aggregation were recorded on the Dodo cultivar (0.47±0.56) at RAILMCF and on the Apple cultivar (0.33±0.48) at MARC during the month of November. At both study sites, the mean annual minimum ATCs formation was recorded on Sabre (2.14±0.41) and Vandyke (2.29±0.33), followed by Dodo (4.26±0.63) and Apple (5.20±1.02), respectively. The variation in cluster formation of A. tubercularis on different mango cultivars and the sampling protocol presented here could be used as initial preliminary information for future research on developing resistant cultivars for integrated pest management methods of A. tubercularis.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Host Preference of Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae) to Different Mango Cultivars in East Wollega and East Shewa Zones, Ethiopia
    AU  - Temesgen Fita
    AU  - Emana Getu
    AU  - Mulatu Wakgari
    AU  - Kebede Woldetsadike
    Y1  - 2023/06/27
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14
    T2  - American Journal of Entomology
    JF  - American Journal of Entomology
    JO  - American Journal of Entomology
    SP  - 70
    EP  - 82
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-0537
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20230702.14
    AB  - Scale insects are serious pests of mango (Mangifera indica) in many mango-producing countries of the world, including Ethiopia. Among the many scale insects, the white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Homoptera: Diaspididae), is a key insect pest of mango causing devastating losses. The current experiment was conducted to study the host preference of A. tubercularis to different mango cultivars grown at Raj Agro Industry Loko Mango Commercial Farm (RAILMCF) in the East Wollega and Melkasa Agricultural Research Center (MARC) mango orchards in the East Shewa zones. Nine mango cultivars were included in the study, viz. Kent, Tommy Atkins, Apple, Kiett, Dodo, Alphonso, Van Dyke, Sabre, and Local cultivars. Among the mango cultivars included in this study, Dodo and Alphonso were grown only at RAILMCF, whereas Van Dyke and Sabre cultivars were grown at MARC. The host preference of A. tubercularis was determined by counting A. tubercularis clusters (ATCs) formed on infested mango leaves over twelve consecutive months from January to December 2018. Four mango trees from each cultivar were randomly selected, and 12 mango leaves were collected at four cardinals from the upper, middle, and lower parts of the tree at monthly bases. The results of the study revealed that the peak maximum mean ATCs were recorded during the month of June on local cultivars at RAILMCF and MARC, with values of 50.97±4.62 and 49.22±5.13, respectively. The minimum mean average clusters of A. tubercularis aggregation were recorded on the Dodo cultivar (0.47±0.56) at RAILMCF and on the Apple cultivar (0.33±0.48) at MARC during the month of November. At both study sites, the mean annual minimum ATCs formation was recorded on Sabre (2.14±0.41) and Vandyke (2.29±0.33), followed by Dodo (4.26±0.63) and Apple (5.20±1.02), respectively. The variation in cluster formation of A. tubercularis on different mango cultivars and the sampling protocol presented here could be used as initial preliminary information for future research on developing resistant cultivars for integrated pest management methods of A. tubercularis.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • Department of Zoological Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • School of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • School of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • Sections