| Peer-Reviewed

Development of Human Indices to Determine Both Returning Point of Residents and Damage Restoration for Response Protocol After the Chemical Accident

Received: 18 March 2022    Accepted: 8 April 2022    Published: 29 July 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

There were about 600 cases of large and small chemical accidents from 2014 to 2020 throughout Korea. The number of chemical accident cases after enforcement of AREEC and CSCA was declined sharply to 113, 79, and 57 in 2015, 2017, and 2019 respectively, which was reduced almost half of the number from 2015. Even if, the number of chemical accident cases was dramatically decreased, a response protocol for returning point of chemical accidental area residents and damage restoration is urgently required. Therefore, human indices were developed to determine returning point of residents and damage restoration after the chemical accident. To determine the returning point of residents after the chemical accident, a new concept, the standard man model was introduced as a human index, in which both H-code and its acute effects were main idea. To evaluate the applicability, a hydrogen fluoride leakage accident in Gumi was applied. The returning point were suggested as the conservative remission period of acute effects among relevant hazard effects and compared with actual returning point. The coverage of each age group were considered with reflecting average daily dose expected for actual residents. In addition, a relief-index as a social-scientific approach was reflected as well to apply the damage restoration. Actual returning point of residents in Gumi was 88 days; and that of standard man model suggested was 84 days. The expected amount of exposure at aged 12 or under was at least 2.35 times greater than that of this model, 40s, theoretically. However, their population ratio was less than 1%, so 99% of residents could be applied when the standard man model was applied. The relief-index was as an objective and quantitative methodology to apply the qualitative aspect. Although evaluated as a relatively positive result, there was a limitation such as the number of accident applied to the verification of standard man model. The relief index was also considered, but further research should be carried out to find threshold level for the relief.

Published in American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11
Page(s) 129-138
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chemical Accident, Returning Point of Residents, Standard Man Model, Remission Period, Acute Effect

References
[1] Energydaily [Internet]. c2020. Reduced chemical accidents after the implementation of the ‘ACT ON REGISTRATION, EVALUATION, ETC OF CHEMICALS’ and the ‘CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT; 2020 June 22 [cited 2020 October 19]. Available from: https://www.energydaily.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=109297.
[2] National Institute of Chemical Safety [Internet]. c2020. Chemical accident status and cases; 2020 April 6 [cited 2020 October 5]. Available from: https://icis.me.go.kr/search/searchType2.do?menuNo=2020000&upperMenuNo=2000000&link=/search/searchType2.do&searchWord=#none
[3] Hube Global Co., Ltd. Hydrogen Fluoride Leakage Accident 3rd Stage Resident Health Impact Survey. National Institute of Environmental Research; 2014.
[4] National Law Information Center [Internet]. c2009. REGULATIONS ON CLASSIFICATION, LABEL LING, ETC. OF CHEMICALS (Article 11 (Hazard or Danger Statements)); 2009 January 5 [cited 2020 August 19]. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/admRulLsInfoP.do?chrClsCd=&admRulSeq=2100000191770
[5] GOV.KR 24 [Internet]. c2017. The 8th Korean Standard Disease Classification (KCD-8) revision and announcement; 2017 July 26 [cited 2020 September 29]. Available from: https://www.gov.kr/portal/ntnadmNews/2198351
[6] Korean exposure factors handbook. National Institute of Environmental Research; 2019.
[7] Korean exposure factors handbook for children. National Institute of Environmental Research; 2019.
[8] Sungkyunkwan University SSK Risk Communication Research Center [Internet]. c2014. Relief Level Report on the Risk of New Infectious Diseases; 2014 October 14 [cited 2020 September 29]. Available from: https://shb.skku.edu/riskcomm/menu4/sub4_3.jsp?mode=view&article_no=101371&board_wrapper=%2Friskcomm%2Fmenu4%2Fsub4_3.jsp&pager.offset=0&board_no=1096
[9] FAIRVIEW [Internet]. c2000. Bronchospasm (Adult); 2000 [cited 2020 June 10] Available form: https://www.fairview.org/patient-education/115807EN
[10] Gozales R. CDC [Internet]. c2001. Nonspecific Upper Respiratory Tract Infection; 2001 [cited 2020 August 19] Available from: https://www.primarycare.tips/uploads/3/0/3/7/3037726/antibiotic20use20in20adults20respiratory20get20smart20cdc20academic20detail1.pdf
[11] Parsons JP, Hallstrand TS, Mastronarde JG, Kaminsky DA, Rundell KW, Hull JH, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical CareMedicine. 2013; 187 (9): 1016-1027.
[12] Mcphee J, Papadakis A, Rabow W. CURRENT Medical Diagnosis and Treatment, 52th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013.
[13] Shah T, NMS Medicine Casebook. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
[14] Andreoli TE, Benjamin IJ, Griggs RC, Wing EJ. Andreoli and Carpenter’s Cecil Essentials of Medicine, 8th ed. New York: Elsevier; 2010.
[15] AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN [Internet].c2000 Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Bronchitis; 2000 December 1 [cited 2020 October 13]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2010/1201/p1345.html.
[16] Tintinalli JE, et al. Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.
[17] Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls R. Rosen’s Emergency Medicine: concepts and clinicalpractice, 7thed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2010.
[18] Ropper AH, Bron RH. Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology, 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
[19] Healthline [Internet]. c2005. How Many Days Does It Take to Recover from a Sore Throat?; 2018 October 23 [cited 2020 October 19]. Available from: https://www.healthline.com/health/how-long-does-asore-throat-last
[20] Family Practice Notebook [Internet]. c1995. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 2020 October 13 [cited 2020 October 19]. Available from: https://fpnotebook.com/Lung/Failure/ActRsprtryDstrsSyndrm.htm
[21] Seoul national university hospital [Internet]. c2010. Medical encyclopedia; 2010 [cited 2020 October 19]. Available from: http://www.snuh.org/health/encyclo/view/12/2/2.do
[22] Braunwald E, Isselbacher KJ, Petersdorf RG, et al. Harrison’s Manual of Medicine, 17th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
[23] World Health Organization (WHO). Manual for the Public Health Management of Chemical Incidents. 2009.
[24] SGIS Statistical geographic information service [Internet]. c2015. 2020 Population and housing census; 2015 [cited 2020 September 5]. Available from: https://sgis.kostat.go.kr/jsp/pyramid/pyramid1.jsp
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Jun Yong Yang, Jeong Moo Heo, Hyun Seok Lee, Jun Sang Lee, Yong Sung Cho, et al. (2022). Development of Human Indices to Determine Both Returning Point of Residents and Damage Restoration for Response Protocol After the Chemical Accident. American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 6(3), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Jun Yong Yang; Jeong Moo Heo; Hyun Seok Lee; Jun Sang Lee; Yong Sung Cho, et al. Development of Human Indices to Determine Both Returning Point of Residents and Damage Restoration for Response Protocol After the Chemical Accident. Am. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2022, 6(3), 129-138. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Jun Yong Yang, Jeong Moo Heo, Hyun Seok Lee, Jun Sang Lee, Yong Sung Cho, et al. Development of Human Indices to Determine Both Returning Point of Residents and Damage Restoration for Response Protocol After the Chemical Accident. Am J Environ Sci Eng. 2022;6(3):129-138. doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11,
      author = {Jun Yong Yang and Jeong Moo Heo and Hyun Seok Lee and Jun Sang Lee and Yong Sung Cho and Ho Hyun Kim and Sang Hee Park},
      title = {Development of Human Indices to Determine Both Returning Point of Residents and Damage Restoration for Response Protocol After the Chemical Accident},
      journal = {American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {129-138},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajese.20220603.11},
      abstract = {There were about 600 cases of large and small chemical accidents from 2014 to 2020 throughout Korea. The number of chemical accident cases after enforcement of AREEC and CSCA was declined sharply to 113, 79, and 57 in 2015, 2017, and 2019 respectively, which was reduced almost half of the number from 2015. Even if, the number of chemical accident cases was dramatically decreased, a response protocol for returning point of chemical accidental area residents and damage restoration is urgently required. Therefore, human indices were developed to determine returning point of residents and damage restoration after the chemical accident. To determine the returning point of residents after the chemical accident, a new concept, the standard man model was introduced as a human index, in which both H-code and its acute effects were main idea. To evaluate the applicability, a hydrogen fluoride leakage accident in Gumi was applied. The returning point were suggested as the conservative remission period of acute effects among relevant hazard effects and compared with actual returning point. The coverage of each age group were considered with reflecting average daily dose expected for actual residents. In addition, a relief-index as a social-scientific approach was reflected as well to apply the damage restoration. Actual returning point of residents in Gumi was 88 days; and that of standard man model suggested was 84 days. The expected amount of exposure at aged 12 or under was at least 2.35 times greater than that of this model, 40s, theoretically. However, their population ratio was less than 1%, so 99% of residents could be applied when the standard man model was applied. The relief-index was as an objective and quantitative methodology to apply the qualitative aspect. Although evaluated as a relatively positive result, there was a limitation such as the number of accident applied to the verification of standard man model. The relief index was also considered, but further research should be carried out to find threshold level for the relief.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Development of Human Indices to Determine Both Returning Point of Residents and Damage Restoration for Response Protocol After the Chemical Accident
    AU  - Jun Yong Yang
    AU  - Jeong Moo Heo
    AU  - Hyun Seok Lee
    AU  - Jun Sang Lee
    AU  - Yong Sung Cho
    AU  - Ho Hyun Kim
    AU  - Sang Hee Park
    Y1  - 2022/07/29
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11
    T2  - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering
    SP  - 129
    EP  - 138
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-7993
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajese.20220603.11
    AB  - There were about 600 cases of large and small chemical accidents from 2014 to 2020 throughout Korea. The number of chemical accident cases after enforcement of AREEC and CSCA was declined sharply to 113, 79, and 57 in 2015, 2017, and 2019 respectively, which was reduced almost half of the number from 2015. Even if, the number of chemical accident cases was dramatically decreased, a response protocol for returning point of chemical accidental area residents and damage restoration is urgently required. Therefore, human indices were developed to determine returning point of residents and damage restoration after the chemical accident. To determine the returning point of residents after the chemical accident, a new concept, the standard man model was introduced as a human index, in which both H-code and its acute effects were main idea. To evaluate the applicability, a hydrogen fluoride leakage accident in Gumi was applied. The returning point were suggested as the conservative remission period of acute effects among relevant hazard effects and compared with actual returning point. The coverage of each age group were considered with reflecting average daily dose expected for actual residents. In addition, a relief-index as a social-scientific approach was reflected as well to apply the damage restoration. Actual returning point of residents in Gumi was 88 days; and that of standard man model suggested was 84 days. The expected amount of exposure at aged 12 or under was at least 2.35 times greater than that of this model, 40s, theoretically. However, their population ratio was less than 1%, so 99% of residents could be applied when the standard man model was applied. The relief-index was as an objective and quantitative methodology to apply the qualitative aspect. Although evaluated as a relatively positive result, there was a limitation such as the number of accident applied to the verification of standard man model. The relief index was also considered, but further research should be carried out to find threshold level for the relief.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Chemtopia Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea

  • Chemtopia Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea

  • Chemtopia Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea

  • Chemtopia Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea

  • Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Nano Environment Engineering/Biological Engineering, SeoKyeong University, Seoul, Korea

  • Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Nano Environment Engineering/Biological Engineering, SeoKyeong University, Seoul, Korea

  • Chemtopia Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea

  • Sections