| Peer-Reviewed

Ethnographic Inquiry at the Library: Analyzing Relations to Understand the Barriers to Public Reading

Received: 16 November 2020    Accepted: 1 December 2020    Published: 25 January 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A number of sociological inquiries over the last twenty years have demonstrated the pertinence and usefulness of an ethnographic approach to studying the relationship between library users and professionals, between the users and the “objects” on offer at the library, and between people and the spaces created for them. the interactions observed in libraries show the social ties of class and gender which, reinforced by the effects of age and generational differences, drive social segmentation from within the library. despite the sequence of reforms that have changed the mission of french libraries since the 1980s, there remains a vast section of the french population that never steps foot in a library, even if one is located close to home or where they work or study. since physical inaccessibility is not the problem, what is? During a round table at the conference of the Association of French Librarians (ABF) in June 2017, the issue of the social inequalities that are created and amplified by the relationship between library staff and publics and between books and publics was identified as one of libraries’ greatest challenges. librarians now admit that the “library apparatus” produces inequalities. it is an “apparatus” in the foucauldian sense, simultaneously a discourse, site and tool of power that aims to define, discipline and order knowledge; its structural characteristics themselves can deter the entrance of people unaccustomed to places of culture and thus favor their self-exclusion: imposing architecture, austere layout, minimalist decoration, coded displays and signs, majority female staff, and professional jargon are so many dimensions of a space that remains autoreferential and closed off. akin to schools in their link to written texts and established knowledge, libraries are socially-marked sites, expressions of separate territoriality within a neighborhood, city, or even a university campus. by proclaiming in every way and direction the absolute dominion of the written word, the library erects a silent but powerful boundary between those who master this realm of the word – absorbed as an aesthetic education more than it is learnt at school – and use it in their work, their free time, their culture, curiosity and emancipation, and those who dwell outside of the lettered, de facto socially-dominated world.

Published in American Journal of Information Science and Technology (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11
Page(s) 1-11
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Libraries, Class and Gender Inequalities, Literacy and Symbolic Barriers

References
[1] ABF-GIF-BPI (Association des Bibliothécaires de France- Groupe Ile-de-France-Bibliothèque Publique d’Information) (1998, second ed. 2006) Bibliothécaires en Ile-de-France: autoportrait d’un groupe professionnel. Les cahiers du GIF. CNFPT/Direction des Affaires Culturelles d’Ile-de-France, Paris, TdD33_Bibliothecaires en prospective_2006.pdf.
[2] Barrère, A. (1997) Les lycéens au travail. Tâches objectives, épreuves subjectives, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
[3] Baudelot, C., Cartier, M., Détrez, C. (1999) Et pourtant ils lisent…, Le Seuil, Paris.
[4] Bertrand A-M. (1999) Les bibliothèques, La Découverte, Paris.
[5] Bertrand A.-M. et al. (2001) Les bibliothèques municipales et leurs publics: pratiques ordinaires de la culture, BPI/Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris.
[6] Bourdieu, P. (1979) La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement, Minuit, Paris.
[7] Coulangeon, P. (2005) Sociologie des pratiques culturelles, La Découverte, Paris.
[8] De Rosa, C. (2006) College students' perceptions of libraries and information resources: a report to the OCLC membership, OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Dublin, Ohio. Print. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/pdfs/studentperceptions.pdf.
[9] De Singly, F. (1991) L’engagement dans la lecture chez les collégiens: inégal et fragile. In (eds) Privat, J.-M. & Reuter, Y.: Lectures et médiations culturelles, Presses Universitaires de Lyon, Villeurbanne, 99-113.
[10] Détrez, C. (2003) Rapports à la lecture, adolescence et «genre». In (eds) Donnat, O. & Tolila, P.: Le (s) public (s) de la culture, 2 volumes (the 2nd on CD-ROM), Presses de Science Po, Paris, 119-127.
[11] Donnat, O. (2005) Féminisation des pratiques culturelles. Développement culturel, Bulletin du Département des Etudes, de la prospective et des Satistiques du Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, 147: 2005, https://www.cairn.info/femmes-genre-et-societes--9782707144126-page-423.htm#.
[12] Dubet, F. & Martuccelli, D. (1996) A l’école. Sociologie de l’expérience scolaire, Seuil, Paris.
[13] Duru-bellat, M. (1995) Filles et garçons à l’école, approches sociologiques et psycho-sociales. Revue française de Pédagogie, 2nd part: La construction scolaire des différences entre les sexes, 110: 75-109.
[14] Forlani, S. (2010) Femmes, pouvoir et bibliothèques: l’accès aux hautes fonctions dans les bibliothèques françaises, mémoire d’étude de conservateur de bibliothèque (dir. Bertrand, A.-M.), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Sciences de l’Information et des Bibliothèques (ENSSIB), Villeurbanne. Print, https://www.enssib.fr/bibliotheque-numerique/documents/48195-femmes-pouvoir-et-bibliotheques.pdf.
[15] Given, L. M. & Leckie, G. J. (2003) Sweeping the Library: Mapping the Social Activity Space of the Public Library. Library and Information Science Research, 25: 365-385, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sweeping-the-library%3A-Mapping-the-social-activity-1-Given-Leckie/5b5a25dd9716507e7456e962412a9556a5a2d30b.
[16] Goblot, E. (1925, last ed. 2010) La barrière et le niveau (étude sociologique sur la bourgeoisie française), Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
[17] Goulet V. (2017) Les bibliothécaires sont-ils vecteurs d’inégalités?. Médiapart.fr, June 23, www.ugr.es/~alozano/Translations/SweepingtheLibrary.pdf.
[18] Hedjerassi, N. (2003), La fréquentation par la bande. In (eds) Martine Burgos et al.: Des jeunes et des bibliothèques. Trois études sur la fréquentation juvénile, BPI/Centre Pompidou, Paris, 21-78.
[19] Horellou-Lafarge, C. & Segré, M. (2007) Sociologie de la lecture, La Découverte, Paris.
[20] Jiao, Q. J. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1997) Antecedents on library anxiety. Library Quarterly, 67/4: 372-389, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/629972.
[21] Lahire, B. (2001) Héritages sexués: incorporation des habitudes et des croyances. In (ed) Blöss, T.: La dialectique hommes-femmes, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 9-21.
[22] Lahire, B. (2004) La culture des individus. Dissonances culturelles et distinction de soi, La Découverte, Paris.
[23] Leclaire, C. (2010) S’asseoir, braconner, se courber: le vocabulaire des corps à la médiathèque. Bulletin des bibliothèques de France (BBF), 55/ 6: 59-64, https://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2010-06-0059-001 ISSN 1292-8399.
[24] McCurdy, D. W., Spradley J. P. & Shandy D. J. (2005) The Cultural Experience: Ethnography in Complex Society, Long Grove (IL): Waveland Press (second edition).
[25] Maresca, B., Evans C. & Gaudet F. (2007) Les bibliothèques municipales en France après le tournant Internet. Attractivité, fréquentation et devenir. Enquête DLL-CREDOC (Direction du Livre et de la Lecture et Centre de Recherche pour l’Etude et l’Observation des Conditions de Vie), BPI/Centre Pompidou, Paris.
[26] Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (2016) Publics et usages des bibliothèques municipales en 2016, Direction Générale des Médias et des Industries culturelles, TMO Grandes Enquêtes, Paris, https://www.culture.gouv.fr/Sites-thematiques/Livre-et-lecture/Actualites/Enquete-sur-les-Publics-et-les-usages-des-bibliotheques-municipales-en-2016.
[27] Observatoire CNFPT (2001) Enquête démographique sur les personnels des bibliothèques, Ministère de la Culture & Ministère de l’Education Nationale, Paris, www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/dll/enquete/demographie.pdf.
[28] Octobre, S. (2004) Les loisirs culturels des 6-14 ans, La Documentation Française, Paris.
[29] Octobre, S., Détrez, C., Mercklé, P. (2011) L’enfance des loisirs. Trajectoires communes et parcours individuels de la fin de l’enfance à la grande adolescence. La Documentation française, Paris.
[30] Pasquier, D. (2003) Des audiences aux publics: le rôle de la sociabilité dans les pratiques culturelles. In (eds) Donnat, O. & Tolila, P.: Le (s) public (s) de la culture, 2 volumes (the 2nd on CD-ROM), Presses de Science Po, Paris: 109-117.
[31] Passeron, J.-C. (1991) Figures et contestations de la culture. Légitimité et relativisme culturel and Le polymorphisme culturel de la lecture. In (ed) Passeron, J.-C.: Le raisonnement sociologique. L’espace non-poppérien du raisonnement naturel, Nathan, Paris: 291-314 and 335-345.
[32] Paugam S. & Giorgetti C. (2013) Des pauvres à la bibliothèque. Enquête au Centre Pompidou, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
[33] Payne, L. A. (1998) Public Library Support for Groups and Users. In (ed) Whitesides, W. L.: Reinvention of the Public Library for the 21st Century, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, 83-94.
[34] Pedler E. & Zerbib O. (2001) Les nouvelles technologies à l’épreuve des bibliothèques. BPI/Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris.
[35] Petite S. & Le Douarin L. (2008) La diversité des usages et des étudiants au sein de la Médiathèque Jean Lévy à Lille. Bibliothèque (s), 40: 66-68, http://www.enssib.fr/bibliotheque-numerique/document-59513#page=68.
[36] Poissenot, J.-C. (1997) Les adolescents et la bibliothèque. Fidélité et désertion. BPI/Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris.
[37] Repaire V. & Touitou C. (2010) Les 11-18 ans et les bibliothèques municipales. BPI/Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris.
[38] Robine N. (1984) Les jeunes travailleurs et la lecture. La Documentation Française, Paris.
[39] Robine N. (1991). Relais et barrières: la perception de l’aménagement de l’espace et des classifications par les usagers dans les lieux de prêt ou de vente du livre, In (eds) Privat, J.-M. & Reuter, Y.: Lectures et médiations culturelles. Presses Universitaires de Lyon, Villeurbanne, 115-125.
[40] Roselli, M. (2003) La bibliothèque dans les quartiers défavorisés. Un espace de requalification individuelle. Bulletin des bibliothèques de France (BBF), 6: 74-80, https://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2003-06-0074-001 ISSN 1292-8399.
[41] Roselli, M. (2006) Usagers et usages devant une offre de lecture publique libre: parcours d’acculturation et formes d’appropriation lettrées. Sociétés contemporaines, 4/64: 135-151, https://doi.org/10.3917/soco.064.0135
[42] Roselli, M. & Perrenoud, M. (2010) Du lecteur à l’usager. Enquête ethnographique en bibliothèque universitaire, Presses Universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse.
[43] Roselli, M. (2010) Chemins de rencontre et de mise en commun de savoirs en milieu étudiant. Etude de quatre figures de passeurs. Pensée plurielle, 24/2: 63-78, https://doi.org/10.3917/pp.024.0063.
[44] Roselli, M. (2011) Les enquêtes qualitatives en bibliothèque: quelles techniques pour quels résultats?. In (ed.) Evans, C. Mener l’enquête. Guide pratique des études des publics en bibliothèques. Presses de l’ENSSIB, Villeurbanne, 80-92.
[45] Roselli, M. (2011) La bibliothèque, un monde de femmes. Déterminations et conséquences sur la segmentation des publics jeunes dans les bibliothèques. Réseaux, 29/168-169: 133-164, https://doi.org/10.3917/res.168.0133.
[46] Roselli, M. (2014) Cultures juvéniles et bibliothèques publiques: lier récréation et espace culturel. Agora, 66/1: 61-75, https://doi.org/10.3917/agora.066.0061.
[47] Roselli, M. & Coladant D. (2014) Le livre, l’ordinateur et le fauteuil. Etude des pauvres à la médiathèque José Cabanis (Toulouse), final report to the Chief of Public Library Service of Toulouse.
[48] Roselli, M. (2016) La bibliothèque dans les quartiers populaires. Mondes sociaux, http://sms.hypotheses.org/8718.
[49] Roselli, M. (2016) La construction sociale de la figure de lectrice et de sa contre-figure masculine. Revue de Recherches en Littératie Médiatique Multimodale, 4. Published following the 2016 ANR Translit/International Conference Pratiques et parcours trans-littéraciques, ESPE of the Académie de Rouen, https://doi.org/10.7202/1046990ar.
[50] Roselli, M. (2019) Se retirer pour lire. La place de la solitude élective et les négociations avec la trame sociale. Sociologie et Sociétés, L/1: 67 90.
[51] Roselli M. (2019) La relazione di servizio pubblico in biblioteca: la dimensione sociale della mediazione, AIB Studi. Rivista delle biblioteche e dell’edizione italiana, 59/1 2: 9 29.
[52] Saijad, U. J., Mumtaz A. A. & Nosheen F. W. (2018) The relationship between emotional intelligence, library anxiety, and academic achievement among the university students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52/11: 237–248, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618790629.
[53] Siblot, Y., Cartier, M., Coutant, I. & Renehy, N. (2015) Sociologie des classes populaires, Armand Colin, Paris.
[54] Spradley, J. P. (1980) Participant Observation, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
[55] Zotian, E. (2006) Modes d’usage et d’appropriation. L’exemple des enfants de Belsunce à la Bibliothèque d’Alcazar. Bulletin des bibliothèques de France (BBF), 6: 68-74, https://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/bbf-2006-06-0068-013 ISSN 1292-8399.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mariangela Roselli. (2021). Ethnographic Inquiry at the Library: Analyzing Relations to Understand the Barriers to Public Reading. American Journal of Information Science and Technology, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mariangela Roselli. Ethnographic Inquiry at the Library: Analyzing Relations to Understand the Barriers to Public Reading. Am. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2021, 5(1), 1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mariangela Roselli. Ethnographic Inquiry at the Library: Analyzing Relations to Understand the Barriers to Public Reading. Am J Inf Sci Technol. 2021;5(1):1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11,
      author = {Mariangela Roselli},
      title = {Ethnographic Inquiry at the Library: Analyzing Relations to Understand the Barriers to Public Reading},
      journal = {American Journal of Information Science and Technology},
      volume = {5},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-11},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajist.20210501.11},
      abstract = {A number of sociological inquiries over the last twenty years have demonstrated the pertinence and usefulness of an ethnographic approach to studying the relationship between library users and professionals, between the users and the “objects” on offer at the library, and between people and the spaces created for them. the interactions observed in libraries show the social ties of class and gender which, reinforced by the effects of age and generational differences, drive social segmentation from within the library. despite the sequence of reforms that have changed the mission of french libraries since the 1980s, there remains a vast section of the french population that never steps foot in a library, even if one is located close to home or where they work or study. since physical inaccessibility is not the problem, what is? During a round table at the conference of the Association of French Librarians (ABF) in June 2017, the issue of the social inequalities that are created and amplified by the relationship between library staff and publics and between books and publics was identified as one of libraries’ greatest challenges. librarians now admit that the “library apparatus” produces inequalities. it is an “apparatus” in the foucauldian sense, simultaneously a discourse, site and tool of power that aims to define, discipline and order knowledge; its structural characteristics themselves can deter the entrance of people unaccustomed to places of culture and thus favor their self-exclusion: imposing architecture, austere layout, minimalist decoration, coded displays and signs, majority female staff, and professional jargon are so many dimensions of a space that remains autoreferential and closed off. akin to schools in their link to written texts and established knowledge, libraries are socially-marked sites, expressions of separate territoriality within a neighborhood, city, or even a university campus. by proclaiming in every way and direction the absolute dominion of the written word, the library erects a silent but powerful boundary between those who master this realm of the word – absorbed as an aesthetic education more than it is learnt at school – and use it in their work, their free time, their culture, curiosity and emancipation, and those who dwell outside of the lettered, de facto socially-dominated world.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Ethnographic Inquiry at the Library: Analyzing Relations to Understand the Barriers to Public Reading
    AU  - Mariangela Roselli
    Y1  - 2021/01/25
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11
    T2  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
    JF  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
    JO  - American Journal of Information Science and Technology
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 11
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-0588
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20210501.11
    AB  - A number of sociological inquiries over the last twenty years have demonstrated the pertinence and usefulness of an ethnographic approach to studying the relationship between library users and professionals, between the users and the “objects” on offer at the library, and between people and the spaces created for them. the interactions observed in libraries show the social ties of class and gender which, reinforced by the effects of age and generational differences, drive social segmentation from within the library. despite the sequence of reforms that have changed the mission of french libraries since the 1980s, there remains a vast section of the french population that never steps foot in a library, even if one is located close to home or where they work or study. since physical inaccessibility is not the problem, what is? During a round table at the conference of the Association of French Librarians (ABF) in June 2017, the issue of the social inequalities that are created and amplified by the relationship between library staff and publics and between books and publics was identified as one of libraries’ greatest challenges. librarians now admit that the “library apparatus” produces inequalities. it is an “apparatus” in the foucauldian sense, simultaneously a discourse, site and tool of power that aims to define, discipline and order knowledge; its structural characteristics themselves can deter the entrance of people unaccustomed to places of culture and thus favor their self-exclusion: imposing architecture, austere layout, minimalist decoration, coded displays and signs, majority female staff, and professional jargon are so many dimensions of a space that remains autoreferential and closed off. akin to schools in their link to written texts and established knowledge, libraries are socially-marked sites, expressions of separate territoriality within a neighborhood, city, or even a university campus. by proclaiming in every way and direction the absolute dominion of the written word, the library erects a silent but powerful boundary between those who master this realm of the word – absorbed as an aesthetic education more than it is learnt at school – and use it in their work, their free time, their culture, curiosity and emancipation, and those who dwell outside of the lettered, de facto socially-dominated world.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Sociology, University of Toulouse 2-Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France

  • Sections