| Peer-Reviewed

Influence of Core Compressibility, Flexibility and Transverse Shear Effects on the Response of Sandwich Structures

Received: 15 October 2016    Accepted: 6 December 2016    Published: 21 January 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This paper examines the adequacy of first order shear deformation theory (FSDT) based layered shell finite element by comparing with 2D and 3D models without imposing any constraint on the deformation behaviour of core. The effect of core compressibility and transverse flexibility in the behaviour of sandwich beams are studied. Plane and 3D models are able to capture the higher order shear stress variation across the thickness of core, whereas classical models and layered models results in constant shear stress across the thickness of the core. Results of the finite element models indicate the necessity of shear correction factor for rigid core considering shear strain energy criteria or average shear strain criteria, whereas for soft core, the shear correction factor is unity (=1).

Published in American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14
Page(s) 81-91
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Sandwich Structures, Honeycomb Core, Skin, Finite Element Method, Zigzag Theory

References
[1] Plantema FJ. Sandwich Construction - The Bending and Buckling of Sandwich Beams, Plates and Shells, Wiley: 1966.
[2] Allen HG. Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels, Pergamon Press, Oxford: 1969.
[3] Zenkert D. The Handbook of Sandwich Construction, EMAS Publishing, West Midlands: 1997.
[4] Vinson JR. Sandwich Structures, Applied Mechanics Review 2001, 54: 201-214.
[5] Chalak HD, Chakrabarti A, Iqbal MA, Sheikh AH. An improved C0 FE model for the analysis of laminated sandwich plate with softcore, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2012; 56: 20–31.
[6] Bekuita JJRB, Oguamanama DCD, Damisab O. A quasi-2D finite element formulation for the analysis of sandwich beams, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2007; 43: 1099-1107.
[7] Etemadi E, Khatibi AA, Takaffoli M. 3D finite element simulation of sandwich panels with a functionally graded core subjected to low velocity impact, Composite Structures 2009; 89: 28–34.
[8] Schwarts-Givli H, Rabinovitch O, Frostig Y. Free vibrations of delaminated unidirectional sandwich panels with a transversely flexible core a modified Galerkin approach, Journal of Sound and Vibration 2007; 301: 253-277.
[9] Oskooei S, Hansen JS. Higher-order finite element for sandwich plates, AIAA Journal 2000; 38: 525-533.
[10] Cook RD, Malkus RS, Plesha ME. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York: 1989.
[11] Matthews FL. Overview and review of composite material - Finite Element Modelling of Composite Material and Structures, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge England: 2000.
[12] Noor AK, Burton WS, Bert CW. Computational models for sandwich panels and shells, Applied Mechanics Review 1996; 49: 155-199.
[13] Carrera E, Brischetto S. A survey with numerical assessment of classical and refined theories for the analysis of sandwich plates, Applied Mechanics Reviews 2009; 62: 010803-1-17.
[14] Rikards R. Finite element analysis of vibration and damping of laminated composites, Composite and Structures 1993; 24: 193-204.
[15] Pandya BN, Kant T. Higher-order shear deformable theories for flexure of sandwich plates-finite element evaluations, International Journal of Solids Structures 1988; 24: 1267-1286.
[16] Kant T, Manjunath BS. Refined theories for composite and sandwich beam with C0 finite elements, Computers and Structures 1989; 33: 753-764.
[17] Liu S. Vibration analysis of composite laminated plates, Finite Element Analysis and Design 1991; 9: 295-307.
[18] Kapuria S, Kulkarni SD. An improved discrete Kirchhoff element based on third order zigzag theory for static analysis of composite and sandwich plates, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007; 69: 1948–1981.
[19] Singh SK, Chakrabarti A, Bera P, Sony JSD. An efficient C0 FE model for the analysis of composites and sandwich laminates with general layup, Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 2011; 8: 197- 212.
[20] Noor AK, Burton WS. Assessment of shear deformation theories for multilayered composite plates, Applied Mechanics Review 1989; 42: 1–13.
[21] Noor AK, Burton WS. Assessment of computational models for multilayered composite shells, Applied Mechanics Review 1990; 43: 67-97.
[22] Leger CA, Chan WS. Analysis of interlaminar stresses in symmetric and unsymmetric laminates under various loadings, AIAA Paper No.93-1517 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-1511).
[23] Tanov R, Tabiei A. Adding transverse normal stresses to layered shell finite elements for the analysis of composite structures, Composite Structures 2006; 76: 338-344.
[24] Pandit MK, Sheikh AH, Singh BN. An improved higher order zigzag theory for the static analysis of laminated sandwich plate with soft core, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2008; 44: 602-610.
[25] Pagano NJ. Exact solution of rectangular bi-directional composites and sandwich plates, Journal of Composite Materials 1970; 4: 20-34.
[26] Hua H, Belouettar S, Potier-Ferry M, Makradi A. A novel finite element for global and local buckling analysis of sandwich beams, Composite Structures 2009; 90: 270–278.
[27] Rothschild Y, Echtermeyer AT, Arnesen A. Modelling of the non-linear material behaviour of cellular sandwich foam core, Composites 1994; 25: 111-118.
[28] Shiying Z, Yao J. Exact solution of sandwich beams, Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition) 1995; 16: 539-548.
[29] Kim J, Swanson SR. Design of sandwich structures for concentrated loading, Composite Structures 2001; 52: 365-373.
[30] Chamis CC, Aiello RA, Murthy PLN. Composite sandwich thermo-structural behavior: computational simulation, Proc. 27th Structural Dynamics and Material Conference 1986; San Antonio TX: Technical Papers, Part 1: 370-381.
[31] Chamis CC, Aiello RA, Murthy PLN. Fiber composite sandwich thermo-structural behavior: computational simulation, Composites Tech Res 1988; 10[3]: 93-99.
[32] Elspass W, Flemming M. Analysis of precision sandwich structures under thermal loading, ICAS Proceedings 17th Congress of the lnt Council Aeronaut Sci (ICAS-90-4.8.1) 1990; Stockholm, Sweden: 2: 1513-1518.
[33] Pradeep KR, Rajagopal SV. Response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel under differential heating environment, ICTACEM 2004, IIT Kharagpur: 2004.
[34] Pradeep KR, Rao BN, Srinivasan SM, Balasubramaniam K. Study on finite element modeling aspects of delaminated honeycomb sandwich beams, Proceedings International Conference on Composites for 21st Century: Current & Future Trends ICC: CFT-2011; Bangalore: 548-556.
[35] Xu XF, Qiao P. Homogenized elastic properties of honeycomb sandwich with skin effect, International Journal of Solids and Structures 2002; 39: 2153-2188.
[36] Ashby MF, Gibson LJ. Cellular solids: structure and properties, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, New York: 1997.
[37] Kardomateasa GA, Simitsesa GJ, Shenb L, Lia R. Buckling of sandwich wide columns, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 2002; 37: 1239-1247.
[38] Ramtekkar GS, Desai YM, Shah AH. Application of a three-dimensional mixed finite element model to the flexure of sandwich plate, Computers and Structures 2003; 81: 2183-2198.
[39] Rezaeifard M, Salami SJ, Dehkordi MB, Sadighi M.,A nonlinear model for studying a sandwich panel with thin composite faces and elastic-plastic core, Thin walled Structures 2016; 107:,119-137.
[40] Khandelwal RP, Chakrabarti A, Bhargava P. Accurate calculation of transverse shear stresses for soft-core sandwich laminates, Acta Mechanica 2014; 225 [10]: 2877–2891.
[41] Riks E, Rankin CC. Sandwich modeling with an application to the residual strength analysis of a damaged compression panel, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 2002; 37: 897-908.
[42] Burlayenko VN, Sadowski T. Finite element nonlinear dynamic analysis of sandwich plates with partially detached face-sheet and core, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2012; 62: 49-64.
[43] Perel VY, Palazotto AN. Dynamic geometrically nonlinear analysis of transversely compressible sandwich plates, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 2003; 38: 337-356.
[44] Damanpack AR, Khalili SMR. High-order free vibration analysis of sandwich beams with a flexible core using dynamic stiffness method, Composite Structures 2012; 94: 1503-1514.
[45] Pradeep KR, Nageswara Rao B, Srinivasan SM, Balasubramaniam K. Vibration Based Damage Evaluation in Honeycomb Sandwich Beams using Validated Finite Element Models, Proceedings of the International Conference on Theoretical, Applied, Computational and Experimental Mechanics (ICTACEM-2010), IIT Kharagpur, India: 2010; Paper No.0306: 751-753.
[46] Pradeep KR, Nageswara Rao B, Sivakumar SM, Balasubramanium K. Interface fracture assessment on sandwich DCB specimens, Journal of Reinforced Plastics & Composites 2010; 29: 1963-1976.
[47] Pradeep KR, Nageswara Rao B, Sivakumar SM, Balasubramanium K. Interface fracture assessment on honeycomb sandwich composite DCB specimens, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2012; 93: 108-118.
[48] Pradeep KR, Srinivasan SM, Nageswara Rao B, Balasubramaniam K. Study on finite element modeling aspects of delaminated honeycomb sandwich beams, International Journal of Vehicle Structures & Systems 2012; 4 [3]: 117-121.
[49] Pradeep KR. Modelling, deflection and fracture assessment of debonds in sandwich structures, Ph. D. Thesis, Solid Mechanics Division, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras: 2013.
[50] Pradeep KR, Nageswara Rao B, Srinivasan SM, Balasubramaniam K. Modal strain energy change ratio for damage identification in honeycomb sandwich structures, Canadian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 2014; 2 [1]: 9-24.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Koovapparambil Ramunny Pradeep, Boggarappu Nageswara Rao, Sivakumar Madras Srinivasan, Krishnan Balasubramaniam, Sirajudeen Ahamed. (2017). Influence of Core Compressibility, Flexibility and Transverse Shear Effects on the Response of Sandwich Structures. American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 2(2), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Koovapparambil Ramunny Pradeep; Boggarappu Nageswara Rao; Sivakumar Madras Srinivasan; Krishnan Balasubramaniam; Sirajudeen Ahamed. Influence of Core Compressibility, Flexibility and Transverse Shear Effects on the Response of Sandwich Structures. Am. J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2017, 2(2), 81-91. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Koovapparambil Ramunny Pradeep, Boggarappu Nageswara Rao, Sivakumar Madras Srinivasan, Krishnan Balasubramaniam, Sirajudeen Ahamed. Influence of Core Compressibility, Flexibility and Transverse Shear Effects on the Response of Sandwich Structures. Am J Mech Ind Eng. 2017;2(2):81-91. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14,
      author = {Koovapparambil Ramunny Pradeep and Boggarappu Nageswara Rao and Sivakumar Madras Srinivasan and Krishnan Balasubramaniam and Sirajudeen Ahamed},
      title = {Influence of Core Compressibility, Flexibility and Transverse Shear Effects on the Response of Sandwich Structures},
      journal = {American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering},
      volume = {2},
      number = {2},
      pages = {81-91},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmie.20170202.14},
      abstract = {This paper examines the adequacy of first order shear deformation theory (FSDT) based layered shell finite element by comparing with 2D and 3D models without imposing any constraint on the deformation behaviour of core. The effect of core compressibility and transverse flexibility in the behaviour of sandwich beams are studied. Plane and 3D models are able to capture the higher order shear stress variation across the thickness of core, whereas classical models and layered models results in constant shear stress across the thickness of the core. Results of the finite element models indicate the necessity of shear correction factor for rigid core considering shear strain energy criteria or average shear strain criteria, whereas for soft core, the shear correction factor is unity (=1).},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Influence of Core Compressibility, Flexibility and Transverse Shear Effects on the Response of Sandwich Structures
    AU  - Koovapparambil Ramunny Pradeep
    AU  - Boggarappu Nageswara Rao
    AU  - Sivakumar Madras Srinivasan
    AU  - Krishnan Balasubramaniam
    AU  - Sirajudeen Ahamed
    Y1  - 2017/01/21
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14
    T2  - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
    SP  - 81
    EP  - 91
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-6060
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170202.14
    AB  - This paper examines the adequacy of first order shear deformation theory (FSDT) based layered shell finite element by comparing with 2D and 3D models without imposing any constraint on the deformation behaviour of core. The effect of core compressibility and transverse flexibility in the behaviour of sandwich beams are studied. Plane and 3D models are able to capture the higher order shear stress variation across the thickness of core, whereas classical models and layered models results in constant shear stress across the thickness of the core. Results of the finite element models indicate the necessity of shear correction factor for rigid core considering shear strain energy criteria or average shear strain criteria, whereas for soft core, the shear correction factor is unity (=1).
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Operational Launch Vehicle Team, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum, India

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah University, Green Fields, Vaddeswaram, Guntur, India

  • Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

  • Structural Design and Engineering Group, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Trivandrum, India

  • Sections