| Peer-Reviewed

Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Under Drought Stress Conditions

Received: 11 July 2022    Accepted: 9 August 2022    Published: 24 August 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Seed yield is complex traits considered as ultimate product of it components, hence the knowledge of interrelationship between contributing characters and seed yield is pre-requisite to plan meaningful crop improvement program. A total of 64 bread wheat genotypes were planted at Werer Agricultural Research Center during 2019/20 to assess genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients and their direct and indirect effects on grain yield. Under optimum condition biomass yield, harvest index, fertile tiller plant-1 and spike length showed positive and highly significant correlation with grain yield at genotypic and phenotypic level. Under stress condition biomass yield, harvest index, fertile tiller plant-1, number of spikelets spike-1 and spike length showed positive and highly significant correlation with grain yield at genotypic and phenotypic level. This positive correlation could be resulted from the presence of common genetic elements that controls the characters to the same direction. Under optimum condition, biomass yield (0.864) followed by harvest index (0.627) exerted the highest positive direct effect on grain yield at genotypic level. At phenotypic level biomass yield (0.819) followed by harvest index (0.626) exerted strong positive direct effect on grain yield. Under stress condition biomass yield (0.784) and harvest index (0.405) exerted highest positive direct effect on grain yield. Biomass yield (0.765) exerted positive and highest direct effect on grain yield, whereas harvest index (0.214) exerted moderate positive direct effect on grain yield at phenotypic level under stress condition. The result indicates any genetic improvement on those traits could improve grain yield.

Published in American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11
Page(s) 120-126
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Bread Wheat, Correlation, Path Coefficient, Stress

References
[1] Abate GT, Bernard T, Brauw AD, Minot N (2018). The impact of the use of new technologies on farmers’ wheat yield in Ethiopia: evidence from a randomized control trial. Journal of Agriculture and Economics, 49: 409–421.
[2] Abd-Allah HT, Rabie HA, Mansour E, Swelam AA (2018). Genetic variation and interrelationships among agronomic traits in bread wheat genotypes under water deficit and normal irrigation conditions. Zagazig Journal Agricultural Research, 45 (4): 1209-1229.
[3] Abderrahmane H, Abidine F, Hamenna B (2013). Correlation, path analysis and stepwise regression in durum wheat (Triticum durumDesf) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability, 3 (2): 122–131.
[4] Adhiena Mesele, Wassu Mohammed and Tadesse Dessalegn (2016). Estimation of heritability and genetic advance of yield and yield related traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes at Ofla district, Northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 10 (1): 31-37.
[5] Ahmadizadeh M, Shahbazi H, Valizadeh M, Zaefizadeh M (2011). Genetic diversity of durum wheat landraces using multivariate analysis under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (10): 2294-2302.
[6] Akililu Nigussie, Adem Kedir, Abiy Adisu, Getinet Belay, Desta Gebrie Kidane Desalegn (2015). Bread wheat production in small scale irrigation user’s agro-pastoral households in Ethiopia: case of Afar and Oromia regional state. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 7 (4): 123-130.
[7] Akpinar BA, Lucas SJ, Budak H (2013). Genomics approaches for crop improvement against abiotic stress. The Scientific World Journal, doi: 10.1155/2013/361921.
[8] Alemu Dabi, Firew Mekbib, Tadesse Desalegn (2016). Estimation of genetic and phenotypic correlation coefficients and path analysis of yield and yield contributing traits of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 1 (4): 145-154.
[9] Arya S, Mishra DK, Bornare SS (2013). Screening genetic variability in advance lines for drought tolerance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). International Journal of Quarterly Life Sciences, 8 (4): 1193-1196.
[10] Ashebir Baye, Baye Berihun, Muluken Bantayehu, Bitwoded Derebe (2020) Genotypic and phenotypic correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield-related traits in advanced bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 6 (1): 1752603.
[11] Athar H, Bhutto Asghar A, Rajpar SH, Ali K, Amjad A (2016) Correlation and regression analysis for yield traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Journal of Natural Sciences, 8 (3): 96-104.
[12] Bahar B, Yildirim M, Yucel C (2011). Heat and drought resistance criteria in spring bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Morpho-physiological parameters for heat tolerance. Scientific Research and Essays, 6 (10): 2212-2220.
[13] Baranwal DK, Mishra VK, Vishwakarma MK, Yadav PS, Arun B (2012). Studies on genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield contributing traits in wheat (Triticum. aestivum L.). Plant Archives, 12 (1): 99-104.
[14] Birhanu Mecha, Sentayehu Alamerew, Alemayehu Assefa, Ermias Assefa and Dargicho Dutamo (2017). Correlation and path coefficient studies of yield and yield associated traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Advances in Plants and Agriculture Research, 6 (5): 00226.
[15] CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2020). Report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season). Agricultural sample survey 2018/2019 central statistics agency: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[16] Dawit Tsegaye, Tadesse Dessalegn, Yigzaw Dessalegn and Getnet Share (2012). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in durum wheat germplasm (Triticum durum Desf). Agricultural Research and Reviews, 1 (4): 107-112.
[17] Foud HM (2018). Correlation, path and regression analysis in some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under normal irrigation and drought condition. Egypt Journal of Agronomy, 40 (2): 133-144.
[18] Girma Degife (2018). Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis of agro-morphological traits among bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes at Raya valley of Southern Tigray, Ethiopia, MSc Thesis Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[19] IBPGR (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources) (1985). Wheat descriptors. Commission of European community: Committee on disease resistance breeding and use of gene bank, Rome, Italy.
[20] Khabiri E, Imani AA, Shahbazi H (2012). Studying the grain yield and yield components in advanced rain fed wheat genotypes. Annals of Biological Research, 3 (12): 5647-5650.
[21] Khan N, Naqvi FN (2011). Heritability of morphological traits in bread wheat advanced lines under irrigated and non-Irrigated conditions. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3 (3): 215-222.
[22] Kumar AV, Singh J, Kumar L, Kumar R., Kumar P, Chand P (2017). Genetic variability and diversity analysis for yield and its components in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Journal Agricultural Research, 51 (2): 128-134.
[23] Lenka D, Mishra B (1973). Path coefficient analysis of yield in rice varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 43: 376-379.
[24] Morketa Gudeta (2017). Genetic variability and association of traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties at Gitilo Dale, Western Ethiopia. Msc Thesis Postgraduate Program Directorate, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[25] Obsa Chimdesa (2014). Genetic variability among bread wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) genotypes for growth characters, yield and yield components in Bore District, Oromia Regional State. MSc Thesis Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[26] SAS (Statistical Analysis System) (2008). SAS Institute Version 9.2 Inc. Cary, NC., USA.
[27] Singh KA, Singh SK, Garg HS, Kumar R, Choudhary R (2014). Assessment of relationships and variability of morpho-physiological characters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress and irrigated Conditions. The Bioscan, 9 (2): 473-484.
[28] Singh RK, Chaundhary BD (1977). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani publishers, New Delhi, p 304.
[29] Subhani GM, Chowdhry MA (2000). Correlation and path coefficient analysis in bread wheat under drought stress and normal conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3 (1): 72-77.
[30] Talebi R (2011). Evaluation of chlorophyll content and canopy temperature as indicator for drought tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5 (11): 1457-1462.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tamiru Olbana Milkessa. (2022). Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Under Drought Stress Conditions. American Journal of Plant Biology, 7(3), 120-126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tamiru Olbana Milkessa. Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Under Drought Stress Conditions. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2022, 7(3), 120-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tamiru Olbana Milkessa. Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Under Drought Stress Conditions. Am J Plant Biol. 2022;7(3):120-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11,
      author = {Tamiru Olbana Milkessa},
      title = {Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Under Drought Stress Conditions},
      journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
      volume = {7},
      number = {3},
      pages = {120-126},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20220703.11},
      abstract = {Seed yield is complex traits considered as ultimate product of it components, hence the knowledge of interrelationship between contributing characters and seed yield is pre-requisite to plan meaningful crop improvement program. A total of 64 bread wheat genotypes were planted at Werer Agricultural Research Center during 2019/20 to assess genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients and their direct and indirect effects on grain yield. Under optimum condition biomass yield, harvest index, fertile tiller plant-1 and spike length showed positive and highly significant correlation with grain yield at genotypic and phenotypic level. Under stress condition biomass yield, harvest index, fertile tiller plant-1, number of spikelets spike-1 and spike length showed positive and highly significant correlation with grain yield at genotypic and phenotypic level. This positive correlation could be resulted from the presence of common genetic elements that controls the characters to the same direction. Under optimum condition, biomass yield (0.864) followed by harvest index (0.627) exerted the highest positive direct effect on grain yield at genotypic level. At phenotypic level biomass yield (0.819) followed by harvest index (0.626) exerted strong positive direct effect on grain yield. Under stress condition biomass yield (0.784) and harvest index (0.405) exerted highest positive direct effect on grain yield. Biomass yield (0.765) exerted positive and highest direct effect on grain yield, whereas harvest index (0.214) exerted moderate positive direct effect on grain yield at phenotypic level under stress condition. The result indicates any genetic improvement on those traits could improve grain yield.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis of Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes Under Drought Stress Conditions
    AU  - Tamiru Olbana Milkessa
    Y1  - 2022/08/24
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11
    T2  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JF  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JO  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    SP  - 120
    EP  - 126
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8337
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220703.11
    AB  - Seed yield is complex traits considered as ultimate product of it components, hence the knowledge of interrelationship between contributing characters and seed yield is pre-requisite to plan meaningful crop improvement program. A total of 64 bread wheat genotypes were planted at Werer Agricultural Research Center during 2019/20 to assess genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients and their direct and indirect effects on grain yield. Under optimum condition biomass yield, harvest index, fertile tiller plant-1 and spike length showed positive and highly significant correlation with grain yield at genotypic and phenotypic level. Under stress condition biomass yield, harvest index, fertile tiller plant-1, number of spikelets spike-1 and spike length showed positive and highly significant correlation with grain yield at genotypic and phenotypic level. This positive correlation could be resulted from the presence of common genetic elements that controls the characters to the same direction. Under optimum condition, biomass yield (0.864) followed by harvest index (0.627) exerted the highest positive direct effect on grain yield at genotypic level. At phenotypic level biomass yield (0.819) followed by harvest index (0.626) exerted strong positive direct effect on grain yield. Under stress condition biomass yield (0.784) and harvest index (0.405) exerted highest positive direct effect on grain yield. Biomass yield (0.765) exerted positive and highest direct effect on grain yield, whereas harvest index (0.214) exerted moderate positive direct effect on grain yield at phenotypic level under stress condition. The result indicates any genetic improvement on those traits could improve grain yield.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Werer Agricultural Research Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sections