Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat

Asha Ahmed; Taye Tolemariam; Ashebir Worku

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat

Asha Ahmed^*, Taye Tolemariam, Ashebir Worku

Published in American Journal of Zoology (Volume 6, Issue 4)

Received: 5 November 2023 Accepted: 30 November 2023 Published: 18 December 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Twenty-five intact yearling goats, were randomly assigned to a complete randomized block design (CRBD) with five treatments and five replications. The aim was to assess the impact of different levels of poultry litter (PL) on feed intake, digestibility, growth performance, and economic return of Arsi Bale goats. Different levels of poultry litter were supplemented in various treatment groups i.e T1- 38.5 % Noug Seed Cake (NSC) + 60.5 % Wheat Bran (WB) + 1% Salt) being control group, T2 (31.6% NSC + 57.4%WB + 10% PL + 1% Salt), T3 (24.8% NSC + 54.3%WB + 20% PL + 1% Salt), T4 (17.9% NSC + 51.1%WB + 30% PL + 1% Salt) and T5 (11.5% NSC + 47.5%WB + 40% PL + 1% Salt). The trial lasted for 90 days, and there were seven days of digestibility testing. There was no significant difference in initial body weight (IBW) and final body weight (FBW) among the treatments, but a significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in the total body weight gain (TWG) and average daily weight gain (AGD). Goats supplemented with the highest level of poultry litter (T5) gained more weight (P<0.05) than the other groups. The results indicate that supplementing with 40% PL is more effective in increasing weight gain and is economically feasible compared to the other treatments and the control group. No significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in dry matter intake (DMI), organic matter intake (OMI), and crude protein intake (CPI) with increased levels of supplementation. Digestibility did not differ significantly among the treatments. The feed conversion ratio was 6.33, 8.00, 8.18, 11.77, and 11.29 g/gm gain for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Therefore, poultry litter can substitute up to 40% as source of protein for NSC and/or WB without affecting the nutrients utilization but with improved growth performance of goats. Further levels of inclusion of PL and the necessary physical or chemical treatments are recommended to assess more profitable return and possible impact on carcass quality.

Published in	American Journal of Zoology (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12
Page(s)	72-83
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Arsi Bale Goats, Body Weight, Feed Intake, Digestibility, Poultry Litter

References

[1]	Tarekegn, Getinet Mekuriaw., and P. Wouobeng, Jaures, Kouam Simo., Mrode, Raphael., Edea, Zewdu., Liu, Bin., Zhang, Wenguang., Mwai, Okeyo Ally., Dessie, Tadelle and Tesfaye, Kassahun., "Genome-wide diversity and demographic dynamics of Cameroon goats and their divergence from east African, north African, and Asian conspecifics," PloS one, vol. 14, no. 4, p. e0214843, 2019.
[2]	A. A. Fantahun T, Abegaz S, "Characterization of goat production systems and trait preferences of goat keepers in Bench Maji zone, south western Ethiopia," African J Agric Res, vol. 11, pp. 2768–2774, 2016.
[3]	FAOSTAT, "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database," FAO, Ed., ed. Rome, Italy, 2020.
[4]	M. o. A. MoA "Performance assessment report on the growth and transformation agenda in the spheres of agriculture," 2012.
[5]	FAO, "Crops and livestock products," 2021.
[6]	M. Chander, "Chaff cutters and fodder chaffing: A simple technology worth adoption. In H.P.S. Makker, ed.," 2011.
[7]	A. K. Samanta, K. K. Singh, M. M. Das, and M. S. B. a. K. S. S., "Effect of complete feed block on nutrient utilisation and rumen fermentation in Barbari goats.," Small Ruminant Research., vol. 48, pp. 95-102, 2003.
[8]	T. Adugna, "Feed resources for producing export quality meat and livestock in Ethiopia (Examples from selected Weredasin Oromia and SNNPS) regional states," 2007.
[9]	ATARC, "Adami Tulu Agricultural research center 2022 anual report on Research achivement and challengs.," ATARC, Batu 2022.
[10]	D. Jackson, B. Rude, K. Karanja, and N. C. Whitley, "Utilization of poultry litter pellets in meat goat diets," Small Ruminant Research, vol. 66, no. 1-3, pp. 278-281, 2006.
[11]	L. Jeremiah and L. Gibson, "The effect of dietary poultry litter supplementation on beef chemical, cooking, and palatability properties and consumer acceptance," Food research international, vol. 36, no. 9-10, pp. 943-948, 2003.
[12]	Ghaly AE and M. KN, "Drying of poultry manure for use as animal feed," American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences vol. 7, pp. 239-254, 2012.
[13]	N. S. Bolan, A. Szogi, T. Chuasavathi, B. Seshadri, M. Rothrock, and P. Panneerselvam, "Uses and management of poultry litter," World's Poultry Science Journal, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 673-698, 2010.
[14]	D. T. Mavimbela, "The nutritional value of broiler litter as a feed source for sheep during periods of feed shortage," University of Pretoria, 2006.
[15]	Van Ryssen J., "Poultry litter as a feedstuff for ruminants: A South African scene." South African Animal Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 1-8, 2001.
[16]	A. Snow and A. E. Ghaly, "The nutritive value of wastewater grown barley and its utilization in fish feed," American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2007.
[17]	NRC, "Nutrient requirements of ruminants." Washington, DC. Nwaigwe, C. O., Nwankpa, C. A., National Academy Press, 1998.
[18]	K. Gülten, F. Rad, and M. Kindir, "Growth performance and feed conversion efficiency of siberian sturgeon juveniles (Acipenserbaeri) reared in concentrate ways," Turkey Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, vol. 24, pp. 435-442, 2000.
[19]	AOAC, Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Inc. 1990.
[20]	P. Van Soest and J. Robertson, "A laboratory manual for animal science," Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA, 1985.
[21]	S. K. Ehui and B. Rey, "Partial budget analysis for on-station and on-farm small ruminant production systems research: Method and data requirements," 1992.
[22]	Van Ryssen J. B. J., "Poultry litter as a feed ingredient for ruminants: the South African situation.," South African Society of Animal Science 2000.
[23]	K. Olson and J. Daniel, "Feeding poultry litter to beef cattle (2005)," 2005.
[24]	P. McDonald, R. A. Edward, J. F. D. Greenhalgh and C. A. Morgan., "Animal nutrition." New York: Long man Scientific and Technical, Copuplished in the U.S.A with J. Wiley and Sons Inc., 2002, pp. Pages.
[25]	S. Melaku, K. J. Peters, and A. Tegegne, "Effects of supplementation with foliages of selected multipurpose trees, their mixtures or wheat bran on feed intake, plasma enzyme activities, live weight and scrotal circumference gains in Menz sheep," Livestock production science, vol. 89, no. 2-3, pp. 253-264, 2004.
[26]	H. Tesfay, "Supplementation of Afar rams with graded levels of mixtures of protein and energy sources: effects on feed intake, digestibility, live weight and carcass parameters," An MSc Thesis presented to School of Graduated Studies Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia. 24p, 2007.
[27]	M. Fitwi and G. Tadesse, "Effect of sesame cake supplementation on feed intake, body weight gain, feed conversion efficiency and carcass parameters in the ration of sheep fed on wheat bran and teff (Eragrostis teff) straw," Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89-106, 2013.
[28]	A. G. Tsadik, B. Tamir, and S. Melaku, "Inclusion of different proportions of poultry litter in the rations of yearling Hararghe Highland goats," Livestock Research for Rural Development, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 9, 2008.
[29]	Deshck A., Abo-Shehada M., Allonby E., and Givens D. I. & Hill R., "Assesment of the nutritive value for ruminants of poultry litter," Anim. Feed Sci. Tech, vol. 73, pp. 29-35, 1998.
[30]	A. L. Goetsch and G. E. Aiken, "Broiler litter in ruminant diets – Implications for use as a low-cost byproduct feedstuff for goats.," in The opportunities and challenges of enhancing goat production in east Africa., G. A. a. A. L. G. R. C. Merkel, Ed. UK: E (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston,, 2000.
[31]	M. Yousuf et al., "Growth performance characteristics of goats fed varied levels of poultry manure in whole cassava plant based concentrate diet," Asian journal of agriculture and rural development, vol. 3, no. 393-2016-23857, pp. 823-828, 2013.
[32]	C. Nwaigwe, C. Nwankpa, and C. Nwaigwe, "The effects of sawdust/poultry litter and Brachiaria ruziziensis silages on the performance of West Africa dwarf goats," Asian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 581-587, 2011.
[33]	M. Bakshi and J. Fontenot, "Processing and nutritive evaluation of broiler litter as livestock feed," Animal feed science and technology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 337-345, 1998.
[34]	A. E. Cullison, McCampbella H. C., A. C. Cunningham, R. S. W. lowrey, M. H. C., B. D. and, and D. H. Sherwood, "Use of poultry manures in steer finishing rations," J. Anim. Sci, 42: 219., vol. 42, p. 219, 1976.
[35]	A. Bhattacharya and J. Taylor, "Recycling animal waste as a feedstuff: A review," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1438-1457, 1975.
[36]	M. Hadjipanayotou, "Voluntary in take of citrus pulp-poultry litter silage by grading female Friesian calves, chios lambs and Damascus kids.," Agric. Res. Inst, Nicosia, Cyprus, vol. 155, p. 6, 1993.
[37]	T. Negesse, "Digestibility of poultry litter and its influence on the performance of beef cattle," M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya College of Agriculture, Addis Ababa University,, Ethiopia., 1984.
[38]	G. Berhanu, "Performance of Somali Goats supplemented with different proportions of groundnut cake and wheat bran," An MSc thesis presented to the school of graduate studies of Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya. 85p, 1998.
[39]	T. Ayalew, "The performance of Black head Ogaden sheep fed poultry litter and Monensin.," M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya College of Agriculture, Addis Ababa University Ethiopia. p, 1983.
[40]	R. Greer, R. Whitman, and R. Woodward, "Estimation of probability of beef cows being culled and calculation of expected herd life," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 10-19, 1980.
[41]	S. Abdul, S. Yashim, and G. Jokthan, "Effects of supplementing sorghum stover with poultry litter on performance of Wadara cattle," American-Eurasian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16-18, 2008.
[42]	B. Obeidat et al., "Effects of feeding broiler litter on performance of Awassi lambs fed finishing diets," Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 165, no. 1-2, pp. 15-22, 2011.
[43]	A. Ghaly and K. MacDonald, "Drying of poultry manure for use as animal feed," American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 239-254, 2012.
[44]	A. Azizi, A. Sharifi, A. Azarfar, A. Kiani, and A. Jolazadeh, "Performance and ruminal parameters of fattening Moghani lambs fed recycled poultry bedding," Animal Nutrition, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145-150, 2017.
[45]	G. Animut, R. Merkel, G. Abebe, T. Sahlu, and A. Goetsch, "Effects of level of broiler litter in diets containing wheat straw on performance of Alpine doelings," Small Ruminant Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 125-133, 2002.
[46]	M. Alam, M. Khan, M. Akbar, and M. Kamruzzaman, "Broiler litter and layer manure in the diet of growing bull calves," Bangladesh Veterinarian, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 62-67, 2008.
[47]	A. Nurfeta, "Feed intake, digestibility, nitrogen utilization, and body weight change of sheep consuming wheat straw supplemented with local agricultural and agro-industrial by-products," Tropical animal health and production, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 815-824, 2010.
[48]	S. Chaudhry and Z. Naseer, "Processing and nutritional value of broiler litter as a feed for buffalo steers," J. Anim. Plant Sci, vol. 22, no. Suppl 3, pp. 358-364, 2012.
[49]	O. Owen, A. Amakiri, E. Ngodigha, and E. Chukuigwe, "The biologic and economic effect of introducing poultry waste in rabbit diets," International Journal of Poultry Science, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1036-1038, 2008.
[50]	N. Esenbuga et al., "Effect of breed on fattening performance, slaughter and meat quality characteristics of Awassi and Morkaraman lambs," Livestock Science, vol. 123, no. 2-3, pp. 255-260, 2009.
[51]	K. Knowlton, V. Wilkerson, D. Casper, and D. Mertens, "Manure nutrient excretion by Jersey and Holstein cows," Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 407-412, 2010.
[52]	M. Elemam, A. Fadelelseed, and A. Salih, "Growth performance, digestibility, N-balance and rumen fermentation of lambs fed different levels of deep-stack broiler litter," Res. J. Anim. Vet. Sci, vol. 4, pp. 9-16, 2009.
[53]	N. H. Talib and F. A. Ahmed, "Digestibility, degradability and dry matter intake of deep-stacked poultry litter by sheep and goats," Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1474-1479, 2008.
[54]	P. Tinnimit, Y. Yu, K. McGuffey, and J. Thomas, "Dried animal waste as a protein supplement for sheep," Journal of Animal Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 431-435, 1972.
[55]	M. E. Ensminger and C. G. Olentine, "Feeds and nutrition, complete," 1978.
[56]	A. Bello and D. Tsado, "Feed intake and nutrient digestibility of growing Yankasa rams fed sorghum stover supplemented with graded levels of dried poultry droppings based diet," Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 56-63, 2013.
[57]	H. S. Abdel–Mohsein and M. A. Mahmoud, "Risk of heavy metals from using broiler litter as an alternative animal feedstuff or organic fertilizer," Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 84-94, 2015.
[58]	P. McDonald, Animal nutrition. Pearson Education India, 2002.
[59]	M. Nadeem, A. Ali, A. Azim, and A. Khan, "Effects of feeding broiler litter on growth and nutrient utilization by Barbari goat," Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 73-77, 1993.
[60]	T. Yosef, U. Mengistu, A. Solomon, Y. Mohammed, and K. Kefelegn, "Camel and cattle population dynamics and livelihood diversification as a response to climate change in pastoral areas of Ethiopia," Livestock research for rural development, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1-10, 2013.
[61]	Y. Mekasha, R. Merkel, A. Goetsch, T. Sahlu, and K. Tesfai, "Effects of method of offering broiler litter and level of prairie hay intake on growth of Boer× Spanish wethers," Small Ruminant Research, vol. 55, no. 1-3, pp. 123-133, 2004.
[62]	D. Levey and Z. Holzer, "Poultry letter for intensive beefproduction.," Anim. Prod, vol. 23, pp. 317-327, 1976.
[63]	T. Negesse et al., "Performance of Spanish and Boer× Spanish doelings consuming diets with different levels of broiler litter," Small Ruminant Research, vol. 69, no. 1-3, pp. 187-197, 2007.
[64]	W. A. W. Razali et al., "Degradation of oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) fibre during composting process using in-vessel composter," BioResources, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 4786-4805, 2012.
[65]	P. Van Soest and V. Mason, "The influence of the Maillard reaction upon the nutritive value of fibrous feeds," Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 32, no. 1-3, pp. 45-53, 1991.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ahmed, A., Tolemariam, T., Worku, A. (2023). Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat. American Journal of Zoology, 6(4), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ahmed, A.; Tolemariam, T.; Worku, A. Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat. Am. J. Zool. 2023, 6(4), 72-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ahmed A, Tolemariam T, Worku A. Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat. Am J Zool. 2023;6(4):72-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12,
  author = {Asha Ahmed and Taye Tolemariam and Ashebir Worku},
  title = {Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat},
  journal = {American Journal of Zoology},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {72-83},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20230604.12},
  abstract = {Twenty-five intact yearling goats, were randomly assigned to a complete randomized block design (CRBD) with five treatments and five replications. The aim was to assess the impact of different levels of poultry litter (PL) on feed intake, digestibility, growth performance, and economic return of Arsi Bale goats. Different levels of poultry litter were supplemented in various treatment groups i.e T1- 38.5 % Noug Seed Cake (NSC) + 60.5 % Wheat Bran (WB) + 1% Salt) being control group, T2 (31.6% NSC + 57.4%WB + 10% PL + 1% Salt), T3 (24.8% NSC + 54.3%WB + 20% PL + 1% Salt), T4 (17.9% NSC + 51.1%WB + 30% PL + 1% Salt) and T5 (11.5% NSC + 47.5%WB + 40% PL + 1% Salt). The trial lasted for 90 days, and there were seven days of digestibility testing. There was no significant difference in initial body weight (IBW) and final body weight (FBW) among the treatments, but a significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in the total body weight gain (TWG) and average daily weight gain (AGD). Goats supplemented with the highest level of poultry litter (T5) gained more weight (P<0.05) than the other groups. The results indicate that supplementing with 40% PL is more effective in increasing weight gain and is economically feasible compared to the other treatments and the control group. No significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in dry matter intake (DMI), organic matter intake (OMI), and crude protein intake (CPI) with increased levels of supplementation. Digestibility did not differ significantly among the treatments. The feed conversion ratio was 6.33, 8.00, 8.18, 11.77, and 11.29 g/gm gain for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Therefore, poultry litter can substitute up to 40% as source of protein for NSC and/or WB without affecting the nutrients utilization but with improved growth performance of goats. Further levels of inclusion of PL and the necessary physical or chemical treatments are recommended to assess more profitable return and possible impact on carcass quality.
},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat
AU  - Asha Ahmed
AU  - Taye Tolemariam
AU  - Ashebir Worku
Y1  - 2023/12/18
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12
T2  - American Journal of Zoology
JF  - American Journal of Zoology
JO  - American Journal of Zoology
SP  - 72
EP  - 83
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7413
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12
AB  - Twenty-five intact yearling goats, were randomly assigned to a complete randomized block design (CRBD) with five treatments and five replications. The aim was to assess the impact of different levels of poultry litter (PL) on feed intake, digestibility, growth performance, and economic return of Arsi Bale goats. Different levels of poultry litter were supplemented in various treatment groups i.e T1- 38.5 % Noug Seed Cake (NSC) + 60.5 % Wheat Bran (WB) + 1% Salt) being control group, T2 (31.6% NSC + 57.4%WB + 10% PL + 1% Salt), T3 (24.8% NSC + 54.3%WB + 20% PL + 1% Salt), T4 (17.9% NSC + 51.1%WB + 30% PL + 1% Salt) and T5 (11.5% NSC + 47.5%WB + 40% PL + 1% Salt). The trial lasted for 90 days, and there were seven days of digestibility testing. There was no significant difference in initial body weight (IBW) and final body weight (FBW) among the treatments, but a significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in the total body weight gain (TWG) and average daily weight gain (AGD). Goats supplemented with the highest level of poultry litter (T5) gained more weight (P<0.05) than the other groups. The results indicate that supplementing with 40% PL is more effective in increasing weight gain and is economically feasible compared to the other treatments and the control group. No significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in dry matter intake (DMI), organic matter intake (OMI), and crude protein intake (CPI) with increased levels of supplementation. Digestibility did not differ significantly among the treatments. The feed conversion ratio was 6.33, 8.00, 8.18, 11.77, and 11.29 g/gm gain for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Therefore, poultry litter can substitute up to 40% as source of protein for NSC and/or WB without affecting the nutrients utilization but with improved growth performance of goats. Further levels of inclusion of PL and the necessary physical or chemical treatments are recommended to assess more profitable return and possible impact on carcass quality.

VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Asha Ahmed

Oromia Livestock Development Agency, Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District Livestock Office, Batu, Ethiopia; Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

Contact Email
Taye Tolemariam

Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Ashebir Worku

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ahmed, A., Tolemariam, T., Worku, A. (2023). Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat. American Journal of Zoology, 6(4), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ahmed, A.; Tolemariam, T.; Worku, A. Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat. Am. J. Zool. 2023, 6(4), 72-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ahmed A, Tolemariam T, Worku A. Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat. Am J Zool. 2023;6(4):72-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12,
  author = {Asha Ahmed and Taye Tolemariam and Ashebir Worku},
  title = {Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat},
  journal = {American Journal of Zoology},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {72-83},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20230604.12},
  abstract = {Twenty-five intact yearling goats, were randomly assigned to a complete randomized block design (CRBD) with five treatments and five replications. The aim was to assess the impact of different levels of poultry litter (PL) on feed intake, digestibility, growth performance, and economic return of Arsi Bale goats. Different levels of poultry litter were supplemented in various treatment groups i.e T1- 38.5 % Noug Seed Cake (NSC) + 60.5 % Wheat Bran (WB) + 1% Salt) being control group, T2 (31.6% NSC + 57.4%WB + 10% PL + 1% Salt), T3 (24.8% NSC + 54.3%WB + 20% PL + 1% Salt), T4 (17.9% NSC + 51.1%WB + 30% PL + 1% Salt) and T5 (11.5% NSC + 47.5%WB + 40% PL + 1% Salt). The trial lasted for 90 days, and there were seven days of digestibility testing. There was no significant difference in initial body weight (IBW) and final body weight (FBW) among the treatments, but a significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in the total body weight gain (TWG) and average daily weight gain (AGD). Goats supplemented with the highest level of poultry litter (T5) gained more weight (P<0.05) than the other groups. The results indicate that supplementing with 40% PL is more effective in increasing weight gain and is economically feasible compared to the other treatments and the control group. No significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in dry matter intake (DMI), organic matter intake (OMI), and crude protein intake (CPI) with increased levels of supplementation. Digestibility did not differ significantly among the treatments. The feed conversion ratio was 6.33, 8.00, 8.18, 11.77, and 11.29 g/gm gain for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Therefore, poultry litter can substitute up to 40% as source of protein for NSC and/or WB without affecting the nutrients utilization but with improved growth performance of goats. Further levels of inclusion of PL and the necessary physical or chemical treatments are recommended to assess more profitable return and possible impact on carcass quality.
},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Substitution of Poultry Litter for Concentrate Mix as Protein Supplement on Growth Performance of Arsi-Bale Goat
AU  - Asha Ahmed
AU  - Taye Tolemariam
AU  - Ashebir Worku
Y1  - 2023/12/18
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12
T2  - American Journal of Zoology
JF  - American Journal of Zoology
JO  - American Journal of Zoology
SP  - 72
EP  - 83
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7413
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230604.12
AB  - Twenty-five intact yearling goats, were randomly assigned to a complete randomized block design (CRBD) with five treatments and five replications. The aim was to assess the impact of different levels of poultry litter (PL) on feed intake, digestibility, growth performance, and economic return of Arsi Bale goats. Different levels of poultry litter were supplemented in various treatment groups i.e T1- 38.5 % Noug Seed Cake (NSC) + 60.5 % Wheat Bran (WB) + 1% Salt) being control group, T2 (31.6% NSC + 57.4%WB + 10% PL + 1% Salt), T3 (24.8% NSC + 54.3%WB + 20% PL + 1% Salt), T4 (17.9% NSC + 51.1%WB + 30% PL + 1% Salt) and T5 (11.5% NSC + 47.5%WB + 40% PL + 1% Salt). The trial lasted for 90 days, and there were seven days of digestibility testing. There was no significant difference in initial body weight (IBW) and final body weight (FBW) among the treatments, but a significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in the total body weight gain (TWG) and average daily weight gain (AGD). Goats supplemented with the highest level of poultry litter (T5) gained more weight (P<0.05) than the other groups. The results indicate that supplementing with 40% PL is more effective in increasing weight gain and is economically feasible compared to the other treatments and the control group. No significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in dry matter intake (DMI), organic matter intake (OMI), and crude protein intake (CPI) with increased levels of supplementation. Digestibility did not differ significantly among the treatments. The feed conversion ratio was 6.33, 8.00, 8.18, 11.77, and 11.29 g/gm gain for T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively. Therefore, poultry litter can substitute up to 40% as source of protein for NSC and/or WB without affecting the nutrients utilization but with improved growth performance of goats. Further levels of inclusion of PL and the necessary physical or chemical treatments are recommended to assess more profitable return and possible impact on carcass quality.

VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download