Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Numerical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Strengthened With CFRP

Received: 21 September 2023    Accepted: 28 October 2023    Published: 22 December 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) structure performance behavior investigation is important in order to produce structural systems having stiffness, strength, deformation capacity required to withstand seismic loading with acceptable performance. Number of studies conducted to investigate the performance of structural RC frame members such as beams, columns, beam-column joints under seismic loading, primarily using experimental methods. The main aim of this thesis is to investigate numerically the performance of RC portal frame strengthened with 0%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% of total length of RC frames with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) under seismic loading in displacement control. In the first scheme of this study finite element model for six RC portal frames strengthened with different percentages of CFRP have been developed by using finite element software called ABAQUS and those RC portal frames with identical dimension of beam and columns of cross section of 300x350mm and column is 1365mm in height and beam of 2350mm length has been simulated under seismic loads up to 3% drift ratio in displacement control. In the second schemes of this study finite element model for three RC portal frames (one as base lines and two were strengthened with CFRP sheets) subjected to lateral cyclic load and gravity loads on beam critical zones. Nonlinear finite element analysis with damaged plasticity model for concrete and orthographic elastic properties for CFRP in ABAQUS/standard is adapted to simulate RC portal frames. The accuracy of the nonlinear finite element models has been verified using the experiment results conducted on beam-column joints by other researchers. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results showed that strengthening the RC portal frame with the 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% of CFRP increased the dissipation energy capacity by 2.39%, 4.1%, 5.95%, 7.04% and 7.39% respectively. Results also showed that strengthening with CFRP results in fewer cracks, less degradation of strength after yielding than bare RC frame and decrease in stiffness degradation.

Published in Engineering and Applied Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12
Page(s) 90-111
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

RC Portal Frames, Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer, Finite Element Analysis, Seismic Loading and Displacement Control

References
[1] Aslani, H., and E. Miranda. 2005. “Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings.” Ph. D. dissertation. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ.
[2] Abaqus Analysis User Manual – Abaqus Version 6.8. (2008). Retrieved November 5, 2010, from http://bee-pg-031941:2080 /v6.8/books/usb/default.htm
[3] Balamuralikrishnan, R., Al Madhani, M. and Al Madhani, R. “Study on Retrofitting of RC Column Using Ferrocement Full and Strip Wrapping.” Journal of Civil Engineering 5(14) (November 2019): 2472-2485.
[4] Behnam, H., Kuang, J. S. and Samali, B., 2018. Parametric finite element analysis of RC wide beam-column connections. Computers & Structures, 205, pp. 28-44.
[5] Bento, R., Falcão, S., & Rodrigues, F. (2004). 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Non-Linear Static Procedures in Performance Based Seismic Design, (2522).
[6] Beydokhty EZ, Shariatmadar H (2016) Behavior of damaged exterior RC beam-column joints strengthened by CFRP composites. Lat Am J Solids Struct 13: 880–897.
[7] Brena, S. F., and G. N. Mcguirk. 2013. ˜ “Advances on the behavior characterization of FRP-anchored carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets used to strengthen concrete elements.” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 7 (1): 3–16.
[8] Birtel V, Mark P. Parameterised finite element modelling of RC beam shear failure. In: ABAQUS users’ conference; 2006. p. 95–108.
[9] Celik, O. C., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2010. “Seismic fragilities for nonductile reinforced concrete frames—Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.” Struct. Saf. 32 (1): 1–12.
[10] Chen, W. F., & Lui, E. M. (2006). Earthquake Engineering for Structural Design. London, New York.
[11] Dan S, Bob C, Badea C, Dan D, Florescu C, Cotoarba L, Gruin A (2018) Carbon fber reinforced polymers used for strengthening of existing reinforced concrete structures. Mater Plast 55(January): 536–540.
[12] Dalalbashi, A., Eslami, A., and Ronagh, H. R. (2013). "Numerical investigation on the hysteretic behavior of RC joints retrofitted with different CFRP configurations." Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(3), 371-382.
[13] Elias I. Saqan, Hayder A. Rasheed. And T. Alkhrdaji.“Evaluation of the seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames strengthened with CFRP fabric and NSM bars”. Composite Structures 184 (2018) 839–847.
[14] Eslami, A., Dalalbashi, A., and Ronagh, H. R. (2013). "On the effect of plastic hinge relocation in RC buildings using CFRP." Compos Part B-Eng, 52(0), 350-361.
[15] Dowrick, D. (2009). Earthquake Resistant Design and Risk Reduction (Second Edi). Tauranga, New Zealand.
[16] Fajfar, P., & Eeri, M. (2000). A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance Based Seismic Design, 16(3), 573–592.
[17] Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA]. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Washington, USA.
[18] Goulet, C. A., C. B. Haselton, J. Mitrani-Reiser, J. L. Beck, G. G. Deierlein, K. A. Porter, and J. P. Stewart. 2007. “Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1973–1997.
[19] Jalayer, F., H. Ebrahimian, A. Miano, G. Manfredi, and H. Sezen. 2017. “Analytical fragility assessment using un-scaled ground motion records.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 46 (15): 2639–2663.
[20] Jankowiak T, Lodygowski T. Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model. Found Civ Environ Eng 2005; 6: 53–69.
[21] Jeong, S. H., A. M. Mwafy, and A. S. Elnashai. 2012. “Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of code-compliant multi-story RC buildings.” Eng. Struct. 34 (Jan): 527–537.
[22] Kunisue, A. “Retrofitting Method of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Elasto-Plastic Steel Dampers.” 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2000).
[23] Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Kumar, S. K., & Murari, K. (2014). Analysis And Capacity Based Earthquake Resistant Design Of Multi Storeyed Building, 4(8), 7–13.
[24] Liel, A. B., and G. G. Deierlein. 2013. “Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (4): 1391–1411.
[25] Lu, Z. T. 2005. “Application of high performance FRP and innovations of structure engineering.” [In Chinese.] J. Arch. Civ. Eng. 22 (1): 1–5.
[26] Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division-ASCE, 1998, 124(8): 892―900.
[27] Mohammed A. Sakr, Ayman A. Seleemah, Tarek M. Khalifa, and Galal EL-Samak.” Studying Behavior of Exterior RC Beam–Column Joints Strengthened Using CFRP for Achieving “Strong Column-Weak Beam” In RC Frames”.East African Scholars J Eng Comput Sci: 2(2) (february-2019).
[28] Miano, A., F. Jalayer, H. Ebrahimian, and A. Prota. 2018a. “Cloud to IDA: A very efficient solution for performing incremental dynamic analysis.” In Proc., Italian Concrete Days 2016, edited by M. Di Prisco, and M. Menegotto. New York: Springer.
[29] Mahdavi, N. and Tasnimi, A. A. “Modeling and verification of response of RC columns strengthened in flexure with mechanically fastened FRP.” Journal of Vibroengineering 20 (4) (June 2018).
[30] Najafgholipour, M. A., Dehghan, S. M., Dooshabi, A. and Niroomandi, A., 2017. Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beam-column connections with governing joint shear failure mode. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 14, pp. 1200-1225.
[31] Ohu RB (2012) Flexural response of reinforced concrete beams with embedded CFRP plates. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan.
[32] Quiertant M, Ferrier E, Chataigner S, Sadone R, Quiertant M, Paris-est U (2012) Anchoring FRP laminates for the seismic strengthening of RC columns. In: International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retroftting.
[33] Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. New York, United States of America (USA).
[34] Sahoo, R. R. (2008). Analysis and Capacity Based Earthquake Resistant Design of Multi Bay Multi Storeyed 3D-RC Frame. Rourkela, Orissa, India.
[35] Saqan, E. I. (1995). Evaluation of ductile beam-column connections for use in seismic- resistant precast frames. PhD thesis University of Texas, Austin.
[36] Sextos, A., Simopoulos, S., & Skoulidou, D. (2015). Ductility, Performance and Construction Cost of R / C Buildings Designed to Eurocode 8, 1–10. Themelis,
[37] Task Committee on Performance-Based Design “Advocating for Performance-Based Design” Report to the Structural Engineering Institute Board of Governors: ASCE, Structural engineering institute (April, 2018)
[38] Teng, J. G., J. F. Chen, S. T. Smith, and L. Lam. 2002. FRP-strengthened RC structures. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
[39] Victorsson, V. K. (2011). The Reliability of Capacity-Designed Components in Seismic Resistant Systems. Stanford University, California, USA.
[40] Wang L, Xuan W, Zhang Y, Cong S, Liu F, Gao Q, Chen H (2016) Experimental and numerical research on seismic performance of earthquake-damaged RC frame strengthened with CFRP sheets. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016: 1–11.
[41] Wang X, Qi Y, Sun Y, Xie Z, Liu W (2019) Compressive behavior of composite concrete columns with encased FRP confined concrete cores. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 19(8): 1792.
[42] Ye, L. P., and P. Feng. 2006. “Applications and development of fiberreinforced polymer in engineering structures.” [In Chinese.] China Civ. Eng. J. 39 (3): 24–36.
[43] Zareian, F., P. Kaviani, and E. Taciroglu. 2015. “Multiphase performance assessment of structural response to seismic excitations.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (11).
[44] Zhang H, Xu X (2019) Comparative analysis of dynamic characteristics of concrete frames reinforced with GFRP Bars and CFRP Bars. In: IOP Conference Series: earth and environmental science (vol 267).
[45] Zhu, B. L. 1989. Structural seismic test: Evaluation of seismic performance of structures. [In Chinese.] Beijing: Seismological Press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tola, S. G. (2023). Numerical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Strengthened With CFRP. Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8(5), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tola, S. G. Numerical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Strengthened With CFRP. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2023, 8(5), 90-111. doi: 10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tola SG. Numerical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Strengthened With CFRP. Eng Appl Sci. 2023;8(5):90-111. doi: 10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12,
      author = {Shimelis Getachew Tola},
      title = {Numerical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Strengthened With CFRP},
      journal = {Engineering and Applied Sciences},
      volume = {8},
      number = {5},
      pages = {90-111},
      doi = {10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eas.20230805.12},
      abstract = {Reinforced concrete (RC) structure performance behavior investigation is important in order to produce structural systems having stiffness, strength, deformation capacity required to withstand seismic loading with acceptable performance. Number of studies conducted to investigate the performance of structural RC frame members such as beams, columns, beam-column joints under seismic loading, primarily using experimental methods. The main aim of this thesis is to investigate numerically the performance of RC portal frame strengthened with 0%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% of total length of RC frames with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) under seismic loading in displacement control. In the first scheme of this study finite element model for six RC portal frames strengthened with different percentages of CFRP have been developed by using finite element software called ABAQUS and those RC portal frames with identical dimension of beam and columns of cross section of 300x350mm and column is 1365mm in height and beam of 2350mm length has been simulated under seismic loads up to 3% drift ratio in displacement control. In the second schemes of this study finite element model for three RC portal frames (one as base lines and two were strengthened with CFRP sheets) subjected to lateral cyclic load and gravity loads on beam critical zones. Nonlinear finite element analysis with damaged plasticity model for concrete and orthographic elastic properties for CFRP in ABAQUS/standard is adapted to simulate RC portal frames. The accuracy of the nonlinear finite element models has been verified using the experiment results conducted on beam-column joints by other researchers. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results showed that strengthening the RC portal frame with the 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% of CFRP increased the dissipation energy capacity by 2.39%, 4.1%, 5.95%, 7.04% and 7.39% respectively. Results also showed that strengthening with CFRP results in fewer cracks, less degradation of strength after yielding than bare RC frame and decrease in stiffness degradation.
    },
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Numerical Investigation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Strengthened With CFRP
    AU  - Shimelis Getachew Tola
    Y1  - 2023/12/22
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12
    T2  - Engineering and Applied Sciences
    JF  - Engineering and Applied Sciences
    JO  - Engineering and Applied Sciences
    SP  - 90
    EP  - 111
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1468
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20230805.12
    AB  - Reinforced concrete (RC) structure performance behavior investigation is important in order to produce structural systems having stiffness, strength, deformation capacity required to withstand seismic loading with acceptable performance. Number of studies conducted to investigate the performance of structural RC frame members such as beams, columns, beam-column joints under seismic loading, primarily using experimental methods. The main aim of this thesis is to investigate numerically the performance of RC portal frame strengthened with 0%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% of total length of RC frames with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) under seismic loading in displacement control. In the first scheme of this study finite element model for six RC portal frames strengthened with different percentages of CFRP have been developed by using finite element software called ABAQUS and those RC portal frames with identical dimension of beam and columns of cross section of 300x350mm and column is 1365mm in height and beam of 2350mm length has been simulated under seismic loads up to 3% drift ratio in displacement control. In the second schemes of this study finite element model for three RC portal frames (one as base lines and two were strengthened with CFRP sheets) subjected to lateral cyclic load and gravity loads on beam critical zones. Nonlinear finite element analysis with damaged plasticity model for concrete and orthographic elastic properties for CFRP in ABAQUS/standard is adapted to simulate RC portal frames. The accuracy of the nonlinear finite element models has been verified using the experiment results conducted on beam-column joints by other researchers. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results showed that strengthening the RC portal frame with the 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30% of CFRP increased the dissipation energy capacity by 2.39%, 4.1%, 5.95%, 7.04% and 7.39% respectively. Results also showed that strengthening with CFRP results in fewer cracks, less degradation of strength after yielding than bare RC frame and decrease in stiffness degradation.
    
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering, College of Civil and Architectural Engineering Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sections