Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study

Kasandra Alansa Scott; Chris Cale; Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar; Michelle McCraney

doi:doi:10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study

Kasandra Alansa Scott, Chris Cale, Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar, Michelle McCraney

Published in Education Journal (Volume 10, Issue 4)

Received: 19 June 2021 Accepted: 29 June 2021 Published: 5 July 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Administration and ministers of elementary schools located in the target district in the Caribbean reported that some elementary teachers were inconsistently implementing differentiated instruction (DI) in their practice. Based on the identified problem, it was unclear which specific strategies of DI were causing teachers to experience barriers or challenges during the process of implementation. The purpose of this basic qualitative study was to explore teacher perceptions in one district about their implementation of the conceptual framework, Weimer’s learner-centered teaching theory DI model, in their classroom instruction. Data from schools in one elementary school district in the Beach School District were collected through virtual interviews with 15 teacher participants who had 5 to 10 years of teaching experience for Grades 5 to 6. Data were analyzed with open coding using the RADaR model of analysis. Results indicated that, when teachers use limited and repetitive DI strategies, their use of the DI model in their practice is inconsistent. In addition, teachers indicated they would benefit from some additional training on alternative DI strategies as well as how to effectively differentiate their instruction consistently. The results of this research may contribute to positive social change by providing classroom teachers with additional resources and training to improve the implementation of DI in the classroom and enhance the learning experiences of students.

Published in	Education Journal (Volume 10, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11
Page(s)	114-118
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Differentiated Instruction, Student Learning, Learner-centered Strategies, Classroom Teaching, Educational Practice

References

[1]	Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, pp. xvi-xix, 125.
[2]	Ministry of Education. (2017). Education data report. [Data file]. http://www.education.gob.ky/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/12725127.PDF
[3]	Michael, R. D., Webster, C. A., Egan, C. A., Stewart, G., Nilges, L., Brian, A., Johnson, R., Carson, R., Orendorff, K. & Vazou, S. (2018). Viability of university service learning to support movement integration in elementary classrooms: Perspectives of teachers, university students, and course instructors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.003
[4]	Goh, T. L., Hannon, J. C., Webster, C. A., & Podlog, L. (2017). Classroom teachers’ experiences implementing a movement integration program: Barriers, facilitators, and continuance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 88-95. https://doi.org10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.003
[5]	Andrietti, V., & Su, X. (2019). Education curriculum and student achievement: theory and evidence. Education Economics, 27 (1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1527894
[6]	Guay, F., & Bureau, J. S. (2018). Motivation at school: Differentiation between and within school subjects matters in the prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.05.004
[7]	Office of Education Standards. (2019). School inspection reports 2018-2019. [Data file]. http://www.gov.ky/portal/page/portal/esahome/publications/School%20Inspection%20Rports%2020192020/Full%20Inspection%20Report%20Creek%20and%20Spot%20Bay%20Primary%20School%202019.
[8]	Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47 (1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008
[9]	Brooks, J. S., & Normore, A. H. (2018). Qualitative research in educational leadership studies: Issues in the design and conduct of studies. In Complementary Research Methods for Educational Leadership and Policy Studies (pp. 19-32). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3_2
[10]	Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57-78). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315248813-3
[11]	Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017, January). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18 (1). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1701195
[12]	Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., & Badger, T. A. (2018). Two strategies for qualitative content analysis: An intramethod approach to triangulation. Qualitative Health Research, 28 (5), 824-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317753586
[13]	Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65 (3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
[14]	Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3 (9). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1017

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kasandra Alansa Scott, Chris Cale, Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar, Michelle McCraney. (2021). Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study. Education Journal, 10(4), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kasandra Alansa Scott; Chris Cale; Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar; Michelle McCraney. Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study. Educ. J. 2021, 10(4), 114-118. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kasandra Alansa Scott, Chris Cale, Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar, Michelle McCraney. Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study. Educ J. 2021;10(4):114-118. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11,
  author = {Kasandra Alansa Scott and Chris Cale and Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar and Michelle McCraney},
  title = {Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {114-118},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20211004.11},
  abstract = {Administration and ministers of elementary schools located in the target district in the Caribbean reported that some elementary teachers were inconsistently implementing differentiated instruction (DI) in their practice. Based on the identified problem, it was unclear which specific strategies of DI were causing teachers to experience barriers or challenges during the process of implementation. The purpose of this basic qualitative study was to explore teacher perceptions in one district about their implementation of the conceptual framework, Weimer’s learner-centered teaching theory DI model, in their classroom instruction. Data from schools in one elementary school district in the Beach School District were collected through virtual interviews with 15 teacher participants who had 5 to 10 years of teaching experience for Grades 5 to 6. Data were analyzed with open coding using the RADaR model of analysis. Results indicated that, when teachers use limited and repetitive DI strategies, their use of the DI model in their practice is inconsistent. In addition, teachers indicated they would benefit from some additional training on alternative DI strategies as well as how to effectively differentiate their instruction consistently. The results of this research may contribute to positive social change by providing classroom teachers with additional resources and training to improve the implementation of DI in the classroom and enhance the learning experiences of students.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study
AU  - Kasandra Alansa Scott
AU  - Chris Cale
AU  - Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar
AU  - Michelle McCraney
Y1  - 2021/07/05
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 114
EP  - 118
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11
AB  - Administration and ministers of elementary schools located in the target district in the Caribbean reported that some elementary teachers were inconsistently implementing differentiated instruction (DI) in their practice. Based on the identified problem, it was unclear which specific strategies of DI were causing teachers to experience barriers or challenges during the process of implementation. The purpose of this basic qualitative study was to explore teacher perceptions in one district about their implementation of the conceptual framework, Weimer’s learner-centered teaching theory DI model, in their classroom instruction. Data from schools in one elementary school district in the Beach School District were collected through virtual interviews with 15 teacher participants who had 5 to 10 years of teaching experience for Grades 5 to 6. Data were analyzed with open coding using the RADaR model of analysis. Results indicated that, when teachers use limited and repetitive DI strategies, their use of the DI model in their practice is inconsistent. In addition, teachers indicated they would benefit from some additional training on alternative DI strategies as well as how to effectively differentiate their instruction consistently. The results of this research may contribute to positive social change by providing classroom teachers with additional resources and training to improve the implementation of DI in the classroom and enhance the learning experiences of students.
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Kasandra Alansa Scott

Riley College of Education, Walden University, Minneapolis, USA
Chris Cale

Riley College of Education, Walden University, Minneapolis, USA
Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar

School of Education, University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, St. Augustine, USA
Michelle McCraney

Riley College of Education, Walden University, Minneapolis, USA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kasandra Alansa Scott, Chris Cale, Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar, Michelle McCraney. (2021). Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study. Education Journal, 10(4), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kasandra Alansa Scott; Chris Cale; Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar; Michelle McCraney. Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study. Educ. J. 2021, 10(4), 114-118. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kasandra Alansa Scott, Chris Cale, Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar, Michelle McCraney. Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study. Educ J. 2021;10(4):114-118. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11,
  author = {Kasandra Alansa Scott and Chris Cale and Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar and Michelle McCraney},
  title = {Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study},
  journal = {Education Journal},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {114-118},
  doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20211004.11},
  abstract = {Administration and ministers of elementary schools located in the target district in the Caribbean reported that some elementary teachers were inconsistently implementing differentiated instruction (DI) in their practice. Based on the identified problem, it was unclear which specific strategies of DI were causing teachers to experience barriers or challenges during the process of implementation. The purpose of this basic qualitative study was to explore teacher perceptions in one district about their implementation of the conceptual framework, Weimer’s learner-centered teaching theory DI model, in their classroom instruction. Data from schools in one elementary school district in the Beach School District were collected through virtual interviews with 15 teacher participants who had 5 to 10 years of teaching experience for Grades 5 to 6. Data were analyzed with open coding using the RADaR model of analysis. Results indicated that, when teachers use limited and repetitive DI strategies, their use of the DI model in their practice is inconsistent. In addition, teachers indicated they would benefit from some additional training on alternative DI strategies as well as how to effectively differentiate their instruction consistently. The results of this research may contribute to positive social change by providing classroom teachers with additional resources and training to improve the implementation of DI in the classroom and enhance the learning experiences of students.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Differentiated Instruction and Improving Student Learning: A Qualitative Study
AU  - Kasandra Alansa Scott
AU  - Chris Cale
AU  - Sunddip Panesar-Aguilar
AU  - Michelle McCraney
Y1  - 2021/07/05
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11
T2  - Education Journal
JF  - Education Journal
JO  - Education Journal
SP  - 114
EP  - 118
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2619
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211004.11
AB  - Administration and ministers of elementary schools located in the target district in the Caribbean reported that some elementary teachers were inconsistently implementing differentiated instruction (DI) in their practice. Based on the identified problem, it was unclear which specific strategies of DI were causing teachers to experience barriers or challenges during the process of implementation. The purpose of this basic qualitative study was to explore teacher perceptions in one district about their implementation of the conceptual framework, Weimer’s learner-centered teaching theory DI model, in their classroom instruction. Data from schools in one elementary school district in the Beach School District were collected through virtual interviews with 15 teacher participants who had 5 to 10 years of teaching experience for Grades 5 to 6. Data were analyzed with open coding using the RADaR model of analysis. Results indicated that, when teachers use limited and repetitive DI strategies, their use of the DI model in their practice is inconsistent. In addition, teachers indicated they would benefit from some additional training on alternative DI strategies as well as how to effectively differentiate their instruction consistently. The results of this research may contribute to positive social change by providing classroom teachers with additional resources and training to improve the implementation of DI in the classroom and enhance the learning experiences of students.
VL  - 10
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download