Objective: Compare the application effect of the modified MEWS score before and after correction in cardiovascular medicine. Methods: A retrospective collection of 322 patients who were hospitalized in the Cardiovascular Department of our hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as the control group; 347 patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of our hospital from July 2019 to July 2020 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected as the experimental group. The experimental group used the modified MEWS score after adjustment, and the control group used the modified MEWS score. The clinical outcome and prediction accuracy of the two groups of patients were compared. Results: There was no difference in the clinical outcome of the two groups of patients (P>0.05). The composition of different clinical outcomes of the two groups was different, and the composition ratio between the two groups of the same grade was also different. The prediction accuracy of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). With death and ICU admission as the event endpoints, the correlation between the occurrence of the event and the MEWS score and the area under the ROC curve was statistically different between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The corrected modified MEWS score further improves the accuracy of early warning based on the general modified MEWS score. It can be used to identify potentially critically ill patients.
| Published in | European Journal of Preventive Medicine (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12 |
| Page(s) | 79-82 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cardiovascular Disease, MEWS Score, Clinical Outcome and Prognosis, Preventive Intervention Nursing
| [1] | Subbe C P, Krueger M, Gemmel L. Patients at risk: validation of early warning score in medical admissions [J]. BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, 87 (2): 359P-360P. |
| [2] | Shaikh M A, Punshi A, Talreja M L, et al. Comparison of within 7 Day All-Cause Mortality among HDU Patients with Modified Early Warning Score of ≥5 with those with Score of <5[J]. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2021, 37 (2): 515-519. |
| [3] | Roney J K, Whitley B E, Maples J C, et al. Modified early warning scoring (MEWS): evaluating the evidence for tool inclusion of sepsis screening criteria and impact on mortality and failure to rescue [J]. Journal of clinical nursing, 2015, 24 (23-24): 3343-3354. |
| [4] | Jiang X, Jiang P, Mao Y. Performance of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor, and Speech (CRAMS) score in trauma severity and in-hospital mortality prediction in multiple trauma patients: a comparison study [J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7: e7227. |
| [5] | Mitsunaga T, Hasegawa I, Uzura M, et al. Comparison of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for predicting admission and in-hospital mortality in elderly patients in the pre-hospital setting and in the emergency department [J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7: e6947. |
| [6] | Yu Z, Xu F, Chen D. Predictive value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for the short-term prognosis of emergency trauma patients: a retrospective study [J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11 (3): e41882. |
| [7] | Young K W, Jung S Y, Mi L J, et al. Modified Early Warning Score Changes Prior to Cardiac Arrest in General Wards [J]. Plos One, 2015, 10 (6): e0130523. |
| [8] | Devoe B, Roth A, Maurer G, et al. Correlation of the predictive ability of early warning metrics and mortality for cardiac arrest patients receiving in-hospital Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support [J]. Heart & Lung the Journal of Critical Care, 2016: 497-502. |
| [9] | Yanmei W, Ping L, Min H, et al. Comparison of Modified Early Warning Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II Score System in Evaluating the Ability of Patients in Emergency Internal Medicine [J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2017, 34 (22): 53-56. |
| [10] | Lee Y J, Cho K J, Kwon O, et al. A multicentre validation study of the deep learning-based early warning score for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients admitted to general wards [J]. Resuscitation, 2021. |
| [11] | Clemency B M, Murk W, Moore A, et al. The EMS Modified Early Warning Score (EMEWS): A Simple Count of Vital Signs as a Predictor of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests [J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2021: 1-22. |
| [12] | Knoery C, Barlas R S, Vart P, et al. Modified early warning score and risk of mortality after acute stroke [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2021, 202: 106547. |
| [13] | Liling Z, Yuyan L, Luxiang Z, et al. Application Value of MEWS Score in Early Identification of Potentially Critical Patients in Emergency Department [J]. China Health Standard Management, 2021, 12 (3): 164-166. |
| [14] | Tirotta D, Gambacorta M, La Regina M, et al. Evaluation of the threshold value for the modified early warning score (MEWS) in medical septic patients: a secondary analysis of an Italian multicentric prospective cohort (SNOOPII study) [J]. QJM, 2017, 110 (6): 369-373. |
APA Style
Juxian Wu, Lin Li, Tong Zhong, Lingyi Liu, Xuelu Yang, et al. (2021). Analysis of the Application Effect of the Modified Mews Score After Correction in Cardiovascular Medicine. European Journal of Preventive Medicine, 9(3), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12
ACS Style
Juxian Wu; Lin Li; Tong Zhong; Lingyi Liu; Xuelu Yang, et al. Analysis of the Application Effect of the Modified Mews Score After Correction in Cardiovascular Medicine. Eur. J. Prev. Med. 2021, 9(3), 79-82. doi: 10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12
AMA Style
Juxian Wu, Lin Li, Tong Zhong, Lingyi Liu, Xuelu Yang, et al. Analysis of the Application Effect of the Modified Mews Score After Correction in Cardiovascular Medicine. Eur J Prev Med. 2021;9(3):79-82. doi: 10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12,
author = {Juxian Wu and Lin Li and Tong Zhong and Lingyi Liu and Xuelu Yang and Xia Wei},
title = {Analysis of the Application Effect of the Modified Mews Score After Correction in Cardiovascular Medicine},
journal = {European Journal of Preventive Medicine},
volume = {9},
number = {3},
pages = {79-82},
doi = {10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejpm.20210903.12},
abstract = {Objective: Compare the application effect of the modified MEWS score before and after correction in cardiovascular medicine. Methods: A retrospective collection of 322 patients who were hospitalized in the Cardiovascular Department of our hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as the control group; 347 patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of our hospital from July 2019 to July 2020 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected as the experimental group. The experimental group used the modified MEWS score after adjustment, and the control group used the modified MEWS score. The clinical outcome and prediction accuracy of the two groups of patients were compared. Results: There was no difference in the clinical outcome of the two groups of patients (P>0.05). The composition of different clinical outcomes of the two groups was different, and the composition ratio between the two groups of the same grade was also different. The prediction accuracy of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (PP<0.05). Conclusion: The corrected modified MEWS score further improves the accuracy of early warning based on the general modified MEWS score. It can be used to identify potentially critically ill patients.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Analysis of the Application Effect of the Modified Mews Score After Correction in Cardiovascular Medicine AU - Juxian Wu AU - Lin Li AU - Tong Zhong AU - Lingyi Liu AU - Xuelu Yang AU - Xia Wei Y1 - 2021/05/15 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12 T2 - European Journal of Preventive Medicine JF - European Journal of Preventive Medicine JO - European Journal of Preventive Medicine SP - 79 EP - 82 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8230 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejpm.20210903.12 AB - Objective: Compare the application effect of the modified MEWS score before and after correction in cardiovascular medicine. Methods: A retrospective collection of 322 patients who were hospitalized in the Cardiovascular Department of our hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as the control group; 347 patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine of our hospital from July 2019 to July 2020 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected as the experimental group. The experimental group used the modified MEWS score after adjustment, and the control group used the modified MEWS score. The clinical outcome and prediction accuracy of the two groups of patients were compared. Results: There was no difference in the clinical outcome of the two groups of patients (P>0.05). The composition of different clinical outcomes of the two groups was different, and the composition ratio between the two groups of the same grade was also different. The prediction accuracy of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (PP<0.05). Conclusion: The corrected modified MEWS score further improves the accuracy of early warning based on the general modified MEWS score. It can be used to identify potentially critically ill patients. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: