| Peer-Reviewed

Modelling of the Factors Creating the Yield Gap of Wheat in the Shushtar Area

Received: 16 May 2023    Accepted: 9 June 2023    Published: 21 June 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

One of the main problems in crop production in our country is the huge gap between farmers' actual yields and potential yields. Inappropriate management, in many situations, yields a significant difference that can be accounted for. Studies have shown that the first step in reducing the performance gap is to identify the performance constraints in a particular area. Understanding performance constraints can help us reduce performance gaps. Reducing the yield gaps not only helps to increase yield and production but also improves the use of land and labor, reduces production costs, and increases performance stability. This study was conducted in 2017 in the Shushtar area to estimate the potential and yield gap performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant, as well as the factors limiting the yield and the contribution of each of these factors to the creating yield gap, based on the information and the yield gap collected through a questionnaire and collecting data from the fields of Shushtar area using the method of analysis Functional Comparison (CPA) was reviewed. The real mean of the yield from fields in the Shushtar area was about 3880.38 kg ha-1 and the potential yield of farms was about 9092.78 kg ha-1 the difference between them was 5212.43 kg ha-1. In addition, the results showed that the factors causing the yield gap were important in order of importance including nitrogen percentage of soil (27.09%), soil acidity (25.57%), drainage and flooding (17.93%), soil salinity (11.73%), weed density (9.38%) and nitrogen stem content before flowering (8.30%) On the yield gap the effect on the fields was affected.

Published in International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14
Page(s) 86-91
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Boundary Line Analysis, Potential Yield, Simulation, Yield Gap

References
[1] Aggarwal, P. K., Kalra, N., Bandyopadhyay, S. K. & Selvarajan, S. (1995). A systems approach to analyze production options for wheat in India. In: J. Bouma, A. Kuyvenhoven, B. A. M. Bouman, J. C. Luyten & H. G. Zandstra (Ed). Eco-regional approaches for sustainable land use and food production. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development. (pp. 167-186.) Springer.
[2] Barrow, N. J. & Whelan, B. R. (1998). Comparing the effects of pH on the sorption of metals by soil, by goethite, and on uptake by plants. European Journal of Soil Science, 49, 683-692.
[3] Brisson, N., Rebiere, B., Zimmer, D. & Renalt, D. (2002). Response of the root system of winter wheat crop to water logging. Plant and Soil, 243, 43-55.
[4] De Bie, C. A. J. M. (2000). Comparative Performance an Analysis of Agro-Ecosystems. Ph. D. Thesis. Wageningen, Netherlands, 3, 202-209.
[5] De Datta, S. K. (1981). Principles and practices of rice production. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2, 188-195.
[6] Derakhshan, A., Najari Kalantari N., Gherekhloo J. & Kamkar, B. (2015). Resistance of Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) and Turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) to Tribenuron-methyl Herbicide in Aq Qala. Journal of plant protection, 2, 199-205.
[7] Food and Agriculture Organization (2014). Statistical Yearbook: Production. Retrieved November 10, 2018, from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3590e.pdf
[8] Fischer, R. A., Byerlee, D. & Edmeades, G. O. (2009). Can technology deliver on the yield challenge to 2050 In: FAO Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050, 24–26 June 2009. FAO, Rome. Italy, pp. 1-25.
[9] Fischer, R. A. & Edmeades, G. O. (2010). Breeding and cereal yield progress. Crop Science 50, 85–98.
[10] Grassini, P., Thornton, J., Burr, C. & Cassman, K. G. (2011). High-yield irrigated maize in the Western. Corn Belt. I. On-farm yield, yield potential, and impact of agronomic practices. Field Crops Research, 120, 142-150.
[11] Hochman, Z., Gobbett, D., Holzworth, D., McClelland, T., Van Rees, H., Marinoni, O., Garcia, J. N., & Horan, H. (2012). Quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: a case study of wheat in Australia. Field Crops Research, 136, 85-96.
[12] Hochman, Z. P., Carberry, S., Robertson, M. J., Gaydon, D. S., Bell, L. W. & McIntosh, P. C. (2012). Prospects for ecological intensification of Australian agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy, 44, 109-123.
[13] Hollington, P. A., Gill, K. S., Rashid, A. & Buttar, G. S. (2003). Development and promotion of salinity and water logging tolerant wheat for India and Pakistan. www.pa.hollington@bangor.ac.uk
[14] Kavoosi, M. & Malakouti, M. J. (2006). Determination of potassium critical level with ammonium acetate extractant in guilan rice fields. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 10 (3), 113-123 (In Farsi with English abstract).
[15] Khoshgoftarmanesh, H., Shariatmadari H. & N. Karimian. (2004). Effects of Saline irrigation water and Zn application on soil Cd solubility and Cd concentration in wheat. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 7 (4), 53-59. (In Farsi with English abstract).
[16] Liu, Z. J., Yang, X. G., Hubbard, K. G. & Lin, X. M. (2012). Maize potential yields and yield gaps in the changing climate of northeast China. Global Change Biology, 18 (11), 3441-3454.
[17] Lobell, D. B., Cassman, K. G. & Field, C. B. (2009). Crop Yield Gaps: Their Importance, Magnitudes, and Causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 179-204.
[18] Mekkaoui, M. E., Monneveux, P. & Damania, A. B., (1989). Chlorophyll flourescence as predictive test for salt tolerance in cerals. Preliminary results on durum wheat. Rachis, 8, 16-19.
[19] Nour Mohammadi, G., Siyadat, A. & Kashani, A. (2009). Agronomy, Cereal crops. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz publication. (In Farsi).
[20] Ofori, E., Kyei-Baffour, N., Mensah, E. & Agyare, W. A. (2010). Yield gap analysis in rice production from stakeholders' perspective at annum valley bottom irrigation project at no bewam in Ghana. ARPN Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 5 (6), 50-57.
[21] Pessarakli, M. (1991). Dry matter yield, nitrogen - 15 absorption, and water uptake by green beanundersodium chloride stress. Crop Science, 31 (6), 1633-1640.
[22] Rezaei, A. and Soltani, A., (1998). An introduction to applied regression analysis (4th ed.) Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran (In Farsi).
[23] Siadat, H., & Saadat Boroujeni, S., (1998). Investigating wheat growth and production in farmers’ fields in saline conditions of Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 12 (5), 15-24. (In Farsi with English abstract).
[24] Soltani, A. (2007). Application of SAS in statistical analysis (2nd ed.). Mashhad Jahad Daneshgahi Press (In Farsi).
[25] Trought, M. C. T., & Drew, M. C. (1980). The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedling (Triticum aestivum L.). I. Shoot and root growth in relation to changes in the concentrations of dissolved gasses and solutes in the soil solution. Plant and Soil, 54, 77-94.
[26] Van Ittersum, M. K., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., & Hochman, Z. (2013). Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance-A review. Field Crops Research, 143, 4-17.
[27] Waggoner J. K., Henneberger P. K., Kullman G. J., Umbach D. M., Kamel F., Beane Freeman L. E., Alavanja M. C., Sandler D. P., & Hoppin, J. A. (2013). Pesticide use and fatal injury among farmers in the agricultural health study. Retrieved December, 1, 2018, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00420-012-0752-x
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Iman Ahmadi, Mohmmad Hossein Gharineh, Alireza Abdali Mashhadi. (2023). Modelling of the Factors Creating the Yield Gap of Wheat in the Shushtar Area. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 9(3), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Iman Ahmadi; Mohmmad Hossein Gharineh; Alireza Abdali Mashhadi. Modelling of the Factors Creating the Yield Gap of Wheat in the Shushtar Area. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2023, 9(3), 86-91. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Iman Ahmadi, Mohmmad Hossein Gharineh, Alireza Abdali Mashhadi. Modelling of the Factors Creating the Yield Gap of Wheat in the Shushtar Area. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2023;9(3):86-91. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14,
      author = {Iman Ahmadi and Mohmmad Hossein Gharineh and Alireza Abdali Mashhadi},
      title = {Modelling of the Factors Creating the Yield Gap of Wheat in the Shushtar Area},
      journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {86-91},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20230903.14},
      abstract = {One of the main problems in crop production in our country is the huge gap between farmers' actual yields and potential yields. Inappropriate management, in many situations, yields a significant difference that can be accounted for. Studies have shown that the first step in reducing the performance gap is to identify the performance constraints in a particular area. Understanding performance constraints can help us reduce performance gaps. Reducing the yield gaps not only helps to increase yield and production but also improves the use of land and labor, reduces production costs, and increases performance stability. This study was conducted in 2017 in the Shushtar area to estimate the potential and yield gap performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant, as well as the factors limiting the yield and the contribution of each of these factors to the creating yield gap, based on the information and the yield gap collected through a questionnaire and collecting data from the fields of Shushtar area using the method of analysis Functional Comparison (CPA) was reviewed. The real mean of the yield from fields in the Shushtar area was about 3880.38 kg ha-1 and the potential yield of farms was about 9092.78 kg ha-1 the difference between them was 5212.43 kg ha-1. In addition, the results showed that the factors causing the yield gap were important in order of importance including nitrogen percentage of soil (27.09%), soil acidity (25.57%), drainage and flooding (17.93%), soil salinity (11.73%), weed density (9.38%) and nitrogen stem content before flowering (8.30%) On the yield gap the effect on the fields was affected.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Modelling of the Factors Creating the Yield Gap of Wheat in the Shushtar Area
    AU  - Iman Ahmadi
    AU  - Mohmmad Hossein Gharineh
    AU  - Alireza Abdali Mashhadi
    Y1  - 2023/06/21
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14
    T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    SP  - 86
    EP  - 91
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-7885
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230903.14
    AB  - One of the main problems in crop production in our country is the huge gap between farmers' actual yields and potential yields. Inappropriate management, in many situations, yields a significant difference that can be accounted for. Studies have shown that the first step in reducing the performance gap is to identify the performance constraints in a particular area. Understanding performance constraints can help us reduce performance gaps. Reducing the yield gaps not only helps to increase yield and production but also improves the use of land and labor, reduces production costs, and increases performance stability. This study was conducted in 2017 in the Shushtar area to estimate the potential and yield gap performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant, as well as the factors limiting the yield and the contribution of each of these factors to the creating yield gap, based on the information and the yield gap collected through a questionnaire and collecting data from the fields of Shushtar area using the method of analysis Functional Comparison (CPA) was reviewed. The real mean of the yield from fields in the Shushtar area was about 3880.38 kg ha-1 and the potential yield of farms was about 9092.78 kg ha-1 the difference between them was 5212.43 kg ha-1. In addition, the results showed that the factors causing the yield gap were important in order of importance including nitrogen percentage of soil (27.09%), soil acidity (25.57%), drainage and flooding (17.93%), soil salinity (11.73%), weed density (9.38%) and nitrogen stem content before flowering (8.30%) On the yield gap the effect on the fields was affected.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Khuzestan-Bavi, Iran

  • Department of Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Khuzestan-Bavi, Iran

  • Department of Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Khuzestan-Bavi, Iran

  • Sections