The issue of economic convergence has been widely analyzed by the researchers. Convergence hypothesis has been tested at different levels - global, national, regional and local. This paper is analyzing local economic convergence in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in last three decades. In this period the country was facing twofold transition: from war to peace and from socialism to market economy. The regression and distributional approach to convergence analysis are combined. The first hypothesis research is testing is that poor municipalities grow faster comparing to rich municipalities – unconditional beta convergence. Second hypothesis is that dispersion of local per capita GDP decreases over time – sigma convergence. To further investigate the issue and check the changes in the distribution, several visual inspection instruments were also used. The research findings are inconclusive. While regression analysis provides some evidence for unconditional beta-convergence, in a case of sigma convergence, results are mixed. This is related to significant structural changes country went through, firmly confirmed with the transitional probability matrix data. Findings confirm the necessity for combining different approaches and instruments while analysing convergence. From the specific country perspective, research results can be used as a strong argument for the necessity of new more balanced regional development policy.
| Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15 |
| Page(s) | 203-208 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Beta and Sigma Convergence, Local Government, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| [1] | Armstrong, H. W. (1995). “Convergence among Regions of the European Union, 1950-1990”. Papers in Regional Science, 74 (2), 143-152. (c). |
| [2] | Barrios, S. and Strobl, E. (2005). “The Dynamics of Regional Inequalities”, Economic Papers of the European Commission, 229, Brussels. |
| [3] | Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). “Convergence across States and Regions”. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 107-182. |
| [4] | Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). “Convergence”, Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223-251. |
| [5] | Baumol, W. J. (1986). “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show”. American Economic Review, 76 (5), 1072-1085. |
| [6] | Benczes, I. & Szent-Ivanyi, B. (2015). The European economy in 2014: Fragile recovery and convergence. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53, 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12266 |
| [7] | Bićanić, I., Deskar-Škrbić, M. & Zrnc, J. (2016). A Narrative Explanation of Breakpoints and Convergence Patterns in Yugoslavia and its Successor States 1952-2015. The wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 122. |
| [8] | Cass, D. (1965). “Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation”. Review of Economic Studies, 32, 233-240. |
| [9] | Chatterji, M. (1992). “Convergence Clubs and Endogenous Growth”. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8 (4), 57-69. |
| [10] | Cowell, F. (1980). “On the Structure of Additive Inequality Measures”, Review of Economic Studies, 47, 521-31. |
| [11] | Cuadrado-Roura, J. R., Mancha-Navarro, T. and Garrido-Yserte R. (2000). “Convergence and Regional Mobility in the European Union” 40th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Barcelona. |
| [12] | De la Fuente, A. (2000). “Convergence Across Countries and Regions: Theory and Empirics”. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2465, London: CEPR. |
| [13] | Durlauf, S. N. and Quah, D. T. (1999). “The New Empirics of Economic Growth”. In Taylor, J. and Woodford, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Amsterdam: North-Holland. |
| [14] | Eckey H.-F. and Türck, M. (2006). “Convergence of EU-Regions: A Literature Review”, Discussion Paper at the Economic Department of the University of Kassel, 86/06, Kassel. |
| [15] | Fabiani, S. and Pellegrini, G. (1997). “Education, Infrastructure, Geography and Growth: An Empirical Analysis of the Development of Italian Provinces”. Temi di discussione No. 323, Roma: Banca d’Italia. |
| [16] | Fagerberg J. and Verspagen, B. (1996). “Heading for Divergence? Regional Growth in Europe Reconsidered”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (3), 431-448. |
| [17] | Friedman, M. (1992). “Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?”. Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (4), 2129-2132. |
| [18] | Hofer, H. and Wörgötter, A. (1997). “Regional Per Capita Income Convergence in Austria”. Regional Studies, 31 (1), 1-12. |
| [19] | Matkowski, Z. & Próchniak, M. (2004). Economic convergence in the EU accession countries. Composite Indicators of Business Activity for Macroeconomic Analysis, RIED Papers and Proceedings’, vol. 74), SGH, Warsaw, 405-425. |
| [20] | Martin, R. (2001). “EMU versus the Regions? Regional Convergence and Divergence in Euroland”. Journal of Economic Geography, 1 (1), 51-80. |
| [21] | Maurseth, P. B. (2001). “Convergence, Technology and Geography”. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 12 (3), 247-276. |
| [22] | Monfort, P. (2008). “Convergence of EU regions Measures and evolution”, Directorate-General for Regional Policy Working Papers Series, No 01/2008, Brussels. |
| [23] | Nagy, S. G. and Siljak, Dz. (2019). “Do Transitional Countries Converge towards the European Union?”, Baltic Journal of European Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1 (26). |
| [24] | Neven, D. and Gouyette, C. (1995). “Regional Convergence in the European Community”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33 (1), 47-65. |
| [25] | Niebuhr, A. (2001). “Convergence and the Effects of Spatial Interaction”. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, 21 (2), 113-133. |
| [26] | Overman, H. and Puga, D. (2002). “Unemployment clusters across Europe’s regions and countries”, Economic Policy, CEPR, CES, MSH, vol. 17 (34), 115-148. |
| [27] | Quah, D. T. (1993). “Galton’s Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95 (4), 427-443. |
| [28] | Quah, D. (1996). “Empirics for Economic Growth and Convergence”, European Economic Review, 40, 1353-1375. |
| [29] | Quah, D. (1997). “Empirics for Growth and Distribution. Strati¬ cation, Polarization and Convergence Clubs”, Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 27-59. |
| [30] | Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). “Regional cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence”, European Economic Review, 40, 1325-1352. |
| [31] | Solow, R. (1956). “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 1, 65-94. |
| [32] | Swan, T. W. (1956). “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation”. Economic Record, 32 (63), 334-361. |
| [33] | World Bank (1999). Inequality: Methods and Tools, World Bank’s Web Site on Inequality, Poverty, and Socio-economic Performance, http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/inequal/index.htm |
APA Style
Muamer Halilbasic, Emir Agic. (2021). Testing Convergence in Post-War Transition Country. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 10(5), 203-208. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15
ACS Style
Muamer Halilbasic; Emir Agic. Testing Convergence in Post-War Transition Country. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2021, 10(5), 203-208. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15
AMA Style
Muamer Halilbasic, Emir Agic. Testing Convergence in Post-War Transition Country. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2021;10(5):203-208. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15,
author = {Muamer Halilbasic and Emir Agic},
title = {Testing Convergence in Post-War Transition Country},
journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {203-208},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20211005.15},
abstract = {The issue of economic convergence has been widely analyzed by the researchers. Convergence hypothesis has been tested at different levels - global, national, regional and local. This paper is analyzing local economic convergence in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in last three decades. In this period the country was facing twofold transition: from war to peace and from socialism to market economy. The regression and distributional approach to convergence analysis are combined. The first hypothesis research is testing is that poor municipalities grow faster comparing to rich municipalities – unconditional beta convergence. Second hypothesis is that dispersion of local per capita GDP decreases over time – sigma convergence. To further investigate the issue and check the changes in the distribution, several visual inspection instruments were also used. The research findings are inconclusive. While regression analysis provides some evidence for unconditional beta-convergence, in a case of sigma convergence, results are mixed. This is related to significant structural changes country went through, firmly confirmed with the transitional probability matrix data. Findings confirm the necessity for combining different approaches and instruments while analysing convergence. From the specific country perspective, research results can be used as a strong argument for the necessity of new more balanced regional development policy.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Testing Convergence in Post-War Transition Country AU - Muamer Halilbasic AU - Emir Agic Y1 - 2021/10/28 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 203 EP - 208 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211005.15 AB - The issue of economic convergence has been widely analyzed by the researchers. Convergence hypothesis has been tested at different levels - global, national, regional and local. This paper is analyzing local economic convergence in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in last three decades. In this period the country was facing twofold transition: from war to peace and from socialism to market economy. The regression and distributional approach to convergence analysis are combined. The first hypothesis research is testing is that poor municipalities grow faster comparing to rich municipalities – unconditional beta convergence. Second hypothesis is that dispersion of local per capita GDP decreases over time – sigma convergence. To further investigate the issue and check the changes in the distribution, several visual inspection instruments were also used. The research findings are inconclusive. While regression analysis provides some evidence for unconditional beta-convergence, in a case of sigma convergence, results are mixed. This is related to significant structural changes country went through, firmly confirmed with the transitional probability matrix data. Findings confirm the necessity for combining different approaches and instruments while analysing convergence. From the specific country perspective, research results can be used as a strong argument for the necessity of new more balanced regional development policy. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: