| Peer-Reviewed

Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystems Functions and Services: Systematic Review

Received: 25 September 2021    Accepted: 23 November 2021    Published: 2 December 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The benefits that individuals receive from ecosystems are referred to as ecosystem services (ES). Biodiversity is important in this context since it supports the majority of ecological functions. This review aims to include in the body of knowledge about ecosystem function and services, as well as their relationship to biodiversity. Natural resource stocks and natural ecosystems are essential to the earth's life-support system's operation, and they are priceless to humanity since they contribute to human well-being and welfare. However, because to deforestation and forest degradation, humans has been decreasing these services over the last few decades. The value of ecosystem services is reduced by the loss of species caused by deforestation and forest degradation and lowers our quality of life. Ecosystem processes and services can benefit from biodiversity in a variety of ways. Biodiversity can function as a regulator of important ecological processes, a final ecosystem service, or a good in and of itself. Ecosystems' control, habitat, production, and information functions are all supported by these responsibilities. These functions, in turn, are essential for ecosystems to function properly and deliver services to humans. Biodiversity is woven into ecosystems in a variety of ways. Functional diversity, on the other hand, appears to be the most important component in sustaining ecological integrity and, as a result, providing ecosystem services.

Published in International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12
Page(s) 70-79
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Ecosystem Function, Services

References
[1] Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H. J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T. and Malingreau, J. P., 2002. Humid Tropical forests determination of deforestation rates of the world's. Science, 297, pp. 999-1002.
[2] Adler, P. B., Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T., Hillebrand, H., Hautier, Y., Hector, A., Harpole, W. S., O’Halloran, L. R., Grace, J. B., Anderson, T. M. and Bakker, J. D., 2011. Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. science, 333 (6050), pp. 1750-1753.
[3] Afonso, F., Félix, P. M., Chainho, P., Heumüller, J. A., de Lima, R. F., Ribeiro, F. and Brito, A. C., 2021. Assessing ecosystem services in mangroves: insights from São Tomé Island (Central Africa). Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, p. 1.
[4] Alroy, J., 2008. Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (Supplement 1), pp. 11536-11542.
[5] Andersson, E., Barthel, S. and Ahrné, K., 2007. Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological applications, 17 (5), pp. 1267-1278.
[6] Balvanera, P., Pfisterer, A. B., Buchmann, N., He, J. S., Nakashizuka, T., Raffaelli, D. and Schmid, B., 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology letters, 9 (10), pp. 1146-1156.
[7] Balvanera, P., Siddique, I., Dee, L., Paquette, A., Isbell, F., Gonzalez, A., Byrnes, J., O’Connor, M. I., Hungate, B. A. and Griffin, J. N., 2014. Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: current uncertainties and the necessary next steps. Bioscience, 64 (1), pp. 49-57.
[8] Baraloto, C., Hérault, B., Paine, C. T., Massot, H., Blanc, L., Bonal, D., Molino, J. F., Nicolini, E. A. and Sabatier, D., 2012. Contrasting taxonomic and functional responses of a tropical tree community to selective logging. Journal of applied ecology, 49 (4), pp. 861-870.
[9] Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J. L., Lindsey, E. L., Maguire, K. C. and Mersey, B., 2011. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?. Nature, 471 (7336), pp. 51-57.
[10] Barrufol, M., Schmid, B., Bruelheide, H., Chi, X., Hector, A., Ma, K., Michalski, S., Tang, Z. and Niklaus, P. A., 2013. Biodiversity promotes tree growth during succession in subtropical forest. PLoS one, 8 (11), p. e81246.
[11] Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. and Oakley, T. H., 2008. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (44), pp. 17012-17017.
[12] Calviño-Cancela, M., Chas-Amil, M. L., García-Martínez, E. D. and Touza, J., 2016. Wildfire risk associated with different vegetation types within and outside wildland-urban interfaces. Forest Ecology and Management, 372, pp. 1-9.
[13] Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A. and Kinzig, A. P., 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486 (7401), pp. 59-67.
[14] Cavanaugh, K. C., Gosnell, J. S., Davis, S. L., Ahumada, J., Boundja, P., Clark, D. B., Mugerwa, B., Jansen, P. A., O'Brien, T. G., Rovero, F. and Sheil, D., 2014. Carbon storage in tropical forests correlates with taxonomic diversity and functional dominance on a global scale. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23 (5), pp. 563-573.
[15] Chalcraft, D. R., Wilsey, B. J., Bowles, C. and Willig, M. R., 2009. The relationship between productivity and multiple aspects of biodiversity in six grassland communities. Biodiversity and conservation, 18 (1), pp. 91-104.
[16] Chapin Iii, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E. and Mack, M. C., 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405 (6783), pp. 234-242.
[17] Chivian, E. and Bernstein, A., 2009. Sustaining Life: How Human Health Depends on Biodiversity.
[18] Clark, C. M., Flynn, D. F., Butterfield, B. J. and Reich, P. B., 2012. Testing the link between functional diversity and ecosystem functioning in a Minnesota grassland experiment. PloS one, 7 (12), p. e52821.
[19] Corlett, R. T. and Primack, R. B., 2011. Tropical rain forests: an ecological and biogeographical comparison. John Wiley & Sons.
[20] Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'neill, R. V., Paruelo, J. and Raskin, R. G., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. nature, 387 (6630), pp. 253-260.
[21] Daily, G. C., 2013. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems (1997) (pp. 454-464). Yale University Press.
[22] Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J. and Shallenberger, R., 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7 (1), pp. 21-28.
[23] Davies, A. B., Robertson, M. P., Levick, S. R., Asner, G. P., van Rensburg, B. J. and Parr, C. L., 2014. Variable effects of termite mounds on A frican savanna grass communities across a rainfall gradient. Journal of vegetation science, 25 (6), pp. 1405-1416.
[24] de Groot, R., van der Perk, J., Chiesura, A. and Marguliew, S., 2000. Ecological functions and socioeconomic values of critical natural capital as a measure for ecological integrity and environmental health. In Implementing ecological integrity (pp. 191-214). Springer, Dordrecht.
[25] Dhanaraj, B., Papanna, M. K., Adinarayanan, S., Vedachalam, C., Sundaram, V., Shanmugam, S., Sekar, G., Menon, P. A., Wares, F. and Swaminathan, S., 2015. Prevalence and risk factors for adult pulmonary tuberculosis in a metropolitan city of South India. PloS one, 10 (4), p. e0124260.
[26] Dı́az, S. and Cabido, M., 2001. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in ecology & evolution, 16 (11), pp. 646-655.
[27] Dirzo, R. and Raven, P. H., 2003. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annual review of Environment and Resources, 28 (1), pp. 137-167.
[28] Egoh, B. N., Reyers, B., Carwardine, J., Bode, M., O'FARRELL, P. J., Wilson, K. A., Possingham, H. P., Rouget, M., De Lange, W., Richardson, D. M. and Cowling, R. M., 2010. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Little Karoo, South Africa. Conservation Biology, 24 (4), pp. 1021-1030.
[29] Exchange, A. P. E., 2005. Ecosystem Services Enhanced by Salmon Habitat Conservation in the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed.
[30] Finegan, B., Peña-Claros, M., de Oliveira, A., Ascarrunz, N., Bret-Harte, M. S., Carreño-Rocabado, G., Casanoves, F., Díaz, S., Eguiguren Velepucha, P., Fernandez, F. and Licona, J. C., 2015. Does functional trait diversity predict above-ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses. Journal of Ecology, 103 (1), pp. 191-201.
[31] Foley, J. A., Asner, G. P., Costa, M. H., Coe, M. T., DeFries, R., Gibbs, H. K., Howard, E. A., Olson, S., Patz, J., Ramankutty, N. and Snyder, P., 2007. Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5 (1), pp. 25-32.
[32] Forrester, D. I. and Bauhus, J., 2016. A review of processes behind diversity—productivity relationships in forests. Curr For Rep 2: 45–61.
[33] Gairola, S., Sharma, C. M., Ghildiyal, S. K. and Suyal, S., 2011. Live tree biomass and carbon variation along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate valley slopes of the Garhwal Himalaya (India). Current Science, pp. 1862-1870.
[34] Gamfeldt, L., Snäll, T., Bagchi, R., Jonsson, M., Gustafsson, L., Kjellander, P., Ruiz-Jaen, M. C., Fröberg, M., Stendahl, J., Philipson, C. D. and Mikusiński, G., 2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature communications, 4 (1), pp. 1-8.
[35] Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M., 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis, 1, pp. 110-139.
[36] Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., Caldeira, M. C., Diemer, M., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., Finn, J. A., Freitas, H., Giller, P. S., Good, J. and Harris, R., 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. science, 286 (5442), pp. 1123-1127.
[37] Hoffmann, M., Hilton-Taylor, C., Angulo, A., Böhm, M., Brooks, T. M., Butchart, S. H., Carpenter, K. E., Chanson, J., Collen, B., Cox, N. A. and Darwall, W. R., 2010. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. science, 330 (6010), pp. 1503-1509.
[38] Hooper, D. U., Chapin Iii, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S. and Schmid, B., 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological monographs, 75 (1), pp. 3-35.
[39] Huston, M. A., 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia, 110 (4), pp. 449-460.
[40] Isbell, F., Calcagno, V., Hector, A., Connolly, J., Harpole, W. S., Reich, P. B., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., Tilman, D., Van Ruijven, J. and Weigelt, A., 2011. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature, 477 (7363), pp. 199-202.
[41] Jenkins, D. G., 2015. Estimating ecological production from biomass. Ecosphere, 6 (4), pp. 1-31.
[42] Johnson, A. W., 1999. Invitation to organic chemistry. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
[43] Kremen, C., 2005. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecology letters, 8 (5), pp. 468-479.
[44] Lasky, J. R., Bachelot, B., Muscarella, R., Schwartz, N., Forero-Montaña, J., Nytch, C. J., Swenson, N. G., Thompson, J., Zimmerman, J. K. and Uriarte, M., 2015. Ontogenetic shifts in trait-mediated mechanisms of plant community assembly. Ecology, 96 (8), pp. 2157-2169.
[45] Leemans, R. and De Groot, R. S., 2003. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment.
[46] Loreau, M. and Hector, A., 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature, 412 (6842), pp. 72-76.
[47] Luck, G. W., Daily, G. C. and Ehrlich, P. R., 2003. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18 (7), pp. 331-336.
[48] Mace, G. M., Norris, K. and Fitter, A. H., 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in ecology & evolution, 27 (1), pp. 19-26.
[49] McMichael, A., Scholes, R., Hefny, M., Pereira, E., Palm, C. and Foale, S., 2005. Linking ecosystem services and human well-being. Island Press.
[50] Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I. and Gough, L., 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity?. Ecology, 82 (9), pp. 2381-2396.
[51] Mooney, H. A., Ehrlich, P. R. and Daily, G. E., 1997. Ecosystem services: a fragmentary history. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems, pp. 11-19.
[52] Mouchet, M. A., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. and Mouillot, D., 2010. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Functional Ecology, 24 (4), pp. 867-876.
[53] Naeem, S. and Wright, J. P., 2003. Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem. Ecology letters, 6 (6), pp. 567-579.
[54] Naeem, S., Bunker, D. E., Hector, A., Loreau, M. and Perrings, C. eds., 2009. Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford University Press.
[55] Nature, E., 1994. Sustainability in Practice: Planning for Environmental Sustainability. English Nature.
[56] Norton, B. G., 2014. Why preserve natural variety?. Princeton University Press.
[57] Novacek, M. J. and Cleland, E. E., 2001. The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98 (10), pp. 5466-5470.
[58] Paquette, A. and Messier, C., 2011. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20 (1), pp. 170-180.
[59] Ruiz-Jaen, M. C. and Potvin, C., 2010. Tree diversity explains variation in ecosystem function in a neotropical forest in Panama. Biotropica, 42 (6), pp. 638-646.
[60] Schopf, J. W., 2006. Fossil evidence of Archaean life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361 (1470), pp. 869-885.
[61] Seidel, D., Leuschner, C., Scherber, C., Beyer, F., Wommelsdorf, T., Cashman, M. J. and Fehrmann, L., 2013. The relationship between tree species richness, canopy space exploration and productivity in a temperate broad-leaf mixed forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 310, pp. 366-374.
[62] Sekercioglu, C. H., 2010. Ecosystem functions and services. Conservation biology for all, 2010, pp. 45-72.
[63] Šímová, I., Li, Y. M. and Storch, D., 2013. Relationship between species richness and productivity in plants: the role of sampling effect, heterogeneity and species pool. Journal of Ecology, 101 (1), pp. 161-170.
[64] Spash, C. L., 2008. How much is that ecosystem in the window? The one with the bio-diverse trail. Environmental Values, 17 (2), pp. 259-284.
[65] Srivastava, D. S., Cadotte, M. W. and MacDonald, A. A., M, Marushia RG, Mirotchnick N. 2012. Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 15, pp. 637-648.
[66] Stiling, P. D., 1996. Ecology: theories and applications (Vol. 4). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
[67] Szwagrzyk, J. and Gazda, A., 2007. Above-ground standing biomass and tree species diversity in natural stands of Central Europe. Journal of vegetation Science, 18 (4), pp. 555-562.
[68] TEEB, 2011. TEEB manual for cities: Ecosystem services in urban management, The Economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB).
[69] Thompson, I. D., Okabe, K., Tylianakis, J. M., Kumar, P., Brockerhoff, E. G., Schellhorn, N. A., Parrotta, J. A. and Nasi, R., 2011. Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy. BioScience, 61 (12), pp. 972-981.
[70] Turner, I. M., 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. Journal of applied Ecology, pp. 200-209.
[71] Van Con, T., Thang, N. T., Khiem, C. C., Quy, T. H., Lam, V. T., Van Do, T. and Sato, T., 2013. Relationship between aboveground biomass and measures of structure and species diversity in tropical forests of Vietnam. Forest Ecology and Management, 310, pp. 213-218.
[72] van der Velden, M. A. J., 2015. The link between biodiversity and ecosystem services: how to incorporate scientific knowledge into a conservation strategy (Master's thesis).
[73] Vance-Chalcraft, H. D., Willig, M. R., Cox, S. B., Lugo, A. E. and Scatena, F. N., 2010. Relationship between aboveground biomass and multiple measures of biodiversity in subtropical forest of Puerto Rico. Biotropica, 42 (3), pp. 290-299.
[74] Vandewalle, M., Sykes, M. T., Harrison, P. A., Luck, G. W., Berry, P., Bugter, R., Dawson, T. P., Feld, C. K., Harrington, R., Haslett, J. R. and Hering, D., 2008. Review paper on concepts of dynamic ecosystems and their services. Project report to the European Union Sixth Framework Programme.
[75] Verweij, P. A., Schouten, M. A., Van Beukering, P., Triana, J., Van der Leeuw, K. and Hess, S., 2009. Keeping the Amazon forests standing: a matter of values.
[76] Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J. M., 1997. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science, 277 (5325), pp. 494-499.
[77] Walker, B. and Salt, D., 2012. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island press.
[78] Weir, J. T. and Schluter, D., 2007. The latitudinal gradient in recent speciation and extinction rates of birds and mammals. Science, 315 (5818), pp. 1574-1576.
[79] Wu, X., Wang, X., Tang, Z., Shen, Z., Zheng, C., Xia, X. and Fang, J., 2015. The relationship between species richness and biomass changes from boreal to subtropical forests in China. Ecography, 38 (6), pp. 602-613.
[80] Zarandian, A., Baral, H., Yavari, A. R., Jafari, H. R., Stork, N. E., Ling, M. A. and Amirnejad, H., 2016. Anthropogenic decline of ecosystem services threatens the integrity of the unique Hyrcanian (Caspian) forests in Northern Iran. Forests, 7 (3), p. 51.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Abdulbasit Hussein. (2021). Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystems Functions and Services: Systematic Review. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 6(4), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abdulbasit Hussein. Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystems Functions and Services: Systematic Review. Int. J. Ecotoxicol. Ecobiol. 2021, 6(4), 70-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abdulbasit Hussein. Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystems Functions and Services: Systematic Review. Int J Ecotoxicol Ecobiol. 2021;6(4):70-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12,
      author = {Abdulbasit Hussein},
      title = {Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystems Functions and Services: Systematic Review},
      journal = {International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology},
      volume = {6},
      number = {4},
      pages = {70-79},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijee.20210604.12},
      abstract = {The benefits that individuals receive from ecosystems are referred to as ecosystem services (ES). Biodiversity is important in this context since it supports the majority of ecological functions. This review aims to include in the body of knowledge about ecosystem function and services, as well as their relationship to biodiversity. Natural resource stocks and natural ecosystems are essential to the earth's life-support system's operation, and they are priceless to humanity since they contribute to human well-being and welfare. However, because to deforestation and forest degradation, humans has been decreasing these services over the last few decades. The value of ecosystem services is reduced by the loss of species caused by deforestation and forest degradation and lowers our quality of life. Ecosystem processes and services can benefit from biodiversity in a variety of ways. Biodiversity can function as a regulator of important ecological processes, a final ecosystem service, or a good in and of itself. Ecosystems' control, habitat, production, and information functions are all supported by these responsibilities. These functions, in turn, are essential for ecosystems to function properly and deliver services to humans. Biodiversity is woven into ecosystems in a variety of ways. Functional diversity, on the other hand, appears to be the most important component in sustaining ecological integrity and, as a result, providing ecosystem services.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystems Functions and Services: Systematic Review
    AU  - Abdulbasit Hussein
    Y1  - 2021/12/02
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12
    T2  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JF  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JO  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    SP  - 70
    EP  - 79
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1735
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20210604.12
    AB  - The benefits that individuals receive from ecosystems are referred to as ecosystem services (ES). Biodiversity is important in this context since it supports the majority of ecological functions. This review aims to include in the body of knowledge about ecosystem function and services, as well as their relationship to biodiversity. Natural resource stocks and natural ecosystems are essential to the earth's life-support system's operation, and they are priceless to humanity since they contribute to human well-being and welfare. However, because to deforestation and forest degradation, humans has been decreasing these services over the last few decades. The value of ecosystem services is reduced by the loss of species caused by deforestation and forest degradation and lowers our quality of life. Ecosystem processes and services can benefit from biodiversity in a variety of ways. Biodiversity can function as a regulator of important ecological processes, a final ecosystem service, or a good in and of itself. Ecosystems' control, habitat, production, and information functions are all supported by these responsibilities. These functions, in turn, are essential for ecosystems to function properly and deliver services to humans. Biodiversity is woven into ecosystems in a variety of ways. Functional diversity, on the other hand, appears to be the most important component in sustaining ecological integrity and, as a result, providing ecosystem services.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Natural Resource Management, Haramaya University College of Agriculture and Environmental Science (HU CAES), Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

  • Sections