| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Process Techniques on Three Feedstocks Mix on Briquette Performance Properties

Received: 13 January 2022    Accepted: 4 February 2022    Published: 16 February 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Energy availability at domestic level is a challenge across the world and especially in Africa. Firewood is the major source of energy for cooking for households in Kenya and there is need for a friendly sustainable environmental fuel. Carbonized biomass materials (briquettes) are considered a substitute. This study thus evaluated effect of selected briquetting techniques on briquettes’ performance properties. Milled charcoal dusts mixed in a ratio of 1:1:1 (Rice husk, maize cob, and sugarcane bagasse) with molasses binder in the ratio of 6:1 was hence ready for densification and agglomeration. The Water Boiling Test was used in determination of the briquette’s performance characteristics for various parameters. High (screw press); and low (drum agglomerator and hand making) pressure briquetting techniques were distinctly different in ignition time (minutes), time to boil (minutes) burning rate (g/min), specific fuel consumption (g/ml) and power output (kW) values as (4, 3, 3; 14, 12, 11: 0.8, 1.1, 1.3; 0.11, 0.13, 0.15; and 1.8, 1.4, 0.75). Diversified briquetting techniques, number and type of feedstocks are thus factors that influence performance characteristics of briquettes in converting the agricultural and or other wastes for useful energy application. This knowledge should enable users to make choices on techniques for optimum efficiency towards realization of Sustainable Development Goal Number #7 on affordable and clean energy.

Published in Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11
Page(s) 1-8
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Energy, Feedstock, Carbonization, Technique, Briquettes, Performance Properties

References
[1] Abdulkareem, S., Hakeem, B. A., Ahmed, I. I., Ajiboye, T. K., Adebisi, J. A., & Yahaya, T. (2018). Combustion Characteristics of Bio-Degradable Biomass Briquettes. 13, 13.
[2] Abdulrasheed, A., Aroko, U. O., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Compression Pressure Effect on Mechanical & Combustion Properties of Sawdust Briquette using Styrofoam adhesive as binder. 15, 7.
[3] Adeleke, A. A., Ikubanni, P. P., Orhadahwe, T. A., Christopher, C. T., Akano, J. M., Agboola, O. O., Adegoke, S. O., Balogun, A. O., & Ibikunle, R. A. (2021). Sustainability of multifaceted usage of biomass: A review. Heliyon, 7 (9), e08025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08025.
[4] Adeniyi, A. G., & Ighalo, J. O. (2020). Computer-Aided Modeling of Thermochemical Conversion Processes for Environmental Waste Management. In C. M. Hussain (Ed.), Handbook of Environmental Materials Management (pp. 1–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_185-1.
[5] Ajimotokan, H. A., Ehindero, A. O., Ajao, K. S., Adeleke, A. A., Ikubanni, P. P., & Shuaib-Babata, Y. L. (2019). Combustion characteristics of fuel briquettes made from charcoal particles and sawdust agglomerates. Scientific African, 6, e00202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00202.
[6] Anggraeni, S., Hofifah, S. N., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2021). Effects of Particle Size and Composition of Cassava Peels and Rice Husk on The Briquette Performance. 16, 16.
[7] Berrueta, V. M., Edwards, R. D., & Masera, O. R. (2008). Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico. Renewable Energy, 33 (5), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.04.016.
[8] Bonsu, B. O., Takase, M., & Mantey, J. (2020). Preparation of charcoal briquette from palm kernel shells: case study in Ghana. Heliyon 6, e05266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05266.
[9] Cardil, A., de-Miguel, S., Silva, C. A., Reich, P. B., Calkin, D., Brancalion, P. H. S., Vibrans, A. C., Gamarra, J. G. P., Zhou, M., Pijanowski, B. C., Hui, C., Crowther, T. W., Hérault, B., Piotto, D., Salas-Eljatib, C., Broadbent, E. N., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Picard, N., Aragão, L. E. O. C., & Liang, J. (2020). Recent deforestation drove the spike in Amazonian fires. Environmental Research Letters, 15 (12), 121003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abcac7.
[10] Chirchir, D. K., Nyaanga, D. M., & Githeko, J. M. (2013). Effect of Binder Types and Amount on Physical and Combustion Characteristics. 11.
[11] da Silva, S. B., Arantes, M. D. C., de Andrade, J. K. B., Andrade, C. R., Carneiro, A. de C. O., & Protásio, T. de P. (2020). Influence of physical and chemical compositions on the properties and energy use of lignocellulosic biomass pellets in Brazil. Renewable Energy, 147, 1870–1879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.131.
[12] Davies, R., & Abolude, D. (2013). Ignition and Burning Rate of Water Hyacinth Briquettes. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2013/1964.
[13] Davies, R. M., & Davies, O. A. (2013). Physical and Combustion Characteristics of Briquettes Made from Water Hyacinth and Phytoplankton Scum as Binder. Journal of Combustion, 2013, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/549894.
[14] Demirbas, A., & Sahin-Demirbas, A. (2004). Briquetting Properties of Biomass Waste Materials. Energy Sources, 26 (1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310490251918.
[15] Grover P., & Mishra K (2006), “Development of an Appropriate Biomass Briquetting Technology Suitable for Production and Use in Developing Countries”, Biomass Conversion Technology Journal, Vol. 1, p. 45-48.
[16] Ikelle, I. I., Anyigor, C and Ogah, S. P. (2018). The Characterization of the Heating Properties of Briquettes of Coal and Rice Husk, IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-JAC), e-ISSN: 2278-5736. Volume 7, Issue 5 Ver. II, pp. 100-105.
[17] Jamradloedluk, J., & Wiriyaumpaiwong, S. (2007). Production and Characterization of Rice Husk Based Charcoal Briquettes, KKU Engineering Journal, vol. 34 (4), 391-398.
[18] Kabok, P., Nyaanga, D. M., Mbugua, J. M., & Eppinga, R. (2018). Effect of Shapes, Binders and Densities of Faecal Matter - Sawdust Briquettes on Ignition and Burning Times. J. Pet. Environ. Biotechnol. 09 https://doi.org/10.4172/2157- 7463.1000370.
[19] Kaur, S., Kumar, D., Singla, M., & Dogra, R. (2020). Biogas to Bio-CNG from paddy straw: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8 (3), 1833–1838. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3y.9475.
[20] Kaur, A.; Roy, M. and Kundu, K. (2017). Densification of Biomass by Briquetting: A Review. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 8, 20561–20568.
[21] Kizito, S., Jjagwe, J., Ssewaya, B., Nekesa, L., Tumutegyereize, P., Zziwa, A., & Komakech, A. J. (2021). Biofuel characteristics of non-charred briquettes from dried fecal sludge blended with food market waste: Suggesting a waste-to-biofuel enterprise as a win–win strategy to solve energy and sanitation problems in slums settlements. Waste Management, S0956053X21006176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.029.
[22] Kongprasert, N., Wangphanich, P., & Jutilarptavorn, A. (2019). Charcoal briquettes from Madan wood waste as an alternative energy in Thailand. Procedia Manuf. 30, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.019.
[23] Kpalo, S. Y., Zainuddin, M. F., Manaf, L. A., & Roslan, A. M. (2020b). A Review of Technical and Economic Aspects of Biomass Briquetting. Sustainability, 12 (11), 4609. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114609.
[24] Kumar, R., Strezov, V., Weldekidan, H., He, J., Singh, S., Kan, T., & Dastjerdi, B. (2020). Lignocellulose biomass pyrolysis for bio-oil production: A review of biomass pre-treatment methods for production of drop-in fuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 123, 109763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109763.
[25] Lubwama, M., & Yiga, V. A. (2018). Characteristics of briquettes developed from rice and coffee husks for domestic cooking applications in Uganda. Renew. Energy 118, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.003.
[26] Lubwama, M., Yiga, V. A., Muhairwe, F., & Kihedu, J. (2019). Physical and combustion properties of agricultural residue bio-char bio-composite briquettes as sustainable domestic energy sources. Renew. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. renene.2019.10.085.
[27] Mbuba, J., Nyaanga, D. M., Kabok, P., & Eppinga, R. (2017). Effect of mix ratios and binders on physical and physical combustion characteristics of faecal matter-sawdust briquettes. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 7, 94–99.
[28] Navalta, C. J. L. G., Banaag, K. G. C., Raboy, V. A. O., Go, A. W., Cabatingan, L. K., & Ju, Y.-H. (2020). Solid fuel from Co-briquetting of sugarcane bagasse and rice bran. Renewable Energy, 147, 1941–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.129.
[29] Ndindeng, S. A., Mbassi, J. E. G., Mbacham, W. F., Manful, J., Graham-Acquaah, S., Moreira, J., Dossou, J., & Futakuchi, K. (2015). Quality optimization in briquettes made from rice milling by-products. Energy for Sustainable Development, 29, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.09.003.
[30] Nguyen, Q. A., Smith, W. A., Wahlen, B. D., & Wendt, L. M. (2020). Total and Sustainable Utilization of Biomass Resources: A Perspective. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00546.
[31] Nunes, L. J. R., Causer, T. P., & Ciolkosz, D. (2020). Biomass for energy: A review on supply chain management models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 109658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109658.
[32] Nwabue, F. I., Unah, U., & Itumoh, E. J. (2017). Production and characterization of smokeless bio-coal briquettes incorporating plastic waste materials. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 8, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.02.008.
[33] Ochola, G. O. (2018). Urbanization and Environmental Stress: A Review of Impacts of Urban Development on the Environment in Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 14 (3). https://doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2018.14.555889.
[34] Olorunnisola, A. (2004). Briquetting of rattan furniture waste. Journal of Bamboo and Rattan, 3 (2), 139-149.
[35] Onaji P. B., & Siemons R. V. (2003). “Production of Charcoal Briquettes from Cotton Stalks in Malawi: Methodology for Feasibility Studies using Experiences in Sudan.” Biomass and Bioenergy, 4: 199-211.
[36] Onuegbu, T. U., Ekpunobi, U. E., Ogbu, I. M., Ekeoma, M. O., & Obumselu, F. O. (2011). Comparative studies of ignition time and water boiling test of coal and biomass briquettes blend. Int. J. Res. Rev. Appl. Sci. 7, 153–159.
[37] Onukak, I. E., Mohammed-Dabo, I. A., Ameh, A. O., Okoduwa, S. I. R., & Fasanya, O. O. (2017). Production and characterization of biomass briquettes from tannery solid waste. Recycling 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling2040017.
[38] Oyelaran, O. A. (2015). Evaluating the bio-energy potential of groundnut shell and sugarcane bagasse waste composite. 5.
[39] Sawadogo, M., Tchini Tanoh, S., Sidib´e, S., Kpai, N., & Tankoano, I. (2018). Cleaner production in Burkina Faso: Case study of fuel briquettes made from cashew industry waste. J. Clean. Prod. 195, 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.05.261.
[40] Sharma, D., Ravindra, K., Kaur, M., Prinja, S., & Mor, S. (2020). Cost evaluation of different household fuels and identification of the barriers for the choice of clean cooking fuels in India. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101825.
[41] Song, B., & Hall, P. (2020). Densification of Biomass and Waste Plastic Blends as a Solid Fuel: Hazards, Advantages, and Perspectives. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00058.
[42] Sunnu, A. K., Adu-Poku, K. A., & Ayetor, G. K. (2021). Production and Characterization of Charred Briquettes from Various Agricultural Waste. Combustion Science and Technology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2021.1977803.
[43] Trigueiro, W. R., Nabout, J. C., & Tessarolo, G. (2020). Uncovering the spatial variability of recent deforestation drivers in the Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Environmental Management, 275, 111243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111243.
[44] Tumuluru, J. S., & Fillerup, E. (2020). Briquetting characteristics of woody and herbaceous biomass blends: Impact on physical properties, chemical composition, and calorific value. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 14 (5), 1105–1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2121.
[45] Tumuluru, S. J.; Wright, C. T.; Hess, J. R., & Kenney, K. L. (2011). A review of biomass densification systems to develop uniform feedstock commodities for bioenergy application. BiofuelsBioprod. Bioref. 5, 683–707.
[46] Ugwu, K. & Agbo., K. (2013). Evaluation of Binders in the Production of Briquettes from Empty Fruit Bunches of Elais Guinensis. International Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2 (4), 176. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20130204.17.
[47] Wilaipon, P. (2009). The Effects of Briquetting Pressure on Banana-Peel Briquette and the Banana Waste in Northern Thailand. 5.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Wilberforce Okwara, Daudi Nyaanga, Peter Kabok, Jane Nyaanga. (2022). Effect of Process Techniques on Three Feedstocks Mix on Briquette Performance Properties. Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, 7(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Wilberforce Okwara; Daudi Nyaanga; Peter Kabok; Jane Nyaanga. Effect of Process Techniques on Three Feedstocks Mix on Briquette Performance Properties. J. Energy Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 7(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Wilberforce Okwara, Daudi Nyaanga, Peter Kabok, Jane Nyaanga. Effect of Process Techniques on Three Feedstocks Mix on Briquette Performance Properties. J Energy Environ Chem Eng. 2022;7(1):1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11,
      author = {Wilberforce Okwara and Daudi Nyaanga and Peter Kabok and Jane Nyaanga},
      title = {Effect of Process Techniques on Three Feedstocks Mix on Briquette Performance Properties},
      journal = {Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering},
      volume = {7},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-8},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeece.20220701.11},
      abstract = {Energy availability at domestic level is a challenge across the world and especially in Africa. Firewood is the major source of energy for cooking for households in Kenya and there is need for a friendly sustainable environmental fuel. Carbonized biomass materials (briquettes) are considered a substitute. This study thus evaluated effect of selected briquetting techniques on briquettes’ performance properties. Milled charcoal dusts mixed in a ratio of 1:1:1 (Rice husk, maize cob, and sugarcane bagasse) with molasses binder in the ratio of 6:1 was hence ready for densification and agglomeration. The Water Boiling Test was used in determination of the briquette’s performance characteristics for various parameters. High (screw press); and low (drum agglomerator and hand making) pressure briquetting techniques were distinctly different in ignition time (minutes), time to boil (minutes) burning rate (g/min), specific fuel consumption (g/ml) and power output (kW) values as (4, 3, 3; 14, 12, 11: 0.8, 1.1, 1.3; 0.11, 0.13, 0.15; and 1.8, 1.4, 0.75). Diversified briquetting techniques, number and type of feedstocks are thus factors that influence performance characteristics of briquettes in converting the agricultural and or other wastes for useful energy application. This knowledge should enable users to make choices on techniques for optimum efficiency towards realization of Sustainable Development Goal Number #7 on affordable and clean energy.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of Process Techniques on Three Feedstocks Mix on Briquette Performance Properties
    AU  - Wilberforce Okwara
    AU  - Daudi Nyaanga
    AU  - Peter Kabok
    AU  - Jane Nyaanga
    Y1  - 2022/02/16
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11
    T2  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
    JF  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
    JO  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 8
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2637-434X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220701.11
    AB  - Energy availability at domestic level is a challenge across the world and especially in Africa. Firewood is the major source of energy for cooking for households in Kenya and there is need for a friendly sustainable environmental fuel. Carbonized biomass materials (briquettes) are considered a substitute. This study thus evaluated effect of selected briquetting techniques on briquettes’ performance properties. Milled charcoal dusts mixed in a ratio of 1:1:1 (Rice husk, maize cob, and sugarcane bagasse) with molasses binder in the ratio of 6:1 was hence ready for densification and agglomeration. The Water Boiling Test was used in determination of the briquette’s performance characteristics for various parameters. High (screw press); and low (drum agglomerator and hand making) pressure briquetting techniques were distinctly different in ignition time (minutes), time to boil (minutes) burning rate (g/min), specific fuel consumption (g/ml) and power output (kW) values as (4, 3, 3; 14, 12, 11: 0.8, 1.1, 1.3; 0.11, 0.13, 0.15; and 1.8, 1.4, 0.75). Diversified briquetting techniques, number and type of feedstocks are thus factors that influence performance characteristics of briquettes in converting the agricultural and or other wastes for useful energy application. This knowledge should enable users to make choices on techniques for optimum efficiency towards realization of Sustainable Development Goal Number #7 on affordable and clean energy.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Agricultural Engineering, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya

  • Department of Agricultural Engineering, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya

  • Department of Agricultural Engineering and Renewable Energy, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology (JOOUST), Siaya, Kenya

  • Department of Crops, Horticulture and Soils, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya

  • Sections