Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona; Joel Ogunyemi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona, Joel Ogunyemi

Published in Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Received: 20 June 2022 Accepted: 18 July 2022 Published: 29 July 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In this study, the reasons behind sustained utilisation of non-energy saving lamps (ESLs) in Nigeria vis-à-vis global lamps utilisation and environmental impacts of using non-ESLs was examined. The study was conducted via an online questionnaire using a qualitative research approach to survey 62 randomly selected apartments in the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria on policy awareness and motivation for non-ESL utilisation. Data obtained were tested for lamps’ utilisation dependency on household income using correlation and regression analysis with 5% significant level. The impact of sustained non-ESL utilisation on CO₂ emission was looked into. Pearson’s regression coefficients (R2) of 0.4646, 0.4772, 0.2716 and 0.4871 were obtained for incandescent, CFL, LED and magnetic ballast fluorescent lamps respectively. The results showed that the utilisation of non-ESL considered is dependent on the household income. On the other hand, LED lamp utilisation shows a moderate dependency; 83% of the respondents were unaware of government policy on non-ESLs and 24% chose market availability of non-ESL as motivation for utilisation; 46% of the respondents chose cheap cost as motivation. Thus, the household economic status, lack of policy implementation, availability and cheap cost of non-ESL in the Nigerian market can be seen to have contributed to the sustained utilisation of incandescent lamps in the country. About 77% of lamps sampled (non-ESLs 13% and CFL 64%) can be replaced with LED. The results showed that Nigeria has great opportunities to contribute to global CO₂ emissions reduction possible form the eradication of non-ESL in the country.

Published in	Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14
Page(s)	71-79
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CO₂ Emissions, Energy-Saving Lamps, Energy-Saving Policy, Incandescent Lamp, LED Lamp, Nigerian Residential Sector

References

[1]	IEA. Light's labour's lost policies for energy-efficient lighting; 2006.
[2]	B. Stoffel, ‘The Role of Pumps for Energy Consumption and Energy Saving’. In: Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Pumps and Pump Units’, B. Stoffel, ed., 2015. pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100597-2.00001-X.
[3]	United Nations Population Fund. World Population Dashboard, Nigeria. https://www.unfpa.org/data/world-population/NG, 2021.
[4]	Central Bank of Nigeria, ‘Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin’, Abuja, 2009.
[5]	Country Meters: Nigeria Population. https://countrymeters.info/en/Nigeria, 2021.
[6]	C. Ezema, A. O. Olotuah, and O. I. Fagbenle, ‘Evaluation of Energy Use in Public Housing in Lagos, Nigeria: Prospects for Evaluation of Energy’, Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 5 (1), 15-24, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/ijred.5.1.15-24.
[7]	M. U. Nwachukwu, N. F. Ezedinma, and U. Jiburum, ‘Comparative Analysis of Electricity Consumption among Residential, Commercial and Industrial Sectors of the Nigeria’ s Economy’, J. Energy Technol. Policy, 4 (3), pp. 7–13, 2014.
[8]	Otegbulu, A. J. Odekoya, and O. Johnson, ‘Determinants of investment in energy efficient light bulbs in Lagos residential buildings’, Elixir Proj. Manag., 51, 11159–11163, 2012.
[9]	US Department of Energy, ‘Energy Saver’, 2014. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/energy-saver.
[10]	G. Nair, L. Gustavsson and K. Mahapatra. ‘Factors influencing energy efficiency investments in existing Swedish residential buildings’, Energ. Policy, 38 (6), 2956–2963, 2010.
[11]	K. P. Tsagarakis, F. Bounialetou, K. Gillas, M. Profylienou, A. Pollaki and N. Zografakis, ‘Tourists’ attitudes for selecting accommodation with investments in renewable energy and energy saving systems’, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 15 (2), 1335–1342, 2011.
[12]	L. Gustavsson and A. Joelsson, ‘Energy Conservation and Conversion of Electrical Heating Systems in Detached houses’, Energ. Build., 39, 717–726, 2007.
[13]	J. S. Black, P. C. Stern, and J. Elworth, ‘Personal and Contextual Influences on Household Energy Adaptations’, J. Appl. Psychol., 70, 1985, 1985.
[14]	S. Barr, A. W. Gilg, and N. Ford, ‘The household energy gap : examining the divide between habitual-and purchase- related conservation behaviour’, Energ. Policy, 33, 1425–1444, 2005.
[15]	D. Urge-Vorsatz and J. Hauff, ‘Drivers of market transformation: Analysis of the Hungarian lighting success story’, Energ. Policy, 29, 801–810, 2001.
[16]	Z. Gou, S. S. Lau and D. Prasad, ‘Market Readiness and Policy Implications for Green Buildings: Case Study From Hong Kong’ J. Green Build, 8 (2): 162–173, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.8.2.162
[17]	M. Suzuki, ‘Identifying roles of international institutions in clean energy technology innovation and diffusion in the developing countries: matching barriers with roles of the institutions’, J. Clean. Prod.(2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2014.08.070
[18]	C. Aravena, A. Riquelme, and E. Denny, ‘Money, Comfort or Environment? Priorities and Determinants of Energy Efficiency Investments in Irish Households’, J. Consum. Policy, 39 (2), 159–186, 2016.
[19]	Masini, and E. Menichetti, ‘The impact of behavioural factors in the renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework and empirical findings’, Energ. Policy, 40, 28–38, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.062.
[20]	S. Ebrahimigharehbaghi, Q. K. Qian, F. M. Meijer, H. J. Visscher. ‘Unraveling Dutch homeowners' behaviour towards energy efficiency renovations: What drives and hinders their decision-making?’, Energ. Policy, 12 pp. 546–561, 2019.
[21]	Johnson, A. J. Odekoya & O. L. Umeh, Factors Influencing the Usage of Compact Fluorescent Lamps in Existing Residential Buildings in Lagos, Nigeria’, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2 (2), 2012, 63-70.
[22]	S. C. Lillemo, ‘Measuring the effect of procrastination and environmental awareness on households’ energy-saving behaviours: An empirical approach’, Energ. Policy, 66, 249–256, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.077.
[23]	G. Trotta. ‘Factors affecting energy-saving behaviours and energy efficiency investments in British households’, Energ. Policy, 114. 529-539, 2018.
[24]	Brazil, 2010. Interministerial Ordinance no 1.007 of December 31, 2010. Brazil. Available at: http://www.mme.gov.br/documents/10584/904396/Portaria_interminestral+1007+de+31-12-2010+Publicado+no+DOU+de+06-01-2011/d94edaad-5e85-45de-b002-f3ebe91d51d1?version=1.1.
[25]	E360 DIGEST, ‘EU Ban on Incandescent Bulbs Goes into Effect on September 1’, Yale Environment 360, Yale School of the Environment https:// e360.yale.edu/digest/european_union_ban_on_incandescent_light_bulbs_begins_september_1, 2012.
[26]	N. A. A., Howarth, and J. Rosenow, ‘Banning the bulb: Institutional evolution and the phased ban of incandescent lighting in Germany’, Energy Policy, 67, 737–746. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.060.
[27]	M. Bross, A Pirgov, ‘Do new types of energy-saving lamps change the markets? In: Energy Efficiency in Domestic Appliances and Lighting’ (Eds.) Bertoldi P, Werle R. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference vol. 2 (EEDAL’09 16- 18 June, Berlin, Germany).
[28]	J. Edge and H. McKeen-Edwards, ‘Solid state lighting review – Potential and challenges in Europe Light Bulbs and Bright Ideas?: The Global Diffusion of a Ban on Incandescent Light’, 80th Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association University of British Colombia 5 June 2008, 2008.
[29]	L. J. Sandah, T. L. Gilbride, M.R. Ledbetter, H. E. Steward and C. Calwell, ‘Compact Fluorescent Lighting in America: Lessons Learned on the Way to Market’, The U.S. Department of Energy, 2006. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/04/f14/cfl_lessons_learned_web.pdf
[30]	N. Eyre. ‘Barrierstoenergy efficiency more than just market failure’. Energy Environ. 8, 25–43, 1997.
[31]	M. Perez-Guerrero. ‘Energy, styles of life, and distributive justice’, J. Energy Dev., 38–44. 1975.
[32]	K. Gillingham., R. G. Newell and K. Palmer. ‘Retrospective Examination of Demand-side Energy Efficiency Policies Discussion Paper 04–19, June, rev. Sept. (Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.), 2004.
[33]	M. Tribedi, ‘Essay on Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL): Top 6 Essays Energy Management’, [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringenotes.com/essay/energy-management/essay-on-compact-fluorescent-lamp-cfl-top-6-essays-energy-management/18639, 2017.
[34]	D. F. de Souza, P. P. F. da Silva, L. F. A. Fontenele, G. D. Barbosa, M. de Oliveira Jesus, ’Efficiency, quality, and environmental impacts: A comparative study of residential artificial lighting’, Energy Rep. 5, 409-424, 2019.
[35]	Z. A. Adetona and J. Ogunyemi, ‘An Investigation into the Utilisation of Energy Saving Lamps in Residential Buildings−A Case Study of Lagos Nigeria’, 2020 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, Nairobi, Kenya, August 25-28, 2020, 1-5, doi: 10.1109/PowerAfrica49420.2020.9219873, 2020.
[36]	Becir, D., ‘Longetivity of Light bulbs and how to make them last longer’. http://www.robaid.com/gadgets/longevity-of-light-bulbs-and-how-to-make-them-last-longer.htm, 2012. Retrieved June 16, 2020.
[37]	R. Kane and H. Sell, ‘Revolution in Lamps: A Chronicle of 50 Years of Progress’. 2nd ed. Fairmont Press, Fairmont, 2001, pp. 189-190.
[38]	De Almeida a, B. Santos, B. Paolo and M. Quicheron, ‘Solid state lighting review - Potential and challenges in Europe’, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 34, 30–48. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.029, Elsevier.
[39]	P. K. Maity, ‘Energy savings by excessive use of CFLS ensuing disastrous ecosystem’, Int. J. Dev. Res. 6 (8), 8884-8889, 2016.
[40]	M. A. Novikov, “Oleg Vladimirovich Losev: Pioneer of Semiconductor Electronics (Celebrating One Hundred Years since His Birth)” Phys. Solid State, 46 (1), 1–4. 2004. Translated from Fizika Tverdogo Tela, 46, No. 1, 2004, pp. 5–9.
[41]	L. DiLaura, K. Houser, R. Mistrick, and G. R. Steffy, The lighting handbook, 10th ed. Society of North America, New York, 2011.
[42]	T. A. Edison, Electric-Lamp. US Pat. 223.898, 1880. https://patents.google.com/patent/US223898A/en
[43]	R. K. Chaudhary, M. Kumar ‘Comparison of Different Light Sources’, International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Eng. Technol., 4 (4), 2017. DOI10.17148/IARJSET.2017.4407 36.
[44]	E. Martinot and N. Borg, ‘Energy-efficient lighting programs Experience and lessons from eight countries’, Energy Policy. 26 (14), 1071-1081, 1998.
[45]	A.A.O. Akinola, O. T. Oginni, O. L. Rominiyi, and J. F. Eiche, ‘Comparative study of residential household energy consumption in Ekiti State, Nigeria’. British J. Appl. Sci & Technol. 21 (2): 1- 10, 2017.
[46]	M. B. Adamu, H. Adamu, S. M. Ade, and G. I. Akeh, ‘Household Energy Consumption in Nigeria: A Review on the Applicability of the Energy Ladder Model’, J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. Vol. 24 (2) 237-244 February 2020.
[47]	W.A. Bolaji, ‘Investigation of the Use of Energy Efficient Bulbs in Residential Buildings in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria’, International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability 5 (2)/2018, 155-162.
[48]	K. Ley, J. Gaines, A. Ghatikar, ‘The Nigerian Energy Sector: An Overview with a Special Emphasis on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency and Rural Electrification’, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. Nigerian Energy Support Programme (NESP). (2015).
[49]	S. O. Oyedepo, Energy efficiency and conservation Measures: tools for sustainable energy development in Nigeria. Int. J. Energy Eng., 2 (2012), pp. 86-98.
[50]	E. Uyigue, M. Agho, A. Edevbaro, O. O. Godfrey, O. P. Uyigue and O. G. Okungbowa. Energy Efficiency Survey in Nigeria A Guide for Developing Policy and Legislation. Community Research and Development Centre’, 2009. https://www.osti.gov/etdeweb/servlets/purl/21328691.
[51]	S. Geissler, D. Österreicher, and E. Macharm. Transition towards Energy Efficiency: Developing the Nigerian Building Energy Efficiency Code’, Sustainability 2018, 10, 2620; doi: 10.3390/su10082620.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona, Joel Ogunyemi. (2022). Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector. Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, 7(3), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona; Joel Ogunyemi. Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector. J. Energy Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 7(3), 71-79. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona, Joel Ogunyemi. Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector. J Energy Environ Chem Eng. 2022;7(3):71-79. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14,
  author = {Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona and Joel Ogunyemi},
  title = {Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector},
  journal = {Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {71-79},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeece.20220703.14},
  abstract = {In this study, the reasons behind sustained utilisation of non-energy saving lamps (ESLs) in Nigeria vis-à-vis global lamps utilisation and environmental impacts of using non-ESLs was examined. The study was conducted via an online questionnaire using a qualitative research approach to survey 62 randomly selected apartments in the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria on policy awareness and motivation for non-ESL utilisation. Data obtained were tested for lamps’ utilisation dependency on household income using correlation and regression analysis with 5% significant level. The impact of sustained non-ESL utilisation on CO2 emission was looked into. Pearson’s regression coefficients (R2) of 0.4646, 0.4772, 0.2716 and 0.4871 were obtained for incandescent, CFL, LED and magnetic ballast fluorescent lamps respectively. The results showed that the utilisation of non-ESL considered is dependent on the household income. On the other hand, LED lamp utilisation shows a moderate dependency; 83% of the respondents were unaware of government policy on non-ESLs and 24% chose market availability of non-ESL as motivation for utilisation; 46% of the respondents chose cheap cost as motivation. Thus, the household economic status, lack of policy implementation, availability and cheap cost of non-ESL in the Nigerian market can be seen to have contributed to the sustained utilisation of incandescent lamps in the country. About 77% of lamps sampled (non-ESLs 13% and CFL 64%) can be replaced with LED. The results showed that Nigeria has great opportunities to contribute to global CO2 emissions reduction possible form the eradication of non-ESL in the country.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector
AU  - Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona
AU  - Joel Ogunyemi
Y1  - 2022/07/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14
T2  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JF  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JO  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
SP  - 71
EP  - 79
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-434X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14
AB  - In this study, the reasons behind sustained utilisation of non-energy saving lamps (ESLs) in Nigeria vis-à-vis global lamps utilisation and environmental impacts of using non-ESLs was examined. The study was conducted via an online questionnaire using a qualitative research approach to survey 62 randomly selected apartments in the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria on policy awareness and motivation for non-ESL utilisation. Data obtained were tested for lamps’ utilisation dependency on household income using correlation and regression analysis with 5% significant level. The impact of sustained non-ESL utilisation on CO2 emission was looked into. Pearson’s regression coefficients (R2) of 0.4646, 0.4772, 0.2716 and 0.4871 were obtained for incandescent, CFL, LED and magnetic ballast fluorescent lamps respectively. The results showed that the utilisation of non-ESL considered is dependent on the household income. On the other hand, LED lamp utilisation shows a moderate dependency; 83% of the respondents were unaware of government policy on non-ESLs and 24% chose market availability of non-ESL as motivation for utilisation; 46% of the respondents chose cheap cost as motivation. Thus, the household economic status, lack of policy implementation, availability and cheap cost of non-ESL in the Nigerian market can be seen to have contributed to the sustained utilisation of incandescent lamps in the country. About 77% of lamps sampled (non-ESLs 13% and CFL 64%) can be replaced with LED. The results showed that Nigeria has great opportunities to contribute to global CO2 emissions reduction possible form the eradication of non-ESL in the country.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona

Department of Electrical Electronic Engineering, The Federal Polytechnic Ilaro, Ilaro, Nigeria
Joel Ogunyemi

Department of Electrical Electronic Engineering, The Federal Polytechnic Ilaro, Ilaro, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona, Joel Ogunyemi. (2022). Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector. Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering, 7(3), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona; Joel Ogunyemi. Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector. J. Energy Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 7(3), 71-79. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona, Joel Ogunyemi. Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector. J Energy Environ Chem Eng. 2022;7(3):71-79. doi: 10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14,
  author = {Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona and Joel Ogunyemi},
  title = {Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector},
  journal = {Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {71-79},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeece.20220703.14},
  abstract = {In this study, the reasons behind sustained utilisation of non-energy saving lamps (ESLs) in Nigeria vis-à-vis global lamps utilisation and environmental impacts of using non-ESLs was examined. The study was conducted via an online questionnaire using a qualitative research approach to survey 62 randomly selected apartments in the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria on policy awareness and motivation for non-ESL utilisation. Data obtained were tested for lamps’ utilisation dependency on household income using correlation and regression analysis with 5% significant level. The impact of sustained non-ESL utilisation on CO2 emission was looked into. Pearson’s regression coefficients (R2) of 0.4646, 0.4772, 0.2716 and 0.4871 were obtained for incandescent, CFL, LED and magnetic ballast fluorescent lamps respectively. The results showed that the utilisation of non-ESL considered is dependent on the household income. On the other hand, LED lamp utilisation shows a moderate dependency; 83% of the respondents were unaware of government policy on non-ESLs and 24% chose market availability of non-ESL as motivation for utilisation; 46% of the respondents chose cheap cost as motivation. Thus, the household economic status, lack of policy implementation, availability and cheap cost of non-ESL in the Nigerian market can be seen to have contributed to the sustained utilisation of incandescent lamps in the country. About 77% of lamps sampled (non-ESLs 13% and CFL 64%) can be replaced with LED. The results showed that Nigeria has great opportunities to contribute to global CO2 emissions reduction possible form the eradication of non-ESL in the country.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Electric Energy Impact on the Environment: Factors Influencing the Sustained Energy-Inefficient Lamps Utilisation in Nigeria Residential Sector
AU  - Zacchaeus Adesakin Adetona
AU  - Joel Ogunyemi
Y1  - 2022/07/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14
T2  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JF  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
JO  - Journal of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering
SP  - 71
EP  - 79
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-434X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeece.20220703.14
AB  - In this study, the reasons behind sustained utilisation of non-energy saving lamps (ESLs) in Nigeria vis-à-vis global lamps utilisation and environmental impacts of using non-ESLs was examined. The study was conducted via an online questionnaire using a qualitative research approach to survey 62 randomly selected apartments in the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria on policy awareness and motivation for non-ESL utilisation. Data obtained were tested for lamps’ utilisation dependency on household income using correlation and regression analysis with 5% significant level. The impact of sustained non-ESL utilisation on CO2 emission was looked into. Pearson’s regression coefficients (R2) of 0.4646, 0.4772, 0.2716 and 0.4871 were obtained for incandescent, CFL, LED and magnetic ballast fluorescent lamps respectively. The results showed that the utilisation of non-ESL considered is dependent on the household income. On the other hand, LED lamp utilisation shows a moderate dependency; 83% of the respondents were unaware of government policy on non-ESLs and 24% chose market availability of non-ESL as motivation for utilisation; 46% of the respondents chose cheap cost as motivation. Thus, the household economic status, lack of policy implementation, availability and cheap cost of non-ESL in the Nigerian market can be seen to have contributed to the sustained utilisation of incandescent lamps in the country. About 77% of lamps sampled (non-ESLs 13% and CFL 64%) can be replaced with LED. The results showed that Nigeria has great opportunities to contribute to global CO2 emissions reduction possible form the eradication of non-ESL in the country.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download