| Peer-Reviewed

The Effect of Interchange Attributes on Public-Transport Users’Intention to Use Routes Involving Transfers

Received: 30 December 2012    Accepted:     Published: 20 February 2013
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

From past travel behavior studies it is evident that several trip attributes have been established as key factors in travelers’ decision to use public transport. Using these factors, the present study seeks to provide a psychological perspective of the inconvenience expressed by public transport users’ when making transfers between public-transport modes. The theory of planned behaviorhas been adopted to determine the trip attributes influencing public transport users’ intention to use routes involving transfers. A survey was undertaken in two major transport centers in Auckland, New Zealand. Analysis of results has shown that public transport users’ are intolerant towards greater delays, even if occurrence is rare. Minimization of transfer walking and waiting times increases users’ intention to use transfer routes. Results suggested that reliability of transfers and reduction in journey times has the most influence on users’ intention to make transfers. Findings of the study is expected to support decision makers in developing new transfer routes and improving the quality of existing transfer routes to provide travelers with a possible attractive alternative to automobile.

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12
Page(s) 5-13
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

PublicTransport, Theory of Planned Behavior, Transfer, Travel Behavior

References
[1] Currie, G. and A. Delbosc, "Exploring the trip chaining behaviour of public transport users in Melbourne". Transport Policy, 2011. 18(1): pp. 204-210.
[2] Iseki, H. and B.D. Taylor, "Not All Transfers Are Created Equal: Towards a Framework Relating Transfer Connectivity to Travel Behaviour". Transport Reviews, 2009. 29(6): pp. 777-800.
[3] Hadas, Y. and P. Ranjitkar, "Modeling public-transit connec-tivity with spatial quality-of-transfer measurements". Journal of Transport Geography, 2012. 22: pp. 137-147.
[4] Guo, Z. and N.H.M. Wilson, "Modeling the Effect of Transit System Transfer on Travel Behaviour". Transportation Re-search Record, 2007. No.No. 2006, pp. 11-20.
[5] Liu, R., R.M. Pendyala, and S. Polzin, "Assessment of In-termodal Transfer Penalties Using Stated Preference Data". Transportation Research Record 1997. No.1607: pp. 74-80.
[6] Ceder, A., L.-A. Yann, and C. Coriat, "Measuring Public Transport Connectivity Performance Applied in Auckland". Transport Research Record, 2009. No. 2111, pp. 139-147.
[7] Muller, T. and P. Furth, "Transfer Scheduling and Control to Reduce Passenger Waiting Time ". Transport Research Record, 2009. No.No. 2112, pp. 111-118.
[8] Hsu, S.C., "Determinants of passenger transfer waiting time at multi-modal connecting stations". Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2010. 46(3): pp. 404-413.
[9] Hadas, Y. and A. Ceder, "Public Transit Network Connectiv-ity". Transportation Research Record, 2010. No.No. 2143, pp. 1-8.
[10] Currie, G. and C. Loader, "Bus Network Planning for Transfers and the Network Effect in Melbourne, Australia". Transportation Research Record, 2010. No. 2145, pp. 8-17.
[11] Guo, Z. and N.H.M. Wilson, "Assessment of the Transfer Penalty for Transit Trip". Transportation Research Record 2004. No. 1872: pp. 10-18.
[12] Becker, A.J. and F. Spielberg, "Implementation of a Timed Transfer Network at Norfolk, Virginia". Transportation Re-search Record, 1999. No.No. 1666, pp. 3-13.
[13] Ceder, A. and C. Teh, "Comparing Public Transport Con-nectivity Measures of Major New Zealand Cities". Trans-portation Research Record, 2010. No. 2143, pp. 24-33.
[14] Sharaby, N. and Y. Shiftan, "The impact of fare integration on travel behavior and transit ridership". Transport Policy, 2012. 21: pp. 63-70.
[15] Kumar, P., S.Y. Kulkarni, and M. Parida, "Security perceptions of Delhi commuters at Metro-bus interchange in multi modal perspective". Journal of Transport Security, 2011. 4: pp. 295-307.
[16] Bachok, S. "What do passengers need out of public transport information systems?".in 29th Conference of Australian In-stitute of Transport Research. 2007. Adelaide, Australia.
[17] VandeWalle, S. and T. Steenberghen, "Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains". Trans-poration Research Part A, 2006. 40: pp. 151-162.
[18] Molin, E. and C. Chorus, "The Need for Advanced Public Trasnport Information Services When Making Trasnfers". European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research (EJTIR), 2009. 4(9): pp. 397-410.
[19] Long, B., K. Choocharukul, and T. Nakatsuji, "Psychological Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention Toward Future Sky Train Usage in Phnom Penh, Cambodia". Transportation Research Record 2011. No.No. 2217, pp. 63-70.
[20] Healh, Y. and R. Gifford, "Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour: Predicting the Use of Public Transportation". Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002. 32(10): pp. 2154-2189.
[21] Beirao, G. and J.A. Sarsfield-Cabral, "Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study". Transport Policy, 2007. 14(6): pp. 478-489.
[22] Carrus, G., P. Passafaro, and M. Bonnes, "Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation". Journal of En-vironmental Psychology, 2008. 28(1): pp. 51-62.
[23] Callaghan, L. and W. Vincent, "Preliminary Evaluation of Metro Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit Project". Transportation Research Record, 2007. No.2034, pp. 37-44.
[24] Liu, R., "An Assessment of Intermodal Transfer Disutility". Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1996. No.PhD, pp. 156.
[25] Eboli, L. and G. Mazzulla, "Performance indicators for an objective measure of public transport service quality". Eu-ropean Transport, 2012. 51: pp. 1-21.
[26] Iseki, H. "How Do People Perceive Service Attributes at Transit Facilities? An Examination of Perceptions of Transit Service by Transit User Demographics and Trip Characteris-tics". in 90th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. 2011. Washington D.C., USA.
[27] Atkins, S.T., "Personal security as a transport issue: a state-of-the-art review". Transportation Reviews, 1990. 10(2): pp. 111-125.
[28] Cheng, Y.-H., "Exploring passenger anxiety associated with train travel ". Transportation, 2010. 37(6): pp. 875-896.
[29] Grotenhuis, J.W., B.W. Wiegmans, and P. Rietveld, "The desired quality of integrated mulitmodal travel information in public transport: Customer needs for time and effort savings". Transport Policy, 2007. 14: pp. 27-38.
[30] Ajzen, I., "The Theory of Planned Behavior". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991. 50: pp. 179-211.
[31] Ajzen, I., "Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior". Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002. 32(4): pp. 665-683.
[32] Ajzen, I., "Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour". 2 ed, ed. T. Manstead. 2005, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
[33] Bamberg, S., M. Hunecke, and A. Blobaum, "Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies". Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007. 27(3): pp. 190-203
[34] Heath, Y. and R. Gifford, "Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour: Predicting the Use of Public Transportation". Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002. 32(10): pp. 2154-2189.
[35] Chen, C. and W. Chao, "Habitual or reasoned? Using the theory of planned behavior, technology accpetance model, and habit to examine switching intentions towards public transit ". Transportation Research Part F, 2011. 14(2): pp. 128-137.
[36] Anable, J., "'Complacent Car Addicts' or 'Aspiring Envi-ronmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory". Transport Policy, 2005. 12(1): pp. 65-78.
[37] Bamberg, S. and P. Schmidt, "Regulating Transport: Beha-vioural Changes in the Field". Journal of Consumer Policy, 1999. 22: pp. 479-509.
[38] Tertoolen, G., D. Van Kreveld, and B. Verstraten, "Pyscho-logical Resistance Against Attempts to Reduce Private Car Use". Transportation Research Part A, 1998. 32(3): pp. 171-181.
[39] Gatersleben, B. and D. Uzzell, "Affective Appraisals of the Daily Commute". Environment and Behaviour, 2007. 39(3): pp. 416-431.
[40] Bates, J., et al., "The valuation of reliability for personal travel". Transportation Research Part E, 2001. 37(2-3): pp. 191-229.
[41] Guo, Z. and N.H.M. Wilson, "Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: A case study of the London Underground". Transporation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2011. 45(2): pp. 91-104.
[42] Xumei, C., L. Qiaoxian, and D. Guang, "Estimation of Travel Time Values For Urban Public Transport Passengers Based on SP Survey". Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2011. 11(4): pp. 77-84.
[43] Friman, M. and M. Fellesson, "Service Supply and Customer Satisfaction in Public Transportation: The Quality Paradox". Journal of Public Transportation, 2009. 12(4): pp. 57-69.
[44] McCord, M.M., J. Wirtz, and R.G. Mishalani, "Passenger waiting time perceptions at bus stops". Journal of Public Transportation, 2006. 9(2): pp. 89-106.
[45] May, T., "Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process". 4th ed, ed. O.U. Press. 2011, Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill Education.
[46] Crano, W.D. and M.B. Brewer, "Principles and Methods of Social Research". 2nd ed, ed. D. Riegert. 2002, Mahwah, New Jersery: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[47] Singleton Jr, R.A. and B.C. Straits, "Approaches to Social Research". 4th ed, ed. O.U. Press. 2005, New York, USA: Oxford University Press, Inc.
[48] Graybill, F.A., "Theory and application of the linear model". 1976, North Scituate, USA: Duxbury Press.
[49] Ibrahim, M.F., "Improvements and integration of a public transport system: the case of Singapore". Cities, 2003. 20(3): pp. 205-216.
[50] Ulengin, F., et al., "An integrated transportation decision support system for transportation policy decisions: The case of Turkey". Transporation Research Part A, 2007. 41: pp. 80-97.
[51] Luk, J. and P. Olszewski, "Integrated public transport in Singapore and Hong Kong". Road and Transport Research, 2003. 12(4): pp. 41-51.
[52] Ceder, A. (2007). Public Transit Planning and Operation: Theory, Modelling and Practice. Oxford, UK, Elsevier.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Subeh Chowdhury, Avishai(Avi) Ceder. (2013). The Effect of Interchange Attributes on Public-Transport Users’Intention to Use Routes Involving Transfers. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Subeh Chowdhury; Avishai(Avi) Ceder. The Effect of Interchange Attributes on Public-Transport Users’Intention to Use Routes Involving Transfers. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2013, 2(1), 5-13. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Subeh Chowdhury, Avishai(Avi) Ceder. The Effect of Interchange Attributes on Public-Transport Users’Intention to Use Routes Involving Transfers. Psychol Behav Sci. 2013;2(1):5-13. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12,
      author = {Subeh Chowdhury and Avishai(Avi) Ceder},
      title = {The Effect of Interchange Attributes on Public-Transport Users’Intention to Use Routes Involving Transfers},
      journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {5-13},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20130201.12},
      abstract = {From past travel behavior studies it is evident that several trip attributes have been established as key factors in travelers’ decision to use public transport. Using these factors, the present study seeks to provide a psychological perspective of the inconvenience expressed by public transport users’ when making transfers between public-transport modes. The theory of planned behaviorhas been adopted to determine the trip attributes influencing public transport users’ intention to use routes involving transfers. A survey was undertaken in two major transport centers in Auckland, New Zealand. Analysis of results has shown that public transport users’ are intolerant towards greater delays, even if occurrence is rare. Minimization of transfer walking and waiting times increases users’ intention to use transfer routes. Results suggested that reliability of transfers and reduction in journey times has the most influence on users’ intention to make transfers. Findings of the study is expected to support decision makers in developing new transfer routes and improving the quality of existing transfer routes to provide travelers with a possible attractive alternative to automobile.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Effect of Interchange Attributes on Public-Transport Users’Intention to Use Routes Involving Transfers
    AU  - Subeh Chowdhury
    AU  - Avishai(Avi) Ceder
    Y1  - 2013/02/20
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12
    T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    SP  - 5
    EP  - 13
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7845
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130201.12
    AB  - From past travel behavior studies it is evident that several trip attributes have been established as key factors in travelers’ decision to use public transport. Using these factors, the present study seeks to provide a psychological perspective of the inconvenience expressed by public transport users’ when making transfers between public-transport modes. The theory of planned behaviorhas been adopted to determine the trip attributes influencing public transport users’ intention to use routes involving transfers. A survey was undertaken in two major transport centers in Auckland, New Zealand. Analysis of results has shown that public transport users’ are intolerant towards greater delays, even if occurrence is rare. Minimization of transfer walking and waiting times increases users’ intention to use transfer routes. Results suggested that reliability of transfers and reduction in journey times has the most influence on users’ intention to make transfers. Findings of the study is expected to support decision makers in developing new transfer routes and improving the quality of existing transfer routes to provide travelers with a possible attractive alternative to automobile.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, 20 Symonds Street, Auckland, NewZealand

  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, 20 Symonds Street, Auckland, NewZealand

  • Sections