The ability of shale to prevent CO2 from passing through is highly related to a surface phenomenon called capillary entry pressure. Namely, in order for CO2 to invade shale pores and establish flow, a threshold capillary pressure must be overcome by CO2. Evaluating the threshold capillary pressure of shale has been of great interest by the oil and gas industry. Most studies relied on measuring the capillary entry “threshold’’ pressure of shale as CO2 flows through it, and converted it to what is referred to as sealing “sequestration’’ capacity. While many scientists and researcher have measured capillary entry pressure of shale as interacts with different non-wetting fluids such as CO2, their studies were done under ambient temperature which did not reflect in situ conditions. In this study, changes in capillary entry pressure of shale when interacting with CO2, under different temperatures (25°C to 250°C), have been investigated. The combined impact of temperature and petrophysical properties of shale (water content, water activity, permeability and porosity) on capillary entry pressure was also addressed. Results showed that capillary entry pressure of shale when interacting with CO2 was highly affected by temperature. Higher temperatures decreased capillary entry pressure of shale. We believe that pore dilation, where pore throat size expands due to the application of heat, may have caused this decrease in capillary entry pressure of shale. However, in some cases higher temperature activated clay swelling that may have caused an apparent decrease in pore throat radii of shale which translated into higher capillary entry pressure of shale. Results also showed that there exists no distinct relationship between petrophysical properties of shale and its measured capillary entry pressure when interacting with CO2 at different temperatures.
| Published in | Petroleum Science and Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13 |
| Page(s) | 26-37 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
CO2 Sequestration, Pore Dilation, Clay Swelling, Shale Sealing Capacity, Entrance Pressure
| [1] | Abdoulghafour, H., Sarmadivaleh, M., Hauge, L. P., Fernø, M., & Iglauer, S. (2020). Capillary pressure characteristics of CO2-brine-sandstone systems. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 94 (October 2019), 102876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102876 |
| [2] | Akinwunmi, B., Sun, L., Hirvi, J. T., Kasa, S., & Pakkanen, T. A. (2019). Influence of temperature on the swelling pressure of bentonite clay. Chemical Physics, 516, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.09.009 |
| [3] | Al-Bazali, T. M., Zhang, J., Chenevert, M. E., & Sharma, M. M. (2009, October). Estimating the reservoir hydrocarbon capacity through measurement of the minimum capillary entry pressure of shale caprocks. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro. |
| [4] | Al-Bazali, T., Zhang, J., Chenevert, M. E., & Sharma, M. M. (2008). Experimental and numerical study on the impact of strain rate on failure characteristics of shales. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 60 (3-4), 194-204. |
| [5] | Al-Bazali, T. M., Zhang, J., Wolfe, C., Chenevert, M. E., & Sharma, M. M. (2009). Wellbore instability of directional wells in laminated and naturally fractured shales. Journal of Porous Media, 12 (2): 119-130. |
| [6] | Al-Bazali, T. M., Zhang, J., Chenevert, M. E., & Sharma, M. M. (2007). Capillary entry pressure of oil-based muds in shales: the key to the success of oil-based muds. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 30 (4), 297-308. |
| [7] | Bag, R., & Rabbani, A. (2017). Effect of temperature on swelling pressure and compressibility characteristics of soil. Applied Clay Science, 136, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.10.043 |
| [8] | Bakhtiari, A. R., Zakaria, M. P., Yaziz, M. I., Lajis, M. N. H. L., & Bi, X. (2014). E nvironment A sia. EnvironmentAsia, 7 (1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2010.9 |
| [9] | Bennion, D. B., & Bachu, S. (2007). Permeability and relative permeability measurements at reservoir conditions for CO2-water systems in ultra low permeability confining caprocks. 69th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2007: Securing The Future. Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007, 1, 401–410. https://doi.org/10.2523/106995-ms |
| [10] | Benson, S. M., & Cole, D. R. (2008). CO2 sequestration in deep sedimentary formations. Elements, 4 (5), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.4.5.325 |
| [11] | Berg, R. R. (1975). Capillary Pressures in Stratigraphic Traps. AAPG Bulletin (American Association of Petroleum Geologists), 59 (6), 939–956. https://doi.org/10.1306/83d91ef7-16c7-11d7-8645000102c1865d |
| [12] | Broadhead, R. (2002). Petroleum Geology: an Introduction. New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Figure 1, 12. http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/faq/energy/petroleum/Petroleum_geology_intro.pdf |
| [13] | Bryan, J., & Eng, P. (1989). Fundamentals of fluid flow. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784409190.ch04 |
| [14] | Burnside, N. M., & Naylor, M. (2014). Review and implications of relative permeability of CO2/brine systems and residual trapping of CO2. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 23, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.013 |
| [15] | Busch, A., Alles, S., Gensterblum, Y., Prinz, D., Dewhurst, D. N., Raven, M., D., Stanjek, H., & Krooss, B. M. (2008). Carbon dioxide storage potential of shales. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2 (3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.003 |
| [16] | Chang, Y. B., Lim, M. T., Pope, G. A., & Sepehrnoori, K. (1999). CO2 flow patterns under multiphase flow: Heterogeneous field-scale conditions. SPE Reprint Series, 51, 145–153. |
| [17] | Chenevert, M. E., & Amanullah, M. (2001). Shale preservation and testing techniques for borehole-stability studies. SPE Drilling and Completion, 16 (3), 146–149. https://doi.org/10.2118/73191-PA |
| [18] | Chun, B. S., & Wilkinson, G. T. (1995). Interfacial Tension in High-Pressure Carbon Dioxide Mixtures. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 34 (12), 4371–4377. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00039a029 |
| [19] | Comisky, J. T., Santiago, M., McCollom, B., Buddhala, A., & Newsham, K. E. (2011). Sample size effects on the application of mercury injection capillary pressure for determining the storage capacity of tight gas and oil shales. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference 2011, CURC 2011, 3 (1992), 2103–2125. https://doi.org/10.2118/149432-ms |
| [20] | Dewhurst, D. N., Jones, R. M., & Raven, M. D. (2002). Microstructural and petrophysical characterization of Muderong Shale: Application to top seal risking. Petroleum Geoscience, 8 (4), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.8.4.371 |
| [21] | Dzialowski, A., Hale, A., & Mahajan, S. “Lubricity and Wear of Shale: Effects of Drilling Fluids and Mechanical Parameters”, SPE/IADC Paper 25730, Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference in Amsterdam, February 1993. |
| [22] | Donnelly, B., Perfect, E., McKay, L. D., Lemiszki, P. J., DiStefano, V. H., Anovitz, L. M., McFarlane, J., Hale, R. E., & Cheng, C. L. (2016). Capillary pressure – saturation relationships for gas shales measured using a water activity meter. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 33, 1342–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.014 |
| [23] | Egermann, P., Lombard, J. M., & Bretonnier, P. (2006). A fast and accurate method to measure threshold capillary pressure of caprocks under representative conditions. Sca, May, 1–14. |
| [24] | Eshraghi, S. E., Rasaei, M. R., & Zendehboudi, S. (2016). Optimization of miscible CO2 EOR and storage using heuristic methods combined with capacitance/resistance and Gentil fractional flow models. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 32, 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.012 |
| [25] | Espinoza, D. N., & Santamarina, J. C. (2017a). CO2 breakthrough—Caprock sealing efficiency and integrity for carbon geological storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 66 (September), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.09.019 |
| [26] | Espinoza, D. N., & Santamarina, J. C. (2017b). CO2 breakthrough—Caprock sealing efficiency and integrity for carbon geological storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 66 (October), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.09.019 |
| [27] | Farokhpoor, R., Akervol, I., Torsæter, O., & Bjørkvik, B. J. A. (2013). CO2 capillary entry pressure into flow barrier and caprock. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts Held in Napa Valley, California, USA, SCA2013-A054, 7491, 1–8. |
| [28] | Farokhpoor, R., Bjørkvik, B. J. A., Lindeberg, E., & Torsæter, O. (2013). Wettability behaviour of CO2 at storage conditions. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 12, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.003 |
| [29] | Fauziah, C. A., Al-Yaseri, A. Z., Beloborodov, R., Siddiqui, M. A. Q., Lebedev, M., Parsons, D., Roshan, H., Barifcani, A., & Iglauer, S. (2019). Carbon Dioxide/Brine, Nitrogen/Brine, and Oil/Brine Wettability of Montmorillonite, Illite, and Kaolinite at Elevated Pressure and Temperature. Energy and Fuels, 33 (1), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02845 |
| [30] | Favero, V., & Laloui, L. (2018). Impact of CO2 injection on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of a clay-rich caprock. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 71 (September 2017), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.017 |
| [31] | Green, D., Dick, J., & McAloon, M. (2008). Oil/Water Imbibition and Drainage Capillary Pressure Determined by MRI on a Wide Sampling of Rocks. Proceedings of SCA, Dullien 1991, SCA2008-01. http://www.scaweb.org/assets/papers/2008_papers/SCA2008-01.pdf |
| [32] | Hale, A. H., Mody, F. K., & Salisbury, D. P. (1993). Influence of chemical potential on wellbore stability. SPE Drilling and Completion, 8 (3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.2118/23885-PA |
| [33] | Hansen, E. L., Hemmen, H., Fonseca, D. M., Coutant, C., Knudsen, K. D., Plivelic, T. S., Bonn, D., & Fossum, J. O. (2012). Swelling transition of a clay induced by heating. Scientific Reports, 2, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00618 |
| [34] | Jarrett, M. A., Gusler, B., Xiang, T., & Clapper, D. (2004). Improved Competence in Water Activity Measurement. AADE Technical Conference, April 2004. |
| [35] | JENNINGS, H., & NEWMAN GH. (1971). Effect of temperature and pressure on the interfacial tension of water against methane- normal decane mixtures. Soc Petrol Eng J, 11 (2), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.2118/3071-pa |
| [36] | Jennings, J. B. (1987). Capillary Pressure Techniques: Application To Exploration and Development Geology. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 71 (10), 1196–1209. https://doi.org/10.1306/703c8047-1707-11d7-8645000102c1865d |
| [37] | Mathias, S. A., McElwaine, J. N., & Gluyas, J. G. (2014). Heat transport and pressure buildup during carbon dioxide injection into depleted gas reservoirs. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 756, 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.348 |
| [38] | McPhee, C., Reed, J., & Zubizarreta, I. (2015). Capillary Pressure. In Developments in Petroleum Science (Vol. 64). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63533-4.00009-3 |
| [39] | Okasha, T. M., Aramco, A. A. A. S., & Arabia, S. (2006). Investigation of the Effect of Temperature and Pressure on Interfacial Tension and Wettability of Shu ’ aiba reservoir, Saudi Arabia. 3929. |
| [40] | Okasha, T. M., & Aramco, S. (2010). SPE 136934 Effect of Temperature and Pressure on Interfacial Tension and Contact Angle of Khuff Gas Reservoir, Saudi Arabia. Test. |
| [41] | Olabode, A., & Radonjic, M. (2013). Experimental investigations of caprock integrity in CO2 sequestration. Energy Procedia, 37, 5014–5025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.415 |
| [42] | Paterson, L., Ennis-King, J., & Sharma, S. (2010). Observations of thermal and pressure transients in carbon dioxide wells. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5, 3449–3460. https://doi.org/10.2118/134881-ms |
| [43] | Pini, R., Krevor, S. C. M., & Benson, S. M. (2012). Capillary pressure and heterogeneity for the CO2/water system in sandstone rocks at reservoir conditions. Advances in Water Resources, 38, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.12.007 |
| [44] | Plug, W. J., & Bruining, J. (2007). Capillary pressure for the sand-CO2-water system under various pressure conditions. Application to CO2 sequestration. Advances in Water Resources, 30 (11), 2339–2353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.05.010 |
| [45] | Qiao, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Yuan, S., Zhu, Y., & Wang, J. (2012). PVAm–PIP/PS composite membrane with high performance for CO2/N2 separation. AIChE Journal, 59 (4), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic |
| [46] | Saraji, S., Goual, L., Piri, M., & Plancher, H. (2013). Wettability of supercritical carbon dioxide/water/quartz systems: Simultaneous measurement of contact angle and interfacial tension at reservoir conditions. Langmuir, 29 (23), 6856–6866. https://doi.org/10.1021/la3050863 |
| [47] | Saraji, S., Piri, M., & Goual, L. (2014). The effects of SO2 contamination, brine salinity, pressure, and temperature on dynamic contact angles and interfacial tension of supercritical CO2/brine/quartz systems. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 28, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.06.024 |
| [48] | Sarmadivaleh, M., Al-Yaseri, A. Z., & Iglauer, S. (2015). Influence of temperature and pressure on quartz-water-CO2 contact angle and CO2-water interfacial tension. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 441, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.010 |
| [49] | Seyyedattar, M., Ghiasi, M. M., Zendehboudi, S., & Butt, S. (2020). Determination of bubble point pressure and oil formation volume factor: Extra trees compared with LSSVM-CSA hybrid and ANFIS models. Fuel, 269 (December), 116834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116834 |
| [50] | Shukla, R., Ranjith, P., Haque, A., & Choi, X. (2010). A review of studies on CO2 sequestration and caprock integrity. Fuel, 89 (10), 2651–2664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.012 |
| [51] | Teich-McGoldrick, S. L., Greathouse, J. A., Jové-Colón, C. F., & Cygan, R. T. (2015). Swelling Properties of Montmorillonite and Beidellite Clay Minerals from Molecular Simulation: Comparison of Temperature, Interlayer Cation, and Charge Location Effects. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 119 (36), 20880–20891. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03253 |
| [52] | Traps, P. (2014). Gas Oil. Encyclopedia of Lubricants and Lubrication, 727–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22647-2_200181 |
| [53] | Vavra, C. L., Kaldi, J. G., & Sneider, R. M. (1992). Geological applications of capillary pressure: a review. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 76 (6), 840–850. https://doi.org/10.1306/bdff88f8-1718-11d7-8645000102c1865d |
| [54] | Vermeulen, N. (2003). The water content of soils - Inaugural Lecture. 13th African Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, September. |
| [55] | Zendehboudi, S., Khan, A., Carlisle, S., & Leonenko, Y. (2011). Ex situ dissolution of CO2: A new engineering methodology based on mass-transfer perspective for enhancement of CO2 sequestration. Energy and Fuels, 25 (7), 3323–3333. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200199r |
| [56] | Ziabakhsh-Ganji, Z., & Kooi, H. (2014). Sensitivity of Joule-Thomson cooling to impure CO2 injection in depleted gas reservoirs. Applied Energy, 113, 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.059 |
| [57] | Schwartz, B., Huffman, K., Thornton, D., & Elsworth, D. (2019). The effects of mineral distribution, pore geometry, and pore density on permeability evolution in gas. |
APA Style
Abrar Almutairi, Talal Al-Bazali. (2022). A Critical Appraisal of Thermal Effects on CO2 Entrance Pressure. Petroleum Science and Engineering, 6(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13
ACS Style
Abrar Almutairi; Talal Al-Bazali. A Critical Appraisal of Thermal Effects on CO2 Entrance Pressure. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 6(1), 26-37. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13,
author = {Abrar Almutairi and Talal Al-Bazali},
title = {A Critical Appraisal of Thermal Effects on CO2 Entrance Pressure},
journal = {Petroleum Science and Engineering},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {26-37},
doi = {10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pse.20220601.13},
abstract = {The ability of shale to prevent CO2 from passing through is highly related to a surface phenomenon called capillary entry pressure. Namely, in order for CO2 to invade shale pores and establish flow, a threshold capillary pressure must be overcome by CO2. Evaluating the threshold capillary pressure of shale has been of great interest by the oil and gas industry. Most studies relied on measuring the capillary entry “threshold’’ pressure of shale as CO2 flows through it, and converted it to what is referred to as sealing “sequestration’’ capacity. While many scientists and researcher have measured capillary entry pressure of shale as interacts with different non-wetting fluids such as CO2, their studies were done under ambient temperature which did not reflect in situ conditions. In this study, changes in capillary entry pressure of shale when interacting with CO2, under different temperatures (25°C to 250°C), have been investigated. The combined impact of temperature and petrophysical properties of shale (water content, water activity, permeability and porosity) on capillary entry pressure was also addressed. Results showed that capillary entry pressure of shale when interacting with CO2 was highly affected by temperature. Higher temperatures decreased capillary entry pressure of shale. We believe that pore dilation, where pore throat size expands due to the application of heat, may have caused this decrease in capillary entry pressure of shale. However, in some cases higher temperature activated clay swelling that may have caused an apparent decrease in pore throat radii of shale which translated into higher capillary entry pressure of shale. Results also showed that there exists no distinct relationship between petrophysical properties of shale and its measured capillary entry pressure when interacting with CO2 at different temperatures.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Critical Appraisal of Thermal Effects on CO2 Entrance Pressure AU - Abrar Almutairi AU - Talal Al-Bazali Y1 - 2022/04/09 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13 DO - 10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13 T2 - Petroleum Science and Engineering JF - Petroleum Science and Engineering JO - Petroleum Science and Engineering SP - 26 EP - 37 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4516 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20220601.13 AB - The ability of shale to prevent CO2 from passing through is highly related to a surface phenomenon called capillary entry pressure. Namely, in order for CO2 to invade shale pores and establish flow, a threshold capillary pressure must be overcome by CO2. Evaluating the threshold capillary pressure of shale has been of great interest by the oil and gas industry. Most studies relied on measuring the capillary entry “threshold’’ pressure of shale as CO2 flows through it, and converted it to what is referred to as sealing “sequestration’’ capacity. While many scientists and researcher have measured capillary entry pressure of shale as interacts with different non-wetting fluids such as CO2, their studies were done under ambient temperature which did not reflect in situ conditions. In this study, changes in capillary entry pressure of shale when interacting with CO2, under different temperatures (25°C to 250°C), have been investigated. The combined impact of temperature and petrophysical properties of shale (water content, water activity, permeability and porosity) on capillary entry pressure was also addressed. Results showed that capillary entry pressure of shale when interacting with CO2 was highly affected by temperature. Higher temperatures decreased capillary entry pressure of shale. We believe that pore dilation, where pore throat size expands due to the application of heat, may have caused this decrease in capillary entry pressure of shale. However, in some cases higher temperature activated clay swelling that may have caused an apparent decrease in pore throat radii of shale which translated into higher capillary entry pressure of shale. Results also showed that there exists no distinct relationship between petrophysical properties of shale and its measured capillary entry pressure when interacting with CO2 at different temperatures. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: