| Peer-Reviewed

Demonstration and Scaling up of In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts

Received: 11 December 2020    Accepted: 28 December 2020    Published: 10 March 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The experiment was conducted during 2019 cropping season in six Peasant Associations (PAs) of Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts; with objectives of demonstration and scaling up the selected in-situ moisture conservation structures (Tied ridge and furrow closed at both Ends), awareness creation and analyzed the cost benefit. Totally twelve (12) FREG members were established and 600 farmers, 12 animator and 6 DAs were participated on training from six Peasant Associations (PAs). Two FREG members were established in each Peasant Associations (PAs). From these, 240 farmers were from FREG and 360 from non-FREG were participated on introductory training. Totally 100 farmers, 4 DAs and animator, 4 SMS and 32 others were participated on field day from both districts respectively. The mean yield obtained from tied ridge and furrow closed at both ends were 89.55 and 71.69 Qtha-1 at Negele Arsi district and 72.81 and 69.96 Qtha-1 were obtained from Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district respectively. The two-selected in-situ moisture conservation structures were gave a significant yield in both districts. The net benefit obtained from tied ridge, furrow closed at both end were 50,241 and 37,096 ETH Birr ha-1 respectively at NegeleArsi district. In addition, the net benefit obtained from tied ridge and furrow closed at both end were 38,119 and 35,896 ETH Birr ha-1 respectively at Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district. In-situ moisture conservation structures (tied ridge and furrow closed at both Ends) were more economical and better if it is more scale up in the study area and similar agro ecology. Agricultural and natural resource office should have give a great attention to popularized and scaling up this technologies in moisture deficit areas of the districts.

Published in Science Research (Volume 9, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12
Page(s) 6-13
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Tied Ridge, Furrow Closed at End, FREG, Training, Field Day, Net Benefit, Cost and Yield

References
[1] Alemu B and Kidane D. (2014). The Implication of Integrated Watershed Management for Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands: Case Study of Ethiopian Highlands. J Agric Biodivers Res, 3 (6): 78-90.
[2] Dagnaw, A., Bagegnehu, B. and Abiy, G. (2018). Onfarm Verification of the Soil Moisture and Yield Response of Tied Ridge on Maize Production in Dry Areas of SNNPR, Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 8 (5): 1-5.
[3] Dulo Husen, Zelalem Shalemew, Ayub Jelde, Anbase Ambosa and Tesfaye Gemechu (2020). Pre-scaling up of in situ moisture conservation techniques on maize (zea mays l.) yield in dugda district
[4] Gebreegziabher, T., Nyssen, J., Govaerts, B., Fekadu, G., Mintesinot, B., Mitiku, H., and Deckers, J. (2009). Contour furrows for in situ soil and water conservation, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Soil and Tillage Research, 103, 257-264.
[5] Gebreyesus B. T., (2004). Tied Ridging as In-situ Rainwater Harvesting Methods for Improving Sorghum Yield at Abergelle Area, Tigray Regional State. An MSc. Thesis submitted to Haremaya University.
[6] Georgis K, Takele A. (2000). Conservation farming technologies for sustaining crop production in semi-arid areas of Ethiopia. In Conservation Tillage for Dryland Farming. Technological options and experiences in Eastern and Southern Africa, eds. E. K. Biamah; J. Rockstrom; G. E. Okwach. RELMA, Workshop Report No. 3, 142-147.
[7] Gicheru P. T., (2002). The effect of different soil management practices on crust formation, soil moisture conservation and crop growth in Machang’a area, Mbeere District, Kenya. Ph. D Thesis. University of Nairobi, Kenya.
[8] Gitau A. N., (2004). Mechanical behavior of hard setting Luvisol soil. Ph. D Thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
[9] Haregeweyn et al., J. Poesen, G. Verstraeten, J. De Vente, G. Govers, S. Deckers, J. Moeyersons, (2005). Specific sediment yield in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: Assessment and semi-quantitative modeling. Geomorphology 69, 315-331.
[10] Heluf G. (2003). Grain yield response of sorghum (sorghum bicolor) to tied ridges and planting methods on Entisols and Vertisols of Alemaya area, Eastern Ethiopian highlands journal of agriculture and rural development in the Tropics and Subtropics 104 (2): 113–128.
[11] Husen, D. and Shalemew, Z (2020). Effects of In-situ Moisture Conservation Techniques on Maize (Zea Mays) Yield and Yield Components (Moisture Deficit Area of Dugda woreda), International Journal of Agricultural] and agribusiness 7 (1): 17-23.
[12] Kassie, M. and Holden, S. (2007). Share cropping efficiency in Ethiopia: threats of eviction and kinship. Agricultural Economics 37: 179-188.
[13] Mekuria, M. and Waddington, S. (2004) Institutional and Policy Support Is Essential to Promote the Adoption of Soil Fertility Technologies on Maize-Based Smallholder Farms in Southern Africa. Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane.
[14] Naba, W., Moges, A. and Gebremichael, A. (2020). Evaluating the effect of in-situ rainwater harvesting techniques on maize production in moisture stress areas of humbo woreda, wolaita zone, southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. Tech. 10 (1): 71-79. https://doi.org/10.3329/ijarit.v10i1.48096.
[15] Nyamadzawo G, Wuta M, Nyamangara J, Gumbo D. (2013). Opportunities for optimizing in field water harvesting to cope with changing climate in semi arid smallholder farminga reas of Zimbabwe. Springer plus 2, 1-9.
[16] ORS (2004). The Oromia Regional State government: Socio Economic Profile of East Shoa Zone
[17] Solh, M., & Van Ginkel, M. (2014). Drought preparedness and drought mitigation in the developing world's drylands. Weather and Climate Extremes, 3 (1), 62–66.
[18] Taye Belachew and YifruAbera, (2010). Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to tied ridges and planting methods at Goro, Southeastern Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journals ifAgronomy, 3 (1): 21-24.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Dulo Husen, Zelalem Shalemew, Anbese Ambomsa, Ayub Jelde. (2021). Demonstration and Scaling up of In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts. Science Research, 9(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Dulo Husen; Zelalem Shalemew; Anbese Ambomsa; Ayub Jelde. Demonstration and Scaling up of In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts. Sci. Res. 2021, 9(1), 6-13. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Dulo Husen, Zelalem Shalemew, Anbese Ambomsa, Ayub Jelde. Demonstration and Scaling up of In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts. Sci Res. 2021;9(1):6-13. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12,
      author = {Dulo Husen and Zelalem Shalemew and Anbese Ambomsa and Ayub Jelde},
      title = {Demonstration and Scaling up of In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts},
      journal = {Science Research},
      volume = {9},
      number = {1},
      pages = {6-13},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sr.20210901.12},
      abstract = {The experiment was conducted during 2019 cropping season in six Peasant Associations (PAs) of Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts; with objectives of demonstration and scaling up the selected in-situ moisture conservation structures (Tied ridge and furrow closed at both Ends), awareness creation and analyzed the cost benefit. Totally twelve (12) FREG members were established and 600 farmers, 12 animator and 6 DAs were participated on training from six Peasant Associations (PAs). Two FREG members were established in each Peasant Associations (PAs). From these, 240 farmers were from FREG and 360 from non-FREG were participated on introductory training. Totally 100 farmers, 4 DAs and animator, 4 SMS and 32 others were participated on field day from both districts respectively. The mean yield obtained from tied ridge and furrow closed at both ends were 89.55 and 71.69 Qtha-1 at Negele Arsi district and 72.81 and 69.96 Qtha-1 were obtained from Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district respectively. The two-selected in-situ moisture conservation structures were gave a significant yield in both districts. The net benefit obtained from tied ridge, furrow closed at both end were 50,241 and 37,096 ETH Birr ha-1 respectively at NegeleArsi district. In addition, the net benefit obtained from tied ridge and furrow closed at both end were 38,119 and 35,896 ETH Birr ha-1 respectively at Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district. In-situ moisture conservation structures (tied ridge and furrow closed at both Ends) were more economical and better if it is more scale up in the study area and similar agro ecology. Agricultural and natural resource office should have give a great attention to popularized and scaling up this technologies in moisture deficit areas of the districts.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Demonstration and Scaling up of In-Situ Moisture Conservation Techniques on Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield in Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts
    AU  - Dulo Husen
    AU  - Zelalem Shalemew
    AU  - Anbese Ambomsa
    AU  - Ayub Jelde
    Y1  - 2021/03/10
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12
    T2  - Science Research
    JF  - Science Research
    JO  - Science Research
    SP  - 6
    EP  - 13
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-0927
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20210901.12
    AB  - The experiment was conducted during 2019 cropping season in six Peasant Associations (PAs) of Negele Arsi and Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha Districts; with objectives of demonstration and scaling up the selected in-situ moisture conservation structures (Tied ridge and furrow closed at both Ends), awareness creation and analyzed the cost benefit. Totally twelve (12) FREG members were established and 600 farmers, 12 animator and 6 DAs were participated on training from six Peasant Associations (PAs). Two FREG members were established in each Peasant Associations (PAs). From these, 240 farmers were from FREG and 360 from non-FREG were participated on introductory training. Totally 100 farmers, 4 DAs and animator, 4 SMS and 32 others were participated on field day from both districts respectively. The mean yield obtained from tied ridge and furrow closed at both ends were 89.55 and 71.69 Qtha-1 at Negele Arsi district and 72.81 and 69.96 Qtha-1 were obtained from Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district respectively. The two-selected in-situ moisture conservation structures were gave a significant yield in both districts. The net benefit obtained from tied ridge, furrow closed at both end were 50,241 and 37,096 ETH Birr ha-1 respectively at NegeleArsi district. In addition, the net benefit obtained from tied ridge and furrow closed at both end were 38,119 and 35,896 ETH Birr ha-1 respectively at Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha district. In-situ moisture conservation structures (tied ridge and furrow closed at both Ends) were more economical and better if it is more scale up in the study area and similar agro ecology. Agricultural and natural resource office should have give a great attention to popularized and scaling up this technologies in moisture deficit areas of the districts.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Batu, Ethiopia

  • Sections