Paola Matiko Martins Okuda
In general, SciencePG has grown annually, but has the potential to grow further. The Editorial Assistant is always kind and readily available to help. I'd like to suggest SciencePG to have Annual conference with the editors (online) to know each other, to discuss new scientific methods, to assess the manuscripts, and discuss how to make the SciencePG into a more excellence group in quality of science.
Quality is never compromised in any articles or books released by SciencePG. And topics are unique, especially regarding books. SciencePG yields rapid growth with high standard quality in many fields. Immediate and prompt communication with authors and reviewers are quite nice experiences. Especially, The editors' desk replies and instructions are very clear and they make things easier and faster in a comfortable way. If SciencePG expand their branches in medicine, dentistry and allied health sciences, it would be better. As a whole, I give a very good comment on SciencePG.
I felt that the peer review system functions very good. There is transparency in the flow of the review, the users can rest assured. Until the publication from posted the paper, the person who gave me support was very helpful and quick response. I am very grateful for the great work of SciencePG.