The main objective of this work is to show a fermentation influence by some associations of two lactic acid bacteria and three bifidobacteria on proteolysis and the antigenicity of sheep milk proteins. This latter freshly collected is skimmed, sterilized and inoculated by a mixed culture. The mixture is homogenized and incubated at 40°C until it is a curd. On these fermented milks previously lyophilized, were measured the rate of lactic acid product, bacterial counts, the rate of total protein, α-NH2 functions and the antigenicity of three proteins (β-Lg, α-La and SA). The obtained averages are compared with the "t" test of Student compared to sterile milk without ferment taken as control. The best proteolysis is achieved in the fermented milk by Streptococcus thermophilus (St) associated with Lactobacillus plantarum (Lp) with a high antigenic potential of β-Lg and the α-La probably due to the detection of unmasked antigenic sites.
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11 |
| Published in | Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 3, May 2015) |
| Page(s) | 84-89 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Sheep Milk, Bacteria, Fermentation, Proteolysis, Antigenicity, Awareness, Female rabbits
| [1] | D. De boissieu and C. Dupont,“Allergy to Extensively Hydrolysed Cow Milk Proteins in Infants,” Archives de Pédiatrie Elsevier Masson Ed, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 124-126. |
| [2] | F. Rance and G. Dutau, “Actualités sur l’Exploration et la Prise en Charge de l’Allergie aux Protéines du Lait de Vache (APLV),” Revue Française d’Allergologie Elsevier Masson Ed, Vol. 49, 2009, pp. S28-S33. |
| [3] | M. Heyman, “Food Antigens, Intestinal Barrier and Mucosal Immunity,” Cahiers de Nutrition et Diététique, Vol. 45, 2010, pp. 65-71. |
| [4] | J. P. Dessaint, “Tolérance ou Réactivité aux Allergènes,” Revue Française d’Allergologie, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2006, pp. 125-27. |
| [5] | S. Strobel and A.M.Mowat, “Oral Tolerance and Allergic Responses to Food Proteins,” Current Opinion of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 6, 2006, pp. 207-213. |
| [6] | K. Adel-patient, S. Ah-leung, H. Bernard, D.A. Creminon and J.M. Wal, “Oral Sensitization to Peanut is Highly Enhanced by Application of Peanut Extracts to intact Skin, but is Prevented when CPG and Cholera Toxin are Added,”International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, Vol. 143, 2007, pp. 10-20. |
| [7] | A.C. Ouwehand,“Antiallergic Effects of Probiotics,”Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 137, No.Suppl 2, 2007, pp. S794-797. |
| [8] | P. Chamberlin, “Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Proteins part J: Causes and Clinical Manifestations of Immunogenicity, the Regulatory,”Review, Vol. 5, 2002, pp. 4-9. |
| [9] | G. Ernest, M.D. Seidman and M.D. Sanford Singer, “Therapeutic Modalities for Cow’s Milk Allergy,”Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, Vol. 90, 2003, pp. 104-11. |
| [10] | J.P. Chouraqui, C. Dupont, A. Bocquet, H. Bresson, A. Briend, D. Darmaun and M.L. Frelut, “Feeding During the First Months of Life and Prevention of Allergy,”Archive de Pédiatrie, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2008, pp. 431-442. |
| [11] | K. Adel-patient, H. Bernard and J.M. Wal, “Devenir des Allergènesdans le Tube Digestif, ”Revue Française d’Allergologie &d’Immunologie Clinique, Vol. 48, 2008, pp. 335-43. |
| [12] | H.B. Ghoddusi and R.K. Robinson, “Enumeration of Starter Cultures in Fermented Milks, ”Journal of Dairy Research,Vol. 63, 1996, pp. 151-158. |
| [13] | B.E. Terzaghi and W.E. Sandine, “Improved Medium for Lactic Streptococci and their Bacteriophages, ”Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 29, 1975, pp. 807-813. |
| [14] | J.C. De Man, M. Rogosa and M.E. Sharpe, “A Medium for Cultivation of Lactobacilli,” Journal of Applied Bacteriology, Vol. 23, 1960, pp. 130-135. |
| [15] | A.Y. Tamine, V.M.E. Marshall and R.K. Robinson,“Microbiological Aspects of Milks Fermented by Bifidobacteria,”Journal of Dairy Research, Vol. 62, 1995, pp. 151-187. |
| [16] | J.P. Accolas, R. Bloquel and J. Regnier, “Propriétés Acidifiantes des Bactéries Lactiques Thermophiles en relation avec la Fabrication du Yaourt, ” Revue Le Lait,Vol. 67, 1977, pp. 1-23. |
| [17] | O.H. Lowry, N.H. Rosebrough, A.L. Fan and R.I. Randal, “Protein Measurement with Folin Phenol Reagent,”Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 193, 1951, pp. 265-275. |
| [18] | E. Doi, D. Shibata and T. Matoba,“Modified Colorimetric Ninhydrin Methods for Peptidase Assay, ”Annals of Biochemistry, Vol. 118, 1981, pp. 173-184. |
| [19] | E. Engvall and P. Perlmann, “Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Quantitative Assay of Globulin G,” Journal of Immunochemistry, Vol. 8, 1971, pp. 871-874. |
| [20] | Council of European Communities.Council Instructions about the Protection of Living Animals used in Scientific Investigations. Official Journal European Communities (JO 86/609/CEE); L 358: 1-28 (Corrigendum Official Journal L 117 of 05.05.1987). 1987. |
| [21] | M.S. Garro, G.F. De Valdez and G.S. De Giori, “ Temperature Effect on the Biological Activity of Bifidobacterium longum CRL 849 and Lactobacillus fermentumCRL 251 in Pure and Mixed Cultures Grown in Soy Milk,”Journal ofFood Microbiology, Vol. 21,2004, pp. 511-18. |
| [22] | C. Benjamas, S. Hiroshi and Suteaki S, “ Enhanced Kefiran Production by Mixed Culture of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae,”Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 100, 2003, pp. 43-53. |
| [23] | E.H.E Ayad, S. Nashat, N. El-sadek, H. Metwaly and M. El-soda, “Selection of Wild Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Traditional Egyptian Dairy Products According to Production and Technological Criteria,”Journal ofFood Microbiology, Vol. 21, 2004, pp. 715-25. |
| [24] | A. Chekroun, A. Bensoltane, D. Saidi and O Kheroua, “Dietetic Valorisation of Cow’s Milk Proteins Fermented at 45°C by Lactobacillus acidophilus Associated with Bifidobacteria,” Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No.3, Série 34, 2011, pp. 282-289. |
| [25] | A.M. Gomes, F.X. Malcata and F.A. Klaver, “Growth Enhancement of Bifidobacteriumlactis Bo and Lactobacillus acidophilus Kid by Milk Hydrolysates, ” Journal of Dairy Sciences, Vol. 81, 1998, pp. 281-285. |
| [26] | J.F. Payne, A.E.J Morris and P. Beers, “Note: Evaluation of Selective Media for the Enumeration of Bifidobacterium sp. in Milk,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 86, 1999, pp. 353-358. |
| [27] | A. Shihata and N.P. Shah, “ Proteolytic Profiles of Yogurt and Probiotic Bacteria,”International Dairy Journal, Vol. 10, 2000, pp. 401-408. |
| [28] | M.A. Chopard, M. Schmitt, E. Perreard and J.F. Chamba, “Aspect Qualitatif de l’Activité Protéolytique des Lactobacilles Thermophiles utilisés en Fabrication de Fromages à Pâte Pressée Cuite, ” Revue LeLait,Vol. 81, 2001, pp.183-94. |
| [29] | T. Requena, J. Burton, T. Matsuki, K. Munro, M.A. Simon, R. Tanaka, K. Watanabe and G. Tannock, “Identification, Detection and Enumeration of Human Bifidobacterium Species by PCR Targeting the Transaldolase Gene,”Journal ofApplied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 68, No. 5, 2002, pp. 2420-2427. |
| [30] | A. Bensoltane, A. Yagoubi, M. Mahi and A. Cheriguene, “Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Traditional Algerian Butter,”Egyptian Journal of Applied Sciences,Vol. 19, No. 11B, 2004, pp. 604-614. |
| [31] | V. Hunsinger, “Maladies Inflammatoires du Réservoir Iléal réalisé après Anastomose Iléo Anale en cas de Rectocolite Hémorragique,” " Le Rapport est disponible sur le Site de l’Agence de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments : www.afssa.fr " © Quotipharm (Tous droits réservés) 2005. |
| [32] | A. Chekroun, A. Bensoltane, O. Kheroua, D. Saidi, “Biotechnological Characteristics of Fermented Milk by Bacterial Association of the Strains Streptococcus, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium,” Egyptian Journal of Applied Sciences,Vol. 21, No. 2b, 2006, pp. 583-598. |
| [33] | A. Chekroun, A. Bensoltane, “Nutritional Characterization of Fermented Cow’s Milk at 45 ºC by Lactobacillusacidophilus Associated with Bifidobacteria,”Egyptian Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 22, No.12 A, 2007, pp. 188-202. |
| [34] | D. Lorient, “Influence des Traitements Technologiques sur les Propriétés Nutritionnelles du Lait,” Lait, Nutrition et SantéTechnique& Documentation Ed Paris, 2001, pp. 193-207. |
| [35] | S. Pougheon, “Le lait et ses Constituants : Caractéristiques Physico-Chimiques,” Lait, Nutrition et Santé Technique& Documentation Ed Paris, 2001, pp. 21-22. |
| [36] | S.I. French, W.J. Harper, N.M. Kleinholz, R.B. Jones and K.B. Green-church, “Maillard Reaction Induced Lactose Attachment to Bovine β-Lactoglobulin: Electrospray Ionization and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Examination, ”Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 50, 2002, pp. 820-823. |
| [37] | T. Bintsis, A. Vafopoulou-mastrojiannaki, E. Litopoulou-tzanetaki and R.K. Robinson, “Protease, Peptidase and Esterase Activities by Lactobacilli and Yeast Isolates from Feta Cheese Brine,”Journal of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 95, 2003, pp. 68-77. |
| [38] | I. Mierau, E.R. Kunji, G. Venema and J. Kok, “Casein and Peptide Degradation in Lactic Acid Bacteria,”Biotechnology Genetic Engineering Review, Vol. 14, 1997, pp. 279-301. |
| [39] | P. Langella, S. Nouaille, J. Commissaire, A. Bolotine, A. Gruss and Le loir Y, “Expression Protéique (Protéone), Caractérisation des Facteurs d’Hôtes Affectant la Sécrétion de Protéines Hétérologues chez Lactococcus lactis,” Revue LeLait,Vol. 81, 2001, pp. 19-28. |
| [40] | B.Guessas and M. Kihal, “Characterisation of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Algerian Arid zone Raw Goats Milk,”African Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2004, pp. 339-342. |
| [41] | D.A. Moneret-vautrin, R. Hatahet and G. Kanny, “ Hydrolysats de Protéines : Laits Hypoallergéniques et Formules Extensivement Hydrolysées. Bases Immuno-allergologiques de leur Utilisation dans la Prévention et le Traitement de l’Allergie au Lait, ” Archives de Pédiatrie Elsevier Ed,Vol. 8, 2001, pp. 1348-1357. |
| [42] | F. Bonomi, A. Fiocchi, H. Frokiaer, A. Gaiaschi, S. Lametti, C. Poiesi, P. Rasmussen, P. Restani and P. Rovere, “Reduction of Immunoreactivity of Bovine Bêta-lactoglobulin Upon Combined Physical and Proteolytic Treatment,”Journal of Dairy Research, Vol. 70, 2003, pp. 51-59. |
| [43] | E.M. Guido, A. Warm, S. Arslanoglu and V. Mielo, “Management of Bovine Protein Allergy : New Perspectives and Nutritional Aspects,”Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Vol. 86, No. 6 Suppl, 2002, pp. 1-93. |
APA Style
M. Missouri, A. Chekroun, S. Belalia, H. Mahdjoub Bessam, O. Kheroua. (2015). Valuing the Antigenicity of Sheep Milk Proteins after Fermentation at 40ºC. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 3(3), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11
ACS Style
M. Missouri; A. Chekroun; S. Belalia; H. Mahdjoub Bessam; O. Kheroua. Valuing the Antigenicity of Sheep Milk Proteins after Fermentation at 40ºC. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2015, 3(3), 84-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11
AMA Style
M. Missouri, A. Chekroun, S. Belalia, H. Mahdjoub Bessam, O. Kheroua. Valuing the Antigenicity of Sheep Milk Proteins after Fermentation at 40ºC. J Food Nutr Sci. 2015;3(3):84-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11,
author = {M. Missouri and A. Chekroun and S. Belalia and H. Mahdjoub Bessam and O. Kheroua},
title = {Valuing the Antigenicity of Sheep Milk Proteins after Fermentation at 40ºC},
journal = {Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences},
volume = {3},
number = {3},
pages = {84-89},
doi = {10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfns.20150303.11},
abstract = {The main objective of this work is to show a fermentation influence by some associations of two lactic acid bacteria and three bifidobacteria on proteolysis and the antigenicity of sheep milk proteins. This latter freshly collected is skimmed, sterilized and inoculated by a mixed culture. The mixture is homogenized and incubated at 40°C until it is a curd. On these fermented milks previously lyophilized, were measured the rate of lactic acid product, bacterial counts, the rate of total protein, α-NH2 functions and the antigenicity of three proteins (β-Lg, α-La and SA). The obtained averages are compared with the "t" test of Student compared to sterile milk without ferment taken as control. The best proteolysis is achieved in the fermented milk by Streptococcus thermophilus (St) associated with Lactobacillus plantarum (Lp) with a high antigenic potential of β-Lg and the α-La probably due to the detection of unmasked antigenic sites.},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Valuing the Antigenicity of Sheep Milk Proteins after Fermentation at 40ºC AU - M. Missouri AU - A. Chekroun AU - S. Belalia AU - H. Mahdjoub Bessam AU - O. Kheroua Y1 - 2015/04/03 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11 T2 - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences JF - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences JO - Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences SP - 84 EP - 89 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7293 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.11 AB - The main objective of this work is to show a fermentation influence by some associations of two lactic acid bacteria and three bifidobacteria on proteolysis and the antigenicity of sheep milk proteins. This latter freshly collected is skimmed, sterilized and inoculated by a mixed culture. The mixture is homogenized and incubated at 40°C until it is a curd. On these fermented milks previously lyophilized, were measured the rate of lactic acid product, bacterial counts, the rate of total protein, α-NH2 functions and the antigenicity of three proteins (β-Lg, α-La and SA). The obtained averages are compared with the "t" test of Student compared to sterile milk without ferment taken as control. The best proteolysis is achieved in the fermented milk by Streptococcus thermophilus (St) associated with Lactobacillus plantarum (Lp) with a high antigenic potential of β-Lg and the α-La probably due to the detection of unmasked antigenic sites. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: