The Relationship Between Trade Openness and Economic Growth in Muslim Countries: An Empirical Investigation
This paper studies the association between openness and growth for selected Muslim countries. The rational for conducting this study only on Muslim countries is to explore this relationship among economies having different religion, economic and social characteristics. This paper employed random and fixed effect model (RE & FE). Also, Pedroni and Kao Cointegration test is used to explore the long run relationship between openness and growth. The finding from Pedroni Cointegration test has indicated the long run relationship among variables. However, this long run relationship is absent in Kao Cointegration test. The results of RE and FE model have shown that openness has significant and positive effect on growth. In addition, foreign direct investment, inflation and human capital are also affecting growth in Muslim countries.
The Relationship Between Trade Openness and Economic Growth in Muslim Countries: An Empirical Investigation, Economics.
Vol. 5, No. 2,
2016, pp. 15-19.
Ali, W. & Abdullah, A. (2015). The impact of trade openness on the economic growth of Pakistan: 1980- 2010. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 7(2).
Asteriou, D. (2006). Applied Econometrics: A modern Approach, E-Views and Microfit. Palgrave Macmillan.
Barro, R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1 06 (2), pp.4 07-43.
Ben –David, D. & Loewy, M. (1998). Free trade, growth and convergence. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 143-170
Ben–David, D. & Loewy, M. (2000). Knowledge dissemination, capital accumulation, trade, and endogenous growth. Oxford Economic papers, 52, 637-650.
Ben–David, D. & Loewy, M. (2003). Trade and Neoclassical growth model. Journal of Economic Integration, 18, 1-16.
Chang, R., Kaltani, L., & Loayza, N. V. (2009). Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementariness. Journal of development Economics, 90, 33-49.
Chen, L. B. (1999). Trade openness and economic growth: Evidence in East Asia and Latin America. Journal of Economic Integration. 14(2), 265-295.
Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2): 249-272.
Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., 1990. Comparative advantage and long-run growth. American Economic Review, 80, 796–815.
Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., 1991a. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43– 61.
Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., 1991b. Endogenous product cycles. Economic Journal, 101, 1229–1241.
Georgios, K. (2003). Trade openness and Economic growth can we estimate the precise effect? Applied Econometrics and International Development, 3(1).
Gries, T., & Redlin, M. (2012). Trade openness and Economic Growth: A panel causality analysis. Centre For International Economics Working Paper Series, No. 2011-06, June 2012.
Hassen, S., Anis, O., Taha, Z., & Yorsa, S. (2013). Trade openness and economic growth: The case of Tunisia. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 24-32.
Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran and Y. Shin, 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74.
Kao, C. (1999). Spurious Regression and Residual-Based tests for Cointegration in Panel Data, Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1-44.
Levin, A., C. F. Lin and C. S. Chu, 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1-24.
Maddala, G. S. and S. Wu, 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 631-652.
Nduka, E. K., Chukwu, J. O. & Ugbor, K. I. (2013). Trade openness and economic growth: A comparative analysis of the pre and post structural adjustment programme in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Business and Economics, 3(3.4).
Pedroni Peter, 1999. Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653-670.
Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel Cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to PPP hypothesis: new results. Econometric Theory, 20(3): 597-627.
Reyna, O. C. (2007). Panel data analysis. Fixed effects and random effects using STATA (v.4.2). Princeton University.
Sarkar, P., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2005). Trade liberalization and growth: case studies of India and Korea. Economic and political weekly, 40(53), 5635-5641.
Spilimbergo, A. (2000). Growth and trade: The north can lose. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 131-146.
Sarkar, P. (2008, September). Trade openness and growth: is there any link? Journal of Economic issues, 42(3), 763-785.
Sakyi, D., Villaverde, J., Maza, A., & Chittedi, K. R. (2012). Evidence from heterogeneous panel Cointegration analysis for middle income countries. Guadernos de Economica, 31(57), 21-40.
Sachs, J. D., Warner, A. M. (1995). Economic reform and the process of economic integration. Brookings Papers of Economic, 1 – 118.
Sachs, J. D., Warner, A. M. (1997a). Fundamental sources of long-run growth. American Economic Review, 87, 184–188.
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2009). Economics Development, (10ed). Addison Wesley. www.pearsoned.co.uk.
Thirlwall, A. P. (2011). Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan.
The World Bank (2014). World Development Indicators (2014), The World Bank Group.
Wacziarg, R. (2001). Measuring the dynamic gains from trade: The World Bank Economic Review, 15, 393-429.
Winters, L. A. (2004). Trade liberalization and Economic performance: An overview. The Economic Journal, 114F4-F21.
Yanikkaya, H. (2002). Trade openness and economic growth: A cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 57-89.
Young, A. (1991, May). Learning by doing and dynamic effects of international trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.