| Peer-Reviewed

Identifying Stakeholders in Land Use Management Process and Its Critical Factors in ASEAN

Received: 22 July 2015    Accepted: 7 August 2015    Published: 13 August 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The main aim of this qualitative-based research is two folds: to identify the main stakeholders who are directly and indirectly impacted by land and who have actually or potentially influence on land use management (LUM) and the critical factors which determine the smooth coordination and cooperation among stakeholders in member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Through reviewing available key literature in individual ASEAN member states (AMSs), it shows that at the macro (aggregate)-level, there are three key stakeholders in LUM, i.e. government, companies, and community. Whereas, at the micro (disaggregate)-level, there can be a large number of stakeholders. With respect to government, many department or agencies may involve in LUM. One important finding of this study is that individual villagers or farmers are not always easy to be integrated in the land use planning and LUM; while farmer groups should be the engine of this integration

Published in Journal of Investment and Management (Volume 4, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24
Page(s) 237-249
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

LUM, ASEAN, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Vietnam

References
[1] Abdulharis, Eka Djunarsjah, and Andri Hernandi, 'Stakeholder Analysis on Implementation on Marine Cadastre in Indonesia. Integrating Generations', paper presented at the FIG Working Week 2008, 14-19 June 2008, Stockholm (Sweden).
[2] Albano, Mylene G, 'The Land Administration Reform Agenda', paper presented the International Conference on Reform in Land Administration Systems (Lessons & Challenges), 24-26 November 2003, Makati City, Manila (Philippines).
[3] Andrianto, A., Obidzinski, K.,Wajdi, F., Tetuka, B., 'Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Papua Post-New Order Regime', mimeo, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) (2008), Bogor (Indonesia).
[4] Billgrena, C. and Holme, H., 'Approaching reality: Comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management', Land Use Policy, 25 (2008): 550–562.
[5] Brits, Anne-Marie, Chris Grant and Tony Burns, 'Comparative Study of Land Administration Systems. With special reference to Thailand, Indonesia and Karnataka (India)', paper presented at the Regional Workshops on Land Policy Issues, Asia Program, 4-6 June 2002, Phnom Penh (Cambodia) (Land Equity International Pty Ltd – www.landequity.com.au).
[6] Clerc, Johanna, 'Unpacking tenure security', Working Paper No.102 (2012), Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor (Indonesia).
[7] Contreras-Hermosilla, A. and C. Fay, Strengthening Forest Management in Indonesia through Land Tenure Reform, Forest Trends, CIFOR (2005): Bogor (Indonesia).
[8] Dandy, N, Mark S. Reed, C.H. Quinn, H. Posthumus, C. Prell, J. Morris, K. Hubacek, A. Graves and L.C. Stringer,‘Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management,’ Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (2009): 1933–1949
[9] Davuth, Lor; Suon Sopha; and Seng Thany, 'Land Administration in Cambodia', power point presentation in International Seminar on Land Administration Trends & Issues in the Asia Pacific Region, 19-20 August 2008, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia).
[10] Dealca, Rhea Lyn M., 'Initiatives to Improve Land Administration System in the Philippines', paper presented at the 7th FIG Regional Conference on Spatial Data Serving People: Land Governance and the Environment – Building the Capacity, 19-22 October 2009, Hanoi (Viet Nam).
[11] Ducourtieux, O., Laffort, J. R. and Sacklokham, S., 'Land policy and farming practices in Laos', Development and Change, 36(3) (2005):499–526
[12] Engelke E. D, and Dorothea Biehl, 'Land Use Management as Key Part of Metropolitan Governance for for Sustainable Urbanisation', paper presented at the 46th ISOCARP Congress 2010, Nairobi (Kenya).
[13] FA, 'Cambodia Forestry Outlook Study', Working Paper No. APFSOS II/ WP/ 2010/ 32, Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study II, the Forestry Administration, Phnom Penh (Cambodia).
[14] FAO, 'Conflict and Natural Resource Management', Community Forestry, 2000, June, Roma.
[15] Fujita, Y., Vongvisouk, T., Chantavong, H. and Chanthaleunnavong, S., 'Decentralized forest management in production forest in Central Laos Forest, Dong Phousi Production Forest and Dong Sithuoane Production Forest', in P. Durst, C. Brown, H. D. Tacio and M. Ishikawa (eds.), In Search of Excellence: Exemplary Forest Management in Asia and the Pacific (2005),.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, and the Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific (RECOFTC), Bangkok (Thailand).
[16] Fuys, A., Mwangi, E. and Dohrn, S., 'Securing common property regimes in a globalizing world. Synthesis of 41 case studies on common property regimes from Asia, Africa, Europe and Latin America', CGIAR System wide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (2008), Rome (Italy): International Land Coalition (http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/5363/ILC_ Securing_Common_ Property_ Regimes_E.pdf?sequence=1).
[17] Grimble, R., 'Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management, Socioeconomic Methodologies', Research Report (1998), Chatham (England): Natural Resources Institute.
[18] Grimble, R. and Wellard, K., 'Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities', Agricultural Systems, 55(2) (1997): 173–193
[19] Guiang, Ernesto S. and Gem Castillo, 'Trends in Forest Ownership, Forest Resources Tenure and Institutional Arrangements in the Philippines: Are They Contributing to Better Forest Management and Poverty Reduction?', paper prepared for FAO as one of a series of country-specific case studies from Asia, Manila: Philippine Environmental Governance Project Phase 2 (EcoGov 2), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Development Alternatives Inc. (DAI), and the Philippines Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) (2006), Manila (the Philippines).
[20] Haakansson, Malene (ed.), 'Stolen Land Stolen Future. A Report on Land Grabbing in Cambodia', Association of World Council of Churches related Development Organisations in Europe (APRODEV), December 2011, Brussel (Belgium).
[21] IFC, 'Stakeholder Engagement: A Good Practice Handbook for Companies Doing Business in Emerging Markets', May 2007, Washington, D.C. (the United States): International Finance Corporation
[22] Kayoi, Martin, Adrian Wells, and Gill Shepherd, 'Poverty and Natural Resource Conflict in Indonesian Papua: Reconciling Growth and Social Justice', research paper, September 2006, http://www.profor.info/Documents/pdf/livelihoods/IndonesianPapuaCaseStudy.pdf, Jakarta (Indonesia).
[23] Larsen, Rasmus Klocker, Jo Marie Acebes, and Alejandro Belen, ' Philippines Integrated Coastal Management: diverging Stakeholder Agendas and Elite Co-option in the Babuyan Islands', Working Paper, October 2010, Stockholm (Sweden): Stockholm Environment Institute
[24] Manivong, Khamphay and Phouthone Sophathilath, 'Status of Community Based Forest Management in Lao PDR', January 2007, Bangkok (Thailand) and Vientiane (Lao PDR): The Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific (RECOFTC) and National Agriculture and Forestry Institute (NAFRI), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
[25] MK16 Project Team,'Fostering Evidence-Based IWRM in the Stung Pursat Catchment (Tonle Sap Great Lake) Cambodia CPWF-Mekong Basin Development Challenge. Stakeholder Analysis Report', prepared for Mekong Basin Leader CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food, March 2013, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,.
[26] Mumtas, Meraman and Chatupote, 'Stakeholder Analysis for Sustainable Land Management of Pak Phanang River Basin, Thailand', Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 91 (2013): 349-356.
[27] Natalie Bugalski and David Pred (eds.), 'Untitled. Tenure Insecurity and Inequality in the Cambodian Land Sector', (2009) Bridges Across Borders Southeast Asia, Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, Jesuit Refugee Service, Phnom Penh (Cambodia)
[28] Nyamu-Musembi, C.,,Breathing life into dead theories about property rights in rural Africa, lessons from Kenya', in B. Englert and E. Daley (eds.), Women’s land rights and privatization in Eastern Africa, (2008) Oxford (UK): James Currey.
[29] Phillips, Robert, 'Some Key Questions About Stakeholder Theory', Ivey Business Journal, March/April 2004 (http:.//iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/the-workplace)
[30] Pongwichian, Pirach, Chaiyanam Dissataporn and Kulras Ananpongsuk, 'Community Participatory Network on Sustainable Land Management: A Case Study on Saline Soil in Northeastern Part of Thailand', (2008) Office of Research and Development for Land Management, LDD, Bangkok (Thailand) (http://www.ldd.go.th/web_LDDAPEC/PDF/30/30nov_10%20Pirach%20Community%20Participatory%20Network.pdf).
[31] Prell, C., K. Hubacek, M. S. Reed, T. P. Burt, J. Holden, N. Jin, 'Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management', (2007) Leeds (United Kingdom), Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds.
[32] REDD, 'Laos', REDD Countries, the REDD Desk, 04/07/2012, Vientiane (Laos), (http://theredddesk.org/sites/default/files/resources/countries/readiness_overview/laos_ro_en.pdf).
[33] Sawathvong, Silavanh, Participatory Land Management Planning in Biodiversity Conservation Areas of Lao PDR, Doctoral thesis (2003), Department of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
[34] Sawathvong, Silivanh, 'Experiences from developing an integrated landuse planning approach for protected areas in the Lao PDR', Forest Policy and Economics 6 (2004): 553-566, Vientiane (Lao PDR) (http://www.elseveier. com/ locate/ forpol).
[35] Sipaseuth, Phetdavan and Glenn Hunt, 'Customary Land Rights in Laos – an overview', power point presentation (2009), JVC Laos, Vientiane (Lao PDR).
[36] Sirait, M.T., 'Indigenous peoples and oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia', research paper (2009), Amsterdam University Law Faculty and Cordaid, Amsterdam & The Hague (the Netherlands).
[37] Sokha, Pel, Pierre-Yves Le Meur, Sam Vitou, Laing Lan, Pel Setha, Hay Leakhena and Im Sothy, 'Land Transactions in Rural Cambodia. A Synthesis of Findings from Research on Appropriation and Derived Rights to Land', Gret - Collection Études et Travaux - Série en ligne n° 18, May 2008, Phnom Penh (Cambodia): GRET Organisation (www.gret.org).
[38] Samsudin, Salfarina, 'A Review of Organizational Arrangements in Malaysia Land Administration System towards Good Governance: Issues and Challenges', paper presented at the FIG Working Week 2011, 18-22 May 2011, Bridging the Gap between Cultures, Marrakech (Morocco).
[39] Sar, Sovann, 'Land Reform in Cambodia', paper presented at the FIG Congress 2010 'Facing the Challenges – Building the Capacity', 11-16 April 2010, Sydney (Australia),
[40] Sopha, Thienthong and Alice Sharp, ' Sustainable Wetland Management in Lao PDR: A Case Study of Xe Champhone Wetlands', paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Ecological, Environmental and Biological Sciences (ICEEBS'2013), 29-30 April 2013, Singapore.
[41] Sovannarith, So, Real Sopheap, Uch Utey, Sy Rathmony Brett Ballard and Sarthi Acharya, 'Social Assessment of Land in Cambodia. A Field Study', Working Paper No. 20, November 2001, Cambodia Development Resource Institute, Phnom Penh (Cambodia).
[42] UNDP, 'Participatory Governance Assessment: The 2012 Indonesia Forest, Land, and REDD+ Governance Index', UN-REDD Programme (2013), Jakarta (Indonesia).
[43] USAID, 'Thailand', USAID Country Profile 2013, Property Rights and Resource Governance, Washington, DC (the USA) (http://usaidlandtenure.net/Burma).
[44] USAID, 'Burma', USAID Country Profile 2013, Property Rights and Resource Governance, Washington, DC (the USA) (http://usaidlandtenure.net/Burma).
[45] Tan, Nguyen Quang, 'Forest Land Allocation and Community Forest Management in Vietnam', Session J, 13 July 2011, RECOFTC – The Center for People and Forests, Lombok (Indonesia).
[46] Thongmanivong, S. and Fujita,.Y., 'Recent land use and livelihood transition in Northern Laos', Mountain Research and Development, 26(3) (2006):237–244
[47] Thongmanivong, S., Fujita, Y. and Fox, J., 'Resource use dynamics and land-cover change in Ang Nhai Village and Phou Phanang National Reserve Forest, Lao PDR', Environmental Management, 36(3): (2005) 382–393
[48] Trisurat, Yongyut,'Community-based Wetland Management in Northern Thailand', International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 2(1) (2006):49-62.
[49] Wells-Dang, Andrew, 'Promoting Land Rights in Vietnam: A Multi-Sector Advocacy Coalition Approach', Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 8-11 April 2013, The World Bank, Washington DC (the USA).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tulus Tahi Hamonangan Tambunan. (2015). Identifying Stakeholders in Land Use Management Process and Its Critical Factors in ASEAN. Journal of Investment and Management, 4(5), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tulus Tahi Hamonangan Tambunan. Identifying Stakeholders in Land Use Management Process and Its Critical Factors in ASEAN. J. Invest. Manag. 2015, 4(5), 237-249. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tulus Tahi Hamonangan Tambunan. Identifying Stakeholders in Land Use Management Process and Its Critical Factors in ASEAN. J Invest Manag. 2015;4(5):237-249. doi: 10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24,
      author = {Tulus Tahi Hamonangan Tambunan},
      title = {Identifying Stakeholders in Land Use Management Process and Its Critical Factors in ASEAN},
      journal = {Journal of Investment and Management},
      volume = {4},
      number = {5},
      pages = {237-249},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jim.20150405.24},
      abstract = {The main aim of this qualitative-based research is two folds: to identify the main stakeholders who are directly and indirectly impacted by land and who have actually or potentially influence on land use management (LUM) and the critical factors which determine the smooth coordination and cooperation among stakeholders in member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Through reviewing available key literature in individual ASEAN member states (AMSs), it shows that at the macro (aggregate)-level, there are three key stakeholders in LUM, i.e. government, companies, and community. Whereas, at the micro (disaggregate)-level, there can be a large number of stakeholders. With respect to government, many department or agencies may involve in LUM. One important finding of this study is that individual villagers or farmers are not always easy to be integrated in the land use planning and LUM; while farmer groups should be the engine of this integration},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Identifying Stakeholders in Land Use Management Process and Its Critical Factors in ASEAN
    AU  - Tulus Tahi Hamonangan Tambunan
    Y1  - 2015/08/13
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24
    T2  - Journal of Investment and Management
    JF  - Journal of Investment and Management
    JO  - Journal of Investment and Management
    SP  - 237
    EP  - 249
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7721
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150405.24
    AB  - The main aim of this qualitative-based research is two folds: to identify the main stakeholders who are directly and indirectly impacted by land and who have actually or potentially influence on land use management (LUM) and the critical factors which determine the smooth coordination and cooperation among stakeholders in member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Through reviewing available key literature in individual ASEAN member states (AMSs), it shows that at the macro (aggregate)-level, there are three key stakeholders in LUM, i.e. government, companies, and community. Whereas, at the micro (disaggregate)-level, there can be a large number of stakeholders. With respect to government, many department or agencies may involve in LUM. One important finding of this study is that individual villagers or farmers are not always easy to be integrated in the land use planning and LUM; while farmer groups should be the engine of this integration
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Center for Industry, SME and Business Competition Studies, University of Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

  • Sections