Science Research

| Peer-Reviewed |

Evaluation of Several Drought Tolerance Criteria in Cultivated Varieties of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Their Relationships with Yield Reduction

Received: 26 November 2015    Accepted: 26 January 2016    Published: 9 March 2016
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Drought is the most significant constraint for crop production in the world. Therefore, employing high-yielding cultivars tolerant to drought is an effective approach to reduce its detrimental effects. Six barley cultivars were evaluated to screening drought tolerant cultivars in two different conditions of irrigation. The experiments were arranged based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the research station of College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. The cultivars in the first experiment meet normal irrigation condition (100% field capacity; FC) while these cultivars in the second experiment were exposed to water-stressed condition (no irrigation after anthesis). Grain yield, its components and drought tolerance indices based on grain yield of the genotypes such as Tolerance (TOL), Mean Productivity (MP), Susceptibility Index (SI), Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI), Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) and Stress Tolerance Index (STI) were calculated. Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences among the barley cultivars for yield and its components in normal and stress conditions. Yield in non-stress (Yp) and stress (Ys) conditions showed positive and significant correlations with STI, MP and GMP. PCA analysis also indicated that STI, MP and GMP were more reliable indices to screen drought tolerant barley cultivars. The results revealed that Lokht-Himalia and Dorla were sensitive and semi-sensitive, respectively. Other evaluated barley cultivars were tolerant to drought. Therefore, they may be recommended for cultivate in drought prone regions. Also these cultivars can be used in barley breeding programs aimed at improving drought tolerance.

DOI 10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11
Published in Science Research (Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2016)
Page(s) 26-32
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Drought, Stress, Crop Yields, Tolerance Indices

References
[1] Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., & Baum, M. (2007). Participatory plant breeding in water-limited environments. Experimental Agriculture, 43(04), 411-435.
[2] Chen, R. S., Dilley, M., & Yetman, G. (2005). Natural. Disaster. Hotspots. A. Global. Risk. Analysis. The World Bank Hazard Management Unit.
[3] Reynolds, M., & Tuberosa, R. (2008). Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. Current opinion in plant biology, 11(2), 171-179.
[4] Blum, A. (2005). Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive?. Crop and Pasture Science, 56(11), 1159-1168.
[5] Pinto, R. S., Reynolds, M. P., Mathews, K. L., McIntyre, C. L., Olivares-Villegas, J. J., & Chapman, S. C. (2010). Heat and drought adaptive QTL in a wheat population designed to minimize confounding agronomic effects. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 121(6), 1001-1021.
[6] Fernandez, G. C. (1992, August). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In Proceedings of the international symposium on adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress (pp. 257-270).
[7] Rosielle, A. A., & Hamblin, J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science, 21(6), 943-946.
[8] Fischer, R. A., & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Crop and Pasture Science, 29(5), 897-912.
[9] Khalili, M., Naghavi, M. R., Aboughadareh, A. P., & Talebzadeh, S. J. (2012). Evaluating of drought stress tolerance based on selection indices in spring canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(11), p78.
[10] SAS. (2013). SAS version 9.2. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc. SAS Online Doc 913.
[11] Reynolds, M. P., Pierre, C. S., Saad, A. S., Vargas, M., & Condon, A. G. (2007). Evaluating potential genetic gains in wheat associated with stress-adaptive trait expression in elite genetic resources under drought and heat stress. Crop Science, 47(Supplement_3), S-172.
[12] Mardeh, A. S. S., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K., & Mohammadi, V. (2006). Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field Crops Research, 98(2), 222-229.
[13] Geravandi, M., Farshadfar, E., & Kahrizi, D. (2010). Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat advanced genotypes in field and laboratory conditions. Seed and Plant Improvment Journal, 26(2), 233-252.
[14] Nazari, L., & Pakniyat, H. (2010). Assessment of drought tolerance in barley genotypes. J. Appl. Sci, 10(2), 151-156.
[15] Yarnia, M., Arabifard, N., Khoei, F. R., & Zandi, P. (2013). Evaluation of drought tolerance indices among some winter rapeseed cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(53), 10914-10922.
[16] Dorostkar, S., Dadkhodaie, A., & Heidari, B. (2015). Evaluation of grain yield indices in hexaploid wheat genotypes in response to drought stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 61(3), 397-413.
[17] Farshadfar, E., Poursiahbidi, M. M., & Safavi, S. M. (2013). Assessment of drought tolerance in land races of bread wheat based on resistance/tolerance indices. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 1(2), 143-158.
[18] Aliakbari, M., Saed-Moucheshi, A., Hasheminasab, H., Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Asad M. T., & Emam Y. (2013). Suitable stress indices for screening resistant wheat genotypes under water deficit conditions. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4(10), 2665-2672.
[19] Naghavi, M. R., Pouraboughadareh, A., & Khalili, M. (2013). Evaluation of drought tolerance Indices for screening some of corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars under environmental conditions. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5, 388-393.
[20] Pakniyat, H., Saed-Moucheshi, A., & Haddadi, M. H. (2013). Modelling and determination of relationship between kernel yield and its related traits in maize inbred lines and their hybrids using multiple regression and path coefficient analysis. International journal of Agriculture and Crop Science, 5(5), 522-528.
[21] Rahimi, M., Dehghani, H., Rabiei, B., & Tarang, A. R. (2013). Evaluation of rice segregating population based on drought tolerance criteria and biplot analysis. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5(3), 194.
[22] Ramirez-Vallejo, P., & Kelly, J. D. (1998). Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica, 99(2), 127-136.
[23] Khakwani, A. A., Dennett, M. D., & Munir, M. (2011). Drought tolerance screening of wheat varieties by inducing water stress conditions. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol, 33(2), 135-142.
[24] Taghipour, F., & Salehi, M. (2008). The study of salt tolerance of Iranian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in seedling growth stages. Bio. Diver. Conser, 172, 53-58.
[25] Ahmed, I. A., El-Hag, A. A., Amer, K. A., El-Moselhy, M. A., & Said, M. A. (2001). Evaluation of some barley genotypes for salt tolerance. National Coordination Meeting, Egypt, ARC, Cairo, Sept., 2-4.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Saeideh Dorostkar, Hassan Paknyiat, Mahmood Ahmadi Kordshooli, Raziyeh Ghorbani, Massumeh Aliakbari, et al. (2016). Evaluation of Several Drought Tolerance Criteria in Cultivated Varieties of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Their Relationships with Yield Reduction. Science Research, 4(2), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Saeideh Dorostkar; Hassan Paknyiat; Mahmood Ahmadi Kordshooli; Raziyeh Ghorbani; Massumeh Aliakbari, et al. Evaluation of Several Drought Tolerance Criteria in Cultivated Varieties of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Their Relationships with Yield Reduction. Sci. Res. 2016, 4(2), 26-32. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Saeideh Dorostkar, Hassan Paknyiat, Mahmood Ahmadi Kordshooli, Raziyeh Ghorbani, Massumeh Aliakbari, et al. Evaluation of Several Drought Tolerance Criteria in Cultivated Varieties of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Their Relationships with Yield Reduction. Sci Res. 2016;4(2):26-32. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11,
      author = {Saeideh Dorostkar and Hassan Paknyiat and Mahmood Ahmadi Kordshooli and Raziyeh Ghorbani and Massumeh Aliakbari and Neda Sobhanian and Reza Valiloo},
      title = {Evaluation of Several Drought Tolerance Criteria in Cultivated Varieties of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Their Relationships with Yield Reduction},
      journal = {Science Research},
      volume = {4},
      number = {2},
      pages = {26-32},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sr.20160402.11},
      abstract = {Drought is the most significant constraint for crop production in the world. Therefore, employing high-yielding cultivars tolerant to drought is an effective approach to reduce its detrimental effects. Six barley cultivars were evaluated to screening drought tolerant cultivars in two different conditions of irrigation. The experiments were arranged based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the research station of College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. The cultivars in the first experiment meet normal irrigation condition (100% field capacity; FC) while these cultivars in the second experiment were exposed to water-stressed condition (no irrigation after anthesis). Grain yield, its components and drought tolerance indices based on grain yield of the genotypes such as Tolerance (TOL), Mean Productivity (MP), Susceptibility Index (SI), Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI), Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) and Stress Tolerance Index (STI) were calculated. Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences among the barley cultivars for yield and its components in normal and stress conditions. Yield in non-stress (Yp) and stress (Ys) conditions showed positive and significant correlations with STI, MP and GMP. PCA analysis also indicated that STI, MP and GMP were more reliable indices to screen drought tolerant barley cultivars. The results revealed that Lokht-Himalia and Dorla were sensitive and semi-sensitive, respectively. Other evaluated barley cultivars were tolerant to drought. Therefore, they may be recommended for cultivate in drought prone regions. Also these cultivars can be used in barley breeding programs aimed at improving drought tolerance.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluation of Several Drought Tolerance Criteria in Cultivated Varieties of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Their Relationships with Yield Reduction
    AU  - Saeideh Dorostkar
    AU  - Hassan Paknyiat
    AU  - Mahmood Ahmadi Kordshooli
    AU  - Raziyeh Ghorbani
    AU  - Massumeh Aliakbari
    AU  - Neda Sobhanian
    AU  - Reza Valiloo
    Y1  - 2016/03/09
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11
    T2  - Science Research
    JF  - Science Research
    JO  - Science Research
    SP  - 26
    EP  - 32
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-0927
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sr.20160402.11
    AB  - Drought is the most significant constraint for crop production in the world. Therefore, employing high-yielding cultivars tolerant to drought is an effective approach to reduce its detrimental effects. Six barley cultivars were evaluated to screening drought tolerant cultivars in two different conditions of irrigation. The experiments were arranged based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the research station of College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. The cultivars in the first experiment meet normal irrigation condition (100% field capacity; FC) while these cultivars in the second experiment were exposed to water-stressed condition (no irrigation after anthesis). Grain yield, its components and drought tolerance indices based on grain yield of the genotypes such as Tolerance (TOL), Mean Productivity (MP), Susceptibility Index (SI), Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI), Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) and Stress Tolerance Index (STI) were calculated. Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences among the barley cultivars for yield and its components in normal and stress conditions. Yield in non-stress (Yp) and stress (Ys) conditions showed positive and significant correlations with STI, MP and GMP. PCA analysis also indicated that STI, MP and GMP were more reliable indices to screen drought tolerant barley cultivars. The results revealed that Lokht-Himalia and Dorla were sensitive and semi-sensitive, respectively. Other evaluated barley cultivars were tolerant to drought. Therefore, they may be recommended for cultivate in drought prone regions. Also these cultivars can be used in barley breeding programs aimed at improving drought tolerance.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

  • Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

  • Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

  • Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

  • Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

  • Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

  • Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

  • Sections