International Journal of Secondary Education

| Peer-Reviewed |

The Instructional Process: A Review of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting

Received: 22 May 2015    Accepted: 25 July 2015    Published: 19 August 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Interaction Analysis is a technique for capturing quantitative and qualitative dimensions of teacher verbal behaviour in the classroom. As an observational system, it captures the verbal behaviour of teachers and students that is directly related to the social – emotional climate of the classroom. It was developed by Ned Flanders out of Social Psychological Theory and was designed to test the effect of social emotional climate on students’ attitudes and learning. The theoretical assumptions of Interaction Analysis (IA) are that in a normal classroom situation, verbal communication is predominant; the teacher exerts a great deal of influence on the student and the student’s behaviour is affected to a great extent by this type of teacher behaviour exhibited. Flanders’ ten category system that attempts to categorize all the verbal behaviour to be found in the classroom is explored in this paper. The objective is the advocacy for the adoption of FIAC in the instructional process in our public schools, since the quantity and quality of teacher – student interaction is a critical dimension of effective classroom teaching and enhanced learning.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11
Published in International Journal of Secondary Education (Volume 3, Issue 5, October 2015)
Page(s) 43-49
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Interaction Analysis, Teacher Talk, Pupil Talk, Indirect Influence, Direct Influence

References
[1] Amidon, E.J. & Flanders, N.A. (1963). Interaction Analysis as a feedback system. Interaction Analysis Theory, Research and Application. E.J. Amidon and J.B. Hough. Eds. Philadelphia: Addisn-Wesly publishing company. Inc. Chapter 1: 121 – 140.
[2] Amidon, E.J. & Hunter, E. (1966). Verbal Interaction in the classroom: The verbal interaction category system. Interaction Analysis Theory, Research and Application. E.J. Amidon and J.B. Hough (Eds.) Philadelphia: Addison – Wesley Publishing Company. Inc. Chapter 2: 141 – 149.
[3] Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN). (2013). National Policy on Education (6th edition) Abuja: NERDC Press
[4] Gay, L.R.(2000). Competencies for Analysis and Application (5TH ed) Educational Research Florida International University. Pp 448-457
[5] Hafix, M.M; Naseerud din, M & Ishitiaq, H. (2008).Teacher-student verbal interaction patterns at the tertiary level of education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 1, 1: pp 45-50
[6] Inamullah, M. (2005). Patterns of classroom interaction at different educational levels in the light of Flanders’ interaction analysis. PhD. Thesis Retrieved Sept.26, 2012, from http://eprintshec.goal.pk
[7] Jasraj, Kaur. (2013). Flanders interaction analysis category system (FIAC). Distance Education PUP
[8] Newman, M. (2001). PEPBL Methodology, Working Paper 6: Flanders Interaction Analysis.
[9] Niki,F.R. (2011). Flanders Interaction Analysis. Retrieved April 23, 2015, from http://www.slideshare.net/selvabarady/flanders-interaction-analysis
[10] Tisher, R.P. (2007) Classroom Interaction Analysis: the new religion. Journal Research in Science Education 2: 35 – 49.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Veronica Odiri Amatari. (2015). The Instructional Process: A Review of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(5), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Veronica Odiri Amatari. The Instructional Process: A Review of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting. Int. J. Second. Educ. 2015, 3(5), 43-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Veronica Odiri Amatari. The Instructional Process: A Review of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting. Int J Second Educ. 2015;3(5):43-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11,
      author = {Veronica Odiri Amatari},
      title = {The Instructional Process: A Review of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting},
      journal = {International Journal of Secondary Education},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {43-49},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsedu.20150305.11},
      abstract = {Interaction Analysis is a technique for capturing quantitative and qualitative dimensions of teacher verbal behaviour in the classroom. As an observational system, it captures the verbal behaviour of teachers and students that is directly related to the social – emotional climate of the classroom. It was developed by Ned Flanders out of Social Psychological Theory and was designed to test the effect of social emotional climate on students’ attitudes and learning. The theoretical assumptions of Interaction Analysis (IA) are that in a normal classroom situation, verbal communication is predominant; the teacher exerts a great deal of influence on the student and the student’s behaviour is affected to a great extent by this type of teacher behaviour exhibited. Flanders’ ten category system that attempts to categorize all the verbal behaviour to be found in the classroom is explored in this paper. The objective is the advocacy for the adoption of FIAC in the instructional process in our public schools, since the quantity and quality of teacher – student interaction is a critical dimension of effective classroom teaching and enhanced learning.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Instructional Process: A Review of Flanders’ Interaction Analysis in a Classroom Setting
    AU  - Veronica Odiri Amatari
    Y1  - 2015/08/19
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11
    T2  - International Journal of Secondary Education
    JF  - International Journal of Secondary Education
    JO  - International Journal of Secondary Education
    SP  - 43
    EP  - 49
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7472
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11
    AB  - Interaction Analysis is a technique for capturing quantitative and qualitative dimensions of teacher verbal behaviour in the classroom. As an observational system, it captures the verbal behaviour of teachers and students that is directly related to the social – emotional climate of the classroom. It was developed by Ned Flanders out of Social Psychological Theory and was designed to test the effect of social emotional climate on students’ attitudes and learning. The theoretical assumptions of Interaction Analysis (IA) are that in a normal classroom situation, verbal communication is predominant; the teacher exerts a great deal of influence on the student and the student’s behaviour is affected to a great extent by this type of teacher behaviour exhibited. Flanders’ ten category system that attempts to categorize all the verbal behaviour to be found in the classroom is explored in this paper. The objective is the advocacy for the adoption of FIAC in the instructional process in our public schools, since the quantity and quality of teacher – student interaction is a critical dimension of effective classroom teaching and enhanced learning.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Educational Foundations, Faculty of Education Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

  • Sections