Differences in Intelligence and Creativity between Tattooed and Non-Tattooed Students
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
Volume 4, Issue 4, August 2015, Pages: 165-169
Received: May 31, 2015; Accepted: Jun. 10, 2015; Published: Jun. 30, 2015
Views 2450      Downloads 79
Authors
Anette Sandra Cebula, Medical School Hamburg, University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
Erich Kasten, Dept. of Neuropsychology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Background: In everyday life stereotypes, i.e. simplified imaginations about others are often built. One of innumerable stereotypes is that tattooed people drink too much alcohol, take always drugs, don’t avoid risks and, maybe, they are even more stupid than the rest of humanity. On the other hand tattoos can be very artful. Therefore it is conceivable that tattooed people are more creative than others. Objective: This work is focusing on the question if there is a difference (a) in creativity and (b) in the crystallized intelligence between tattooed and non-tattooed persons. Methodology: To capture these characteristics an intelligence questionnaire (MWT-A) and five of eleven sub-tests of a creativity questionnaire (TDK) were used. To achieve a sufficient homogeneity between the samples, the survey was conducted only among students. A total of 104 persons were interviewed of which 50 people were tattooed and 54 non-tattooed, aged between 20 and 54 years. The survey took place at several universities and colleges in Hamburg and took about ten minutes per person. Results: There were no significant group differences regarding crystallized intelligence; moreover there was no correlation between having tattoos and creativity. Conclusion: Tattooed students seem to be neither less intelligent nor more creative than other students.
Keywords
Tattoo, Intelligence, Creativity, Body Modification
To cite this article
Anette Sandra Cebula, Erich Kasten, Differences in Intelligence and Creativity between Tattooed and Non-Tattooed Students, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 4, No. 4, 2015, pp. 165-169. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.14
References
[1]
Arafat. (02. 05 2012). Focus. Abgerufen am 06. 06 2015 von http://www.focus.de/panorama/videos/tattoo-kuenstler-arafat-mein-erstes-tattoo-stach-ich-mir-mit-acht-jahren_vid_31081.html
[2]
Asendorpf (2007). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit. Springer.
[3]
Bammann & Stöver (2006). Tätowierungen im Strafvollzug. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.
[4]
Boytchev (2013). Risiken von Tätowierungen. Berlin: Spiegel.
[5]
Catalano (17. 03 2000). When the body is the canvas, safety counts. Abgerufen am 08. 08 2014 von APB News: www.apbnews.com
[6]
Cattell (1973). Personality and mood by questionnaire. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
[7]
Dean (2010). Consumer perceptions of visible tattoos on service personnel. Managing Service Quality, p. 300-308.
[8]
Dominguez, Alegre, García-Melgares, Laguna, Martín, Sanchéz, et al. (2008). Tattoo pigment in two lymph nodes in a patient with melanoma. Journal Compilation. European Acadamy of Dermatology and Venereology, p. 101-136.
[9]
Getzels & Jackson.(1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York: Wiley.
[10]
Goldstein (1967). Mercery-Cadmium Sensitivity in Tattoos. Annals of Internal Medicine.
[11]
Guéguen (12. Juli 2012). Tattoos, Piercings, and Alcohol Consumption. ISBRA, p. 1253-1256.
[12]
Guilford (1967). The nature of human intelligence. University of Wisconsin- Madison: Mc Graw Hill series in psychology.
[13]
Jäger, Süß, & Beauducel (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur- Test (Bd. Form 4). (W. Sarges, & H. Wottawa, Hrsg.) Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
[14]
Kächelen (2004). Tatau und Tattoo: Eine Epigraphik der Identitätskonstruktion. Aachen: Shaker .
[15]
Kalfar (2012). Tätowieren: Spezielle Techniken. In H. Kalfar, & H. Kalfar (Hrsg.), Tätowieren: Spezielle Techniken (Bd. 4.1., p. 3).
[16]
Kasten (2006). Body Modification. München, Basel: Reinhardt Klimke, 2008
[17]
Long & Rickman. (1994). Infectious complications of tattoos. Clinical infectious diseases. Oxford Journals, p. 610-619.
[18]
Meier (2010). Inked: 0,3 mm unter der Haut der Gesellschaft: Empirische Analyse gesellschaftlicher Diskriminierungs- und Exklusionsprozesse in der Moderne - untersucht am Phänomen der Tätowierung. Berlin: RabenStück Verlag.
[19]
Mrasek (2013). Tätowierfarben- Gift im Arschgeweih. Berlin: Spiegel.
[20]
Postel (2009). Fürs Leben gezeichnet. Frankfurter Allgemeine.
[21]
Feige (2003). Ein Tattoo ist für immer: Die Geschichte der Tätowierung in Deutschland. Mit Fotografien aus einhundert Jahren Tattoo-Kuns, p. 412, Berlin: Schwarzkopf & Schwarzkopf.
[22]
Sternberg (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, p. 269–287.
[23]
Thurstone (1931). Multiple factor analysis, p. 406-427. Chicago: Psychological Review.
[24]
Wessel & Kasten (2014). Body-piercing and self-mulitation: A multifaceted relationship. American Journal of Applied Psychology. 3(4): p. 104-109
[25]
Wohlrab, Stahl & Kappeler (2007). Body Image. Modifying the body: Motivations for getting tattoed and pierced, 87-95. Göttingen: Science Direct.
[26]
Worp, Boomstra, Coutinho, & Hoek (01. 01 2006). Surveillance report. http://www. eurosurveillance. org/ ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=591
[27]
Wüstendörfer. (04 2011). Familie und Armut. Familie und Armut-Eine Sonderauswertung des AWO-ISS-Datensatzes 1999 und 2003/04 über familiäre Bedingungen und ihre Auswirkungen auf Armut und Lebenslage der Kinder. Nürnberg, Frankfurt am Main: Institut für Sozialarbeit und Sozialpädagogik e.V.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931