| Peer-Reviewed

Self Efficacy and Work Performance: A Theoretical Framework of Albert Bandura's Model, Review of Findings, Implications and Directions for Future Research

Received: 4 June 2015    Accepted: 12 June 2015    Published: 14 July 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The article examined the relationship between Self Efficacy and Work Performance using Albert Bandura's Social Cognition Theory as a theoretical framework. Bandura's main proposition was that individuals with high self efficacy believe in themselves and go on to exhibit high performance while individuals with low self efficacy do not have confidence in themselves and end up with low performance. The review of Iiterature revealed that findings have been varried with some studies having a positive relationship between self effficacy and work performance, some a negative relationship and some no relationship between the variables. However it was discovered from the studies that several interveining variables such as nature of the task, inteligence, personality, skill level, motivation, supervision, training, level of the worker, education, etc mediated the relationship between self efficacy and work performance. Thus, Bandura's Social Cognition theory has great implications for the world of work and performance in organisations, but may not necessarily act in isolation, but in conjunction with other organisational variables to foster optimum job performance.

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15
Page(s) 170-173
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Work Performance, Self Efficacy, Organisations, Social Cognition Theory

References
[1] Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191 – 215. Doi:10.1037/0033 – 295x.84.2.191.
[2] Bandura, A. (1994). Exercise of Personal and Collective Efficacy in Changing Societies. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (pp. 1-45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
[4] Bandura, A. (1998). Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. In L.A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York: The Guilford Press.
[5] Cherian, J. & Jacob, J. (2013). The Impact of Self Efficacy on Motivation and Performance of Employees. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 8, No. 14
[6] Gist, M. E. and Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability. The Academy of Management Review Vol. 17, No. 2.
[7] Hax, G. (2010) Self Efficacy and Work related Performance: A Metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2) 240-261.
[8] Hurter, N. (2008). The Role of Self-Efficacy in Employee Commitment http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitsream/handle/10500/2309/dissertation.pdf?sequence=1.
[9] Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A. and Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Integral Role of Individual Differences. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 92, No. 1, 107-127.
[10] Lunenburg, F. (2011). Self-Efficacy in the Workplace: Implications for Motivation and Performance. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 14(1).
[11] Luszczynska, A. & Schwarzer, R. (2008) Planning and Self-Efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast study examination: A longitudinal study of self-regulatory cognitions. Psychology and health, 18, 93-108.
[12] Rubina, E. & Azam, S. A. (2004) Self Efficacy: Implication for Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource Management. Academy of Management Review, Vol 12, No 3
[13] Schwarzer, R. E. Luszczynska, A. (2007) Self-Efficacy. In M. Gerrard & K. O. McCaul (Eds). Health Behaviour Constructs: Theory, Measurement and Research. National Cancer Institute Website. Retrieved June 11, 2008.
[14] Stajkovic, A. D. and Fred, L. (1998). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Metal-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, Vol 124(2), Sep. 1998, 240-261.
[15] Zellars, A; Donald, O. & Taft, G. (2002) Issues in Performance and Worth of Employee’s Self. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 765-774.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Manasseh N. Iroegbu. (2015). Self Efficacy and Work Performance: A Theoretical Framework of Albert Bandura's Model, Review of Findings, Implications and Directions for Future Research. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 170-173. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Manasseh N. Iroegbu. Self Efficacy and Work Performance: A Theoretical Framework of Albert Bandura's Model, Review of Findings, Implications and Directions for Future Research. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2015, 4(4), 170-173. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Manasseh N. Iroegbu. Self Efficacy and Work Performance: A Theoretical Framework of Albert Bandura's Model, Review of Findings, Implications and Directions for Future Research. Psychol Behav Sci. 2015;4(4):170-173. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15,
      author = {Manasseh N. Iroegbu},
      title = {Self Efficacy and Work Performance: A Theoretical Framework of Albert Bandura's Model, Review of Findings, Implications and Directions for Future Research},
      journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
      volume = {4},
      number = {4},
      pages = {170-173},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20150404.15},
      abstract = {The article examined the relationship between Self Efficacy and Work Performance using Albert Bandura's Social Cognition Theory as a theoretical framework. Bandura's main proposition was that individuals with high self efficacy believe in themselves and go on to exhibit high performance while individuals with low self efficacy do not have confidence in themselves and end up with low performance. The review of Iiterature revealed that findings have been varried with some studies having a positive relationship between self effficacy and work performance, some a negative relationship and some no relationship between the variables. However it was discovered from the studies that several interveining variables such as nature of the task, inteligence, personality, skill level, motivation, supervision, training, level of the worker, education, etc mediated the relationship between self efficacy and work performance. Thus, Bandura's Social Cognition theory has great implications for the world of work and performance in organisations, but may not necessarily act in isolation, but in conjunction with other organisational variables to foster optimum job performance.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Self Efficacy and Work Performance: A Theoretical Framework of Albert Bandura's Model, Review of Findings, Implications and Directions for Future Research
    AU  - Manasseh N. Iroegbu
    Y1  - 2015/07/14
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15
    T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    SP  - 170
    EP  - 173
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7845
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.15
    AB  - The article examined the relationship between Self Efficacy and Work Performance using Albert Bandura's Social Cognition Theory as a theoretical framework. Bandura's main proposition was that individuals with high self efficacy believe in themselves and go on to exhibit high performance while individuals with low self efficacy do not have confidence in themselves and end up with low performance. The review of Iiterature revealed that findings have been varried with some studies having a positive relationship between self effficacy and work performance, some a negative relationship and some no relationship between the variables. However it was discovered from the studies that several interveining variables such as nature of the task, inteligence, personality, skill level, motivation, supervision, training, level of the worker, education, etc mediated the relationship between self efficacy and work performance. Thus, Bandura's Social Cognition theory has great implications for the world of work and performance in organisations, but may not necessarily act in isolation, but in conjunction with other organisational variables to foster optimum job performance.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of psychology, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria

  • Sections