Social Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans

Received: 14 July 2015    Accepted: 20 July 2015    Published: 25 July 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The paper presented below is intended to reveal the institutional and substantive inconsistencies within the international legal system instituted for the governance of the oceans –UNCLOS-, from a literature review of various theoretical approaches related to fragmentation of international law. So, what is contained in the document it was initially oriented to the context of the reader by presenting the theoretical guidelines necessary for the understanding of the legal system in question, and then directed towards the realization of a critical analysis of the operation of such a legal system.

DOI 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13
Published in Social Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 4, August 2015)
Page(s) 86-89
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Institutional and Substantive Inconsistencies, System Instituted for the Governance of Oceans, Fragmentation of International Law

References
[1] RIVERO, J. (2010). El Tribunal Internacional de Derecho del Mar. Retrieved on September 24, 2014 http://www.revistafacultadderecho.edu.uy/ojs2.4.2/index.php/rfd/article/view/80/83.
[2] TRIBUNAL INTERNACIONAL DEL DERECHO DEL MAR. (2011). Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar. Retrieved on October 18, 2014: http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/brochure/ITLOS_Brochure_spanish.pdf.
[3] ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS. (2001). Convención de las Naciones Unidas Sobre el Derecho del Mar – Convemar-. Retrieved on August 15, 2014: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/convemar_es.pdf.
[4] CABRERA, M. (2013). El Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar. La institución judicial para el régimen de los océanos. Retrieved on October 25, 2014: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/31598/Documento_completo__.pdf?sequence=4.
[5] HOYOS, C. (2000). Un modelo para investigación documental: guía teórico-práctica sobre construcción de Estados del Arte con importantes reflexiones sobre la investigación. Medellín, Señal Editora.
[6] CABRERA, Op.Cit. p. 48-51.
[7] ORGANIZACIÓN DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS. Op.Cit. Parte XV Sección 1 Art. 285, Parte XI sección 5, Anexo VI Art. 14.
[8] INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. (2014). International Court Of Justice. Retrieved on October 26, 2014:http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/sp/files/notice.pdf.
[9] TRIBUNAL INTERNACIONAL DEL DERECHO DEL MAR. Op.Cit. p. 18.
[10] JIMÉNEZ, E., ARBUET-VIGNALI, H., and PUCEIRO, R., (2005) Derecho Internacional Público. Principios, normas y estructuras. Montevideo, Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 1° edic. 20, pp. 190-191.
[11] TRIBUNAL INTERNACIONAL DEL DERECHO DEL MAR. (2010) Guía del procedimiento judicial ante el Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar. Retrieved on October 19, 2014: http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/guide/Guide.Sp.2009-1.pdf.
[12] INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA. (2009). Rules of the Tribunal. Retrieved on October 26, 2014: http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/basic_texts/Itlos_8_E_17_03_09.pdf.
[13] NACIONES UNIDAS, COMISIÓN DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL (2006), Fragmentación del Derecho Internacional: Dificultades derivadas de la diversificación y expansión del Derecho Internacional. p.5. Retrieved on October 26, 2014: http://v880.derecho.unam.mx:8083/papime/pdf/5.pdf.
[14] Ibíd.p.5.
[15] Ibíd.p.5.
[16] CABRERA, Op.Cit. p. 9-14, 178.
[17] HORNA, Á. (2014). Apuntes acerca del Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar: ¿Hamburgo v. La Haya? Retrieved on October 13, 2014:https://www.google.com.co/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Frevistas.pucp.edu.pe%2Findex.php%2Fagendainternacional%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F7342%2F7560&ei=KehbVPrvM-y1sQT3s4Fo&usg=AFQjCNHWv4rVkOgjEGPcxfeM9fo4DKe3KA&bvm=bv.78677474,d.aWw.
[18] Ibíd. P. 4-5.
[19] RIVERO. Op.Cit. p.3.
Author Information
  • CYNERGIA Investigation Group, Department of Law, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia

  • CYNERGIA Investigation Group, Department of Political Science, Universidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Jorge Sánchez, Paola Tafur. (2015). Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans. Social Sciences, 4(4), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Jorge Sánchez; Paola Tafur. Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans. Soc. Sci. 2015, 4(4), 86-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Jorge Sánchez, Paola Tafur. Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans. Soc Sci. 2015;4(4):86-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13,
      author = {Jorge Sánchez and Paola Tafur},
      title = {Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans},
      journal = {Social Sciences},
      volume = {4},
      number = {4},
      pages = {86-89},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20150404.13},
      abstract = {The paper presented below is intended to reveal the institutional and substantive inconsistencies within the international legal system instituted for the governance of the oceans –UNCLOS-, from a literature review of various theoretical approaches related to fragmentation of international law. So, what is contained in the document it was initially oriented to the context of the reader by presenting the theoretical guidelines necessary for the understanding of the legal system in question, and then directed towards the realization of a critical analysis of the operation of such a legal system.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Fragmentation of International Legal System Established for the Governance of the Oceans
    AU  - Jorge Sánchez
    AU  - Paola Tafur
    Y1  - 2015/07/25
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13
    T2  - Social Sciences
    JF  - Social Sciences
    JO  - Social Sciences
    SP  - 86
    EP  - 89
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-988X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20150404.13
    AB  - The paper presented below is intended to reveal the institutional and substantive inconsistencies within the international legal system instituted for the governance of the oceans –UNCLOS-, from a literature review of various theoretical approaches related to fragmentation of international law. So, what is contained in the document it was initially oriented to the context of the reader by presenting the theoretical guidelines necessary for the understanding of the legal system in question, and then directed towards the realization of a critical analysis of the operation of such a legal system.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections