Background: Many people have prejudices that subjects with tattoos have a tendency to criminal behavior. This article deals with the question if there really are differences in the inclination to criminal behavior between tattooed and non-tattooed people. Method: The investigation was conducted using 15 short descriptions of criminal behavior, which represent different crimes i.e. theft, burglary, malicious damage, consuming drugs, drinking alcohol in public transport or acting violent. The participants had to rate from zero to ten how they would react in these situations. A total of 110 persons (average age 23.5 y., 66.4% male, 33.6% female; 55% no tattoo, 45% tattooed) were interviewed. Results: There was a small but significant difference between tattooed and non-tattooed people. Interestingly there was a significant intra-group difference between more pacific and more aggressive tattoo themes. In consideration of the gender, the number of tattoos and the visibility of tattoo no significant differences or correlations were discovered. Conclusion: Decisive for the tendency toward criminal behavior is not, whether someone has a tattoo or not; more important is what the tattoo shows. Apparently people with aggressive tattoos are more prone to criminal behavior, but not people with peaceful tattoos.
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12 |
| Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2016) |
| Page(s) | 16-20 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Tattoo, Criminal Behavior, Prejudices
| [1] | Cebula, A. S. & Kasten, E. (2015). Differences in Intelligence and Creativity between Tattooed and Non-Tattooed Students. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4 (4), 165-169. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20150404.14. |
| [2] | Deschesnes, M., Finès, P. & Demers, S. (2006). Are tattooing and body piercing indicators of risk-taking behaviours among high school students? Journal of Adolescence, 29, 379-393. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.06.001. |
| [3] | Förtig, H. (2002). Jugendbanden. [Youth gangs]. München: Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH. |
| [4] | Guéguen, N. (2012). Tattoos, Piercings, and Alcohol Consumption. ISBRA, 36(7), 1253-1256. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01711.x. |
| [5] | Junker, H. (2008). Aussagemöglichkeiten zu Tätowierungen aus vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Zeit. [Expressive possibilities to tattoos from prehistoric and early historical times.] Unpublished Magister-Thesis, University of Hamburg, Germany. |
| [6] | Kasten, E. (2006). Body Modification. München, Basel: Reinhardt. |
| [7] | King, K. A. & Vidourek R. A. (2013). Getting inked: Tattoo and risky behavioral involvement among university students. The Social Science Journal, 50, 540-546. |
| [8] | Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| [9] | Liao, P., Chang, H. & Su, Y. (2014). Is tattooing a risk factor for adolescents' criminal behavior? Empirical evidence from an administrative data set of juvenile detainees in Taiwan. Society for Risk Analysis, 34, 2080-2088. doi: 10.1111/risa.12232. |
| [10] | Lombroso, C & Ferrero, G. (1894). Das Weib als Verbrecherin und Prostituierte. [Woman as criminal and prostitute] Hamburg: Verlagsanstalt A.-G., Königlich schwedisch-norwegische Hofverlagshandlung. |
| [11] | Mergen, A. (1968). Der geborene Verbrecher – Ein Bericht über Chromosomenforschung und Kriminologie. [Born criminals - A report on chromosome research and criminology]. Hamburg: Kriminalistik Verlag. |
| [12] | Roberts, T. & Ryan, S. (2002). Tattooing and High-Risk Behavior in Adolescents. Pediatrics, 110, 1058-1063. |
| [13] | Schüttpelz, E. (2006): Unter die Haut der Globalisierung. Die Veränderungen der Körpertechnik ‘Tätowieren’ seit 1769. [Under the skin of globalization. The changes in body art 'tattooing' since 1769th] In: Nanz, T. & Siegert, B. (Eds): Ex machina. Kulturtechniken und Medien. Medien/i, Band 19. Weimar: VDG, 109-154. |
| [14] | Schwind, H.-D. (2011). Kriminologie. [Criminology]. Heidelberg: Kriminalistik Verlag. |
| [15] | Stöver, H. & Bammann, K. (2006). Tätowierungen im Strafvollzug: Haft-Erfahrungen, die unter die Haut gehen. [Tattoos in prison: prison experiences that get under your skin]. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg. |
| [16] | Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1984). Differential association theory. In D. H. Kelly (Ed.), Deviant behavior (2nd ed.). NY: St. Martins Press, 125–131. |
| [17] | Swami, V., Gaughan. H., Tran, U. S., Kuhlmann, T., Stieger, S. & Voracek, M. (2015). Are tattooed adults really more aggressive and rebellious than those without tattoos? Body Image, 15, 149-152. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.09.001. |
| [18] | Wohlrab, S., Stahl, J. & Kappeler, P. M. (2007). Modifying the body: Motivations for getting tattoed and pierced, Body Image, 4, 87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.12.001. |
| [19] | Wulffen, E. (1908): Psychologie des Verbrechers. [Psychology of the criminal]. In: Enzyklopädie der modernen Kriminalistik, Bd. I. Berlin, Langenscheidt-Verlag, 258-259. |
APA Style
Nina Zeiler, Erich Kasten. (2016). Decisive Is What the Tattoo Shows: Differences in Criminal Behavior Between Tattooed and Non-tattooed People. Social Sciences, 5(2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12
ACS Style
Nina Zeiler; Erich Kasten. Decisive Is What the Tattoo Shows: Differences in Criminal Behavior Between Tattooed and Non-tattooed People. Soc. Sci. 2016, 5(2), 16-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12
AMA Style
Nina Zeiler, Erich Kasten. Decisive Is What the Tattoo Shows: Differences in Criminal Behavior Between Tattooed and Non-tattooed People. Soc Sci. 2016;5(2):16-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12,
author = {Nina Zeiler and Erich Kasten},
title = {Decisive Is What the Tattoo Shows: Differences in Criminal Behavior Between Tattooed and Non-tattooed People},
journal = {Social Sciences},
volume = {5},
number = {2},
pages = {16-20},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20160502.12},
abstract = {Background: Many people have prejudices that subjects with tattoos have a tendency to criminal behavior. This article deals with the question if there really are differences in the inclination to criminal behavior between tattooed and non-tattooed people. Method: The investigation was conducted using 15 short descriptions of criminal behavior, which represent different crimes i.e. theft, burglary, malicious damage, consuming drugs, drinking alcohol in public transport or acting violent. The participants had to rate from zero to ten how they would react in these situations. A total of 110 persons (average age 23.5 y., 66.4% male, 33.6% female; 55% no tattoo, 45% tattooed) were interviewed. Results: There was a small but significant difference between tattooed and non-tattooed people. Interestingly there was a significant intra-group difference between more pacific and more aggressive tattoo themes. In consideration of the gender, the number of tattoos and the visibility of tattoo no significant differences or correlations were discovered. Conclusion: Decisive for the tendency toward criminal behavior is not, whether someone has a tattoo or not; more important is what the tattoo shows. Apparently people with aggressive tattoos are more prone to criminal behavior, but not people with peaceful tattoos.},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Decisive Is What the Tattoo Shows: Differences in Criminal Behavior Between Tattooed and Non-tattooed People AU - Nina Zeiler AU - Erich Kasten Y1 - 2016/03/29 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 16 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20160502.12 AB - Background: Many people have prejudices that subjects with tattoos have a tendency to criminal behavior. This article deals with the question if there really are differences in the inclination to criminal behavior between tattooed and non-tattooed people. Method: The investigation was conducted using 15 short descriptions of criminal behavior, which represent different crimes i.e. theft, burglary, malicious damage, consuming drugs, drinking alcohol in public transport or acting violent. The participants had to rate from zero to ten how they would react in these situations. A total of 110 persons (average age 23.5 y., 66.4% male, 33.6% female; 55% no tattoo, 45% tattooed) were interviewed. Results: There was a small but significant difference between tattooed and non-tattooed people. Interestingly there was a significant intra-group difference between more pacific and more aggressive tattoo themes. In consideration of the gender, the number of tattoos and the visibility of tattoo no significant differences or correlations were discovered. Conclusion: Decisive for the tendency toward criminal behavior is not, whether someone has a tattoo or not; more important is what the tattoo shows. Apparently people with aggressive tattoos are more prone to criminal behavior, but not people with peaceful tattoos. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: