Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism

Naira Danielyan

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11

| Peer-Reviewed |

Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism

Naira Danielyan

Received: 5 November 2013 Accepted: Published: 30 November 2013

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The author provides a comparative analysis of the approach to cognition in the theory of self-organization and radical constructivism from the position of synergy between man and nature. It is advanced the idea on the basis of radical constructivism representatives’ concepts by such authors as H. von Foerster, H. Maturana, F. Varela, N. Luhmann, F. Wallner that epistemological subject should be considered as a complex self-organizing object. Its cognitive activity takes place according to the logics of synergetic models. The author proves that cognition based on the constructive realism is the most appropriate to the modern stage of epistemology development as it cancels the opposition of constructivism and realism to some extent as the cognition process from synergetic point of view is an act of projective and constructive thinking which is open for further criticism.

DOI	10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11
Published in	International Journal of Philosophy (Volume 1, Issue 4, December 2013)
Page(s)	51-56
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Epistemological Subject, Epistemological Object, Radical Constructivism, Constructive Realism, Self Organization, Synergy, Anthropic Principle

References

[1]	Cokolov, Sergey A. 2000. Discourse of radical constructivism. Traditions of scepticism in modern philosophy and epistemology. Munich: Phren.
[2]	Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science. 2009. Moscow: Canon+.
[3]	Foerster, Heinz von. 1985. Sicht und Einsicht. Versuche zu einer operativen Erkenntnistheorie. Braunschweig, Wiesbaden: Vieweg.
[4]	Gibson, James J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[5]	Glasersfeld, Ernst von. 1996. Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
[6]	Gurevich, Pavel S. 1993. Anthropological Renaissance. In Man’s phenomenon: Anthology. 3-23. Moscow: Higher School.
[7]	Kasavin, Ilya T. 2008. Constructivism as idea and direction. In Constructivism in epistemology. ed. V.A. Lectorsky. 63-72. Moscow: IPhRAS.
[8]	Lectorsky, Vladislav A. 2005. Kant, radical constructivism and constructive realism in epistemology. Questions of Philosophy 8: 11-21.
[9]	Lectorsky, Vladislav A. 2009. Realism, antirealism, constructivism and constructive realism in modern epistemology and science. In Constructivism approach in epistemology and social sciences. ed. Vladislav A. Lectorsky. 4-40. Moscow: Canon+, ROOI Rehabilitation.
[10]	Luhmann, Niklas. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
[11]	Luhmann, Niklas. 1988. Erkenntnis als Konstruktion. Bern: Benteli.
[12]	Luhmann, Niklas. 1991. Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
[13]	Luhmann, Niklas. 1992. Beobachtung der Moderne. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
[14]	Luhmann, Niklas. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Bd.1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
[15]	Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco. 1987. Der Baum der Erkenntnis: Die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens. Bern, Munich: Scherz.
[16]	Ogurcov, Anatoly P. 2008. From normative Mind to communicative rationality. In Etos of science. Ed. L.P. KIyaschenko, E.Z. Mirskaya.48-86. Moscow: ACADEMIA.
[17]	Prigogine Ilya, Stengers Isabelle. 2001. Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
[18]	Shishkov, Ivan Z. 2003. Searching for new rationality: Philosophy of critical mind. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
[19]	Wallner, Fritz G. 1993. Der Konstruktive Realismus: Theorie eines neuen Paradigmas? In Grenzziehungen zum Konstruktiven Realismus. ed. G. Wallner, J. Schimmer und M. Gostazza. 12-21. Wien: WUV Universitätsverlag.
[20]	Wallner, Fritz G. 1994. Die neue Wiener Schule des Konstruktiven Realismus. In Grenzziehungen zum Konstruktiven Realismus. ed. G. Wallner, J. Schimmer und M. Gostazza. 22-35. Wien: WUV Universitätsverlag.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Naira Danielyan. (2013). Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism. International Journal of Philosophy, 1(4), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Naira Danielyan. Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism. Int. J. Philos. 2013, 1(4), 51-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Naira Danielyan. Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism. Int J Philos. 2013;1(4):51-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11,
  author = {Naira Danielyan},
  title = {Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {1},
  number = {4},
  pages = {51-56},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20130104.11},
  abstract = {The author provides a comparative analysis of the approach to cognition in the theory of self-organization and radical constructivism from the position of synergy between man and nature. It is advanced the idea on the basis of radical constructivism representatives’ concepts by such authors as H. von Foerster, H. Maturana, F. Varela, N. Luhmann, F. Wallner that epistemological subject should be considered as a complex self-organizing object. Its cognitive activity takes place according to the logics of synergetic models. The author proves that cognition based on the constructive realism is the most appropriate to the modern stage of epistemology development as it cancels the opposition of constructivism and realism to some extent as the cognition process from synergetic point of view is an act of projective and constructive thinking which is open for further criticism.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism
AU  - Naira Danielyan
Y1  - 2013/11/30
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 51
EP  - 56
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11
AB  - The author provides a comparative analysis of the approach to cognition in the theory of self-organization and radical constructivism from the position of synergy between man and nature. It is advanced the idea on the basis of radical constructivism representatives’ concepts by such authors as H. von Foerster, H. Maturana, F. Varela, N. Luhmann, F. Wallner that epistemological subject should be considered as a complex self-organizing object. Its cognitive activity takes place according to the logics of synergetic models. The author proves that cognition based on the constructive realism is the most appropriate to the modern stage of epistemology development as it cancels the opposition of constructivism and realism to some extent as the cognition process from synergetic point of view is an act of projective and constructive thinking which is open for further criticism.
VL  - 1
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Naira Danielyan

Department of Philosophy and Sociology, National Research Institute of Electronic Technology, Zelenograd, Moscow, 124498 Russian Federation

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Naira Danielyan. (2013). Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism. International Journal of Philosophy, 1(4), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Naira Danielyan. Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism. Int. J. Philos. 2013, 1(4), 51-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Naira Danielyan. Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism. Int J Philos. 2013;1(4):51-56. doi: 10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11,
  author = {Naira Danielyan},
  title = {Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism},
  journal = {International Journal of Philosophy},
  volume = {1},
  number = {4},
  pages = {51-56},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijp.20130104.11},
  abstract = {The author provides a comparative analysis of the approach to cognition in the theory of self-organization and radical constructivism from the position of synergy between man and nature. It is advanced the idea on the basis of radical constructivism representatives’ concepts by such authors as H. von Foerster, H. Maturana, F. Varela, N. Luhmann, F. Wallner that epistemological subject should be considered as a complex self-organizing object. Its cognitive activity takes place according to the logics of synergetic models. The author proves that cognition based on the constructive realism is the most appropriate to the modern stage of epistemology development as it cancels the opposition of constructivism and realism to some extent as the cognition process from synergetic point of view is an act of projective and constructive thinking which is open for further criticism.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Subject’s Rational Cognitive Activity in the Theory of Self-Organization and Epistemological Constructivism
AU  - Naira Danielyan
Y1  - 2013/11/30
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11
T2  - International Journal of Philosophy
JF  - International Journal of Philosophy
JO  - International Journal of Philosophy
SP  - 51
EP  - 56
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7455
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20130104.11
AB  - The author provides a comparative analysis of the approach to cognition in the theory of self-organization and radical constructivism from the position of synergy between man and nature. It is advanced the idea on the basis of radical constructivism representatives’ concepts by such authors as H. von Foerster, H. Maturana, F. Varela, N. Luhmann, F. Wallner that epistemological subject should be considered as a complex self-organizing object. Its cognitive activity takes place according to the logics of synergetic models. The author proves that cognition based on the constructive realism is the most appropriate to the modern stage of epistemology development as it cancels the opposition of constructivism and realism to some extent as the cognition process from synergetic point of view is an act of projective and constructive thinking which is open for further criticism.
VL  - 1
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download