Journal of Plant Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

Response of Barley (Hordium vulgare L.) to Integrated Cattle Manureand Mineral Fertilizer Application in the Vertisol Areas of South Tigray, Ethiopia

Received: 12 February 2015    Accepted: 27 February 2015    Published: 04 March 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

A study to investigate the effect of integrated mineral and cattle manure fertilizers on grain yield of Barley (Hordium Vulgar L.) was evaluated during 2013 and 2014 main cropping season on vertisols of southern Tigray Ethiopia. The treatment consists four level of N/P205 fertilizer combination (0/0, 23/23, 46/46, 69/69 kg ha-1) and five levels of farm yard manure (0, 4, 6,8,10 ton ha-1) and their interactions arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in three replication. The combined statistical analysis over locations revealed significant main effects of FYM and NP fertilizers (p ≤ 0.05) and interactions effects on grain yield of barley. There were also highly significance variation among N/P fertilizer main effect for biomass, physiological maturity, plant height, seeds per spike and effective tiller per plant, however no significance variation between the FYM main effects and interaction effects of NP and FYM for biomass, physiological maturity, plant height seeds per spike and effective tiller per plant. Grain yield consistently respond to increasing level of fertilizations in the form of NP, FYM or their integration. The results of this finding showed that combined application of 69/69 N/ P205 kg ha-1+ 10 ton ha-1 FYM, 69/69 N/P205 kg ha-1 + 8 ton ha-1 FYM and 69/69 N/ P205 kg ha-1 + 6 ton ha-1 FYM significantly (P<0.05) increase the yield of barley than other treatments. Integrated application of 46/46 N/P205 kg ha-1 with 8 t ha-1 gave 18 % and 100% yield increment than current (46/46 N/P205 kg ha-1) blanket fertilizer recommendation in the area and the control. This may greatly benefits farmers in area where supply of mineral fertilizer is low or cases where farmers can’t afford the cost of high fertilizer input. Higher grain yield (2.9 ton ha-1) was obtained from residual effects of 8 ton ha-1 FYM applied in 2013 on barley grain yields in 2014 cropping season received 46/46 kg ha-1 N/P205.

DOI 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15
Published in Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 2, April 2015)
Page(s) 71-76
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Farmyard Manure, NP Fertilizers, Barley

References
[1] Asmare Yallew, Alemu Hailiye, Alemayehu Assefa, Melkamu Ayalew, Tessema Zewudu, Berihane Assayegn & Halima Hassen. Barley production practices in Gojam and Gondar. In: Chilot Yirga, Fekadu Alemayehu & Woldeyesus Sinebo (eds.). Barley based farming system inthe high lands of Ethiopia. Ethiopian AgriculturalResearch Organisation. Addis Ababa,Ethiopia. pp. 67-89. 1998.
[2] Onwueme, I.C. and T.D. Sinha. Field Crop Production in Tropical Africa. CTA. 1999.
[3] CSA (Central Statistic Authority)-Agricultural Sample Survey 2013/2014: Volume VII - Report on Area and Production Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season), Statistical Bulletin 573, Central Statistical Agency (CSA), the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. 2014.
[4] Birhanu, B., Fekadu, A. & Berhane, L. Food barley in Ethiopia. In: S. Grando and M. H. Gomez (Eds), Food barley: importance, uses and local knowledge. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Food Barley Improvement, 14–17 January 2002, Hammamet, Tunisia. Aleppo: ICARDA. Pp53-81.2005.
[5] Sanchez, P.A., Shepherd K.D., Soule M.J., Place F.M., Buresh R.J., Izac A.M., Mokwunye A.U., Kwesiga F.R., Ndiritu C.N.,Woomer PL Soil fertility repl enishment in Africa: an investment in natural resource capital. In: Buresh at al. (Eds). Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa. SSSA Special Publication No 51. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.1997.
[6] Asnakew Woldeab, Tekaling Mamo, Mengesha, Bekelle & Teferra, Ajema. Soil fertility management studies on wheat in Ethiopia. pp 137–172, in: Hailu Geberemariam, D.G. Tanner and Mengistu Huluka (eds.). Wheat Research in Ethiopia. A Historical Perspective. CIMMYT/IAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.1991.
[7] Tekalign M., Hanque I., Kamara G.S. phosphorus statuse of some Ethiopian high lnad s in proceeding of management of vertisolias in sub Saharan Africa. International livessock center for Africa. Adis Ababa Ethiopia.1998.
[8] Amsal Tarekegne, Hailu Gebre & Francis, C.A. Yield limiting factors to food barley production in Ethiopia. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 10: 97–113.1997.
[9] Amanuel Gorfu, Asefa Taa, Tanner, D.G. and W. Mwangi. 1991. On-Farm Research To Derive Fertilizer Recommendations For Small-Scale Bread Wheat Production: Methodological Issues And Technical Results. Research Report No. 14. IAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 37 p.
[10] Tanner, D.G., Amanuel Gorfu and Asefa Taa. Fertiliser effects on sustainabiljty in the wheat-based smallholder farming systems of Ethiopia. Field Crops Resrearch 33: 235-248.1993.
[11] Gezahegn Ayele and Tekalign Mamo. Determinants of demand for fertilizer in a Vertisol cropping system in Ethiopia. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 72: 165-169.1995.
[12] Fekadu, W & Skjelvåg, A. Soil water requirements and response to fertilization of barley in Northern Ethiopia. Doctoral Scientiarum Thesis. Agricultural university of Norway.2002.
[13] Kho, R. Crop production and the balance of available resources. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 80: 71-85.200.
[14] CSA (Central Statistic Authority) ―Agricultural Sample Survey 2010/2011: Volume I - Report on Area and Production Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season), Statistical Bulletin 417, Central Statistical Agency (CSA), the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.2011.
[15] Salim, M. S., M. Mian, and Mahmoodul Hassan. Annual technical report of project improvement of soil productivity through biological mean. Pak. Agric. Res. Council, Islamabad.1998.
[16] Hussain, T., G. Jullani, and M. Z. Iqbal. Integrated use of organic and inorganic N fertilizer in rice-wheat cropping system. Pak. J. Soil Sci. 3:19-23.1998.
[17] Singh, K. and Sarivastore. Effect of organic manure in Soil fertility as shown by nutrient availability and crop yield response in Potato New Pro. Symp. on soil evaluation, New Delhi.1971.
[18] Nambiar, K.K. Soil health and organic matter: Changing scenario. Proc. Nat. ACAD. Sci. India Spl. pp 141-160.1997.
[19] Chen, L.Z, Xia Z.L., Au SJ. 1988. The integrated use of organic and chemical fertilizer in China. SFCAAS (Ed.). Proceedings of International Symposium on Balanced Fertilization. Chinese Agric. Press, pp. 390-396.CIMMYT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa.
[20] Wang X.B., Cia D.X, Hang J.Z. Land application of organic and inorganic fertilizers for corn in dry land farming in a region of north China sustaining global farm. D.E Ston. R.I.I.I. Montar and G.C. Steinhardt (Eds.), pp. 419-422.2001.
[21] Jackson M.L. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc., Engle wood cliffs, New Jersey.1958.
[22] Bremner, J. M., and C. S. Mulvaney. Methods of soil analysis: in Chemical and microbiological properties, ASA Monograph number 9. pp. 595-624. 1982.
[23] Chapman H.D. Cation Exchange Capacity by Ammonium Saturation. In: Black C.A., Ensminger LE and FE Clark (Eds). Method of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy. Madison Wisconsin, USA. 891-901. 19965.
[24] Olsen S.R., Cole C.W., Watanabe F.S. and L.A. Dean Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate Circular 939, US. Department of Agriculture. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Madison Wisconsin. 1982.
[25] SAS Institute. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 9.0 ed. SAS Institute INC., Cary, NC, USA.2002.
[26] Montgomery D.C. Design and analysis of experiment. 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York. USA.1991.
[27] Abedi T., Alemzadeh A., Kazemeini S.A. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on grain yield and protein banding pattern of wheat. Aust J Crop Sci 4: 384-389.2010.
[28] Kazemeini S.A., Hamzehzarghani H., Edalat M. The impact of nitrogen and organic matter on winter canola seed yield and yield components. Aust J Crop Sci 4: 335- 342.2010.
[29] Mugwe J., Mugendi D., Kungu J., Muna M-M. Maize yields response to application of organic and inorganic input under on-station and on-farm experiments in central Kenya. Exp Agric 45: 47-59.2009.
[30] Pan G., Zhou P., L Z, Pete S., Li L, Qiu D., Zhang X., Xu X., Shen S., Chen X. Combined inorganic/organic fertilization enhances N efficiency and increases rice productivity through organic carbon accumulation in a rice paddy from the Tai Lake region, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131: 274-280.2009.
[31] Dudhat, M. S., D. D. Malavia, R. K. Mathukia, and V. D. Khanpara. Effect of organic manures and chemical fertilizers on wheat and their residual effect on green grain. Gujarat Agric. Univ. Res. J. 22 (1):4-8.1996.
[32] Kumar, R., and C. M. Singh. Crop yields and economics under fertilizer resource constraints along with different FYM application in maize-wheat cropping sequence. J. Hill Res.10 (2):103-107.1997.
[33] Vyas, S. H., M. M. Modhwadia, and V. D. Khanpara. Integrated nutrient management in wheat. Gujarat Agric. Univ. Res. J. 23 (1):12-18.1997.
[34] Heluf Gebrekidan, Asfaw Belay, Yohannes Uloro and Eylachew Zewdie. Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to crop residue management on two major soil types of Alemaya, eastern Ethiopia: I. Effects of varying rates of applied and residual NP fertilizers; Nutrient Cycling Agro.; 54:65–71.1999.
[35] Wakene N., G., and D. K. Friesen. Integrated Use of Farmyard Manure and NP fertilizers for Maize on Farmers’ Fields. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics Volume 106, No. 2, 131–141.2005.
[36] Ahmad Ghanbari, Mahdi Babaeian, Yasser Esmaeilian, Abolfazl Tavassoli and Ahmad Asgharzade. The effect of cattle manure and chemical fertilizer on yield and yield component of barley (Hordeum vulgare). African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(3), pp.504-508.2012.
Author Information
  • Tigray agricultural research institute, Alamata agricultural research center, Alamata, Ethiopia

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Assefa Workineh Chekole. (2015). Response of Barley (Hordium vulgare L.) to Integrated Cattle Manureand Mineral Fertilizer Application in the Vertisol Areas of South Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(2), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Assefa Workineh Chekole. Response of Barley (Hordium vulgare L.) to Integrated Cattle Manureand Mineral Fertilizer Application in the Vertisol Areas of South Tigray, Ethiopia. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 3(2), 71-76. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Assefa Workineh Chekole. Response of Barley (Hordium vulgare L.) to Integrated Cattle Manureand Mineral Fertilizer Application in the Vertisol Areas of South Tigray, Ethiopia. J Plant Sci. 2015;3(2):71-76. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15,
      author = {Assefa Workineh Chekole},
      title = {Response of Barley (Hordium vulgare L.) to Integrated Cattle Manureand Mineral Fertilizer Application in the Vertisol Areas of South Tigray, Ethiopia},
      journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
      volume = {3},
      number = {2},
      pages = {71-76},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20150302.15},
      abstract = {A study to investigate the effect of integrated mineral and cattle manure fertilizers on grain yield of Barley (Hordium Vulgar L.) was evaluated during 2013 and 2014 main cropping season on vertisols of southern Tigray Ethiopia. The treatment consists four level of N/P205 fertilizer combination (0/0, 23/23, 46/46, 69/69 kg ha-1) and five levels of farm yard manure (0, 4, 6,8,10 ton ha-1) and their interactions arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in three replication. The combined statistical analysis over locations revealed significant main effects of FYM and NP fertilizers (p ≤ 0.05) and interactions effects on grain yield of barley. There were also highly significance variation among N/P fertilizer main effect for biomass, physiological maturity, plant height, seeds per spike and effective tiller per plant, however no significance variation between the FYM main effects and interaction effects of NP and FYM for biomass, physiological maturity, plant height seeds per spike and effective tiller per plant. Grain yield consistently respond to increasing level of fertilizations in the form of NP, FYM or their integration. The results of this finding showed that combined application of 69/69 N/ P205 kg ha-1+ 10 ton ha-1 FYM, 69/69 N/P205 kg ha-1 + 8 ton ha-1 FYM and 69/69 N/ P205 kg ha-1 + 6 ton  ha-1 FYM significantly (P<0.05) increase the yield of barley than other treatments. Integrated application of 46/46 N/P205 kg ha-1  with 8 t ha-1 gave 18 % and 100% yield increment than current (46/46 N/P205 kg ha-1) blanket  fertilizer recommendation in the area and the control. This may greatly benefits farmers in area where supply of mineral fertilizer is low or cases where farmers can’t afford the cost of high fertilizer input. Higher grain yield (2.9 ton ha-1) was obtained from residual effects of 8 ton ha-1 FYM applied in 2013 on barley grain yields in 2014 cropping season received 46/46 kg ha-1 N/P205.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Response of Barley (Hordium vulgare L.) to Integrated Cattle Manureand Mineral Fertilizer Application in the Vertisol Areas of South Tigray, Ethiopia
    AU  - Assefa Workineh Chekole
    Y1  - 2015/03/04
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15
    T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    SP  - 71
    EP  - 76
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0731
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20150302.15
    AB  - A study to investigate the effect of integrated mineral and cattle manure fertilizers on grain yield of Barley (Hordium Vulgar L.) was evaluated during 2013 and 2014 main cropping season on vertisols of southern Tigray Ethiopia. The treatment consists four level of N/P205 fertilizer combination (0/0, 23/23, 46/46, 69/69 kg ha-1) and five levels of farm yard manure (0, 4, 6,8,10 ton ha-1) and their interactions arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in three replication. The combined statistical analysis over locations revealed significant main effects of FYM and NP fertilizers (p ≤ 0.05) and interactions effects on grain yield of barley. There were also highly significance variation among N/P fertilizer main effect for biomass, physiological maturity, plant height, seeds per spike and effective tiller per plant, however no significance variation between the FYM main effects and interaction effects of NP and FYM for biomass, physiological maturity, plant height seeds per spike and effective tiller per plant. Grain yield consistently respond to increasing level of fertilizations in the form of NP, FYM or their integration. The results of this finding showed that combined application of 69/69 N/ P205 kg ha-1+ 10 ton ha-1 FYM, 69/69 N/P205 kg ha-1 + 8 ton ha-1 FYM and 69/69 N/ P205 kg ha-1 + 6 ton  ha-1 FYM significantly (P<0.05) increase the yield of barley than other treatments. Integrated application of 46/46 N/P205 kg ha-1  with 8 t ha-1 gave 18 % and 100% yield increment than current (46/46 N/P205 kg ha-1) blanket  fertilizer recommendation in the area and the control. This may greatly benefits farmers in area where supply of mineral fertilizer is low or cases where farmers can’t afford the cost of high fertilizer input. Higher grain yield (2.9 ton ha-1) was obtained from residual effects of 8 ton ha-1 FYM applied in 2013 on barley grain yields in 2014 cropping season received 46/46 kg ha-1 N/P205.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections