Humic Acid to Decrease Fertilization Rate on Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
Volume 3, Issue 5, September 2015, Pages: 234-238
Received: Sep. 30, 2015; Accepted: Oct. 29, 2015; Published: Nov. 13, 2015
Views 4097      Downloads 88
Authors
Ismail Ali Abu-Zinada, Department of Plant Production & Protection, Faculty of Agriculture & Environment, Al-Azhar University-Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestinian Territories
Kamal Soliman Sekh-Eleid, Department of Plant Production & Protection, Faculty of Agriculture & Environment, Al-Azhar University-Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestinian
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The current study aimed at decreasing fertilizers applications on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivar Spunta. Plants were subjected to six treatments as follows: unfertilized control (T0), fertilization program (166-N+ 80-P2O5+ 80-k2O + 30M3 cattle manure ha-1) of Ministry (MAP) of Agriculture (T1), 100% MAP + 20kg humic acid (HA) ha-1 (T2), 100% MAP + 15 kg HA ha-1 (T3), 50% MAP + 20 kg HA ha-1 (T4), 50% MAP+15 kg HA ha-1 (T5). Vegetative growth increased after the different fertilization applications than control where T1, T4 and T3 had the longest plants; T1, T2 and T4 emerged the significant highest number of main stems; T1 and T4 produced the significant highest leaf area and T4 in both seasons and T3 and T2 in the first season had the significant heaviest plant fresh weight. Yield components in general significantly increased where T2 and T3 produced the significant highest tubers number plant-1; T3 yielded the significant highest tubers weight plant-1; T4, T1 and T2 significantly had the highest number of tubers >60 mm diameter plant-1. Tuber physical properties were also significantly and positively affected as compared to control where T3 and T4 resulted in the significant longest tubers. T5, T3 and T1 had the significant widest tubers and T3 and T4 produced the significant heaviest tubers. It could be recommended under similar conditions to add 83-N+40-P2O5+ 40-k2O + 15M3 cattle manure ha-1 + 20kg humic acid ha-1.
Keywords
Humic Acid, Potato Yield, Tuber Properties, Vegetative Growth
To cite this article
Ismail Ali Abu-Zinada, Kamal Soliman Sekh-Eleid, Humic Acid to Decrease Fertilization Rate on Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2015, pp. 234-238. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20150305.20
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Abdel Mawgoud, A., El Greadly, M.R.N., Helmy, Y.I. and Singer, S.M. 2007. Responses of tomato plants to different rates of humic based fertilizer and NPK fertilization. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 3, 169-174.
[2]
Biondi, F.A., Figholia, A., Indiati, R., and Izza, C. 1994. Effect of fertilization with humic acidson soil and plant metabolism: a multidisciplinary approach. Note III: phosphorus dynamics and behavior of some plant enzymatic activities. In Humic Substances in the Global Environment and Implications on Human Health, ed. Senesi N & Miano TM. Elsevier, New York, pp. 239-244.
[3]
Chen, Y. and Aviad, T. (1990): Effect of humic substances on plant growth. In: MacCarthy P., Clapp C.E., Mal- 28 colm R.L., Bloom P.R. (eds): Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Reading. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 161–187.
[4]
Cimrin, K.M. and Yilmaz, I. 2005. Humic acid applications to lettuce do not improve yield but do improve phosphorus availability. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science, 55 (1): 58-63.
[5]
David, P.P., Nelson, P.V. and Sanders, D.C. 1994. A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling solution culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 17 (1): 173-184.
[6]
Dursun, A.I Guvenç I. and Turan, M. 2002. Effects of different levels of humic acid on seedling growth and macro and micronutrient contents of tomato and eggplant. Acta Agrobotanica, 56: 81-88.
[7]
EL-Desuki, M. 2004. Response of onion plants to humic acid and mineral fertilizers application. Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor, 42 (4): 1995-1964.
[8]
El-Hefn, EM. 2010. Effect of saline irrigation water and humic acid application on growth and productivity of two cultivars of cowpea Vigina unguiculata L. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 4 (12): 6154- 6168.
[9]
El-Sayed Hameda, E.A., Saif El Dean, A., Ezzat, S., and El Morsy, A.H.A. 2011. Responses of productivity and quality of sweet potato to phosphorus fertilizer rates and application methods of the humic acid. International Research Journal of Agriculture Science and Soil Science, 1 (9): 383-393.
[10]
Erik, B., Feibert G., Shock C.C., Saundres, L.D. 2000. Evaluation of humic acid and other non conventional fertilizer additives for onion productivity. Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University Ontario.
[11]
FAO. 2011. FAO Statistical Database. Production Crops. Rome, Italy, http://faostat.fao.org/ (verified April 2013).
[12]
Gracia, M.C.V., Estrella F.S., Lopez M.J. and Moreeno, J. 2008. Influence of composite amendment on soil biological properties and plants. Dynamic soil, Dynamic Plant, 1: 1-9.
[13]
Hafez. M.M. 2003. Effect of some sources of nitrogen fertilizer and concentration of humic acid on the productivity of squash plant. Egyptian Journal of Applied Science, 19 (10): 293-309.
[14]
Hartwigson, J.A. and Evans, M.R. 2000. Humic acid seed and substrate treatments promote seedling root development. HortScience, 35 (7): 1231-1233.
[15]
Kashif, S.R., Yaseen, M., Arshad, M. and Abbas, M. 2007. Evaluation of response of calcium carbide as a soil amendment to improve nitrogen economy of soil and yield of okra. Soil and Environment, 26 (1): 69-74.
[16]
Mahmoud. A.R, Hafez M.M. 2010. Increasing productivity of potato plants (Solanum tuberosum, L) by using potassium fertilizer and humic acid application. International Journal of Academic Research, 2 (2):83-88.
[17]
Mehdi, K., Tobeh, A., Gholipoor, A., Jahanbakhsh, S., Hassanpanah, D. and Sofalian, O. 2011. Effects of different N fertilizer rate on starch percentage, soluble sugar, dry matter, yield and yield components of potato cultivars. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5 (9): 1846-1851.
[18]
Ministry of Agriculture. 2010. Annual report on vegetables production in Gaza strip. MOA, Gaza, Palestine.
[19]
Ohta, K., Morishitai S., Sudai, K., Kobayashii, N. and Hosoki, T. 2004. Effects of chitosan soil mixture treatment in the seedling stage on the growth and flowering of several ornamental plants. Journal of Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 73: 66-68.
[20]
Rajpar, I., Bhatti, M., Hassan, Z. and Shah, A. 2011. Humic acid improves growth, yield and oil content of Brassica compestris L. Parkisan Journal Agriculture Engineering and Veterinary sciences. 27 (2): 125-133.
[21]
Rizk, F.A., Shaheen, A.M., Singer, S.M. and Sawan, O.A. (2013) The Productivity of potato plants affected by urea fertilizer as foliar Spraying and humic acid added with irrigation water. Middle East Journal of Agricultural Research, 2 (2): 76-83.
[22]
Russo, R., O. and Berlyn, G.P. 1990. The use organic biostimulants to help low input sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 1(2): 19-42.
[23]
Selim, E.M., Mosa, A.A. and El-Ghamry, A.M. 2009. Evaluation of humic acid fertigation through surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems on potato grown under Egyptian sandy soil conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 96: 1218-1222.
[24]
Serenella, N., Pizzeghelloa, D., Muscolob, A. and Vianello, A. 2002. Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 34: 1527-1536.
[25]
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principals and procedures of statistics. Approach Second Edition, pp. 633.
[26]
Suganya, S. and Sivasamy, R. 2006. Moisture retention and cation exchange capacity of sandy soil as influenced by soil additives. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2 (11): 949-951.
[27]
Suh H.Y., Yoo K.S. and Suh S.G. 2014. Tuber growth of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by foliar or soil application of flavic and humic acid. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology. 55 (3): 183-189.
[28]
Sure, S., Arooie H., Sharifzade K., Dalirimoghadam, R. 2012. Responses of productivity and quality of cucumber to application of the two bio-fertilizers(humic acid and nitroxin) in fall planting. Agriculture Journal. 7 (6): 401-404.
[29]
Taha, Z. Sarhan, 2011. Effect of humic acid and seaweed extracts on growth and yield of potato plant (Solomun tubersum L.). Desirce cv. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, (31): 2.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186