UREAD Impact Behaviour Using Silicon Based Materials
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
Volume 3, Issue 4, August 2015, Pages: 57-62
Received: Jun. 3, 2015; Accepted: Jul. 16, 2015; Published: Jul. 28, 2015
Views 3106      Downloads 105
Remi Bouttier, Ecole Nationale Superieure de Mechanique et D’Aerotechnique (ISAE-ENSMA), Département d'Energétique, France
Gabriel Lopes, Federal University of Uberlandia, Engenharia Mecânica, Santa Mônica, Uberlândia - MG, Brazil
Luke Clarke, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Parsons Building, Dublin 2, Ireland
Rocco Lupoi, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Parsons Building, Dublin 2, Ireland
Article Tools
Follow on us
Several methodologies and techniques are currently available so as to dissipate energy in engineering systems; most of them are either not re-usable, or complex in mechanism. This paper introduces an innovative re-usable energy absorption device, based upon the working principles of Equal Channel Angular Extrusion, and known as UREAD (Universal Re-usable Energy Absorption Device). This study compares the behaviour of different “low-density” deformable materials (a range of silicon rubber grades) inserted in a UREAD unit and loaded under impact condition. The energy absorbed was experimentally measured and compared against the impact energy. It was possible to dissipate levels as high as 74.91% of the impact energy when using a simple set-up, and the device re-usability was demonstrated.
ECAE, Energy Absorption, UREAD, Non-Newtonian Materials, Impact
To cite this article
Remi Bouttier, Gabriel Lopes, Luke Clarke, Rocco Lupoi, UREAD Impact Behaviour Using Silicon Based Materials, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2015, pp. 57-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20150304.12
Alghamdi AAA. Collapsible impact energy absorbers: An overview. Thin-Walled Structures 2001; 39:189–213.
Rajendran R, Prem Sai K, Chandrasekar B, Gokhale A, Basu S. Preliminary investigation of aluminium foam as an energy absorber for nuclear transportation cask. Materials and Design 2008; 29:1732–9.
Kim A, Hasan MA, Nahm SH, Cho SS. Evaluation of compressive mechanical properties of Al-foam using electrical conductivity. Composite Structures 2005; 71:191–8.
Jung A, Lach E, Diebels S. New hybrid foam materials for impact protection. International Journal of Impact Engineering 2014; 64:30-8.
Partovi Meran A, Toprak T, Muǧan A. Numerical and experimental study of crashworthiness parameters of honeycomb structures. Thin-Walled Structures 2014; 78:87-94.
Caserta GD, Iannucci L, Galvanetto U. Shock absorption performance of a motorbike helmet with honeycomb reinforced liner. Composite Structures 2011; 93:2748-59.
Abramowicz W. Thin-walled structures as impact energy absorbers. Thin-Walled Structures 2003; 41:91-107.
Yang Z, Yan H, Huang C, Diao X, Wu X, Wang S, Lu L, Liao L, Wei Y. Experimental and numerical study of circular, stainless thin tube energy absorber under axial impact by a control rod. Thin-Walled Structures 2014; 82:24-32.
Atahan AO, Yücel AÖ, Erdem MM. Crash testing and evaluation of a new generation L1 containment level guardrail. Engineering Failure Analysis 2014; 38:25-37.
Calienciug A, RADU GhN. Design and FEA crash simulation for a composite car bumper. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, Series I: Engineering Sciences 2012; 5(1):7-12.
Jiang K, Yang J. Optimization of bumper system for pedestrian lower leg protection from vehicle impact. Third International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation. 2012.
Simić G, Lučanin V, Tanasković J, Radović N. Experimental research of characteristics of shock absorbers of impact energy of passenger coaches. Experimental Techniques 2009; 29-35.
Wang J, Wang W, Atallah K. A linear permanent-magnet motor for active vehicle suspension. IEEE Transactions On Vehicular Technology 2011; 60(1):55-63.
Zhou S, Yu H, Hu M, Huang L. Design of permanent magnet eddy current brake for a small scaled electromagnetic launch model. Journal of Applied Physics III 2012; 07A738:1-3.
Pendrill AM, Karlsteen M, Rödjegård H. Stopping a roller coaster train. Physics Education 2012; 47(6):728-35.
Mingfu L, Mingbo S, Siji W. Active Elastic Support/Dry Friction Damper with Piezoelectric Ceramic Actuator. Shock and Vibration 2014; ID 712426:1-10.
Samani HR, Mirtaheri M, Zandi AP, Bahai H. The Effects of Dynamic Loading on Hysteretic Behavior of Frictional Dampers. Shock and Vibration 2014; ID 181534:1-9.
Wieczorek N, Gerasch WJ, Rolfes R, Kammerer H. Semiactive Friction Damper for Lightweight Pedestrian Bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 2014; 140:1-13.
Li Z, Zuo L, Kuang J, Luhrs G. Energy-harvesting shock absorber with a mechanical motion rectifier. Smart Materials and Structures 2013; 22:1-10.
Lupoi R, Osman FH. Loading behaviour of 900 UREAD energy channels. International Journal of Crashworthiness 2008, 13, 2: 195-203.
Osman F.H., Lupoi R. Application of “UREAD” for the energy dissipation in engineering structures. Key-Engineering Materials, 486, 2011, 1-4.
Lupoi R. Investigation into Energy Dissipation in Equal Channel Angular Extrusion. PhD Thesis. University of Bath (UK), Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2008.
Hosford W.F., Caddell R.M. Metal Forming: Mechanics and Metallurgy. Cambridge University Press, 4th edition, 2014.
Science Publishing Group
NEW YORK, NY 10018
Tel: (001)347-688-8931