International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications

| Peer-Reviewed |

Investigating Pitting Corrosion of Stainless Steel and Aluminium Using Scanning Vibrating Electrode Techniques and Electrochemical Noise Measurement

Received: 13 April 2016    Accepted: 22 April 2016    Published: 07 May 2016
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

In this study, the susceptibility of aluminium (Al) and steel SS304 to pitting corrosion in FeCl3 and NaCl solutions with varying pH values were investigated using electrochemical noise (ECN) measurement and Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique (SVET). Preliminary surface drop test of SS304 in FeCl3 solution and total immersion test of Al in NaCl solution indicated higher pitting of samples at scratches simulated by scribe. Total immersion test on both SS304 and Al indicated that protecting a sample with epoxy-resin mold does not completely eliminate crevice attack. ECN tests results showed that Al suffered severe time-variant corrosion in FeCl3 solution unlike SS304. The results of SVET tests conducted after 24h immersion indicated that the early pits captured on Al samples were more intense than the later ones. Higher corrosion rates were obtained for samples in NaCl solution of pH 2.89 compared to pH 7.21, indicating that pitting increased with acidity. SVET maps obtained corroborated Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the sampled surfaces. However, though SVET was unable to capture pitting of SS304 in the solutions, SEM image revealed pitting activity on the sample in FeCl3 solution.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16
Published in International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications (Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2016)
Page(s) 71-80
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique (SVET), Electrochemical Noise (ECN), Coefficient of Variation (CoV)

References
[1] Rogers, H. T., “Marine Corrosion”, George Newnes ltd, London, 1968.
[2] Atkins P. W., “Analytical Chemistry” 3rd Ed., (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1986).
[3] Trethewey, K. R. and Chamberlain J. “Corrosion for Science and Engineering” 2nd Ed. (Longman: England,1995)
[4] Fontana, M. G., “Corrosion Engineering”, 3rd Ed., (McGraw-Hill book company: Singapore, 1987).
[5] Sedriks J. A., “Corrosion of Stainless Steels” (John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1979).
[6] Jones K., Hoeppner D. W., Pit to Crack Transition in Precorroded 7075-T6 Aluminium alloy under cyclic loading’’ Corrosion science, 2004, article in press.
[7] Ladislav Kavan, Zuzana Vlckova Zivcova, Vaclav Petrak, Otakar Frank, Pavel Janda, Hana Tarabkova, Milos Nesladek, Vincent Mortet; “Boron-doped Diamond Electrodes: Electrochemical, Atomic Force Microscopy and Raman Study towards Corrosion-modifications at Nanoscale”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 179, 10 October 2015, Pages 626-636.
[8] Renate Hiesgen, Stefan Helmly, Tobias Morawietz, Xiao-Zi Yuan, Haijiang Wang, K. Andreas Friedrich; “Atomic force microscopy studies of conductive nanostructures in solid polymer electrolytes”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 110, 1 November 2013, Pages 292-305.
[9] J. Izquierdo, B. M. Fernández-Pérez, A. Eifert, R. M. Souto, C. Kranz; “Simultaneous Atomic Force—Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy (AFM-SECM) Imaging Of Copper Dissolution”, Electrochimica Acta, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 29 December 2015.
[10] Timo Carstens, Adriana Ispas, Natalia Borisenko, Rob Atkin, Andreas Bund, Frank Endres; “In situ scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) studies of the electrochemical deposition of tantalum in two different ionic liquids with the 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium cation”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 197, 10 April 2016, Pages 374-387.
[11] Emerson C. Rios, Alexsandro M. Zimer, Ernesto C. Pereira, Lucia H. Mascaro; Analysis of AISI 1020 steel corrosion in seawater by coupling electrochemical noise and optical microscopy”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 124, 1 April 2014, Pages 211-217.
[12] Fernanda Hass, Ana C. T. G. Abrantes, Alysson N. Diógenes, Haroldo A. Ponte; “Evaluation of naphthenic acidity number and temperature on the corrosion behavior of stainless steels by using Electrochemical Noise technique”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 124, 1 April 2014, Pages 206-210.
[13] T. Balusamy, T. Nishimura; “In-Situ Monitoring of Local Corrosion Process of Scratched Epoxy Coated Carbon Steel in Simulated Pore Solution Containing Varying percentage of Chloride ions by Localized Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 199, 1 May 2016, Pages 305-313.
[14] M. Curioni, F. Scenini, T. Monetta, F. Bellucci; “Correlation between electrochemical impedance measurements and corrosion rate of magnesium investigated by real-time hydrogen measurement and optical imaging”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 166, 1 June 2015, Pages 372-384.
[15] Hui Xu, Yu Liu, Wen Chen, Rong-Gui Du, Chang-Jian Lin; “Corrosion behavior of reinforcing steel in simulated concrete pore solutions: A scanning micro-reference electrode study”, Electrochimica Acta, Volume 54, Issue 16, 30 June 2009, Pages 4067-4072.
[16] J. Izquierdo, B. M. Fernández-Pérez, L. Martín-Ruíz, V. Mena, R. Rodríguez-Raposo, J. J. Santana, R. M. Souto “Evaluation of the corrosion protection of steel by anodic processing in metasilicate solution using the scanning vibrating electrode technique,” Electrochimica Acta, Volume 178, 1 October 2015, Pages 1-10.
[17] Sara M. Manhabosco, Álvaro Pritzel dos Santos, Marcelo L. Marcolin, Eurico F. Pieretti, Mauricio D. M. Neves, Luís F. P. Dick; “Localized corrosion of laser marked M340 martensitic stainless steel for biomedical applications studied by the scanning vibrating electrode technique under polarization,” Electrochimica Acta, Volume 200, 10 May 2016, Pages 189-196.
[18] Roberts C., Stephen T., B. C. Syrett (Ed), “Electrochemical Impedance and Noise” (NACE International: Houston, USA, 1999).
[19] Volkov A. O., Datta P. K., Burnell-Gray, J. S., Couper R., “Hydrodynamic Measurement of a Single Corrosion Pit Corrosion Science, 2004, 46, pp. 2613-2619.
[20] Uniscan Instrument SRETM Model SVP100 “Scanning Vibrating Electrochemical Probe System Operations Manual, Version 1, PP. 27.
[21] Betts, J. A. (1974); “Signal Processing, Modulation and Noise,” Hodder and Stoughton Publishers, PP. 79.
[22] Cappeln F. V., Bjerrum N. J., Petrushina I. (2005); “Electrochemical Noise Measurement of Steel Corrosion in the molten NaCl-K2SO4 System; J. of Electrochemical Society, Vol. 152 (7), B228 – B235, 10.1149/1.1928187.
[23] Mears R. B. and Evans U. R., Trans Faraday soc. 31, 527 (1935).
[24] Haitem A., “Investigation into Hydrodynamics of Pitting Corrosion on Stainless Steel’’ MSc. Thesis, School of Engineering and Technology, Northumbria University, 2005.
[25] Pessall N., Liu C. (1971) Electrochimica. Acta. 16 (11) PP. 1987 - 2003.
[26] Acuna N., “Fatigue Corrosion Cracking of an austenitic Stainless Steel using Electrochemical Noise Technique.’’, Journal of Anti Corrosion Methods and Materials, Vol. 52/3 (2005), pp. 139-144.
[27] Wipf D., “Initiation and Study of Localised Corrosion by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy” Journal of Colloids and Surfaces: A Physicochemical and Engineering aspects, 1994, 93, pp. 251-261.
Author Information
  • Offshore Technology Institute, Graduate School of Engineering & Technology, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

  • Offshore & Hydrodynamics Group, School of Marine Science & Technology, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, United Kingdom

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Chinwuba Victor Ossia, Charles Ugochukwu Orji. (2016). Investigating Pitting Corrosion of Stainless Steel and Aluminium Using Scanning Vibrating Electrode Techniques and Electrochemical Noise Measurement. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications, 4(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Chinwuba Victor Ossia; Charles Ugochukwu Orji. Investigating Pitting Corrosion of Stainless Steel and Aluminium Using Scanning Vibrating Electrode Techniques and Electrochemical Noise Measurement. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Appl. 2016, 4(2), 71-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Chinwuba Victor Ossia, Charles Ugochukwu Orji. Investigating Pitting Corrosion of Stainless Steel and Aluminium Using Scanning Vibrating Electrode Techniques and Electrochemical Noise Measurement. Int J Mech Eng Appl. 2016;4(2):71-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16,
      author = {Chinwuba Victor Ossia and Charles Ugochukwu Orji},
      title = {Investigating Pitting Corrosion of Stainless Steel and Aluminium Using Scanning Vibrating Electrode Techniques and Electrochemical Noise Measurement},
      journal = {International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications},
      volume = {4},
      number = {2},
      pages = {71-80},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmea.20160402.16},
      abstract = {In this study, the susceptibility of aluminium (Al) and steel SS304 to pitting corrosion in FeCl3 and NaCl solutions with varying pH values were investigated using electrochemical noise (ECN) measurement and Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique (SVET). Preliminary surface drop test of SS304 in FeCl3 solution and total immersion test of Al in NaCl solution indicated higher pitting of samples at scratches simulated by scribe. Total immersion test on both SS304 and Al indicated that protecting a sample with epoxy-resin mold does not completely eliminate crevice attack. ECN tests results showed that Al suffered severe time-variant corrosion in FeCl3 solution unlike SS304. The results of SVET tests conducted after 24h immersion indicated that the early pits captured on Al samples were more intense than the later ones. Higher corrosion rates were obtained for samples in NaCl solution of pH 2.89 compared to pH 7.21, indicating that pitting increased with acidity. SVET maps obtained corroborated Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the sampled surfaces. However, though SVET was unable to capture pitting of SS304 in the solutions, SEM image revealed pitting activity on the sample in FeCl3 solution.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Investigating Pitting Corrosion of Stainless Steel and Aluminium Using Scanning Vibrating Electrode Techniques and Electrochemical Noise Measurement
    AU  - Chinwuba Victor Ossia
    AU  - Charles Ugochukwu Orji
    Y1  - 2016/05/07
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16
    T2  - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
    JF  - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
    JO  - International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
    SP  - 71
    EP  - 80
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0248
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmea.20160402.16
    AB  - In this study, the susceptibility of aluminium (Al) and steel SS304 to pitting corrosion in FeCl3 and NaCl solutions with varying pH values were investigated using electrochemical noise (ECN) measurement and Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique (SVET). Preliminary surface drop test of SS304 in FeCl3 solution and total immersion test of Al in NaCl solution indicated higher pitting of samples at scratches simulated by scribe. Total immersion test on both SS304 and Al indicated that protecting a sample with epoxy-resin mold does not completely eliminate crevice attack. ECN tests results showed that Al suffered severe time-variant corrosion in FeCl3 solution unlike SS304. The results of SVET tests conducted after 24h immersion indicated that the early pits captured on Al samples were more intense than the later ones. Higher corrosion rates were obtained for samples in NaCl solution of pH 2.89 compared to pH 7.21, indicating that pitting increased with acidity. SVET maps obtained corroborated Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of the sampled surfaces. However, though SVET was unable to capture pitting of SS304 in the solutions, SEM image revealed pitting activity on the sample in FeCl3 solution.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections