American Journal of Civil Engineering

| Peer-Reviewed |

Exploring Practical Optimal Topology for Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structures

Received: 01 June 2015    Accepted: 15 June 2015    Published: 02 July 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Topology optimization of reinforced concrete frames is one of a challenging issue in structural engineering. Frame structures, unlike trusses, must provide useable spaces. Architectural requirements affect greatly the layout of the structure and optimal spans, which are obtained theoretically. Sometimes optimal topologies are not possible for real projects because the calculated optimal spans do not provide architectural requirements. In this article, however, exploring for optimal spans for reinforced concrete frames is investigated considering the architectural limitations. For this purpose, three groups of spans, including 5.6m, 7.5m and 11.2m, are considered based on the parking limitations and then optimal practical sizing for the structures are obtained numerically for 5-storey and 10-storey structures. All models are estimated and considerable differences are shown by diagrams. The optimal topology is proposed for 5-storey to 10-storey buildings with different useable spans.

DOI 10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12
Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 4, July 2015)
Page(s) 102-106
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Reinforced Concrete, Frame Structures, Optimization, Span, Topology

References
[1] Babaei M., “The economical effect of ductility levels on reinforced concrete frames design”, American Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 2(1), (2015), 1-6.
[2] Sanaei E. and Babaei M., 2011, “Cellular automata in topology optimization of continuum structures”, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 3 (4), (2011), 27-41.
[3] Sanaei E. and Babaei M., “Topology optimization of structures using cellular automata with constant strain triangles.” International Journal of Civil Engineering, 10 (3), (2012), 179-188.
[4] Babaei M., “Multiobjective optimal number and location for steel outrigger-belt truss system”, unpublished (under review).
[5] Babaei M. and Sanaei E., “Evaluation of HAG method in optimum topology design of steel braced frames”, 1st Regional Congress on Civil Engineering, Malayer University, Iran, (2012).
[6] Babaei M. and Sanaei E., “Multi-objective optimal design of braced frames using hybrid genetic and ant colony optimization algorithm”, unpublished (under review).
[7] Ketkukah T. S., Abubakar I. and Ejeh S. P., “Optimum desing sensitivity of reinforced concrete frames”, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Technology, 2(5), (2014), 144-158.
[8] Guerra A. and Kiousis P. D., “Design optimization of reinforced concrete structures”, Computers and Concrete, Vol. 3, No. 5 (2006) 313-334.
[9] Sharafi P., Hadi M.N.S. and Teh L.H., “Heuristic approach for optimum cost and layout design of 3D reinforced concrete frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(7), (2012), 853-863.
[10] Sharafi, P., Hadi, M. N. and Teh, L. H., “A methodology for cost optimization of the layout design of multi-span reinforced concrete beams”, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing (p. 124). United Kingdom: Civil-Comp Press, (2013).
[11] Thiruvengadam V., Wason J.C. and Gayathri L., “Cost modeling of reinforced concrete buildings designed for seismic effects”, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, 2004.
[12] Iranian National Building Code (INBC), Part 6: Loadings, (2013).
[13] Standard No. 2800-05, Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, (2005).
[14] American Concrete Institute (ACI), Committee 318 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02), Detroit, (2002).
Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mehdi Babaei. (2015). Exploring Practical Optimal Topology for Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structures. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(4), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mehdi Babaei. Exploring Practical Optimal Topology for Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structures. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2015, 3(4), 102-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mehdi Babaei. Exploring Practical Optimal Topology for Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structures. Am J Civ Eng. 2015;3(4):102-106. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12,
      author = {Mehdi Babaei},
      title = {Exploring Practical Optimal Topology for Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structures},
      journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
      volume = {3},
      number = {4},
      pages = {102-106},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20150304.12},
      abstract = {Topology optimization of reinforced concrete frames is one of a challenging issue in structural engineering. Frame structures, unlike trusses, must provide useable spaces. Architectural requirements affect greatly the layout of the structure and optimal spans, which are obtained theoretically. Sometimes optimal topologies are not possible for real projects because the calculated optimal spans do not provide architectural requirements. In this article, however, exploring for optimal spans for reinforced concrete frames is investigated considering the architectural limitations. For this purpose, three groups of spans, including 5.6m, 7.5m and 11.2m, are considered based on the parking limitations and then optimal practical sizing for the structures are obtained numerically for 5-storey and 10-storey structures. All models are estimated and considerable differences are shown by diagrams. The optimal topology is proposed for 5-storey to 10-storey buildings with different useable spans.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Exploring Practical Optimal Topology for Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Structures
    AU  - Mehdi Babaei
    Y1  - 2015/07/02
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12
    T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    SP  - 102
    EP  - 106
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150304.12
    AB  - Topology optimization of reinforced concrete frames is one of a challenging issue in structural engineering. Frame structures, unlike trusses, must provide useable spaces. Architectural requirements affect greatly the layout of the structure and optimal spans, which are obtained theoretically. Sometimes optimal topologies are not possible for real projects because the calculated optimal spans do not provide architectural requirements. In this article, however, exploring for optimal spans for reinforced concrete frames is investigated considering the architectural limitations. For this purpose, three groups of spans, including 5.6m, 7.5m and 11.2m, are considered based on the parking limitations and then optimal practical sizing for the structures are obtained numerically for 5-storey and 10-storey structures. All models are estimated and considerable differences are shown by diagrams. The optimal topology is proposed for 5-storey to 10-storey buildings with different useable spans.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections