American Journal of Modern Energy
Volume 2, Issue 6, December 2016, Pages: 48-53
Received: Sep. 14, 2016;
Accepted: Oct. 28, 2016;
Published: Nov. 25, 2016
Views 3217 Downloads 88
Arezki Harmim, Development Center of Renewable Energies (CDER), URER/MS, Adrar, Algeria
Mebarek Boukar, Development Center of Renewable Energies (CDER), URER/MS, Adrar, Algeria
M’hammed Amar, Development Center of Renewable Energies (CDER), URER/MS, Adrar, Algeria
The energy and exergy efficiencies of a stationary solar cooker equipped with an asymmetric compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) were experimentally evaluated. Experiments were conducted with different water load and at different ambient temperature. It was found that it is preferable that the cooker is directed 30° east of south for an exploitation during morning at a lower ambient temperature with sufficient solar radiation on its intercept area. Also exergy efficiency together with energy efficiency is used to define the optimum water load of the solar cooker. This optimum load is calculated according to 5 kg water/m² intercept area.
Experimental Exergy Analysis and Optimum Water Load of a Solar Cooker, American Journal of Modern Energy.
Vol. 2, No. 6,
2016, pp. 48-53.
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cuce, E., Cuce, P. M., 2013. A comprehensive review on solar cookers. Applied Energy 102, 1399-1421.
Funk, P. A., 2000. Evaluation the international standard procedure for testing solar cookers and reporting performance. Solar Energy 68 (1), 1-7.
Harmim, A., Merzouk, M., Boukar, M., Amar, M., 2013. Design and experimental testing of an innovative building-integrated box type solar cooker. Solar Energy 98, 422-433.
Kerim K. A., 1985. Exergy efficiency and optimum operation of solar collectors. Applied Energy 21, 301-314.
Khalifa, A. M. A., Taha, M. M. A., Akyurt, M., 1985. Solar cookers for outdoors and indoors. Energy 10 (7), 819-829.
Kumar, N., Vishwanath, G., Gupta, A., 2011. An exergy based test protocol for truncated pyramid type solar box cooker. Energy 36, 5710-5715.
Kumar, N., Vishwanath, G., Gupta, A., 2012. An exergy based unified tests protocol for solar cookers of different geometries. Renewable Energy 44, 457-462.
Mahavar, S., Rajawat, P., Punia, R. C., Sengar, N., Dashora, P., 2015. Evaluating the optimum load range for box-type solar cookers. Renewable Energy 74, 187-194.
Mullick, S. C., Kandpal, T. C., Saxena, A. K., 1987. Thermal test procedure for box-type solar cookers. Solar Energy 39 (4), 353-360.
Öztürk, H. H., 2004a. Experimental determination of energy and exergy efficiency of the solar parabolic-cooker. Solar Energy 77, 67-71.
Öztürk, H. H., 2004b. Second law analysis for solar cookers. International Journal of Green Energy 1 (2), 227-239.
Pandey, A. K., Tyagi, V. V., Park, S. R., Tyagi S. K., 2012. Comparative experimental study of solar cookers using exergy analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 109, 425-431.
Panwar, N. L., Kaushik, S. C., Kothari, S., 2012. Experimental investigation of energy and exergy efficiencies of domestic size parabolic dish solar cooker. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 4, 23111-23118.
Petela, R., 2005. Exergy analysis of the solar cylindrical-parabolic cooker. Solar Energy 79, 221-233.
Shukla, S. K., 2009. Comparison of energy and exergy efficiency of community and domestic type parabolic solar cookers. International Journal of Green Energy 6, 437-449.