International Journal of Literature and Arts

| Peer-Reviewed |

Native Korean Speakers’ Attitudes Toward Konglish as a Standardized Variety of English

Received: 18 October 2015    Accepted: 27 October 2015    Published: 13 November 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This study examines native Korean speakers’ attitudes toward the use of Konglish outside of the Korean context and within an international context, as a means of conversing and negotiating with non-Koreans. The purpose of this study seeks to determine if native Korean speakers are in favor of Konglish being legitimately recognized as a standardized variety of English and the potential Konglish has of being used as a communicative tool within an international setting. Given that the English language is arguably viewed as culturally and internationally advantageous within the South Korean context, this research study aims to determine if South Koreans would feel the same way about Konglish if it were legitimately accepted as a standardized variety of English. This study also explores how native Korean speakers view their identity as English speakers, as a means of determining the effects the English language within the South Korean context.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12
Published in International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2015)
Page(s) 136-141
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Konglish, English, Native-Korean Speakers (NKS)

References
[1] Bieswanger, M. (2008). Varieties of English in current English language teaching. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 38(1), 27-47.
[2] Byeol, K. S. (2013). Excuse my Konglish. Retrieved 9/20/2015 from http://www.iafor.org/offprints/acll2013-offprints/ACLL2013_Offprint_0138.pdf
[3] Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York, NY: Routledge.
[4] Dorman, L. (2008). Golf Tour’s Rule: Speak English to Stay in Play. The New York Times. Retrieved 9/25/2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/sports/golf/27golf.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
[5] Fredericks, J.A. (2014). Eight myths of student disengagement: Creating classroom of deep learning. London, U.K.: Sage
[6] Kilickaya, F. (2009). World Englishes, English as an international language and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 2(3), 35-38.
[7] McLaren, P. (2009). Critical pedagogy: A look at major concepts. In A. Darder, M.P. Baltodano, & R. Torres (Eds), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd edition). New York: NY: Routledge.
[8] Park, J. (2009). The local construction of a global language. Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
[9] Park, J-K. (2009). ‘English fever’ in South Korea: Its history and symptoms. ‘Education fever’ drives the demand for English in South Korea today. English Today 97, 25(1), 50-57.
[10] Sharifian, F. (ed.) (2009). English as an International Language: Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
[11] Song-Ae, H. (2005). Good teachers know where to scratch when learners feel itchy: Korean learners’ views of native-speaking teachers of English. Australian Journal of Education (ACER Press), 49(2), 197-213.
[12] Song, J. J. (2011). English as an official language in South Korea: Global English or social malady? Language Problems & Language Planning, 35(1), 35–55. doi:10.1075/lplp.35.1.03son
[13] Teacher program. (n.d.). In J-1 visa exchange visitor program. Retrieved 9/20/2015 from http://j1visa.state.gov/programs/teacher
Author Information
  • English Department, Composition & TESOL, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, USA

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Quanisha Charles. (2015). Native Korean Speakers’ Attitudes Toward Konglish as a Standardized Variety of English. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 3(6), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Quanisha Charles. Native Korean Speakers’ Attitudes Toward Konglish as a Standardized Variety of English. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2015, 3(6), 136-141. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Quanisha Charles. Native Korean Speakers’ Attitudes Toward Konglish as a Standardized Variety of English. Int J Lit Arts. 2015;3(6):136-141. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12,
      author = {Quanisha Charles},
      title = {Native Korean Speakers’ Attitudes Toward Konglish as a Standardized Variety of English},
      journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
      volume = {3},
      number = {6},
      pages = {136-141},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20150306.12},
      abstract = {This study examines native Korean speakers’ attitudes toward the use of Konglish outside of the Korean context and within an international context, as a means of conversing and negotiating with non-Koreans. The purpose of this study seeks to determine if native Korean speakers are in favor of Konglish being legitimately recognized as a standardized variety of English and the potential Konglish has of being used as a communicative tool within an international setting. Given that the English language is arguably viewed as culturally and internationally advantageous within the South Korean context, this research study aims to determine if South Koreans would feel the same way about Konglish if it were legitimately accepted as a standardized variety of English. This study also explores how native Korean speakers view their identity as English speakers, as a means of determining the effects the English language within the South Korean context.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Native Korean Speakers’ Attitudes Toward Konglish as a Standardized Variety of English
    AU  - Quanisha Charles
    Y1  - 2015/11/13
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12
    T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
    JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
    JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
    SP  - 136
    EP  - 141
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-057X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20150306.12
    AB  - This study examines native Korean speakers’ attitudes toward the use of Konglish outside of the Korean context and within an international context, as a means of conversing and negotiating with non-Koreans. The purpose of this study seeks to determine if native Korean speakers are in favor of Konglish being legitimately recognized as a standardized variety of English and the potential Konglish has of being used as a communicative tool within an international setting. Given that the English language is arguably viewed as culturally and internationally advantageous within the South Korean context, this research study aims to determine if South Koreans would feel the same way about Konglish if it were legitimately accepted as a standardized variety of English. This study also explores how native Korean speakers view their identity as English speakers, as a means of determining the effects the English language within the South Korean context.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections