International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology

| Peer-Reviewed |

Ecology of Invasive Species in Saudi Arabia, Calotropis procera (Ait) W.T. Ait.: Floristic Composition and Associated Plant Communities

Received: 20 October 2016    Accepted: 29 November 2016    Published: 27 December 2016
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The present study aims at evaluating the state of Calotropis procera to adapt different environmental conditions; surveying the associated wild plants and recognizing the plant communities which are associated with it. Seventy five stands were selected along Taif region and its adjacent area to represent the environmental variations that are associated with the distribution of Calotropis procera. The abundance of species, life forms, chorotype and economic uses were determined. Two trends of multivariate analysis were applied: classification (TWINSPAN) and ordination (DECORANA). The total number of recorded species associated with Calotropis procera in the study area is 55 species belonging to 48 genera and 27 families. 74.5% of the recoded species are perennials and 25.5% are annuals. The families Fabaceae, Poaceae, Solanaceae have the highest contributions followed by Asteraceae and Zugophyllaceae. Chamaephytes life form had the highest contribution followed by therophytes, phanerophytes and gephytes, while hemicryptophytes were the lowest. The economic uses of the recorded species could be arranged descendingly as follows: grazing → medicinal→ fuel → other uses→human food. The mono-regionals species were the highest followed by pluri-regional species, while the bi-regional and cosmopolitans were the lowest. Ten of the mono-regional species are Sudano-Zambezian species and 6 species are belonging to Saharo-Arabian and Mediterranean regions. The application of TWINSPAN on the cover estimates of 55 species recorded in 75 stands led to the recognition of 7 vegetation groups (A: Themeda triandra, B: Cynodon dactylon, C: Commicarpus ambiguus, D: Amaranthus viridis, E: Acacia tortilis, F: Argemone ochraleuca and G: Verbesina encelioides groups).

DOI 10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20
Published in International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology (Volume 1, Issue 3, December 2016)
Page(s) 127-140
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Calotropis procera, Saudi Arabia, Invasive, Multivariate Analysis, Medicinal Plants

References
[1] Singh U, Wadhwani AM, Johri BM. (1996). Dictionary of economic plants of India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 38–39.
[2] CAB International (2005). Forestry Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
[3] Csurhes, S. (2016). Invasive Plant risk assessment: Calotrope, Calotropis procera. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. Biosecurity Queensland. 18pp.
[4] Khan R, Shahzad S, Choudhary MI, Khan SA, Ahmad A.(2007). Biodiversity of the endophytic fungi isolated from Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. Pakistan Journal of Botany 39: 2233–2239.
[5] Tezara. W, Colombo. R, Coronel. I and Marı´n. O. (2010). Water relations and photosynthetic capacity of two species of Calotropis in a tropical semi-arid ecosystem, Annals of Botany: 1-9.
[6] Boutraa, T. (2010). Growth Performance and Biomass Partitioning of the Desert Shrub Calotropis Procera under Water Stress Conditions, Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 6 (1): 20-26.
[7] Francis, JK. (2002). Calotropis procera. International Institute of Tropical Forestr, US Department of Agriculture.
[8] Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R., Simons, A. (2009). Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0 (http://www. worldagroforestry.org/af/treedb/)
[9] GRIN (2008), National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online searchable database. www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?8653
[10] PIER (2008), Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk. www.hear.org/pier/species/ calotropis_ procera.htm
[11] Soto BB, JMaia de Lima, FJC Freitas, RNL Amorin, ACL Camara, JS Batista (2011). Clinical and pathological effects of Calotropis procera exposure in sheep and rats. Toxicon., 57: 183-185.
[12] Kumar, V. L. and S. Arya,(2006). Medicinal uses and pharmacological properties of Calotropiprocera. In: Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants, Ed., Govil, J. N. Studium Press, Houston, Texas, USA, pp: 373-388.
[13] Murti, Y. B., Yogi. D. Pathak (2010). Pharmacognostic standardization of leaves oc Calotropis procera, International J. Ayurveda Res., 1 (1): 14-17.
[14] Choudhury Ratna and Singh Ritu (1993). Enhanced hydrocarbon extraction from Calotropis procera - a petrocrop, Petroleum Science and technology, 11 (5&6) 733-749.
[15] Choudhury Ratna and Singh Ritu (2007). Hydrocarbons from Calotropis procera - product enhancement and analysis, Internat. J Energy Res. 17 (9), pp. 791-799.
[16] Behera B. K.; Arora M.; Sharma D. K. (2000). Studies on iotransformation of Calotropis Procera Latex - A Renewable Source of Petroleum, Value-Added Chemicals, and Products, Energy Sources, 22 (9) 781-807.
[17] Erdman, M. D. and Erdman, B. A. (1981). Calotropis procera as a source of plant hydrocarbons. Econ. Bot. 35 (4), 467-472.
[18] Kumar, A. and Vijay, N. (2004). Studies on Laticifer Development in Calotropis procera an Important Plant Yielding Hydrocarbon and Improvement of its Growth Potential In: Van Swaaij, Fjallstrom, Helm and Grassi (eds):. Biomass for energy, industry, and climate protection. Proceedings of the Second World Conference ETA-Florence, Rome Italy WIP-Munich, Germany, pp. 176.
[19] Padmaja, K. V., Atheya, N., Bhatnagar, A. K. and Singh, K. K. (2009). onversion of Calotropis procera biocrude to liquid fuels using thermal and catalytic cracking. Fuel, 88 (5), pp. 780-785.
[20] Reddy, M. S. N. and Krupadanam David (2003). A note on the estimation of percentage of biocrude in some petrocrops, Journal of the Indian Botanical Society, 82 (1-4), pp. 40-43.
[21] Migahid, A. M. (1989). Flora of Saudi Arabia, 2nd ed. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
[22] Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974). Aims and Methods and Vegetation Ecology, Wiley and Sons. New York. 547p.
[23] Chaudhary, S. (1999). Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (Part 1), vol. 1, Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riaydh.
[24] Chaudhary, S. A., 2000a. In: Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Part 1), vol. 2. Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, p. 675.
[25] Chaudhary, S. A., 2000b. In: Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Part 2), vol. 2. Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, p. 542.
[26] Chaudhary, S. A., 2000c. In: Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Part 3), vol. 2. Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, p. 432.
[27] Chaudhary, S. A., 2001. In: Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, vol. 3. Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, p. 368.
[28] Collenette, S. (1999). Wild Flowers of Saudi Arabia. NCWCD (National commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development, Publication), Saudi Arabia. 799 pp.
[29] Boulos, L. (1999). Flora of Egypt: Volum one (Aizoaceae–Oxalidaceae). Alhadara, Publishing, Cairo, Egypt.
[30] Boulos, L. (2000). Flora of Egypt: Volume Two (Geraniaceae- Boraginaceae). Al-Hadara Pub., Cairo, Egypt. 352 p.
[31] Boulos, L. (2002). Flora of Egypt: Volume Three (Verbinaceae-Compositae). Al-Hadara Pub., Cairo, Egypt.
[32] Boulos, L. (2005). Flora of Egypt: Volume Four Monocotyledons (Alismataceae-Orchidaceae). Al-Hadara Pub., Cairo, Egypt.
[33] Boulos, L., 2009. Flora of Egypt Chicklist: revised Annotated Ed.. Al-Hadara Pub., Cairo.
[34] Raunkiaer, C. (1937). Plant Life Forms. Clarendon, Oxford.
[35] Zohary, M. (1966). Flora Palaestina. (Part 1). Israel Acad. Sci. and Humanities, Jerusalem.
[36] Zohary, M. (1987). Flora Palaestina (Part II). Jerusalem. Isr. Acad. Sci. Human.
[37] Feinbrun-Dothan, N. A. (1978). Flora Palaestina (Part III). Jerusalem. Isr. Acad. Sci. Human.
[38] Feinbrun-Dothan, N. A. (1986). Flora Palaestina (part IV). Jerusalem. Isr. Acad. Sci. Human.
[39] Mossa, J. S., Al-Yahya, M. A., Al-Meshal, I. A., 1987. Medicinal Plants of Saudi Arabia (Vol. 1), King Saud Univ. Press.
[40] Mandaville, J. P., 1990. Flora of Eastern Saudi Arabia. Kegan Paul International Limited.
[41] Ayyad, M. A. (ed.). 1992. Rangland study of El-Qasr Rural development project. Final Report. (GTZ) GMBH.
[42] Shaltout, K. H., 1997. Current situation of flora and vegetation of south-west Egypt. In: Abdel-Ghaffar, A. S., Marei, S. M. and Gaber, H. M. (eds.). Integrated Land Development of Southern Egypt: Available Resources and Alternative Options. ICDR, CDRI, Canada, pp. 199-241.
[43] Hill, M. O., (1979). TWINSPAN. A Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.
[44] Hill, M. O., (1979). DECORANA: A FORTRAN Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Sfction of Ecology and Systematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
[45] Hill, M. and Gauch, H. G. (1980). Detrended correspondence analysis: an important technique. Vegetatio 42: 47-58.
[46] Gauch, H. G., Wittaker, R. H., 1981. Hierarchical classification of community data. Journal of Ecology 69, 135-152.
[47] Al-Nafie, A. (2004). Plant Geography of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh (In Arabic). 659p.
[48] Al-Nafie, A. (2008). Phytogeography of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 15: 159-176.
[49] Al-Yasi, H. M. (2010). Floristic diversity and dynamics in Sarrawat mountains with special emphasis to Juniper forests, Taif, KSA. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Taif University.
[50] Mosallm, H. A. (2007). Comparative study on the vegetation of protected and nonprotected areas, Sudera, Taif, Saudi Arabia. Intenational Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2: 202-214.
[51] Abdel-Fattah, R. T. and Ali, A. A. (2005). Vegetation- Environment relation in Taif, Saudi Arabia, Int. J. Botany, 4: 1-6.
[52] Al-Turki, T. A. (2004). A prelude to the study of the flora of Jabal Fayfa in Saudi Arabia. Kuwait J. Sci. Eng. 31 (2): 71-145.
[53] Al-Turki, T. A. and Al-Olayan, H. A. (2003). Contribution to the flora of Saudi Arabia; Hail region. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 10 (2). 190-222.
[54] Al-Zahrani, H. S., 2003. Study on the vegetation and ecosystem of Bani Saad mountains, south of Al-Taif city. Umm Al-Qura Univ. J. Sci. Med. Eng. 15, 1-13.
[55] Heneidy, S. Z. and Bidak, L. M. (2001). Multipurpose Plant species in Bisha, Asir region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. J. King Soud. Univ., 13: 11-26.
[56] El-Demerdash, M. A., Hegazy, A. K. and Zialy, A. M. (1994). Distribution of the plant communities in Tihamah coastal plains of Gazan region, Saudi Arabia. Vegetatio, 112: 141-151.
[57] Beeftink, W. G. (1977). The coastal salt marshes of western and northern Europe. In: Chapman V. J. (ed.), Ecosystems of the World 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 109–155.
[58] Zahran M. A. (1982). Ecology of the halophytic vegetation of Egypt. In: Sen D. N. and Rajpurohit K. S. (eds), Tasks for Vegetation Science. Dr W. Junk Publisher, The Hague, pp. 3–20.
[59] Al-Sodany, Y. M., Mosallam, H. A. and Al-Yasi, H. M. (2014). Floristic diversity and plant communities associated with juniper forests in high altitudes. International journal of Current Life Science 4 (2): 118-133.
[60] Zohary, M. (1973). Geobotanical Foundations of the Middle East, 2 vols. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
[61] Anton, D. (1984). Aspects of Geomorphological Evolution: Paleosols and Dunes in Saudi Arabia. In: A. Jado and J. Zotl.eds.. Quaternary Period in Saudi Arabia, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 275-295.
[62] Al-Sodany, Y. M., Bazaid, S. A. and Mosallam, H. A. (2013). Medicinal Plants in Saudi Arabia: I. Sarrwat Mountains at Taif. Academic Journal of Plant Sciences 6 (4): 134-145.
[63] Abulfatih, H. A. 1991. Ecology, In arabic language. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
[64] El-Karemy, Z. A. R. and Zayed, K. M., (1992). Distribution of plant communities across Al Abha escarpment, SW saudi Arabia.
[65] Hegazy, A. K., El Demerdash, M. A and Hosni, H. A. (1998). Vegetation, species diversity and floristic relations along an altitudinal gradient in south-west Saudi Arabia. Journal of Arid Environments, 38: 3-13.
[66] Al-Yemeni, M. N., 2001. Ecology OF Some Plant Communities in Wadi Al-Ammaria, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 8, 145-165.
[67] Al Wadie, H. M., 2007. Plant communities in Wadi Ayaa southwestern Saudi Arabia. Egypt. J. Exp. Biol. (Botany) 3, 1–8.
[68] Kassas M. (1955). Rainfall and vegetation belts in arid NE Africa. Plant Ecology Proc. of the Montpellier Symp., UNESCO: 49–77.
[69] Vesey-Fitzgerald, D. F. (1955). Vegetation of the Red Sea Coast south of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Ecology 43: 477-489.
[70] Kassas, M. (1957). On the ecology of the Red Sea coastal land. Journal of Ecology, 45: 187-203.
[71] Beals, E. W. (1969). Vegetational change along altitudinal gradients. Science, 165: 981–985.
[72] Brooks, W. H., Mandil, K. S., 1983. Vegetation dynamics in the Asir woodlands of southwestern Saudi Arabia. Journal of Arid Environments 6, 357–362.
[73] Ghazanfar, S. A. (1991). Vegetation structure and phytogeography of Jabal Shams, an arid mountain in Oman. Journal of Biogeography, 28: 299–309.
[74] Moustafa, A. A. (1990). Environmental Gradient and Species Distribution on Sinai Mountains. Ph. D. Thesis, Egypt. Botany Dept. Faculty of Science, Suez Canal Univ., 115 pp.
[75] Ayyad, M., Fakhry, A. and Moustafa, A.(2000). Plant biodiversity in the Saint Catherine area of the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Biodiv. Conserv., 9: 265–81.
[76] Shipley, B., Keddy, P. A., Moore, D. R. J., and Lemky, K. (1989). Regeneration and establishment strategies of emergent macrophytes. Journal of Ecology, 77, 1093–110.
[77] Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Amer. Nat. 111: 1169-1195.
[78] Payal, C. and Sharma R. A. (2015). An overview on giant milkweed (Calotropis procera (Ait.) Ait. f.). Journal of Plant Sciences 2015; 3 (1-1): 19-23.
[79] Altaf, W. J. (2006). Response of Calotropis procera for urban, suburban and sewage pollution Umm Al-Qura Univ. J. Sci. Med. Eng., 18.31-40.
[80] Levitt, J., (1980). Responses of Plant to Environmental Stress. Vol. 1: Chilling, freezing and high temperatures stresses, New York, Academic Press.
Author Information
  • Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif, KSA; Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Kafr El-Sheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt

  • Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif, KSA

  • Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif, KSA; Legums Research Department, Field Crops Research Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yassin Mohamed Al-Sodany, Nawar Sunaydih Al-Juaid, Anwar Abdel-Karim Kahil. (2016). Ecology of Invasive Species in Saudi Arabia, Calotropis procera (Ait) W.T. Ait.: Floristic Composition and Associated Plant Communities. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 1(3), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yassin Mohamed Al-Sodany; Nawar Sunaydih Al-Juaid; Anwar Abdel-Karim Kahil. Ecology of Invasive Species in Saudi Arabia, Calotropis procera (Ait) W.T. Ait.: Floristic Composition and Associated Plant Communities. Int. J. Ecotoxicol. Ecobiol. 2016, 1(3), 127-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yassin Mohamed Al-Sodany, Nawar Sunaydih Al-Juaid, Anwar Abdel-Karim Kahil. Ecology of Invasive Species in Saudi Arabia, Calotropis procera (Ait) W.T. Ait.: Floristic Composition and Associated Plant Communities. Int J Ecotoxicol Ecobiol. 2016;1(3):127-140. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20,
      author = {Yassin Mohamed Al-Sodany and Nawar Sunaydih Al-Juaid and Anwar Abdel-Karim Kahil},
      title = {Ecology of Invasive Species in Saudi Arabia, Calotropis procera (Ait) W.T. Ait.: Floristic Composition and Associated Plant Communities},
      journal = {International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology},
      volume = {1},
      number = {3},
      pages = {127-140},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijee.20160103.20},
      abstract = {The present study aims at evaluating the state of Calotropis procera to adapt different environmental conditions; surveying the associated wild plants and recognizing the plant communities which are associated with it. Seventy five stands were selected along Taif region and its adjacent area to represent the environmental variations that are associated with the distribution of Calotropis procera. The abundance of species, life forms, chorotype and economic uses were determined. Two trends of multivariate analysis were applied: classification (TWINSPAN) and ordination (DECORANA). The total number of recorded species associated with Calotropis procera in the study area is 55 species belonging to 48 genera and 27 families. 74.5% of the recoded species are perennials and 25.5% are annuals. The families Fabaceae, Poaceae, Solanaceae have the highest contributions followed by Asteraceae and Zugophyllaceae. Chamaephytes life form had the highest contribution followed by therophytes, phanerophytes and gephytes, while hemicryptophytes were the lowest. The economic uses of the recorded species could be arranged descendingly as follows: grazing → medicinal→ fuel → other uses→human food. The mono-regionals species were the highest followed by pluri-regional species, while the bi-regional and cosmopolitans were the lowest. Ten of the mono-regional species are Sudano-Zambezian species and 6 species are belonging to Saharo-Arabian and Mediterranean regions. The application of TWINSPAN on the cover estimates of 55 species recorded in 75 stands led to the recognition of 7 vegetation groups (A: Themeda triandra, B: Cynodon dactylon, C: Commicarpus ambiguus, D: Amaranthus viridis, E: Acacia tortilis, F: Argemone ochraleuca and G: Verbesina encelioides groups).},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Ecology of Invasive Species in Saudi Arabia, Calotropis procera (Ait) W.T. Ait.: Floristic Composition and Associated Plant Communities
    AU  - Yassin Mohamed Al-Sodany
    AU  - Nawar Sunaydih Al-Juaid
    AU  - Anwar Abdel-Karim Kahil
    Y1  - 2016/12/27
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20
    T2  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JF  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JO  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    SP  - 127
    EP  - 140
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1735
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20160103.20
    AB  - The present study aims at evaluating the state of Calotropis procera to adapt different environmental conditions; surveying the associated wild plants and recognizing the plant communities which are associated with it. Seventy five stands were selected along Taif region and its adjacent area to represent the environmental variations that are associated with the distribution of Calotropis procera. The abundance of species, life forms, chorotype and economic uses were determined. Two trends of multivariate analysis were applied: classification (TWINSPAN) and ordination (DECORANA). The total number of recorded species associated with Calotropis procera in the study area is 55 species belonging to 48 genera and 27 families. 74.5% of the recoded species are perennials and 25.5% are annuals. The families Fabaceae, Poaceae, Solanaceae have the highest contributions followed by Asteraceae and Zugophyllaceae. Chamaephytes life form had the highest contribution followed by therophytes, phanerophytes and gephytes, while hemicryptophytes were the lowest. The economic uses of the recorded species could be arranged descendingly as follows: grazing → medicinal→ fuel → other uses→human food. The mono-regionals species were the highest followed by pluri-regional species, while the bi-regional and cosmopolitans were the lowest. Ten of the mono-regional species are Sudano-Zambezian species and 6 species are belonging to Saharo-Arabian and Mediterranean regions. The application of TWINSPAN on the cover estimates of 55 species recorded in 75 stands led to the recognition of 7 vegetation groups (A: Themeda triandra, B: Cynodon dactylon, C: Commicarpus ambiguus, D: Amaranthus viridis, E: Acacia tortilis, F: Argemone ochraleuca and G: Verbesina encelioides groups).
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections