International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry

| Peer-Reviewed |

Assessment of Water Quality of Bayelsa Rivers Using Pollution Index

Received: 15 January 2017    Accepted: 04 February 2017    Published: 24 February 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Water quality of Bayelsa Rivers was evaluated using pollution index (PI). Water collected from four stations along Brass River was studied. Water quality status was analysed with reference to World Health Organization (WHO) standard for domestic water supply for water quality and department of petroleum resources permissible levels for produced water discharge. The results obtained where then used for pollution index (PI) computation. A pollution index above one (PI>1) indicates that the water source is unacceptable for the particular use. The river water quality parameters comply to a large extent with most of the set standard. However, it was very notable very poor at station A and D in terms of chloride (Cl-), implying that the river Brass and Oloibiri at the points investigated could be chemically unsafe for human consumption as high chloride indicates high chemical activity and possibly anthropogenic pollutant. The pollution index along the rivers Brass, Ewoama, Okoroma, and Oloibiri were 3.53, 2.19, 2.74, 2.88 in terms of numeric value and 2.85, 2.17, 2.41 and 2.55 in terms of relative damage due to pollution respectively. The result revealed that the pollution at Brass was higher than that upstream at oloibiri possibly due to waste inputs from the oil servicing companies. The index declined downstream from Ewoama as the river recovers. This does not imply that no further pollutants were introduced into the rivers as it flows downstream through these locations but rather the level of pollution was within the assimilative capacity of the river.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13
Published in International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry (Volume 2, Issue 1, March 2017)
Page(s) 16-21
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pollution Index, Water Quality, Contaminants, Bayelsa Rivers, Water Quality Standards

References
[1] Knowles, R. S. (1983). The First Pictorial History of the American Oil and Gas Industry 1859-1983. Ohio University Press, Athens, OH. 169pp.
[2] Onuoha, F. C. (2008). Oil Pipeline Sabotage in Nigeria: Dimensions, Actors and Implications for National Security L/C. African Security Review, 17 (3).
[3] Anifowose, B. (2008). Assessing the Impact of Oil & Gas Transport on Nigeria’s Environment. U21 Postgraduate Research Conference Proceedings 1, University of Birmingham UK.
[4] Ite, A. E., and K. T. Semple, (2012). "Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils," Microbial Biotechnology: Energy and Environment, R. Arora, ed., Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CAB International. pp. 250-278.
[5] Wills, M. A. (2000). Ekologicheskaya Vahkta Sakhalin (Sakhalin Environment Watch) Ph. D. Thesis M. Inst. Petroleum.
[6] Neff, J. M., (2002). Bioaccumulation in marine organisms: effect of contaminants from oil well produced water, Amsterdam; London: Elsevier.
[7] Camougis, G. (1981). Environmental Biology for Engineering. A Guide to Environmental Assessment. Academic Press. New York. P.26.
[8] UNEP (2013). Africa Environmental Outlook. Nairobi, Kenya, United Nations Environment Pro- gramme. Retrieved 15 December 2013 from: http://hqweb.unep.org/dewa/Africa/publications/aeo-1/.
[9] Kuruk, P. (2004). Customary Water Laws and Practices: Nigeria. http:/www.fao.org/legal/advserv/ FOA/UCNCS.Nigeria.pdf.
[10] Awosika, L. F. (1995). Impacts of global climate change and sea level rise on coastal resources and energy development in Nigeria. In: Umolu, J. C., (ed). Global Climate Change: Impact on Energy Development. DAMTECH Nigeria Limited, Nigeria.
[11] Powell, C. B., White, S. A., Ibiebele, D. O., Bara, M., Dut Kwicz, B., Isoun, M. and Oteogbu, F. U. (1985). Oshika Oil Spill Environmental Impact; effect on Aquatic biology. Paper presented at NNPC/FMHE International Seminar on petroleum industry and the Nigerian Environment 11 – 13 Nov. 1985, Kaduna, Nigeria P.168–178.
[12] CLO, Civil Liberties Organization, (2002). Blood Trail: Repression and Resistance in the Niger Delta, Ikeja: CLO.
[13] Anifowose, B. (2008). Assessing the Impact of Oil & Gas Transport on Nigeria’s Environment. U21 Postgraduate Research Conference Proceedings 1, University of Birmingham UK.
[14] Chinweze, C. and Abiol-Oloke, G. (2009). Women Issues, Poverty and Social Challenges of Climate Changes in the Nigerian Niger Delta Context. 7th International Conference on the Human Dimension of Global Environmental Changes, UN Campus, Bonne, Germany.
[15] Federal Ministry of Environment Abuja, Nigerian Conservation Foundation Lagos, (2006). WWF UK and CEESP-IUCN Commission on Environmental, Economic, and Social Policy, Niger Delta Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Project.
[16] ANEEJ (2004). Oil of Poverty in the Niger Delta. A publication of the African Network for Environment and Economic Justice.
[17] Twumasi, Y. and Merem E. (2006). GIS and Remote Sensing Applications in the Assessment of Change within a Coastal Environment in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 3 (1): 98-106.
[18] Uyigue, E. and Agho, M. (2007). Coping with Climate Change and Environmental Degradation in the Niger Delta of Southern Nigeria. Community Research and Development Centre Nigeria (CREDC).
[19] Horton RK. (1995). An index number system for rating quality water. J. water pollution control. Ed. 37 (3).
[20] Wetzel, R. G. (2001). Limnology: Lakes and River Ecosystem, 3rd Edition, Academic Press, San Diego, U.S.A. PP 110–115.
[21] Covich, A. P. (1993). Water and Ecosystem. In: Gleick, P. M. (Ed). Water in Crisis, A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources, Oxford University Press. New York. Pp. 40-45.
[22] McOliver, (1981). The Nigeria and Industry. Importance and Role in Economic Development. Lagos. Nigeria, 330p.
[23] Burdon, R. H., O’Kane, D. Fadzillah, N. Gill, V., Boyd, P. A. and Finch, R. R. (1996). Oxidative stress and responses in Arabidopsis thallana and Oryza sativa subjected to chilling salinity stress. Biochemical Society Transactions. 24: 470-472.
[24] Hopkins, W. G. (1999). Introduction to Plant Physiology. Second Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 512p.
[25] Hernandez, J. A. Olmos, E. Corpas, T., Sevilla, F. and Rio, L. A. (1995). Salt induced oxidative stress in chloroplast of pea plants. Plant Science. 105: 151-167.
[26] Egeronu, U. U and Dike R. (2007). Evaluation of pollution levels of Orashi River and Oguta lake Water. J. Chem. Soc. Nigeria. Vol. 32 No 1. P. 159-65.
[27] Leton T and Nkwueke J. O (2005). Application of pollution index (PI) to determine the water quality of the new Calabar River in River state. African Journal of Environmental Pollution and Health. 3 (2) p1-9.
[28] Nemerov, N. L (1991). Stream, Lake, Estuary and Ocean Pollution. Environmental Engineering Services pp. 261-285.
[29] WHO (2004). Guidelines for drinking water quality, Geneva. World Health Organisation.
Author Information
  • Biotechnology and Energy Research Department, Ministry of Science and Technology, Umuahia, Nigeria

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Eluchie Nene Pearl. (2017). Assessment of Water Quality of Bayelsa Rivers Using Pollution Index. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 2(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Eluchie Nene Pearl. Assessment of Water Quality of Bayelsa Rivers Using Pollution Index. Int. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 2(1), 16-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Eluchie Nene Pearl. Assessment of Water Quality of Bayelsa Rivers Using Pollution Index. Int J Bioorg Chem. 2017;2(1):16-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13,
      author = {Eluchie Nene Pearl},
      title = {Assessment of Water Quality of Bayelsa Rivers Using Pollution Index},
      journal = {International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {16-21},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbc.20170201.13},
      abstract = {Water quality of Bayelsa Rivers was evaluated using pollution index (PI). Water collected from four stations along Brass River was studied. Water quality status was analysed with reference to World Health Organization (WHO) standard for domestic water supply for water quality and department of petroleum resources permissible levels for produced water discharge. The results obtained where then used for pollution index (PI) computation. A pollution index above one (PI>1) indicates that the water source is unacceptable for the particular use. The river water quality parameters comply to a large extent with most of the set standard. However, it was very notable very poor at station A and D in terms of chloride (Cl-), implying that the river Brass and Oloibiri at the points investigated could be chemically unsafe for human consumption as high chloride indicates high chemical activity and possibly anthropogenic pollutant. The pollution index along the rivers Brass, Ewoama, Okoroma, and Oloibiri were 3.53, 2.19, 2.74, 2.88 in terms of numeric value and 2.85, 2.17, 2.41 and 2.55 in terms of relative damage due to pollution respectively. The result revealed that the pollution at Brass was higher than that upstream at oloibiri possibly due to waste inputs from the oil servicing companies. The index declined downstream from Ewoama as the river recovers. This does not imply that no further pollutants were introduced into the rivers as it flows downstream through these locations but rather the level of pollution was within the assimilative capacity of the river.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Assessment of Water Quality of Bayelsa Rivers Using Pollution Index
    AU  - Eluchie Nene Pearl
    Y1  - 2017/02/24
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13
    T2  - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
    JF  - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
    JO  - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
    SP  - 16
    EP  - 21
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-9392
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170201.13
    AB  - Water quality of Bayelsa Rivers was evaluated using pollution index (PI). Water collected from four stations along Brass River was studied. Water quality status was analysed with reference to World Health Organization (WHO) standard for domestic water supply for water quality and department of petroleum resources permissible levels for produced water discharge. The results obtained where then used for pollution index (PI) computation. A pollution index above one (PI>1) indicates that the water source is unacceptable for the particular use. The river water quality parameters comply to a large extent with most of the set standard. However, it was very notable very poor at station A and D in terms of chloride (Cl-), implying that the river Brass and Oloibiri at the points investigated could be chemically unsafe for human consumption as high chloride indicates high chemical activity and possibly anthropogenic pollutant. The pollution index along the rivers Brass, Ewoama, Okoroma, and Oloibiri were 3.53, 2.19, 2.74, 2.88 in terms of numeric value and 2.85, 2.17, 2.41 and 2.55 in terms of relative damage due to pollution respectively. The result revealed that the pollution at Brass was higher than that upstream at oloibiri possibly due to waste inputs from the oil servicing companies. The index declined downstream from Ewoama as the river recovers. This does not imply that no further pollutants were introduced into the rivers as it flows downstream through these locations but rather the level of pollution was within the assimilative capacity of the river.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections