| Peer-Reviewed

Falsafah Science of Fritjof Capra in Handling the Environment Destruction

Received: 14 July 2020    Accepted: 5 August 2020    Published: 31 December 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Fritjof Capra introduces a new vision in seeing the reality through the discovery of holistic ecological truth that is linear in nature with the basics of holistic ontology pluralist-spiritualistic-organism and a basis epistemological of synthesis, interactive dialogue, and subject equality. Based on this, Capra explained that the balance between science and technology that is limited by moral values and religion will create ecological sustainability by itself, while the capitalist, materialistic, and hedonism perspective of humanity overrides spiritualism only as a pseudo science. This causes Capra's world view to appear in various fields as the wisdom of nature which is described as the ability of the planet's ecological ecosystems to organizing themselves in complex ways. This is seeing in the perspective of Capra, a science for sustainbale living which explained that science for the sustainability of life no need to create sustainable human society from zero, but can mimic natural ecosystems which are plant communities, animals and microorganisms that are sustainable. This condition explains that when there is a balance between the use of science and technology which is limited by aspects of conscience and religion (Yang) then sustainability automatically occurs. But due to the different perspectives that further increase environmental damage such as climate change, Capra offers the concept of ecoliteracy that guarantees a solid continuation of life together on planet Earth, namely: networks, cycles, solar energy, partnerships, diversity, and balance dynamic. Therefore, Capra offers a solution for solving climate change is eco-literacy which he calls spreading to various fields of science because it will develop into an ecodesign. The groups expected to understand ecoliteration in the face of environmental change (climate change) are politicians, business leaders, professionals at all levels, and educational institutions. This group, according to Capra, is a group of public or institutional policy makers and trusted input providers who have the real ability to create community impacts far ahead.

Published in American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (Volume 5, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13
Page(s) 103-115
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Sustainability, Ecoliteracy, Climate Change

References
[1] Akib M. 2009. Reflections on modern legal thought: an orientation towards a deep ecology paradigm in the study of legal science. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia. Vol. 27 (2): 155-167.
[2] Aminah S. 2008. Indigeneity and reproduction of capitalism knowledge in the power network in the third world. Jurnal Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik. Vol. 21 (4): 336-351.
[3] Aprison W. 2017. Madrasa: The basis of humanistic-religious epistemology. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam. Vol. 12 (1): 117-140.
[4] Arifudin I. 2016. Integration of science and religion and their implications for Islamic education. Jurnal Edukasia Islamika. Vol. 1 (1): 161-179.
[5] Basukiyatno. 2006. Peradaban Islam di Tengah Globalisasi. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Humaniora. Vol. 2 (2): 1-8.
[6] Brameld T. 1965. Education as Power. New York (USA): Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Inc.
[7] Capra F. 1997. Titik Balik Peradaban: Sains, Masyarakat dan Kebangkitan Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta (ID): Bentang Pustaka.
[8] Capra F. 2007. Sustainable Living, Ecological Literacy and the Breath of Life. Canadian Journal of Environmetal Education. Vo. 12: 9-18.
[9] Chandra E. 2012. Filosofi Zat dan Materi Menurut Jabir Bin Hayyan: Aspek Kimiawi dari Studi Filosofis Terhadap Naskah Mukhtâr Rasâ’il. Jurnal Scientiae Educatia. Vol. 1 (2): 1-26.
[10] Dalmeri. 2015. Contextualization of Scientific and Religious Values in Multicultural Society. Jurnal Walisongo. Vol. 23 (2): 377-400.
[11] Darraz MA. 2012. Islamic Eco-Cosmology in Ikhwan al-Safa’s View. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies. Vol. 2 (1): 133-161.
[12] Farisi MI. 2013. Kurikulum Rekonstruksionis dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial: Analisis Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Paedagogia. Vol. 16 (2): 144-165.
[13] Gumelar MS. 2016. Dekonstruksi Pemikiran Fritjof Capra Dalam Buku “Titik Balik Peradaban”. Jurnal Studi Kultural. Vol. 1 (1): 7-11.
[14] Herimanto, Budiati AC, Utami T. 2013. Ecoliteracy Masyarakat Rawan Bencana Melalui Mitos Prabu Boko di Kecamatan Tawangmangu Kabupaten Karangayar Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Forum Ilmu Sosial. Vol. 40 (2): 178-188.
[15] Hidayat S. 2014. Sacred Science vs. Secular Science: Carut Marut Hubungan Agama dan Sains. Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam. Vol. 8 (1): 87-101.
[16] Kartanegara M. 2003. When Science Meets Philosophy and Religion. Jurnal Relief. Vol. 1 (1): 22-35.
[17] Kodra HSA. 2004. Bumi Makin Panas, Banjir Makin Luas: Menyibak Tragedi Hutan. Bandung (ID): Yayasan Nuansa Cendekia.
[18] Kusmarni Y. 2008. Teori Chaos: Sebuah Keteraturan Dalam Keacakan [Report Research]. Bandung (ID): Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
[19] Loedin AA. 2013. Dampak Global Warming Kepada Kesehatan Manusia. In. Begawan Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta (ID): Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. Hal. 21-34.
[20] Merchant C. 1995. Earthcare, Women and The Environment. New York (USA): Rountledge Press.
[21] Mufid F. 2013. Perkembangan Paradigma Epistemologi Dalam Filsafat Islam. Jurnal Studi Keislaman Ulumuna. Vol. 17 (1): 19-40.
[22] Nasoetion AN. 1999. Pengantar ke Filsafat Sains. Bogor: PT. Pustaka Litera AntarNusa.
[23] Praja JS. 2006. Aliran-Aliran Filsafat dan Etika. Bandung (ID): Yayasan Pengembangan Ilmu Agama dan Humaniora.
[24] Rahayu MIF, Susanto AF, Muliya LS. 2014. Model Pemberdayaan Hukum Lingkungan Religius-Kosmik Sebagai Upaya Pelestarian Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Litigasi. Vol. 15 (1): 70-92.
[25] Rahmawati NN. 2016. Perempuan Bali dalam Pergulatan Gender (Kajian Budaya, Tradisi, dan Agama Hindu). Jurnal Studi Kultural. Vol. 1 (1): 63-69.
[26] Riwukore JR, Habaora F. 2019. Perception of farmers on the performance of extensionist in the pasture agroecosystem of Timor Tengah Utara District. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology (AJAESS). 29 (2): 1-10. Doi: 10.9734/AJAESS/2019/45539.
[27] Riwukore JR, Habaora F. 2019. The concept of strategy for garbage management in the Kupang City, Indonesian. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (SJHSS). 4 (6): 395-400. Doi: 10.21276/sjhss.2019.4.6.1.
[28] Riwukore JR, Habaora F. 2019. Revolutionary concept of garbage handling in Kota Kupang, Indonesia. Journal of Ecological Engineering and Environment Protection (EEEP). 2: 39-47.
[29] Rozak A, Arifin IZ. 2002. Filsafat Umum. Bandung (ID): Gema Media Pusakatama.
[30] Rumadan I. 2013. Judges' interpretation of special minimum criminal provisions in the corruption act. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. Vol. 2 (3): 379-404. ISSN: 2303-3274.
[31] Samiha YT. 2016. Standar Menilai Teori dalam Metode Ilmiah pada Kajian Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Studi Islam Medina-Te. Vol. 14 (2): 133-142.
[32] Saragih S, Lassa J, Ramli A. 2007. Kerangka Penghidupan Berkelanjutan. Kerjasama Hivos Southeast Asia Office dan Circle Indonesia.
[33] Sucia AH, Samadi. 2017. Communication Ability dalam Pemecahan Masalah Perubahan Iklim Sesuai Perspektif Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Lingkungan dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Vol. XVIII (2): 53-63. ISSN: 1411-1829. DOI: http: //doi.org/10.21009/PLPB.182.04.
[34] Suriasumantri JS. 2000. Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta (ID): Penerbit Sinar Harapan.
[35] Surajiyo. 2010. Filsafat Ilmu dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[36] Surajiyo. 2012. Ilmu Filsafat Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[37] Susilo AB. 2013. Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hermeneutika Hukum: Suatu Solusi Terhadap Problematikan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. Vol. 2 (3): 449-469. ISSN: 2303-3274.
[38] Suwondo SPD, Pramudana AS. 2016. Peran Sikap Dalam Memediasi Pengaruh Ecoliteracy Terhadap Kesediaan Untuk Membeli Produk Ramah Lingkungan. Jurnal Manajemen Unud. Vol. 5 (7): 4575-4601. ISSN: 2302-8912.
[39] Syadali A, Mudzakir. 1997. Filsafat Umum. Bandung (ID): Pusaka Setia Press.
[40] Syarial. 2017. Islamisasi Sains dan Penolakan Fazlur Rahman. Jurnal Lentera. Vol. 1 (1): 82-63.
[41] Thamrin H. 2013. Local Wisdom in Environmental Preservation: The Local Wisdom in Environmental Sustainable). Jurnal Kutubkhanah. Vol. 16 (1): 46-59.
[42] Udin NHW. 2016. Perspektif Islam Tentang Resiprositas Hubungan Pelestarian Alam dan Kehidupan Sosial. Jurnal Studi Keislaman. Vol. 2 (2): 355-381.
[43] Quddus A. 2012. Ecotheology Islam: Teologi Konstruktif Atasi Krisis Lingkungan. Jurnal Ulumuna. Vol. 16 (2): 311-347. ISSN: 1411-3457.
[44] Widianarko B. 2011. Barriers to politics, ecoliteracy and environmental leadership. Jurnal Riptek. Vol. 5 (1): 1-5.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Jefirstson Richset Riwukore, Fellyanus Habaora, Yohanes Susanto, Asnath Maria Fuah, Rudi Priyanto, et al. (2020). Falsafah Science of Fritjof Capra in Handling the Environment Destruction. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 5(6), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Jefirstson Richset Riwukore; Fellyanus Habaora; Yohanes Susanto; Asnath Maria Fuah; Rudi Priyanto, et al. Falsafah Science of Fritjof Capra in Handling the Environment Destruction. Am. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2020, 5(6), 103-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Jefirstson Richset Riwukore, Fellyanus Habaora, Yohanes Susanto, Asnath Maria Fuah, Rudi Priyanto, et al. Falsafah Science of Fritjof Capra in Handling the Environment Destruction. Am J Eng Technol Manag. 2020;5(6):103-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13,
      author = {Jefirstson Richset Riwukore and Fellyanus Habaora and Yohanes Susanto and Asnath Maria Fuah and Rudi Priyanto and Luki Abdullah and Ahmad Yani and Bagus Priyo Purwanto},
      title = {Falsafah Science of Fritjof Capra in Handling the Environment Destruction},
      journal = {American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management},
      volume = {5},
      number = {6},
      pages = {103-115},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajetm.20200506.13},
      abstract = {Fritjof Capra introduces a new vision in seeing the reality through the discovery of holistic ecological truth that is linear in nature with the basics of holistic ontology pluralist-spiritualistic-organism and a basis epistemological of synthesis, interactive dialogue, and subject equality. Based on this, Capra explained that the balance between science and technology that is limited by moral values and religion will create ecological sustainability by itself, while the capitalist, materialistic, and hedonism perspective of humanity overrides spiritualism only as a pseudo science. This causes Capra's world view to appear in various fields as the wisdom of nature which is described as the ability of the planet's ecological ecosystems to organizing themselves in complex ways. This is seeing in the perspective of Capra, a science for sustainbale living which explained that science for the sustainability of life no need to create sustainable human society from zero, but can mimic natural ecosystems which are plant communities, animals and microorganisms that are sustainable. This condition explains that when there is a balance between the use of science and technology which is limited by aspects of conscience and religion (Yang) then sustainability automatically occurs. But due to the different perspectives that further increase environmental damage such as climate change, Capra offers the concept of ecoliteracy that guarantees a solid continuation of life together on planet Earth, namely: networks, cycles, solar energy, partnerships, diversity, and balance dynamic. Therefore, Capra offers a solution for solving climate change is eco-literacy which he calls spreading to various fields of science because it will develop into an ecodesign. The groups expected to understand ecoliteration in the face of environmental change (climate change) are politicians, business leaders, professionals at all levels, and educational institutions. This group, according to Capra, is a group of public or institutional policy makers and trusted input providers who have the real ability to create community impacts far ahead.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Falsafah Science of Fritjof Capra in Handling the Environment Destruction
    AU  - Jefirstson Richset Riwukore
    AU  - Fellyanus Habaora
    AU  - Yohanes Susanto
    AU  - Asnath Maria Fuah
    AU  - Rudi Priyanto
    AU  - Luki Abdullah
    AU  - Ahmad Yani
    AU  - Bagus Priyo Purwanto
    Y1  - 2020/12/31
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13
    T2  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    JF  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    JO  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
    SP  - 103
    EP  - 115
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1441
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20200506.13
    AB  - Fritjof Capra introduces a new vision in seeing the reality through the discovery of holistic ecological truth that is linear in nature with the basics of holistic ontology pluralist-spiritualistic-organism and a basis epistemological of synthesis, interactive dialogue, and subject equality. Based on this, Capra explained that the balance between science and technology that is limited by moral values and religion will create ecological sustainability by itself, while the capitalist, materialistic, and hedonism perspective of humanity overrides spiritualism only as a pseudo science. This causes Capra's world view to appear in various fields as the wisdom of nature which is described as the ability of the planet's ecological ecosystems to organizing themselves in complex ways. This is seeing in the perspective of Capra, a science for sustainbale living which explained that science for the sustainability of life no need to create sustainable human society from zero, but can mimic natural ecosystems which are plant communities, animals and microorganisms that are sustainable. This condition explains that when there is a balance between the use of science and technology which is limited by aspects of conscience and religion (Yang) then sustainability automatically occurs. But due to the different perspectives that further increase environmental damage such as climate change, Capra offers the concept of ecoliteracy that guarantees a solid continuation of life together on planet Earth, namely: networks, cycles, solar energy, partnerships, diversity, and balance dynamic. Therefore, Capra offers a solution for solving climate change is eco-literacy which he calls spreading to various fields of science because it will develop into an ecodesign. The groups expected to understand ecoliteration in the face of environmental change (climate change) are politicians, business leaders, professionals at all levels, and educational institutions. This group, according to Capra, is a group of public or institutional policy makers and trusted input providers who have the real ability to create community impacts far ahead.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Management Graduate Program, Indo Global Mandiri University, Palembang, Indonesia

  • Programme Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Programme Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Animal Production and Technology, Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Sections