Agronomic Characteristics, Growth Analysis, and Yield Response of Biofield Treated Mustard, Cowpea, Horse Gram, and Groundnuts
International Journal of Genetics and Genomics
Volume 3, Issue 6, December 2015, Pages: 74-80
Received: Oct. 12, 2015; Accepted: Oct. 21, 2015; Published: Nov. 16, 2015
Views 3085      Downloads 83
Authors
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Trivedi Global Inc., Henderson, USA
Alice Branton, Trivedi Global Inc., Henderson, USA
Dahryn Trivedi, Trivedi Global Inc., Henderson, USA
Gopal Nayak, Trivedi Global Inc., Henderson, USA
Mayank Gangwar, Trivedi Science Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Snehasis Jana, Trivedi Science Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Mustard, cowpea, horse gram, and groundnuts are the seasonal pulse crops used as food and fodder in many regions of the world. In the present study, the impact of biofield energy treatment on mustard, cowpea, horse gram, and groundnuts were studied with respect to overall growth, yield, and its related yield attributes. Seeds of each crop was selected and divided in two groups, i.e. control and treated. The treated group of each seed crops was subjected to Mr. Trivedi biofield energy treatment, and were plotted in the separate fields. The plot with untreated seeds were provided with all the precautionary measures such as pesticides, fungicides and organic additives, while no such measures were taken in the plot with treated seeds. Both group of crops were further analyzed and compared for growth, yield, and yield attributes. Further, the effect of biofield treatment was also evaluated on horse gram using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis in order to determine their epidemiological relatedness and genetic characteristics. The results suggest that the percentage increase in yield was maximum in mustard (500%), followed by horse gram (105%), cow pea (52%), and groundnut (44%) as compared with their control. However, improved plant height, overall growth, yield of seeds, plants were free from any diseases and pest were observed in treated group as compared with its respective control. RAPD analysis using eight primers results in polymorphism and the percentage of true polymorphism observed between control and treated samples of horse gram seed sample with an average value of 53%. The overall results suggested that Mr. Trivedi’s biofield energy treatment has a significant impact on mustard, cowpea, horse gram, and groundnuts, which might be used as a better alternative approach to increase the yield of crop as compared with the synthetic chemicals.
Keywords
Biofield Energy Treatment, Mustard, Cowpea, Horse Gram, Groundnut, Polymorphism, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA, Yield attributes
To cite this article
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, Mayank Gangwar, Snehasis Jana, Agronomic Characteristics, Growth Analysis, and Yield Response of Biofield Treated Mustard, Cowpea, Horse Gram, and Groundnuts, International Journal of Genetics and Genomics. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2015, pp. 74-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20150306.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Wysocki D, Corp M (2002) Edible mustard. Oregon State Univ. EM 8796-E.
[2]
Allen EJ, Morgan DG (1972) A quantitative analysis of the effects of nitrogen on the growth, development and yield of oilseed rape. J Agri Sci 78: 315-324.
[3]
Chemining wa GN, Vessey JK (2006) The abundance and efficacy of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae in cultivated soils of the eastern Canadian prairie. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 294-302.
[4]
Timko MP, Singh BB (2008) Cowpea, a multi-functional legume. Genomics of Tropical Crop Plants, (1stedn). Springer science + Business media LLC, New York.
[5]
Jansen PCM (1989) Macrotyloma uniflorum (lam) Verdc. Plant resources of South East Asia, pulses. Pudoc, Wagenin.
[6]
Reddy PCO, Sairanganayakulu G, Thippeswamy M, Reddy PS, Reddy MK, et al. (2008) Identification of stress-induced genes from the drought tolerant semi-arid legume crop horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) through analysis of subtracted expressed sequence tags. Plant Sci 175: 372-384.
[7]
Kawsar SMA, Serajuddin M, Huq E, Nahar N, Ozeki Y (2008) Biological investigation of Macrotyloma uniflorum Linn. extracts against some pathogens. J Biol Sci 8: 1051-1056.
[8]
Reddy AM, Kumar SG, Jyothsnakumari G, Thimmanaik S, Sudhakar C (2005) Lead induced changes in antioxidant metabolism of horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) and Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Chemosphere 60: 97-104.
[9]
Sances F, Flora E, Patil S, Spence A, Shinde V (2013) Impact of biofield treatment on ginseng and organic blueberry yield. AGRIVITA J Agri Sci 35: 22-29.
[10]
Lenssen AW (2013) Biofield and fungicide seed treatment influences on soybean productivity, seed quality and weed community. Agricultural Journal 8: 138-143.
[11]
Oschman JL (2000) Energy medicine: The scientific base. (2ndedn), Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston.
[12]
NIH, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. CAM Basics. Publication 347. [October 2, 2008]. Available at: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/
[13]
Shinde V, Sances F, Patil S, Spence A (2012) Impact of biofield treatment on growth and yield of lettuce and tomato. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6: 100-105.
[14]
Nayak G, Altekar N (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on plant growth and adaptation. J Environ Health Sci 1: 1-9.
[15]
Patil SA, Nayak GB, Barve SS, Tembe RP, Khan RR (2012) Impact of biofield treatment on growth and anatomical characteristics of Pogostemon cablin (Benth.). Biotechnology 11: 154-162.
[16]
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (2000) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (2nd edn), Cold spring harbor: Cold spring harbor laboratory Press.
[17]
Semagn K, Bjornstad A, Ndjiondjop MN (2006) An overview of molecular marker methods for plants. Afr J Biotechnol 5: 2540-2568.
[18]
Shekhawat K, Rathore SS, Premi OP, Kandpal BK, Chauhan JS (2012) Advances in agronomic management of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. Cosson): An overview. Int J Agron 2012: 14. Article ID 408284.
[19]
Casal JJ (2013) Canopy light signals and crop yield in sickness and in health. ISRN Agronomy 2013: 16. Article ID 650439.
[20]
Devendra R, Urs YSV, Kumar MU, Sastry KSK (1983) Leaf area duration and its relationship to productivity in early cultivars of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA B49: 692-696.
[21]
Craufurd PQ, Wheeler TR (2009) Climate change and the flowering time of annual crops. J Exp Bot 60: 2529-2539.
[22]
Nybom H, Weising K, Rotter B (2014) DNA fingerprinting in botany: Past, present, future. Investig Genet 5: 1.
[23]
Sharma V, Sharma TR, Rana JC, Chahota RK (2015) Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure in horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) using RAPD and ISSR markers. Agric Res 4: 221-230.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931