Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

| Peer-Reviewed |

Economic Assessment of New Herbicides Used to Fight the Weeds in Wheat

Received: 4 March 2015    Accepted: 18 March 2015    Published: 21 March 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Within the period 2011-2014, at the experimental base of the Agricultural University – Plovdiv we conducted field experiments with new herbicides in wheat. Based on the obtained results, we made a summarized economic assessment of the chemical fight against weeds. We established the amount of production expenses needed for growing wheat in 10 tested variants including 9 treated with herbicidal preparations. It was found the critical levels of the yield for each variant as well as the factors determining them. The economic effectiveness of production has been analyzed using a system of various indicators: the value of the permanent and variable costs per unit of area; the level of the average yield; the value of the total revenue per unit of area; the amount of the profit from 1 ha; the prime cost of the production and the profitability rate. The highest average yield was obtained from the variants treated with herbicides: Axial 1 plus 050 EK (5180.60 kg/ha); Sekator OD (5200.00 kg/ha) and Pasifica VG (5210, 46 kg/ha). Upon the application of these herbicides, the rate of increase of the additional production from unit of area exceeds the rates of the investments made. This makes the use of these herbicides economically substantiated. With the exception of the untreated control sample, all other herbicides give good economic results from the production of wheat, a sufficient profit rate from unit of area and profitability ranging from 20% to 22%.

DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17
Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2015)
Page(s) 66-70
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Wheat, Herbicides, Economic

References
[1] Ahmad S, Sarwar M, Tanveerand A, Khaliq A, (1995). Efficacy of some weedicides in controlling P. minor Retz. In: Wheat. Proc. 4th All Pakistan WeedSci. Corf., Faisalabad. 26-27 March, 1994, 89-94.
[2] Aleksiev A., Tonev T, Tityanov M, (2003). Economik Analysis of the Effekt of the Chemical Weed Control in Wheat Crops. Agricultural Economiks and Management, 4, 76-83.
[3] Sangi AH, Aslam M. Javed S, Khalid L, (2012). Efficacy and Economics of Mixing Different Herbicides for Controlling Broad and Narrow Leaved Weeds in Wheat. J. Agric. Res., 50 (1), 79-87.
[4] Ashraf MY, Baig NA, Khan MA, (1989). Chemical weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Pakistan J. Agri., Agri. Engg. and Vet. Sci., 5, 21- 4.
[5] Cheema MS, Akhtar M, (2005). Efficacy of different post emergence herbicides and their application methods in controlling weeds in wheat. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res.,11(9-12), 23-29.
[6] Jabbar А, Saeed M, Ghaffar A, (1999). Agro-chemical weed management in wheat. Pakistan J. Agri. Sci., 36, 33-8.
[7] Khan M, Haq N, (1994). Effect of post emergence herbicides on weed control and wheat yield. J. Agric. Res., 32, 253-9.
[8] Koprivlenski V, (2011). Production costs and thresholds of efficiency in plant-growing, Academic publishing house of the Agricultural University, Plovdiv (Bg), 17 - 36.
[9] Sayili M, Akca H, Önen H, (2006). Economic analysis of herbicide usage in wheat fields. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 755-760.
[10] Mushtaq A, Sabir S, Din QM, Ali MA, (2004). Efficacy and Economics of Different Herbicides Against Narrow Leaved Weeds in Wheat. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 647-651.
[11] Mushtaq A, Shahzad S, Din QM, Ali MA, 2004. Efficacy and economics of different herbicides against narrow leaved weeds in wheat. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 6(4): 647-651.
[12] Obst A, (1981). Chemical control in intensive wheat cultivation. In: Kommedahl, T. (ed): Proceedings of Symposia IX International Congress of Plant Protection, 5-11 August 1979, Entomological Society of America, 448-451.
[13] Qazi, MA, Ullah AS, Ali A, (2002). Weed management-hand weeding vs chemical weed control in wheat. Balochistan J. Agric. Sci., 2, 39-42.
[14] Sharar MS, Sharif M, Shah SH, Tanveer A, (1994). Efficacy of some herbicides in controlling weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Proc. 4th All Pakistan Weed Sci. Conf., Faisalabad. 26-27 March, 18.
[15] Tityanov M, Tonev T, Mitkov A, (2009). New Opportunities for Efficient Chemical Control of Weeds in Wheat. Plant Science, vol. XLVI, 154-160.
[16] Tmo, Statistical data (www.tmo.gov.tr), 2005
[17] Heemst DJ, (1985). The influence of weed competition on crop yield. Agricultural Systems, 18, 81-93.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Vasko Nikolov Koprivlenski, Maya Dincheva Dimitrova, Ivan Stoyanov Jalnov, Ilian Dimitrov Zheliazkov, Plamen Ivanov Zorovski. (2015). Economic Assessment of New Herbicides Used to Fight the Weeds in Wheat. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 4(2), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Vasko Nikolov Koprivlenski; Maya Dincheva Dimitrova; Ivan Stoyanov Jalnov; Ilian Dimitrov Zheliazkov; Plamen Ivanov Zorovski. Economic Assessment of New Herbicides Used to Fight the Weeds in Wheat. Agric. For. Fish. 2015, 4(2), 66-70. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Vasko Nikolov Koprivlenski, Maya Dincheva Dimitrova, Ivan Stoyanov Jalnov, Ilian Dimitrov Zheliazkov, Plamen Ivanov Zorovski. Economic Assessment of New Herbicides Used to Fight the Weeds in Wheat. Agric For Fish. 2015;4(2):66-70. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17,
      author = {Vasko Nikolov Koprivlenski and Maya Dincheva Dimitrova and Ivan Stoyanov Jalnov and Ilian Dimitrov Zheliazkov and Plamen Ivanov Zorovski},
      title = {Economic Assessment of New Herbicides Used to Fight the Weeds in Wheat},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {4},
      number = {2},
      pages = {66-70},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20150402.17},
      abstract = {Within the period 2011-2014, at the experimental base of the Agricultural University – Plovdiv we conducted field experiments with new herbicides in wheat. Based on the obtained results, we made a summarized economic assessment of the chemical fight against weeds. We established the amount of production expenses needed for growing wheat in 10 tested variants including 9 treated with herbicidal preparations. It was found the critical levels of the yield for each variant as well as the factors determining them. The economic effectiveness of production has been analyzed using a system of various indicators: the value of the permanent and variable costs per unit of area; the level of the average yield; the value of the total revenue per unit of area; the amount of the profit from 1 ha; the prime cost of the production and the profitability rate. The highest average yield was obtained from the variants treated with herbicides: Axial 1 plus 050 EK (5180.60 kg/ha); Sekator OD (5200.00 kg/ha) and Pasifica VG (5210, 46 kg/ha). Upon the application of these herbicides, the rate of increase of the additional production from unit of area exceeds the rates of the investments made. This makes the use of these herbicides economically substantiated. With the exception of the untreated control sample, all other herbicides give good economic results from the production of wheat, a sufficient profit rate from unit of area and profitability ranging from 20% to 22%.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Economic Assessment of New Herbicides Used to Fight the Weeds in Wheat
    AU  - Vasko Nikolov Koprivlenski
    AU  - Maya Dincheva Dimitrova
    AU  - Ivan Stoyanov Jalnov
    AU  - Ilian Dimitrov Zheliazkov
    AU  - Plamen Ivanov Zorovski
    Y1  - 2015/03/21
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 66
    EP  - 70
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20150402.17
    AB  - Within the period 2011-2014, at the experimental base of the Agricultural University – Plovdiv we conducted field experiments with new herbicides in wheat. Based on the obtained results, we made a summarized economic assessment of the chemical fight against weeds. We established the amount of production expenses needed for growing wheat in 10 tested variants including 9 treated with herbicidal preparations. It was found the critical levels of the yield for each variant as well as the factors determining them. The economic effectiveness of production has been analyzed using a system of various indicators: the value of the permanent and variable costs per unit of area; the level of the average yield; the value of the total revenue per unit of area; the amount of the profit from 1 ha; the prime cost of the production and the profitability rate. The highest average yield was obtained from the variants treated with herbicides: Axial 1 plus 050 EK (5180.60 kg/ha); Sekator OD (5200.00 kg/ha) and Pasifica VG (5210, 46 kg/ha). Upon the application of these herbicides, the rate of increase of the additional production from unit of area exceeds the rates of the investments made. This makes the use of these herbicides economically substantiated. With the exception of the untreated control sample, all other herbicides give good economic results from the production of wheat, a sufficient profit rate from unit of area and profitability ranging from 20% to 22%.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Management end Marketing, Faculty of Economics, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

  • Department of Foundation of Agriculture, Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

  • Department of Foundation of Agriculture, Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

  • Department of Foundation of Agriculture, Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

  • Department of Foundation of Agriculture, Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

  • Sections