| Peer-Reviewed

The Use of Micro-Biological Agents at Different Pairing Times in the Control of Fusarium verticillioides Pathogen of Maize (Zea mays)

Received: 13 June 2015    Accepted: 31 August 2015    Published: 4 July 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Fusarium verticillioides is a widely distributed mitosporic pathogen of maize, able to cause corn seedling blight, root rot, stalk rot and kernel or ear rot. Synthetic fungicides and some crop management practices are also not advisable in the control of this pathogen because chemical fungicide result in environmental pollution or hazards. Antagonistic micro-biological agents (bioagents) can be recommended to farmers because it is cheaper and environmental friendly. This aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of antagonistic micro organisms in the control of Fusarium verticillioides of maize. The efficacy of micro-biological agents: Trichoderma viride, T. pseudokoningii, T. harzianum and Bacillus subtilis were assessed in vitro. Laid in the laboratory in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and subjected to analysis of variance using SAS, 2001. The four antagonistic bioagents showed different inhibitory effect in the control of F.verticillioides. T. viride and T. pseudokoningii were the most effective antagonists; they caused significant inhibitory effect on the growth of F.verticillioides by 0.75cm and 0. 72cm compared to the control which was 2.57cm respectively at 120 hours of incubation. T. harzianum and B. subtilis had the least inhibitory effect against the pathogen. There was a significant inhibition in the growth of F. verticillioides at < 0.05 when paired with all the micro-biological agents used. The introduction of the antagonist before the pathogen in vitro was observed to be the best followed by the simultaneous pairing, and the least inhibition was when the introduction of the antagonist 24 hours after the pathogen. It was observed that all the antagonists tested had good inhibitory potentials on the pathogen, F. verticillioides.

Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15
Page(s) 94-101
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Maize, Trichoderma spp, Bioagents, Bacillus spp

References
[1] Adekunle, O. A (1998). Seed treatment with antagonistic microorganisms against seed and soil borne pathogens of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) in Ibadan. Ph.D thesis. Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, Univ. of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. 149pp.
[2] Adekunle, A. T. Cardwell, K. F. Florini, D. A and Ikotun, T. (2001). Seed treatment with Trichoderma spp for control of Damping-off of cowpea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. Biocontrol Science & Technology 11:449-457.
[3] Anonymous (1985). Labor-saving techniques to screen maize for resistance to stalk rot. IITA Annual Report and Research Highlights. 82pp.
[4] Bacon, C. W., Bennett, R. M., Hinton, D. M. and Voss, K. A. (1992). Scanning Electron-Microscopy of Fusarium moniliforme within asymptomatic corn kernels and kernels associated with equine Leukoencephalomalacia. Plant Disease 76: 144-148.
[5] Bacon, C. W and Hinton, D. M. (1992). Symptomless endophytic colonization of maize by Fusarium moniliforme. Canadian Journal of Botany.74:1195-1202.
[6] Bacon, C. W. and Nelson, P. E. (1994). Fumonisin production in corn by toxigenic strains of Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium proliferatum. Journal of Food Protection 57:514-521.
[7] Bankole, S. A and Adebanjo, A. (2003). Mycotoxins in food in West Africa: current situation and possibilities of controlling it. Africa Journal of Biotechnology 2 (9):254-263.
[8] Cooney, J. M., Lauren, D. R. and Menna, M. E. (2001). Impact of competitive fungi on trichothecene production by Fusarium graminearum. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 49:522-526.
[9] Coulibaly, O. and Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2002). The economics of cowpea in West Africa, pg 351 -366. In: Challenges and opportunity for enhancing sustainable Cowpea production. Proceedings of the world cowpea conference III held at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, 4- 8 September 2000ed by Fatokun C. A, S. A. Tawarali, B.B. Singh, P.M. Kormawa and M.Tamo (2002). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, pg 351 -366.
[10] Drepper, W. J. and Renfro, B. L. (1990). Comparison of Methods for Inoculation of Ears and Stalks of Maize with Fusarium moniliforme. Plant Disease 74: 952-956.
[11] GOAN, (1999). The Organic Farmer. Quarterly Newsletter of the Ghana Organic Agriculture Network (GOAN). 7 pp.
[12] Howell, C. R (2003). Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the Biological Control of Plant Diseases. The History and evolution of Current Concepts. Plant Disease 87: (1).
[13] Latunde- Dada, A. D (1993). Biological control by Sclerotium rolfsii with simplified mycelia formulation of Trichoderma koningii. Plant Pathology 32:522-529.
[14] Leslie, J. F. and Summerell, B. A. (2005). The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell publishing, Ames, IA. 400pp.
[15] Leslie, J, F., Pearson, A. S., Nelson, P. E. and Toussoun, T. A., (1990). Fusarium spp. From Corn, Sorghum, and Soybean fields in the Central and Eastern United States. Phytopathology 80: 343 – 1350.
[16] Macdonald, M. V. and Chapman, R. (1997). The incidence of Fusarium moniliforme on maize from Central America, Africa and Asia during 1992 – 1995. Plant Pathology 46: 112 – 125.
[17] Merrill, A. H., Liotta, D. C. and Riley, R. T. (1996a). Fumonisins: Fungal toxins that shed light on sphingolipid function. Trends in Cell Biology 6: 218-223.
[18] Merrill, A. H., Wang, E., Vales, T., Smith, E., Schroeder, J., Mendalino, D., Alexander, C., Crane, H., Xia, J., Liotta, D., Meredith, F. and Riley, R. (1996b). Fumonisin Toxicity and Sphingolipid Biosynthesis. In: Fumonisins in Food. Edited by L. Jackson, J. DeVries & L. Bullerman. New York: Plenum Press. 297-306 pp.
[19] Munkvold, G. P. and Desjardins, A. E. (1997). Fumonisins in maize: can we reduce their occurrence? Plant Disease 81: 556 – 565.
[20] Onyeka, T. J. (1997). Biological control of cassava anthracnose (C. gloeosporioides f.sp manihotis) by use of antagonistic soil microbes. M.Sc Thesis. Univ. of Ibadan. pp 42.
[21] Peluola, C. O. (2005), Evaluation of botanicals and microbiology bioagents for the control of some fungal pathogens of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Ph. D Thesis, Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. 167pp.
[22] Prescott, L. M., Harley, J. and Klein, D. (2002). Biotechnological Applications. In: Microbiology. Fifth edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. pp. 1020-1022.
[23] Samuel, A., Saburi, A., Usanga, O. E, Ikotun, I. and Isong I. U (2011). Post-harvest food losses reduction in maize production in Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (21): 4833-4839, 5 October, 2011.
[24] Sobowale, A. A. 1994. Antagonistic Epiphytic Fungal Flora of Pepper (Capsicum annum) and their biocontrol potential against postharvest rot of the fruit. M.Sc Thesis, Dept. of Botany and Microbiology, University of Ibadan. 102pp.
[25] Sobowale, A. A., Cardwell, K. F., Odebode, A. C., Bandyopadhyay, R. and Jonathan, S. G (2007). Persistence of Trichoderma species within maize stem against Fusarium verticillioides. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 40(3): 215-231.
[26] United States Department of Agriculture (2007). Animal care annual report of activities fiscal year. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service APHIS 41-35-075. 78pp.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Oluwafolake Akinbode, Feranmi Owolade, Babatunde Ikotun, Clement Odebode. (2017). The Use of Micro-Biological Agents at Different Pairing Times in the Control of Fusarium verticillioides Pathogen of Maize (Zea mays). Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 6(3), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Oluwafolake Akinbode; Feranmi Owolade; Babatunde Ikotun; Clement Odebode. The Use of Micro-Biological Agents at Different Pairing Times in the Control of Fusarium verticillioides Pathogen of Maize (Zea mays). Agric. For. Fish. 2017, 6(3), 94-101. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Oluwafolake Akinbode, Feranmi Owolade, Babatunde Ikotun, Clement Odebode. The Use of Micro-Biological Agents at Different Pairing Times in the Control of Fusarium verticillioides Pathogen of Maize (Zea mays). Agric For Fish. 2017;6(3):94-101. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15,
      author = {Oluwafolake Akinbode and Feranmi Owolade and Babatunde Ikotun and Clement Odebode},
      title = {The Use of Micro-Biological Agents at Different Pairing Times in the Control of Fusarium verticillioides Pathogen of Maize (Zea mays)},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {94-101},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20170603.15},
      abstract = {Fusarium verticillioides is a widely distributed mitosporic pathogen of maize, able to cause corn seedling blight, root rot, stalk rot and kernel or ear rot. Synthetic fungicides and some crop management practices are also not advisable in the control of this pathogen because chemical fungicide result in environmental pollution or hazards. Antagonistic micro-biological agents (bioagents) can be recommended to farmers because it is cheaper and environmental friendly. This aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of antagonistic micro organisms in the control of Fusarium verticillioides of maize. The efficacy of micro-biological agents: Trichoderma viride, T. pseudokoningii, T. harzianum and Bacillus subtilis were assessed in vitro. Laid in the laboratory in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and subjected to analysis of variance using SAS, 2001. The four antagonistic bioagents showed different inhibitory effect in the control of F.verticillioides. T. viride and T. pseudokoningii were the most effective antagonists; they caused significant inhibitory effect on the growth of F.verticillioides by 0.75cm and 0. 72cm compared to the control which was 2.57cm respectively at 120 hours of incubation. T. harzianum and B. subtilis had the least inhibitory effect against the pathogen. There was a significant inhibition in the growth of F. verticillioides at < 0.05 when paired with all the micro-biological agents used. The introduction of the antagonist before the pathogen in vitro was observed to be the best followed by the simultaneous pairing, and the least inhibition was when the introduction of the antagonist 24 hours after the pathogen. It was observed that all the antagonists tested had good inhibitory potentials on the pathogen, F. verticillioides.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Use of Micro-Biological Agents at Different Pairing Times in the Control of Fusarium verticillioides Pathogen of Maize (Zea mays)
    AU  - Oluwafolake Akinbode
    AU  - Feranmi Owolade
    AU  - Babatunde Ikotun
    AU  - Clement Odebode
    Y1  - 2017/07/04
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 94
    EP  - 101
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170603.15
    AB  - Fusarium verticillioides is a widely distributed mitosporic pathogen of maize, able to cause corn seedling blight, root rot, stalk rot and kernel or ear rot. Synthetic fungicides and some crop management practices are also not advisable in the control of this pathogen because chemical fungicide result in environmental pollution or hazards. Antagonistic micro-biological agents (bioagents) can be recommended to farmers because it is cheaper and environmental friendly. This aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of antagonistic micro organisms in the control of Fusarium verticillioides of maize. The efficacy of micro-biological agents: Trichoderma viride, T. pseudokoningii, T. harzianum and Bacillus subtilis were assessed in vitro. Laid in the laboratory in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and subjected to analysis of variance using SAS, 2001. The four antagonistic bioagents showed different inhibitory effect in the control of F.verticillioides. T. viride and T. pseudokoningii were the most effective antagonists; they caused significant inhibitory effect on the growth of F.verticillioides by 0.75cm and 0. 72cm compared to the control which was 2.57cm respectively at 120 hours of incubation. T. harzianum and B. subtilis had the least inhibitory effect against the pathogen. There was a significant inhibition in the growth of F. verticillioides at < 0.05 when paired with all the micro-biological agents used. The introduction of the antagonist before the pathogen in vitro was observed to be the best followed by the simultaneous pairing, and the least inhibition was when the introduction of the antagonist 24 hours after the pathogen. It was observed that all the antagonists tested had good inhibitory potentials on the pathogen, F. verticillioides.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, IAR&T, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ibadan, Nigeria

  • Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, IAR&T, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ibadan, Nigeria

  • Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

  • Department of Botany, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

  • Sections