The Empirical Research on Sustainable Development of the Industrial Undertaking Area in Yangtze River Economic Belt—Take Jinmen City of Hubei Province as an Example
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Volume 9, Issue 4, August 2020, Pages: 105-112
Received: Jun. 8, 2020; Accepted: Jun. 23, 2020; Published: Jul. 4, 2020
Views 85      Downloads 51
Authors
Zhang Zhihui, Remote Sensing Application Institute, Agricultural Sciences Academy of Sichuan, Chengdu, China; Economics and Management College, Panzhihua College, Panzhihua, China
Jiang Zichun, Remote Sensing Application Institute, Agricultural Sciences Academy of Sichuan, Chengdu, China
Huang Ping, Remote Sensing Application Institute, Agricultural Sciences Academy of Sichuan, Chengdu, China
Liu Jian, Remote Sensing Application Institute, Agricultural Sciences Academy of Sichuan, Chengdu, China
Wang Xiaoyan, Remote Sensing Application Institute, Agricultural Sciences Academy of Sichuan, Chengdu, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
[Objective] It has been included into national strategy that we are going to exploit the Yangtze river basin, promote the industrial gradient transfer, and realize sustainable development, to form the new economic supporting belt of China. Industrial undertaking zone is the key area to the sustainable development of the Yangtze River economic belt. Studying quantitatively the regional ecological environment pressure, calculating the threshold value of sustainable development can provide decision-making reference for transforming the development mode of the Yangtze River economic belt and realizing sustainable development. [Method] Dynamically analyze the sustainable development situation from 2006 to 2014 in the demonstration undertaking area of Jing-men city using the ecological footprint model, And comparatively study the current development situation of industrial undertaking areas under provincial scale. [Result] During the sample period, the ecological deficit and ecological pressure in demonstration area continue increasing at first, and the coordination becomes gradually poor, the peak appears in 2012, then the pressure release, coordination begins to recover gradually, resource utilization is becoming efficient. The relation of GDP and ecological footprint fits for typical Kuznets inverted U curve. Undertaking area and demonstration area both highlight the characteristics of “high pressure, low coordination, low development level”. [Conclusion] Put forward the suggestions of carrying out the main function area planning, improving the ecology efficiency of industry and resource allocation efficiency, etc. to cross the inflection point of Kuznets inverted U curve with a lower ecological footprint level, and realize sustainable development.
Keywords
Yangtze River Economic Belt, Industrial Undertaking Area, Ecological Footprint, Sustainable Development, Kuznets Inverted U Curve
To cite this article
Zhang Zhihui, Jiang Zichun, Huang Ping, Liu Jian, Wang Xiaoyan, The Empirical Research on Sustainable Development of the Industrial Undertaking Area in Yangtze River Economic Belt—Take Jinmen City of Hubei Province as an Example, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 9, No. 4, 2020, pp. 105-112. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20200904.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Lu Da Dao. The scientific basis of the general layout of China's industrial productivity in 2000 [J]. Geosciences, 1986, 66 (2): 375-384.
[2]
Lu Da Dao. Building economic belt is the best choice for economic development layout: the great potential of economic development of Yangtze River economic belt [J] Geosciences, 2014, 34 (7): 769-772.
[3]
Western forum. On the development of the Yangtze River economic belt under the "new normal"--Summary of the keynote speech of the Yangtze River Economic Belt summit forum [J]. Western forum, 2015, (01): 23-41.
[4]
Wang Keliang, Meng Xiangrui, Yang Baochen, et al. Study on industrial ecological efficiency of Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on environmental pressure [J]. Resource science, 2015, 37 (7): 1491-1501.
[5]
Wei Xiaoxu, Yan Changzhen. Research progress of ecological carrying capacity evaluation method [J]. Journal of earth environment, 2019, 10 (05): 441-452.
[6]
Zhao Dong-sheng, Guo Cai-yun, Zheng du, et al. Progress in the study of ecological carrying capacity [J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2019, 39 (02): 399-410.
[7]
Wackernagel M, Lean L, Hobson C B. Evaluating the use of national capital with the ecological footprint [J]. AMBIO, 1999, 28 (7): 604-612.
[8]
Gao Lian, Zhou Yong, Li Qing, et al. Analysis of sustainable utilization of cultivated land in Hubei Province Based on Ecological Footprint Theory [J]. Land and natural resources research, 2008 (4): 45-47.
[9]
Liu YC, Li wh. Calculation of ecological footprint equilibrium factors in China based on net primary productivity [J]. Journal of ecology and rural environment, 2010, 26 (5): 401-406.
[10]
Wu Hao, Fang Chaoyang. Calculation and analysis of ecological footprint of Jiangxi Province in 2004-2013 [J]. Jiangxi science, 2015, 33 (3): 428-434.
[11]
Su Zilong, Yuan Guohua, Zhou Wei. Evaluation of land ecological carrying capacity in Anhui Province based on improved 3D ecological footprint model [J]. Water and Soil Conservation Research, 2020, 27 (03): 256-262.
[12]
Li Li, Su Weici, Liu can, et al. Dynamic analysis of ecological footprint in Guizhou Province in recent years [J]. Soil and water conservation research, 2014, 21 (4): 251-255.
[13]
Cao Sheng, Zhou Weijun, Luo Si ying, et al. Evaluation of ecological sustainability in hunan province based on ecological footprint. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18 (05): 877-879+887.62.
[14]
Yang Quanwu, Tu Jianjun, Hou Rui, et al. Dynamic evolution characteristics of ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity in Chongqing [J]. Hubei agricultural science, 2015, 54 (16): 3918-3922.
[15]
Zhang Qun, Guo Huijun, Yang Dong, et al. Evaluation of ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity: a case study of Yunnan Province [J]. Exploration of economic problems, 2015. (7): 23-29.
[16]
Feng Fang, JIN Shuang, Huang Qiaohua, et al. Evaluation of ecological security in Hubei Province based on the energy value-ecological Footprint model [J]. Frozen Glaciers, 2018, 40 (03): 634-642.
[17]
Qiu gaohui, Guangjia. Dynamic evaluation and trend prediction of regional ecological security: a case study of Sichuan Province [J]. Ecological economy, 2015, 31 (4): 129-132.
[18]
He Caihong, Wu Kaiya, Hu Shuheng, et al. Calculation and dynamic analysis of ecological footprint in Shanghai from 2000 to 2009 [J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2012, 35 (2): 268-273.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186