Please enter verification code
Confirm
Land Suitability Evaluation for the Growth of Chamaecyparis obtusa Forest in Gyeongnam Province, South Korea
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Volume 9, Issue 4, August 2020, Pages: 122-127
Received: Jul. 16, 2020; Accepted: Jul. 30, 2020; Published: Aug. 17, 2020
Views 187      Downloads 72
Authors
Moon Hyun Shik, Department of Forest Environmental Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea
Tamirat Solomon, Department of Forest Environmental Resources, Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea; Department of Natural Resources Management, College of Agriculture, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This study was conducted at eight different cities and counties of Gyeongnam province with the objective of evaluating the suitability of lands for the growth of Chamaecyparis obtusa (C. obtusa) species. From each city and county seven to ten sites were systematically selected for the study based on the regional representation of the sample sites by considering south, east, west and north regions of the province. From the selected sites soil data was collected by removing the top fertile soil in order to avoid the influence of decomposed top organic materials on the top soil. Soil samples from each site were air dried and the necessary laboratory processes undertaken. Evaluation of physiochemical characteristics was conducted by analyzing the properties of soil with growth requirement of the species. Storie parametric and FAO land evaluation methods were adopted to evaluate the parameters which were identified as important for the growth of the species. Based on the total index resulted from the parametric evaluation, suitability class was defined by assigning classes of highly suitable, (S1), moderately suitable (S2), marginally suitable (S3) and non-suitable (S4). The results of the study revealed that two study city/county were moderately suitable and the rest were categorized under marginally suitable for the growth and productivity of the species but there was no site which was categorized as highly suitable and non-suitable. It was recommended to use more silvicultural management for the areas categorized under marginally suitable in order to enhance the productivity.
Keywords
Suitable Land, Tree Growth, Soil Property, Silviculture, Forest Productivity
To cite this article
Moon Hyun Shik, Tamirat Solomon, Land Suitability Evaluation for the Growth of Chamaecyparis obtusa Forest in Gyeongnam Province, South Korea, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 9, No. 4, 2020, pp. 122-127. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20200904.14
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Bandyopadhyay, S., Jaiswal, R. K., Hegde V. S. & Jayaraman V. (2009). Assessment of land suitability potentials for agriculture using a remote sensing and GIS based approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30:4, 879-895. https://doi:10.1080/014311 60802395235.
[2]
FAO. (1976). A Framework for Land Valuation FAO Soils Bulletin No. 32. 72. FAO, Rome, Italy.
[3]
Sys, C. E. and Debaveye, J. (1991). Land evaluation, part 1: Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculation. In General administration for development cooperation. Agric. Pub.: 7:274. Brussels: Belgium.
[4]
Kandari, A. M., Kasim, S., Limi, M. A. and Karim, J. (2015). Land Suitability Evaluation for Plantation Forest Development Based on Multi-criteria Approach. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 4:228-238. https://doi:10.11648/j.aff.20150405.15.
[5]
Vanclay, J. K. and Henry, N. B., (1988). Assessing Site Productivity of Indigenous Cypress Pine Forest in Southern Queensland. The Commonwealth Forestry Review. 67 (1). 53-64.
[6]
Kim, S., Guanlin, L. and Son, Y. (2017). The Contribution of Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Practices to Forest Management: The Case of Northeast Asia. Review. Forests. 8: 496. doi: 10.3390/f8120496.
[7]
Douda J., Boublik K., Doudova J., and Kyncl M. (2017). Traditional forest management practices stop forest succession and bring back rare plant species. Journal of applied ecology 57, 761-771.
[8]
AbdelRahman, M. A. E., Natarajan, A., Hegde, R. (2016). Assessment of land suitability and capability by integrating remote sensing and GIS for agriculture in Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka, India. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 19:1. 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.02.001.
[9]
Qu, L., Shao Y. and Zhang, L. (2013). Land Suitability Evaluation Method Based on GIS Technology. IEEE. 978-1-4799-0868-4. Second International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics). doi: 10.1109/Argoeoinformatics.2013.6621869.
[10]
FAO, (2012). Natural Resource Assessment for Crop and Land Suitability: An Application for Selected Bioenergy Crops in Southern Africa Region. Rome, Italy.
[11]
Vasu, D., Srivastava, R., Patil, N. G., Tiwary P., Chandran, P., Singh, S. K. (2018). A comparative assessment of land suitability evaluation methods for agricultural land use planning at village level. Land use policy, 79: 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.landusepol.2018.08.007.
[12]
FAO. (1984). Guidelines: Land evaluation for forestry. FAO Soils Bulletin, No. 48: 123. Rome.
[13]
Ritung, S., Agus, F. W., Hidayat, H. (2007). Land Suitability Evaluation with a case map of Aceh Barat District. Indonesian Soil Research Institute and World Agroforestry Centre, Bogor, Indonesia.
[14]
Toledo, M., Poorter, L., Pen`a-Claros, M., Alarco´n, A., Balca´zar, J., Lean˜o, C., Licona, J. C., Llanque, O, Vroomans, V., Zuidema, P., Bongers, F. (2011). Climate is a stronger driver of tree and forest growth rates than soil and disturbance. Journal of Ecology.99: 254–264. https://doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01741.x.
[15]
Larum, D. (2018). False Cypress Care: How to Grow a False Cypress Tree. Gardening Know How. https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/ornamental/trees/false-cypress/growing-hinoki-cypress.htm (accessed 11/01/2020).
[16]
Park, S. G., You, H. C., Oh, C. J, Choi, W. K. (2015). Analysis of the Correlation between Site Environmental Factors and Tree Ring Growth in Chamaecyparis obtusa stands in Jeonnam Province. Korean Journal of Environ. Ecol. 29 (5): 777-784. https://doi.org/10.13047 /KJEE.2015.29.5.777.
[17]
Sarkar, D. and Haldar, A. (2005). Physical and Chemical Methods in Soil Analysis. Fundamental concepts of analytical chemistry and instrumental techniques. New Age International. 139.
[18]
Hoogsteen, M. J. J., Lantinga, E. A., Bakker, E. J., Groot, J. C. J. and Tittonell, P. A. (2015). Estimating soil organic carbon through loss on ignition: Effects of ignition conditions and structural water loss. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 66 (2): 320–328. https://doi:10.1111/ejss.12224.
[19]
Storie, R. E. (1978). An index for rating the agricultural value of soils, Agricultural Experiment, Station Bulletin 556, University of California Agricultural Experiment Station, Berkley, CA.
[20]
Mueller, L., Schindler, U., Mirschel, W., Shepherd, T. G., Ball, B. C. (2010). Assessing the productivity function of soils. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2010, 30 (3), ff10.1051/agro/2009057ff. ffhal-00886548f.
[21]
Rabia, A. H. and Terribile, F. (2013). Introducing a New Parametric Concept for Land Suitability Assessment. Int. J. of Environmental Science and Development, 4:15-19. https://doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.295.
[22]
O’Geen A. T., Southard S. B. and Southard R. J. (2008). A Revised Storie Index for Use with Digital Soils Information. UC Agriculture & Natural Resources. 1-11. Doi: 10.3733/ucanr.8335.
[23]
Dengiz, O., Gol, C., Sarioğlu, F. E. and Ediş, S. (2010). Parametric approach to land evaluation for forest plantation: A methodological study using GIS model. African Journal of Agri. Research 5 (12): 1482-1496. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR.
[24]
Meijer S. S., Holmgren M., and Van der Putten W. H. (2011). Effects of plant–soil feedback on tree seedling growth under arid conditions. Journal of Plant Ecology. 4:4. 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtr011.
[25]
Martinez-Garza C., Campo J., Ricker M., Tobón W. (2016). Effect of initial soil properties on six- year growth of 15 tree species in tropical restoration plantings. Ecology and Evolution, 6:8686-8694. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2508.
[26]
Wilde, S. A. (1935). The significance of soil texture in forestry, and its determination by a rapid field method. J. Forest. 33: 503-508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/33.5.503.
[27]
Gilliam F. S., Yurish B. M. and Goodwin L. M. (1993). Community Composition of an Old Growth Longleaf Pine Forest: Relationship of Soil Texture. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 120:3. 287-294.
[28]
R. E. White, Principles and practice of soil science: the soil as a natural resource / Robert E. White. – 4th ed. Blackwell Publishing. 2006, 387.
[29]
M. Lukac, and D. L. Godbold, Soil ecology in northern forests: a below ground view of a changing world. Cambridge University Press, New York. 2011, 274.
[30]
Smith, D. W., (1970) "The effects of soil texture and soil moisture on photosynthesis, growth and nitrogen uptake of Scotch pine seedlings". Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4362. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4362
[31]
Khan, M. L. and Tripathi, R. S. (1989). Effect of soil moisture, soil texture and light intensity on emergence, survival and growth of seedlings of a few sub-tropical trees. Indian Journal of Forestry, 12, 196–204.
[32]
Londo, A. J., Kushla, J. D., and Carter, R. C. (2006). Soil pH and tree species suitability in the south. Southern Regional Extension Forestry SEFR-FM-002.
[33]
Gentili, R., Ambrosini, R., Montagnani, C., Caronni, S. and Citterio, S. (2018). Effect of Soil pH on the Growth, Reproductive Investment and Pollen Allergenicity of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1335. https://doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01335.
[34]
A. B. Self, Soil pH and Tree Species Suitability in Mississippi. Extension Service of Mississippi State University, cooperating with U. S. Department of Agriculture. USA. 2016.
[35]
Zeng, F., Chen, X., Huang, B., and Chi, G., (2018). Distribution Changes of Phosphorus in Soil–Plant Systems of Larch Plantations across the Chronosequence. Forests, 9: 563. Doi: 10.3390/ f9090563.
[36]
Jobbagy E. G., and Jackson R. B., (2001). Distribution of soil nutrients with depth: Global patterns and the imprint of plants. Biogeochemistry, 53:51-77. https://doi:10.1023/A:1010760720215.
[37]
Zavišić, A., Yang, N., Marhan, S., Kandeler, E., and Polle, A. (2018) Forest Soil Phosphorus Resources and Fertilization Affect Ectomycorrhizal Community Composition, Beech P Uptake Efficiency, and Photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 9:463. http://doi:10.3389/ fpls.2018. 00463.
[38]
A. R. Weiskittel, D. W. Hann, J. A. Jr. Kershaw, and J. K. Vanclay, Forest growth and yield modelling. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. USA. 2011.
[39]
Long, S., Zeng, S., Liu, F., Wang, G. (2020). Influence of slope, aspect and competition index on the height-diameter relationship of Cyclobalanopsis glauca trees for improving prediction of height in mixed forests. Silva Fennica, 54:1. Id 10242. https://doi.org/10.14214/ sf.10242.
[40]
Aström, M., Dynesius, M., Hylander, K., Nilsson, C. (2007). Slope aspect modifies community responses to clear-cutting in boreal forests. Ecology. 88 (3):749‐758. Doi: 10.1890/06-0613.
[41]
Xue, R., Yang, Q., Miao, F., Wang, X., and Shen, Y. (2018). Slope aspect influences plant biomass, soil properties and microbial composition in alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 18 (1). Temuco mar. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162018005000101.
[42]
Kravkaz-Kuscu I. S., Sariyildiz T., Cetin M., Yigit N., Sevik H., Savaci G. (2018). Evaluation of the soil properties and primary forest tree species in Taskopru (Kastamonu) district. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 27 (3): 1613–1617. https://doi.org/10.15244/ pjoes/ 78475.
[43]
M. Pansu, and J. Gautheyrou, Handbook of Soil Analysis. Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. The Netherlands. 2006, 995.
[44]
P. Baldaccini, and A. Vacca, Soil Suitability for Irrigation. In: Costantini E. A. C. (eds). Manual of methods for soil and land evaluation. Science Publishers. USA. 2009, 570.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186