Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

| Peer-Reviewed |

With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania

Received: 06 May 2017    Accepted: 16 May 2017    Published: 05 July 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Participation is now a dominant conservation narrative in Tanzania as the government is advocating partnership with local communities through Joint Forest Management (JFM). However, conservationists claim that participation does not lead to sustainable conservation and that there is a gap between rhetoric and practice. We assessed stocking and disturbance levels in forests with JFM and compared them with those without. The comparison was done for selected forests within Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania with similar ecological characteristics. Systematic forest inventory was employed and 152 circular plots were sampled. Stocking was higher in forests with JFM than forests without for both montane and lowland forests. The difference was statistically significant across all the vegetation types except in woodland (p= 0.9049). However, forest reserves under JFM were more disturbed than those without. Even though, the disturbances were sustainable and ecologically good as they were below the mean annual increment and therefore considered beneficial to the forest in terms of stimulating regeneration of the harvested tree species. The most harvested tree species in montane forest was Ocotea usambarensis while in the lowland forests were Cedrela odorata, Milicia excelsa, Combretum molle and Albizia petersiana. Lack of incentives, benefit sharing mechanisms and market demands led to weak enforcement of set regulations. As a result, JFM have failed to stop illegal harvesting and these forests have become focal points for disturbances. Therefore, there is a need for taking corrective measures before scaling up of JFM in other parts of the country.

DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11
Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 6, Issue 4, August 2017)
Page(s) 102-110
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Participation, Stocking, Forest Disturbance, Kimboza Forest Reserve, Tanzania

References
[1] Rogers, C. P., O'connell, B., Mwang'ombe, J., Madoffe, S. S. & Hertel, G. (2008). Forest health monitoring in the Ngangao forest, Taita hills, Kenya: A five year assessment of change. Journal of East African Natural History. 97(1): 3–17.
[2] Rogo, L., Oguge, N. (2000). The Taita Hills forest remnants: a disappearing world heritage. Ambio 29: 522–523.
[3] Madoffe, S., Hertel, G. D., Rogers, P., O'connell, B.& Killenga, R. (2006). Monitoring the health of selected eastern arc forests in Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology 44: 171–177.
[4] Forest and Beekeeping Division. (2005). Forest condition assessment of the Eastern Arc Mountains Forests of Tanzania. Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
[5] Bracebridge, C. (2006). Mkindo Forest Reserve: Forest disturbance report for Tanzania Forest Conservation Group and Participatory Environmental Management Programme, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
[6] Ylhäisi, J. (2003). Forest privatization and the role of community in forests and nature protection in Tanzania. Environmental Science and Policy 6: 279-290.
[7] Zahabu, E., Eid, T., Kajembe, G. C., Mbwambo, L., Mongo, C., Sangeda, A. Z., Malimbwi, R. E., Katani, J. Z., Kashaigili, J. J. and Luoga, E. J.(2010). Forestland tenure systems in Tanzania: an overview of policy changes in relation to forest management. INA-report no. 14, 24 p.
[8] Malimbwi, R. E., Munyanziza, E. (2004). From local people to local people: forest management and policy in Tanzania over 100 years. UNISWA Research Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology 7(2): 101-108.
[9] Mniwasa, E., Shauri, V. (2001). Review of the decentralization process and its impact on environment and natural resources management in Tanzania.
[10] Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Adams, W., Hulme, D. (2001). Conservation and Community. In: Hulme D, Murphree M (Eds.) African Wildlife and Livelihoods. James Currey Limited Oxford.
[12] Kajembe, G. C., Ngaga, Y. M. & Chamshama, S. A. O. (2008). Participatory Forest Management in Tanzania: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learned. Paper Presented at CERES Seminar, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
[13] United Republic of Tanzania. (2008). Participatory Forest Management in Tanzania. Facts and figures. Extension and Public Unity, Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, Dar es Salaam. pp 6-10.
[14] Meshack, C. K., Ahdikari, B., Doggart, N. & Lovett, J. C. (2006). Transaction costs of community-based forest management: empirical evidence from Tanzania. African.
[15] Brockington, D. (2007). Forests, community conservation, local government performance: the village forest reserves of Tanzania. Society and Natural Resources 20: 835-848.
[16] Wily, L. A. (2002). The political economy of community forestry in Africa-Getting the power relations right. Forest, Trees and People Newsletter 46: 4–12.
[17] Sauer, J., Abdallah, J. M. (2007). Forest Diversity, tobacco production and resource management in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 9(5): 421-439.
[18] Maximillian, J. R., O’laughlin, J. (2009). Toward sustainable harvesting of Africa’s largest medicinal plant export (Prunus africana): a case study in Tanzania. Southern Forests 71(4): 303–309.
[19] Malimbwi, R. E., Mugasha, A. G. (2001). Reconnaissance inventory report of Handeni Forest Reserve in Tanga, Tanzania.
[20] Philip, M. S. (1994). Measuring trees and forests. University press Cambridge (2nd edn). 310 p.
[21] Luoga, E. J., Witkowski, E. T. F.& Balkwill, K. (2002). Harvested and standing wood stocks in protected and communal miombo woodlands of Eastern Tanzania. Forest Ecology and Management 164: 15-30.
[22] Chamshama, S. A. O., Mugasha, A. G., Zahabu, E. (2004). Stand Biomass and Volume Estimation for Miombo Woodlands at Kitulangalo, Morogoro, Tanzania. Southern African Forest Journal 200: 59-64.
[23] Augspurger, C. K. (1984). Light requirements. A comparative study of growth and survival. Ecology 72: 777-972.
[24] Chadzdon, R. L., Robert, W. P. (1991). The importance of sun flakes for forest understory plant. Bioscience. 41: 760-744.
[25] Allen J. C. (1986). Soil properties and fast growing tree species in Tanzania. Forest ecology and Management 16(1-4) 127-147.
[26] Hobbie, S. E., Jensen, D. B. & Chapin, F. S. (1994). Resource supply and disturbance as controls over present and future plant diversity. In: Schulze, E. D. and Mooney, H. A. (Eds.). Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ecological studies 99, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 385 – 408.
[27] Lugandu, S. D. (2010). The impact of joint forest management on rural community livelihoods, forest cover and transaction costs: A case study of New Dabaga Ulongambi Forest Reserve in Kilolo District, Tanzania. PhD thesis submitted in fulfillment for the degree of doctor of philosophy of the open University of Tanzania.
[28] Malla, Y. B. (2000). Impact of community forestry policy on rural livelihoods and food security in Nepal. Unasylva 51 (3): 37–45.
[29] Springate-Baginski, O., Soussan, J. G., Dev, O. P., Yadav, N. P., Kiff, E. (1999). Community Forestry in Nepal: Impacts on Common Property Resource Management, School of Environment and Development, Series, vol. 3. University of Leeds, UK.
[30] Poffenberger, M., Mcgean, B. (1998). Village voices, forest choices. Joint Forest Management in India. Oxford University press. New delhi. pp17-55.
[31] Adhikari, B., Williams, F., Lovett, J. C. (2005). Local benefits from community forests in the middle hills of Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics. 9: 464– 478.
[32] Acheson, J. M. (2006). Institutional Failure in Resource Management. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 117-134.
[33] North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[34] Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 137–58.
[35] Aswani, S. (2002). Assessing the effects of changing demographics and consumption patterns on sea tenure regimes in the Roviana Lagoon, Solomon Islands. Ambio 31(4): 272–84.
[36] Rose, C. M. (2002). Common property, regulatory property, and environmental protection: comparing community-based management to tradable environmental allowances. In: Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S. (Eds.). The Drama of the Commons, EU Weber, Washington, DC: National Academies Press pp. 233–257.
Author Information
  • Department of Animal, Aquaculture and Range Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sangeda Anthony Zozimus. (2017). With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 6(4), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sangeda Anthony Zozimus. With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania. Agric. For. Fish. 2017, 6(4), 102-110. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sangeda Anthony Zozimus. With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania. Agric For Fish. 2017;6(4):102-110. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11,
      author = {Sangeda Anthony Zozimus},
      title = {With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {6},
      number = {4},
      pages = {102-110},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20170604.11},
      abstract = {Participation is now a dominant conservation narrative in Tanzania as the government is advocating partnership with local communities through Joint Forest Management (JFM). However, conservationists claim that participation does not lead to sustainable conservation and that there is a gap between rhetoric and practice. We assessed stocking and disturbance levels in forests with JFM and compared them with those without. The comparison was done for selected forests within Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania with similar ecological characteristics. Systematic forest inventory was employed and 152 circular plots were sampled. Stocking was higher in forests with JFM than forests without for both montane and lowland forests. The difference was statistically significant across all the vegetation types except in woodland (p= 0.9049). However, forest reserves under JFM were more disturbed than those without. Even though, the disturbances were sustainable and ecologically good as they were below the mean annual increment and therefore considered beneficial to the forest in terms of stimulating regeneration of the harvested tree species. The most harvested tree species in montane forest was Ocotea usambarensis while in the lowland forests were Cedrela odorata, Milicia excelsa, Combretum molle and Albizia petersiana. Lack of incentives, benefit sharing mechanisms and market demands led to weak enforcement of set regulations. As a result, JFM have failed to stop illegal harvesting and these forests have become focal points for disturbances. Therefore, there is a need for taking corrective measures before scaling up of JFM in other parts of the country.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - With or Without Community Participation: A Lesson from Joint Forest Management in the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania
    AU  - Sangeda Anthony Zozimus
    Y1  - 2017/07/05
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 102
    EP  - 110
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.11
    AB  - Participation is now a dominant conservation narrative in Tanzania as the government is advocating partnership with local communities through Joint Forest Management (JFM). However, conservationists claim that participation does not lead to sustainable conservation and that there is a gap between rhetoric and practice. We assessed stocking and disturbance levels in forests with JFM and compared them with those without. The comparison was done for selected forests within Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania with similar ecological characteristics. Systematic forest inventory was employed and 152 circular plots were sampled. Stocking was higher in forests with JFM than forests without for both montane and lowland forests. The difference was statistically significant across all the vegetation types except in woodland (p= 0.9049). However, forest reserves under JFM were more disturbed than those without. Even though, the disturbances were sustainable and ecologically good as they were below the mean annual increment and therefore considered beneficial to the forest in terms of stimulating regeneration of the harvested tree species. The most harvested tree species in montane forest was Ocotea usambarensis while in the lowland forests were Cedrela odorata, Milicia excelsa, Combretum molle and Albizia petersiana. Lack of incentives, benefit sharing mechanisms and market demands led to weak enforcement of set regulations. As a result, JFM have failed to stop illegal harvesting and these forests have become focal points for disturbances. Therefore, there is a need for taking corrective measures before scaling up of JFM in other parts of the country.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections