| Peer-Reviewed

Effects of Heavy Metals Pollution on Some Fish and Mollusc Species from Port Sudan, Sudan

Received: 24 June 2020    Accepted: 4 November 2020    Published: 16 November 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The effects on fishes Lethrinus harak and Cephalopholis minata and on the mollusc Tridacna maxima exposed to different concentrations of heavy metals vanadium, nickel, and copper were investigated. The study indicated that the LC50 for nickel were 198.200 ppm, for L. harak, 196.041 ppm for C. minata and 198.200 ppm for T. maxima. The LC50 for copper were 197.175 ppm for L. harak, 272.932 ppm for C. minata and 272.841 ppm in T. maxima. However, LC50 for vanadium recorded 131.836 ppm for L. harak, 164.769 ppm for C. minata and 164.037 ppm for T. maxima. On the other hand, LT50 due to nickel exposure recorded 74.815, 47.963, and 95.116 hours, for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. LT50 due to copper recorded 35.041, 47.681, and 71.835 hours for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. However, LT50 for vanadium were 11.989, 47.511 and 5.792 hours for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. In this study no response was detected in lower concentrations of nickel and copper i.e. 4 ppm and 32 ppm, however a high response was detected with the same concentrations of vanadium. The study indicated that T. maxima, was more tolerant for heavy metals pollution than L. harak and C. minata. Nickel concentrations detected in tissues analysis were 0.561-0.04 ppm, 0.421-0.02 ppm and 0.871-0.03 ppm for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. While copper concentrations recorded 1.1030-0.09 ppm, 0.4060-0.02 ppm and 1.35-0.03 ppm for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. However, vanadium concentrations, recorded 0.010-0.00 ppm, 0.04-0.014-0.01 ppm and 0.042-0.00 ppm for L. harak, C. minata, and T. maxima, respectively.

Published in Modern Chemistry (Volume 8, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11
Page(s) 33-39
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Heavy Metals, Fish, Mollusca, Pollution, Red Sea, Sudan

References
[1] De Oliveira Ribeiro CA, Belger L, Pelletier E. and Rouleau C. (2002). Histopathological evidence of inorganic mercury and methyl mercury toxicity in the arctic charr (Salvelinusalpinus). Environ. Res.; 90 (3): 217-25.
[2] Holleman, M. (2004). The lingering lessons of the Exxon Valdez spill. Common Dreams.org.
[3] Stephen J. W., David M. V., Withrow and McEwen’s. (2007) Small Animal Clinical Oncology, Elsevier, ISBN, p. 73-4.
[4] Persga (2002). Status of the living marine resources in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden and their management Vol. 3b, strategic action programmer (SAP). Washington, DC. USA.
[5] Idris A. M, Eltayeb M. A. H, Sanja, S. Potgieter-Vermaak, Van Grieken, R., Potgieter, J. H. (2007) Assessment of heavy metals pollution in Sudanese harbour along the Red Sea Coast. Microchemical Journal 87 (2007) 104-112.
[6] Ali, A. Y, Idris, A. M, Ebrahim AM, Eltayeb, M. A (2017) Brown algae (Phaeophyta) for monitoring heavy metals at the Sudanese Red Sea coast. Appl. Water Sci. 1-8.
[7] Meohan, W. R., Norris, L. A., Sears, H. S. (1974). Toxicity of various formulations of 2, 4D to Salmonids in south east Alaska. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 31, 480-485.
[8] Lioyd, R. (1979). An outline scheme for evaluating the hazards to aquatic life from chemical pollution and obtaining water quality criteria sixth FAO/ Sidaw workshop on aquatic pollution in relation to protection of living resources. Mombassa – Kenya. FAW Rome T. F – RAF 112, 154-165.
[9] Gesamp (IMO/ FAO / UNESCO / WMO /IAEA / UN / UNEP) Joint Group of Expert on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution (1988). Review of the Health of the Oceans. Reports and Studies No. 33. Paris.
[10] Ginley Mc, M. (2008). Red Sea large marine ecosystem In: Encyclopedia of earth. Eds. Culture J. Cleveland (Washington, D. C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment).
[11] Doudoroff, P., Andereson, Burdick G. E., Galtsoff p. s., Hant, W. B., Patricj, R., Stong, E. W., and Van Horn W. M. (1951). Bioassay methods for the evaluation of acute toxicity of industrial wastes to fish, sewage Ind. Wastes; 23 (11): 130–136.
[12] Rompe, JD, P Eysel, J Zöllner, B Nafe, J Heine (1999). Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurg. Rev 22, 102–106.
[13] Naz. S and Javed. M (2013). Studies on the toxic effects of Lead and Nickel mixture on two fresh water fishes, Ctenopharyngodon idella and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 23 (3), pp. 798-804.
[14] Yousafzai, A. M., A. R. Khan and A. R. Shakoori. (2009). Trace Metal Accumulation in the Liver of an Endangered South Asian Fresh Water Fish Dwelling in Sub-Lethal Pollution,. Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 41 (1), pp. 35-41.
[15] Ray, D., Banergee, S. K. and Chatterjee, M. (1990). Bioaccumulation of nickel and vanadium in tissues of the catfish Clarias batrachus, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry Volume 38, Issue 3, pp. 169-173.
[16] Raheela, S, MZ Khan, Y Ghazala, SA Ghalib (2014). Levels of heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, copper and lead) on water and selected tissues of Oreochromis mossambicus from different locations of Malir River, Karachi. Canadian Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 3011-3018.
[17] Mohammed, T. A. A., E. M, Mohamed, Y. M. Ebrahim, A. A. Hafez and R. M. E Zamzamy (2014) Some metal concentrations in the edible parts of Tridacna maxima, Red Sea, Egypt, environmental earth science, Environ Earth Sci. (2014) 71: 301–309.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Issra Mohammed Osman Mahjoub, Mohamed Elamin Hamza. (2020). Effects of Heavy Metals Pollution on Some Fish and Mollusc Species from Port Sudan, Sudan. Modern Chemistry, 8(3), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Issra Mohammed Osman Mahjoub; Mohamed Elamin Hamza. Effects of Heavy Metals Pollution on Some Fish and Mollusc Species from Port Sudan, Sudan. Mod. Chem. 2020, 8(3), 33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Issra Mohammed Osman Mahjoub, Mohamed Elamin Hamza. Effects of Heavy Metals Pollution on Some Fish and Mollusc Species from Port Sudan, Sudan. Mod Chem. 2020;8(3):33-39. doi: 10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11,
      author = {Issra Mohammed Osman Mahjoub and Mohamed Elamin Hamza},
      title = {Effects of Heavy Metals Pollution on Some Fish and Mollusc Species from Port Sudan, Sudan},
      journal = {Modern Chemistry},
      volume = {8},
      number = {3},
      pages = {33-39},
      doi = {10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.mc.20200803.11},
      abstract = {The effects on fishes Lethrinus harak and Cephalopholis minata and on the mollusc Tridacna maxima exposed to different concentrations of heavy metals vanadium, nickel, and copper were investigated. The study indicated that the LC50 for nickel were 198.200 ppm, for L. harak, 196.041 ppm for C. minata and 198.200 ppm for T. maxima. The LC50 for copper were 197.175 ppm for L. harak, 272.932 ppm for C. minata and 272.841 ppm in T. maxima. However, LC50 for vanadium recorded 131.836 ppm for L. harak, 164.769 ppm for C. minata and 164.037 ppm for T. maxima. On the other hand, LT50 due to nickel exposure recorded 74.815, 47.963, and 95.116 hours, for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. LT50 due to copper recorded 35.041, 47.681, and 71.835 hours for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. However, LT50 for vanadium were 11.989, 47.511 and 5.792 hours for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. In this study no response was detected in lower concentrations of nickel and copper i.e. 4 ppm and 32 ppm, however a high response was detected with the same concentrations of vanadium. The study indicated that T. maxima, was more tolerant for heavy metals pollution than L. harak and C. minata. Nickel concentrations detected in tissues analysis were 0.561-0.04 ppm, 0.421-0.02 ppm and 0.871-0.03 ppm for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. While copper concentrations recorded 1.1030-0.09 ppm, 0.4060-0.02 ppm and 1.35-0.03 ppm for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. However, vanadium concentrations, recorded 0.010-0.00 ppm, 0.04-0.014-0.01 ppm and 0.042-0.00 ppm for L. harak, C. minata, and T. maxima, respectively.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of Heavy Metals Pollution on Some Fish and Mollusc Species from Port Sudan, Sudan
    AU  - Issra Mohammed Osman Mahjoub
    AU  - Mohamed Elamin Hamza
    Y1  - 2020/11/16
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11
    T2  - Modern Chemistry
    JF  - Modern Chemistry
    JO  - Modern Chemistry
    SP  - 33
    EP  - 39
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-180X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mc.20200803.11
    AB  - The effects on fishes Lethrinus harak and Cephalopholis minata and on the mollusc Tridacna maxima exposed to different concentrations of heavy metals vanadium, nickel, and copper were investigated. The study indicated that the LC50 for nickel were 198.200 ppm, for L. harak, 196.041 ppm for C. minata and 198.200 ppm for T. maxima. The LC50 for copper were 197.175 ppm for L. harak, 272.932 ppm for C. minata and 272.841 ppm in T. maxima. However, LC50 for vanadium recorded 131.836 ppm for L. harak, 164.769 ppm for C. minata and 164.037 ppm for T. maxima. On the other hand, LT50 due to nickel exposure recorded 74.815, 47.963, and 95.116 hours, for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. LT50 due to copper recorded 35.041, 47.681, and 71.835 hours for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. However, LT50 for vanadium were 11.989, 47.511 and 5.792 hours for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. In this study no response was detected in lower concentrations of nickel and copper i.e. 4 ppm and 32 ppm, however a high response was detected with the same concentrations of vanadium. The study indicated that T. maxima, was more tolerant for heavy metals pollution than L. harak and C. minata. Nickel concentrations detected in tissues analysis were 0.561-0.04 ppm, 0.421-0.02 ppm and 0.871-0.03 ppm for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. While copper concentrations recorded 1.1030-0.09 ppm, 0.4060-0.02 ppm and 1.35-0.03 ppm for L. harak, C. minata and T. maxima, respectively. However, vanadium concentrations, recorded 0.010-0.00 ppm, 0.04-0.014-0.01 ppm and 0.042-0.00 ppm for L. harak, C. minata, and T. maxima, respectively.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Fisheries, College of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Bahri, Khartoum, Sudan

  • Department of Chemistry and Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Merowe University of Technology, Merowe, Sudan; Institute of Marine Research, Red Sea University, Port Sudan, Sudan

  • Sections